A clinical predictive model for live birth in women of advanced age undergoing PGT cycles.

PURPOSE: The trend of delaying childbirth has resulted in a growing number of advanced-aged women who are opting for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to screen for monogenic diseases or structural chromosomal rearrangements (PGT-M and PGT-SR). This increase in demand necessitates the development of a clinical predictive model for live birth outcomes in these women. Therefore, the objective of this study is to construct a comprehensive predictive model that assesses the likelihood of achieving a successful live birth in advanced-aged women undergoing PGT-M and PGT-SR treatments. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 37-45-year-old women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease or structural chromosomal rearrangement cycles from 2010 to 2021 was conducted at a university hospital reproductive centre. The purpose was to develop a clinical predictive model for live birth in these women. The main outcome studied was the cumulative live birth rate in the first or subsequent cycles. Developing a decision tree enabled a comprehensive study of clinical parameters and expected outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis included 158 women undergoing 753 preimplantation genetic testing cycles. The cumulative live birth rate was 37.342% (59/158). Decision tree analysis revealed that women aged ≤ 40.1 or women > 40.1 with one or more top-quality transferable embryos in their first cycle had the best chance for a live baby (56% and 41%, respectively). Those older than 40.1 without top-quality embryos and seven or fewer dominant follicles had no live births. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed that for autosomal dominant diseases, there was a negligible increase in live birth rate after three cycles, compared to six cycles in autosomal recessive inheritance. CONCLUSION: In older women, the chance of delivering after repeated cycles is higher in those with at least one top-quality unaffected embryo in their first preimplantation genetic testing cycle. Additional preimplantation genetic testing cycles after three in carriers of an autosomal dominant disorder and six in those with an autosomal recessive disorder should be considered prudently.

The association between the type of progesterone supplementation and miscarriage risk in women who have had a positive pregnancy test following embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify if switching from intramuscular (IM) to vaginal progesterone compared to staying on IM progesterone after a positive pregnancy test following embryo transfer (ET) is associated with miscarriage risk. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a private university-affiliated fertility clinic and included women aged 18-50 years with a positive pregnancy test following ET. The two groups studied were: women who stayed on IM progesterone following a positive pregnancy test and those who switched to vaginal progesterone after a positive test. The main outcome measured was risk of miscarriage < 24 weeks gestation as a proportion of non-biochemical pregnancies. RESULTS: 1988 women were included in the analysis. Among the baseline characteristics, the presence of prior miscarriages as well as prior failed ETs, and frozen cycles (vs fresh) as type of transfer were associated with IM progesterone use (p values ≤ 0.01). As per miscarriage risk < 24 weeks, 22.4% (274/1221) of patients in the IM progesterone group experienced a miscarriage compared with 20.7% (159/767) in the vaginal progesterone group (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.73-1.13). A multivariable logistic regression model revealed an adjusted OR (aOR) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.77-1.22). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that switching from IM to vaginal progesterone after a positive pregnancy test following an ET is not associated with miscarriage risk. Considering that IM progesterone imposes substantial discomfort, this study offers reassurance and some flexibility in treatment protocols. Further prospective studies are necessary to corroborate the results of this study.

Immunomodulation for unexplained recurrent implantation failure: where are we now?

In brief: Immune dysfunction may contribute to or cause recurrent implantation failure. This article summarizes normal and pathologic immune responses at implantation and critically appraises currently used immunomodulatory therapies. Abstract: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may be defined as the absence of pregnancy despite the transfer of ≥3 good-quality blastocysts and is unexplained in up to 50% of cases. There are currently no effective treatments for patients with unexplained RIF. Since the maternal immune system is intricately involved in mediating endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation, both insufficient and excessive endometrial inflammatory responses during the window of implantation are proposed to lead to implantation failure. Recent strategies to improve conception rates in RIF patients have focused on modulating maternal immune responses at implantation, through either promoting or suppressing inflammation. Unfortunately, there are no validated, readily available diagnostic tests to confirm immune-mediated RIF. As such, immune therapies are often started empirically without robust evidence as to their efficacy. Like other chronic diseases, patient selection for immunomodulatory therapy is crucial, and personalized medicine for RIF patients is emerging. As the literature on the subject is heterogenous and rapidly evolving, we aim to summarize the potential efficacy, mechanisms of actions and side effects of select therapies for the practicing clinician.

