RESUMO
While it is widely accepted that the nutritional management of the infant with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is paramount to achieve normal growth and development, nutritional management is also of importance beyond 1 year of age, particularly in toddlers, to support the delayed infantile stage of growth that may extend to 2-3 years of age. Puberty is also a vulnerable period when nutritional needs are higher to support the expected growth spurt. Inadequate nutritional intake throughout childhood can result in failure to achieve full adult height potential, and there is an increased risk for abnormal neurodevelopment. Conversely, the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity among children with CKD underscores the necessity for effective nutritional strategies to mitigate the risk of metabolic syndrome that is not confined to the post-transplant population. Nutritional management is of primary importance in improving metabolic equilibrium and reducing CKD-related imbalances, particularly as the range of foods eaten by the child widens as they get older (including increased consumption of processed foods), and as CKD progresses. The aim of this review is to integrate the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce (PRNT) clinical practice recommendations (CPRs) for children (1-18 years) with CKD stages 2-5 and on dialysis (CKD2-5D). We provide a holistic approach to the overall nutritional management of the toddler, child, and young person. Collaboration between physicians and pediatric kidney dietitians is strongly advised to ensure comprehensive and tailored nutritional care for children with CKD, ultimately optimizing their growth and development.
RESUMO
The benefits of dietary fiber are widely accepted. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of children fail to meet the recommended intake of dietary fiber. Achieving adequate fiber intake is especially challenging in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). An international team of pediatric renal dietitians and pediatric nephrologists from the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce (PRNT) has developed clinical practice recommendations (CPRs) for the dietary intake of fiber in children and adolescents with CKD. In this CPR paper, we propose a definition of fiber, provide advice on the requirements and assessment of fiber intake, and offer practical guidance on optimizing dietary fiber intake in children with CKD. In addition, given the paucity of available evidence and to achieve consensus from international experts, a Delphi survey was performed in which all the clinical practice recommendations were reviewed.
RESUMO
Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk for vitamin deficiency or excess. Vitamin status can be affected by diet, supplements, kidney function, medications, and dialysis. Little is known about vitamin requirements in CKD, leading to practice variation.The Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce (PRNT), an international team of pediatric kidney dietitians and pediatric nephrologists, was established to develop evidence-based clinical practice points (CPPs) to address challenges and to serve as a resource for nutritional care. Questions were formulated using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes), and literature searches undertaken to explore clinical practice from assessment to management of vitamin status in children with CKD stages 2-5, on dialysis and post-transplantation (CKD2-5D&T). The CPPs were developed and finalized using a Delphi consensus approach. We present six CPPs for vitamin management for children with CKD2-5D&T. We address assessment, intervention, and monitoring. We recommend avoiding supplementation of vitamin A and suggest water-soluble vitamin supplementation for those on dialysis. In the absence of evidence, a consistent structured approach to vitamin management that considers assessment and monitoring from dietary, physical, and biochemical viewpoints is needed. Careful consideration of the impact of accumulation, losses, comorbidities, and medications needs to be explored for the individual child and vitamin before supplementation can be considered. When supplementing, care needs to be taken not to over-prescribe. Research recommendations are suggested.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the quality and content of phosphate educational materials used in pediatric chronic kidney disease. METHODS: The quality of text-based (TB) pediatric phosphate educational materials was assessed using validated instruments for health literacy demands (Suitability Assessment of Materials, Patient Education Material Assessment Tool [PEMAT-P]) readability (Flesch Reading Ease, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level). Codes were inductively derived to analyse format, appearance, target audience, resource type, and content, aiming for intercoder reliability > 80%. The content was compared to Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce (PRNT) recommendations. RESULTS: Sixty-five phosphate educational materials were obtained; 37 were pediatric-focused, including 28 TB. Thirty-two percent of TB materials were directed at caregivers, 25% at children, and 43% were unspecified. Most (75%) included a production date, with 75% produced >2 years ago. The median Flesch Reading Easetest score was 68.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 61.1-75.3) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 5.6 (IQR 4.5-7.7). Using Suitability Assessment of Materials, 54% rated "superior" (≥70), 38% rated "adequate" (40-69), and 8% rated "not suitable" (≤39). Low-scoring materials lacked a summary (12%), cover graphics (35%), or included irrelevant illustrations (50%). Patient Education Material Assessment Tool-P scores were 70% (IQR 50-82) for understandability and 50% (IQR 33-67) for actionability. An intercoder reliability of 87% was achieved. Over half of limited foods are in agreement with PRNT (including 89% suggesting avoiding phosphate additives). Recommendations conflicting with PRNT included reducing legumes and whole grains. Over a third contained inaccuracies, and over two-thirds included no practical advice. CONCLUSIONS: TB pediatric phosphate educational materials are pitched at an appropriate level for caregivers, but this may be too high for children under 10 years. The inclusion of relevant illustrations may improve this. Three-quarters of materials scored low for actionability. The advice does not always align with the PRNT, which (together with the inaccuracies reported) could result in conflicting messages to patients and their families.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Body composition could help identify malnutrition in pediatric patients, but there is uncertainty over which techniques are most suitable and prevailing opinion that measurements are difficult to obtain in practice. This study examined the acceptability, practicality, reliability, and validity of different anthropometric and body composition measurements in patients with complex diagnoses in a tertiary pediatric hospital. METHODS: A total of 152 children aged 5-18 years had weight, height, body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), 4-site skinfold thicknesses (SFT), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessed on admission and discharge. Acceptability was assessed in a continuous scale, practicality with number/percentage of successful measurements, reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficients of repeatability, and validity between "simpler" techniques and DXA with Bland-Altman analysis of agreement and Cohen kappa. RESULTS: Techniques were overall acceptable. Measurements were successful in >50%, with patient refusal uncommon. Coefficients of repeatability were good (0.3 cm MUAC and height, 0.2 kg weight, and 1.0 mm SFTs). All techniques significantly overestimated DXA fat mass, but BMI and triceps SFT better identified abnormal fat mass (κ = 0.46 and 0.49). BIA fat-free mass was not significantly different from DXA, with substantial agreement between techniques (κ = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Body composition by a range of techniques is acceptable, practical, and reliable in a diverse group of children with complex diagnoses. BIA seems a good alternative to DXA for assessing fat-free mass, triceps SFT, and BMI for fat mass but should be used with care as it could overestimate total fat mass in individuals.