RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little attention has been paid to selecting and developing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement tools for young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC). The primary purpose of this study was to develop a HRQOL tool for YASCC based on three legacy instruments. METHODS: Data collected from 151 YASCC were analyzed. HRQOL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36, Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors, and Quality of Life-Cancer Survivor. We used the following stages to develop our HRQOL tool: mapping items from three instruments into a common HRQOL construct, checking dimensionality using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), and equating items using Rasch modeling. RESULTS: We assigned 123 items to a HRQOL construct comprised of six generic and eight survivor-specific domains. CFA retained 107 items that meet the assumptions of unidimensionality and local independence. Rasch analysis retained 68 items that satisfied the indices of information-weighted/outlier-sensitive fit statistic mean square. However, items in most domains possess relatively easy measurement properties, whereas YASCC's underlying HRQOL was on the middle to higher levels. CONCLUSIONS: Psychometric properties of the established tool for measuring HRQOL of YASCC were not satisfied. Future studies need to refine this tool, especially adding more challenging items.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Neoplasias/psicologia , Psicometria , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Sistema de Registros , Estresse Psicológico , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Few studies examine the relevance of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC). This study compared the psychometric properties of two survivor-specific instruments, the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivor (QOL-CS) and Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivor (QLACS). METHODS: Data from 151 YASCC who enrolled in cancer/tumor registries of two medical centers were used. We examined construct validity by conducting confirmatory factor analysis using indices of chi-square statistic, comparative fit index, and root mean square error of approximation. We examined convergent/discriminant validity by comparing Pearson's correlation coefficients of homogeneous (e.g., physical functioning and pain) of both instruments versus heterogeneous domains (e.g., physical and psychological functioning). We assessed known-groups validity by examining the extent to which HRQOL differed by late effects and comorbid conditions and calculated relative validity (RV) defined as contrasting F-statistics of individual domains to the domain with the lowest F-statistic. Superior known-groups validity is observed if a domain of one instrument demonstrates a higher RV than other domains of the instruments. RESULTS: YASCC data cannot replicate the constructs both instruments intend to measure, suggesting poor construct validity. Correlations of between-homogeneous and between-heterogeneous domains of both instruments were not discernible, suggesting poor convergent/discriminant validity. Both instruments were equally able to differentiate HRQOL between YASCC with and without late effects and comorbid conditions, suggesting similar known-groups validity. CONCLUSIONS: Neither instrument is superior. Item response theory is suggested to select high-quality items from different instruments to improve HRQOL measure for YASCC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Adulto , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of children with very low risk Wilms tumor (VLRWT) treated with surgery only. BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that postoperative chemotherapy had not improved the prognosis of children with VLRWT. A total of 77 children <24 months of age with small (<550 g) Stage I favorable histology Wilms tumors were treated with surgery only. This study was closed based on stopping rules to ensure that the 2-year EFS was > or =90%. METHODS: A total of 77 children were assessed for EFS and OS. Of these patients, 21 enrolled at the time of closure were recalled, treated with dactinomycin and vincristine (regimen EE4A), and censored for analysis thereafter. About 111 children subsequently treated with EE4A were available for comparison. RESULTS: Median follow-up of surviving patients was 8.2 years for surgery only (range, 1.9-11.8 years) and 5.2 years for the EE4A group (range, 1.6-8.9 years). The estimated 5-year EFS for surgery only was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%, 91%); for the EE4A patients it was 97% (95% CI: 92%, 99%, P = 0.002). One death was observed in each treatment group. The estimated 5-year OS was 98% (95% CI: 87%, 99%) for surgery only and 99% (95% CI: 94%, 99%) for EE4A (P = 0.70). CONCLUSION: The surgery-only EFS was lower than anticipated but, coupled with a much higher than anticipated salvage rate of the chemotherapy naive patients whose disease recurred, led to an observed long-term OS equivalent to that seen with 2-drug chemotherapy. This approach to the treatment of patients with VLRWT eliminates the toxic side-effects of chemotherapy for a large majority of patients. A follow-up study is underway to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Tumor de Wilms/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tumor de Wilms/mortalidadeRESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine information that parents of children with life-limiting conditions want to discuss with children's physicians to assist decision-making, and whether the desire for this information is associated with parents' trust in physicians. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study using a telephone survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised a random sample of 266 parents whose children were enrolled in Florida's Medicaid Program. Parents were asked if they wanted to discuss information related to their children's treatment, including quality of life (QOL), pain relief, spiritual beliefs, clinical diagnosis/laboratory data, changes in the child's behavior due to treatment, changes in the child's appearance due to treatment, chances of recovery, and advice from the physician and family/friends. The Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale was used to measure parents' trust in physicians. We tested the relationships between parents' age, race/ethnicity, education, parent-reported children's health status, and the desired information. We also tested whether the desire for information was associated with greater trust in physicians. RESULTS: Most parents wanted information on their children's QOL (95%), followed by chance of recovery (88%), and pain relief (84%). Compared with nonHispanic whites, nonHispanic blacks and Hispanics showed a greater desire for information and a chance to discuss QOL information had greater trust in their children's physicians than other information after adjusting for covariates (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among children with life-limiting conditions, QOL is the most frequently desired information that parents would like to receive from physicians as part of shared decision-making. Parents' desire for QOL information is associated with greater trust in their children's physicians.