In freeze-all embryo cycles due to endometrial fluid (EF), live birth rates are comparable to those of controls, despite high rates of EF recurrence and cycle cancellation.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) differ between women who have had a freeze-all embryo cycle (FAE) for endometrial fluid (EF) and controls? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 83 women who had a FAE cycle due to the presence of EF between 2010 and 2016 at a university-affiliated private IVF center. The controls were 219 women who had FAE for other indications during the same period and were randomly selected. The main outcome measures were CLBRs, EF recurrence, cancellation and pregnancy loss rates. RESULTS: Population characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The CLBR was not significantly different between the EF and the control group: 39.8 % vs. 47.0 %, respectively, p=0.26. Cancellation rates in the two first FETs were higher in the EF group than the control group: 18.1 % vs. 4.1 % (p<0.001) and 22.9 % vs. 8.5 % (p=0.02). After FAE for EF, we observed a significant risk of EF recurrence (32/177 cycles, 18.1 %), allowing us to identify a poor prognosis subgroup. When EF was detected, the LBR per transfer was 7.1 % (1/14) when the transfer was finally performed (after EF aspiration or EF disappearance), compared to 25 % (32/128) in cycles without EF recurrence (p<0.05). Conversely, in the absence of EF recurrence (145/177, 81.9 %), the LBR was comparable to that of the control group. The type of endometrial preparation does not seem to be associated with EF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Despite higher rates of EF recurrence and cycle cancellation, women with FAE for EF ultimately have comparable LBRs to those who have had a FAE for other indications. However, women presenting with at least one EF recurrence during FETs seem to have a lower LBR.

Recurrent implantation failure in IVF: A Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) after IVF is a challenging topic for clinicians and can be a devastating reality for some patients with infertility. The purpose of this guideline from the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) is to provide the most relevant evidence to date for the assessment and management of RIF. This guideline was developed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. This guideline recognizes the presence of heterogeneity in the definition of RIF. Recommendations are offered here on the investigation of RIF and management options that may increase the chance of a live birth.

Effect of uterine dimensions on live birth rates after single embryo transfer in infertile women.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do uterine size parameters measured by baseline transvaginal ultrasound predict live birth after single embryo transfer (SET) of a high-quality blastocyst? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study including women undergoing their first SET between August 2010 and March 2014 at a large university hospital reproductive centre. The effects of baseline uterine dimensions on live birth rate (LBR) were analysed while controlling for confounding effects. RESULTS: A total of 437 nulliparous and 70 parous women were included. The nulliparous group had lower body mass index (BMI) (24.4 ± 5.1 versus 25.9 ± 4.5 kg/m2; P = 0.015) and a higher number of fibroids (0.4 ± 1.0 versus 0.2 ± 0.5; P = 0.005) than the parous group. While controlling for confounding effects, none of the uterine parameters appeared to be a significant predictor of LBR among nulliparous and parous women (P > 0.05 in all cases). A subsequent analysis of endometrial length was done, whereby the endometrial lengths were divided into quartiles (20.0-32.2 mm; 32.3-36.5 mm; 36.6-40.0 mm; 40.1-54.0 mm). After controlling for confounders, the shortest quartile in the nulliparous group had a significantly lower LBR (P = 0.02) than the other groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves suggested that endometrial cavity length and cervical length did not aid clinically. CONCLUSION: Uterine parameters do not have a clinically useful impact on LBR after SET of a blastocyst in infertile women. The use of baseline endometrial length to predict live birth is no better than chance, while cervical length only predicts failure to live birth.

A comparison of IVF outcomes transferring a single ideal blastocyst in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal ovulatory controls.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects PCOS on live birth rates when transferring a single fresh ideal blastocyst. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study performed at the university-affiliated reproductive center. Women with PCOS and a control group of normal ovulatory women who underwent their first fresh embryo transfer with single ideal grade blastocyst were included in the study. Demographic, stimulation information and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analysed. The primary outcome was live birth rates, and secondary outcomes included pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates. RESULTS: 71 Women with PCOS and 272 normal ovulatory controls underwent their first embryo transfer and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. PCOS patient were younger (31.0 ± 3.7 vs. 33.1 ± 3.2, p = 0.0001), with higher AFC (40.0 ± 9.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.6, p = 0.0001), required lower dose of gonadotropins to stimulate (1198 ± 786 vs. 1891 ± 1224, p = 0.0001), and had higher serum testosterone levels (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p = 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of previous pregnancies, the number of previous full-term pregnancies, the level of basal serum FSH, estradiol level at triggering and the BMI. When compared by Chi squared testing pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates did not differ. However, when controlling (with multivariate stepwise logistic regression) for confounders, live birth rates were lower among the women with PCOS (p = 0.035, CI: 0.18-0.92). CONCLUSION: After controlling for confounders, when transferring a fresh single ideal blastocyst, live birth rates were lower among the women with PCOS than normal ovulatory controls.

Outcomes of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Single Gene Defects in a Privately Funded Period and Publicly Funded Period: A North-American Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the outcomes from IVF-preimplantation genetic testing (IVF-PGT) cycles for single gene defects (SGD) (PGT-M) differ between a privately funded period (PRP) and publicly funded period (PUP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a North-American single tertiary center. The PRP (March 1998 to July 2010) comprised 56 PGT-M cycles from 58 IVF cycles in 38 couples, and the PUP (August 2010 to May 2015) comprised 59 PGT-M cycles from 87 IVF cycles in 38 couples. One PGT-M cycle is defined as one biopsy procedure from one or serial IVF cycles. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per PGT-M cycle were 30.4% and 52.5% in each period, respectively (p=0.021). The live birth rates (LBR) per PGT-M cycle were 21.5% versus 40.9% in each period, respectively (p=0.037). A sub-analysis within the PUP comparing 39 PGT-M cycles from 39 IVF cycles with 20 PGT-M cycles from 49 IVF cycles yielded CPRs per PGT-M cycle of 64.1% and 30.0% and LBRs per PGT-M cycle of 53.8% and 15.0%, in each group, respectively (p< 0.05 for both). CONCLUSION: The transition from private to public funding and a single embryo transfer (ET) guideline has little impact on embryological and clinical outcomes of PGT-M cycles, and results in lower rates of multiple pregnancies. However, these two systems may serve different populations.

Live birth rates remain stable in modified natural IVF despite low anti-Müllerian hormone: analysis of 638 cycles.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do live birth rates (LBR) following modified natural IVF (mnIVF) differ according to serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study including 638 women aged ≤39 years starting their first mnIVF cycle at a university-affiliated private IVF centre. Patients were divided into three groups, by concentration of AMH: ≤0.5 ng/ml (25th percentile), 0.51-2.03 ng/ml (25-75th percentile, reference) and 2.04-6.56 ng/ml (75th percentile). Analyses were stratified by AMH percentile and the age of patients (<35, 35-39 years). Logistic regression assessed the impact of age and AMH percentile on outcomes. LBR was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: LBR per started cycle were comparable across AMH percentiles (11.6%, 12.4% and 17.0% for the 25th, 25-75th and 75th percentile, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the three AMH groups with respect to cancellation, successful egg retrieval, embryo transfer, or biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates. Logistic regression analysis did not identify AMH percentile as a significant predictor of live birth. Compared with the reference group, the odds ratios (OR [95% confidence interval, CI]) for live birth in the <25th and >75th AMH percentile groups were 0.97 (0.54-1.76) and 1.41 (0.82-2.41), respectively. The results were the same regardless of age group (<35 years, 35-39 years). CONCLUSIONS: Serum AMH cannot be used to predict mnIVF outcomes. Patients in lower/upper AMH percentiles showed pregnancy and LBR comparable to patients with normal AMH.

Does ovarian reserve affect outcomes in single ideal blastocyst transfers in women less than 40 years of age?

PURPOSE: There is much debate whether diminished ovarian reserve is purely a quantitative issue, or if quality as determined by pregnancy potential of the ensuing oocytes is also affected. The purpose of this study was to determine whether diminished ovarian reserve, as established by one of three ways described below, affects pregnancy outcomes of women under 40 years old undergoing a single ideal blastocyst transfer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, including 507 women undergoing an ideal quality single embryo transfer between August 2010 and March 2014. Logistic regression was used to control for age, duration of infertility, parity, body mass index, and smoking status. For analysis, women were stratified for: antral follicle counts (≤ 5 vs. > 5), basal serum FSH levels (< 13 vs. ≥ 13 IU/L), and quartile of total FSH dose required for stimulation. RESULTS: In stratifying women by antral follicle count (AFC) ≤ 5 vs. > 5, the pregnancy rate (40 vs. 53%, p = 0.04), clinical pregnancy rate (29 vs. 46%, p = 0.02), and live birth rate (13 vs. 43%, p = 0.001) were superior with AFC > 5. Using FSH levels (< 13 vs. ≥ 13 IU/L), the pregnancy rate (50 vs. 31%, p = 0.27), clinical pregnancy rate (40 vs. 13%, p = 0.45), and live birth rate (38 vs. 13%, p = 0.48) were similar. Examining quartiles of FSH stimulation, the pregnancy rates were similar (from lowest to highest: 45, 52, 54, 41%, p = 0.13); however, clinical pregnancy rate (36, 43, 47, 25%, p = 0.003) and live birth rate (32, 38, 44, 20%, p = 0.005) were superior in lower quartiles vs. the highest quartile. CONCLUSION: Ovarian reserve may affect embryo pregnancy potential and outcomes when measured by AFC and exogenous stimulation but not by basal FSH levels.

Morbid obesity and pregnancy outcomes after single blastocyst transfer: a retrospective, North American study.

PURPOSE: Maternal obesity has been shown to affect reproductive function and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization. More recently, studies have demonstrated lower live birth rates after single blastocyst transfer (SBT) in patients who are overweight or obese. However, the impact of morbid obesity on pregnancy outcomes after SBT has not been well elucidated. The present study aimed to determine whether morbid obesity has a detrimental impact on pregnancy outcomes after SBT in a North American population. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study including 520 nulliparous and multiparous women undergoing top-quality SBT between August 2010 and March 2014 at a University Health Centre in North America was conducted. Primary outcomes included: miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. Subjects were divided into different BMI categories (kg/m2), including <20, 20-24.9, 25.0-29.9, 30-40, and 40 or more. RESULTS: The miscarriage rate per pregnancy for each group, respectively, was 36, 64, 59, 61, and 50% (p = 0.16); the clinical pregnancy (per patient) rate per group was 36, 52, 38, 26, and 10% (p = 0.009); and the live birth rate (per patient) per group was 35, 50, 38, 26 and 10% (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Morbid obesity is a strong and independent predictor of poor pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing top-quality SBT.

Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn.

PURPOSE: A retrospective study was conducted to determine trends in practice and outcomes that occurred since the implementation of the publicly funded in vitro fertilization (IVF) and single embryo transfer (SET) program in Quebec, in August, 2010. METHODS: Data presented was extracted from an advisory report by the Health and Welfare Commissioner, and from a report by the Ministry of Health and Social Services published in June 2014 and October 2013, respectively. This data is publicly available, and was collected from all six private and three public-assisted reproduction centers in Quebec providing IVF services. Data pertains to all IVF cycles performed from the 2009-2010 to 2012-2013 fiscal years. RESULTS: SET was performed in 71 % of cycles in 2012. The number of children born from IVF was 1057 in 2009-2010 and 1723 in 2012-2013 (p < 0.0001). Multiple birth rates from IVF were 24 % in 2009-2010 (before the program began) and 9.45 % in 2012-2013 (p < 0.0001). The proportions of IVF babies that were premature, that were the result of multiple births, or that required neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICU) all decreased by 35.5 % (p < 0.0001), 55 % (p < 0.0001), and 37 % (p < 0.0001), respectively, from 2009-2010 to 2012-2013. The cost per NICU admission for an IVF baby increased from $19,990 to $28,418 from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012. CONCLUSION: This first North American publicly funded IVF program with a SET policy shows that such a program contributes substantially to number of births. It has also succeeded in increasing access to treatment and decreasing perinatal morbidity by decreasing multiple birth rates from IVF. A substantial increase in global public health care costs occurred as well.

Outcomes of 1503 cycles of modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization: a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single academic center to determine if modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization (mnIVF) is an acceptable treatment for the infertile couple. METHODS: Cycles performed between July 2005 and December 2011 were included. In our center's mnIVF protocol, a GnRH antagonist, gonadotrophin, as well as Indocid are given on a daily basis from detection of a dominant follicle until ovulation induction. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per cycle started and per embryo transfer (ET). Outcomes were stratified by female patient age (≤35 years and ≥36 years). They were further stratified in each age group by ovarian response status according to the 2011 Bologna criteria. RESULTS: A total of 1503 cycles of mnIVF, performed in 782 patients, were analyzed. CPRs were 13.7 % per started cycle and 32.5 % per ET. Stratification by ovarian response status (normal or poor) in each age group showed similar CPRs in patients ≤35 years (p = 0.373), and divergent CPRs per ET in patients ≥36 years old (26.26 vs 6.25 %). CONCLUSION: MnIVF is an acceptable treatment option for patients considering IVF, particularly for women ≤35 years old and for women ≥36 years old with normal ovarian response.

Massive hemorrhage following thrombolysis for postpartum pulmonary embolism with cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest following a massive pulmonary embolism in pregnancy or the puerperium is a rare and catastrophic event. CASE: We describe a case of massive pulmonary embolism with cardiac arrest in a 36-year-old patient, presenting 48 hours postpartum. She was treated with thrombolytic therapy and suffered a massive hemorrhage thereafter, which was compounded by disseminated intravascular coagulation. Following an emergency hysterectomy and massive blood-product transfusion, she survived with no neurological sequelae. The medical team present had participated in two simulation sessions with similar scenarios in the weeks before the event. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is only the fifth case reported in the literature on thrombolytic therapy in the postpartum period, and of these has the most severe hemorrhagic complication. An effective multidisciplinary approach to such a complex situation can be acquired through simulation-based training.

Contexte : L'arrêt cardiaque qui suit une embolie pulmonaire massive pendant la grossesse ou la puerpéralité constitue un événement rare et catastrophique. Cas : Nous décrivons un cas d'embolie pulmonaire massive donnant lieu à un arrêt cardiaque qui s'est manifesté 48 heures à la suite de l'accouchement chez une patiente de 36 ans. Un traitement thrombolytique a été administré à la patiente et celle-ci a par la suite connu une hémorragie massive, laquelle a été aggravée par une coagulation intravasculaire disséminée. À la suite d'une hystérectomie d'urgence et d'une transfusion massive de produits sanguins, la patiente a survécu sans séquelles neurologiques. L'équipe médicale présente avait participé à deux sessions de simulation ayant fait appel à des scénarios similaires au cours des semaines précédant l'événement. Conclusion : À notre connaissance, il s'agit seulement du cinquième cas à être signalé dans la littérature en ce qui concerne la mise en œuvre d'un traitement thrombolytique pendant la période postpartum, en plus d'être celui qui a connu la complication hémorragique la plus grave. Une approche multidisciplinaire efficace permettant de faire face à une situation d'une telle complexité peut être acquise par l'intermédiaire d'une formation fondée sur la simulation.