Association between atrial fibrillation and heart failure patient reported outcomes across the ejection fraction spectrum.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between AF and longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) in both HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the TOPCAT and HF-ACTION trials. The effect of AF on KCCQ overall summary scores (OSS), in both trials, was examined using a mixed effects regression model. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to AF status at baseline: patients with a history of AF but no AF detected on ECG at enrollment (Hx AF group), patients with history of AF and AF detected on ECG at enrollment (ECG AF group) and patients with post-randomization new-onset AF (New AF group). RESULTS: In TOPCAT, among 1,710 patients with KCCQ data available, AF was associated with a significantly lower KCCQ-OSS (-3.98; 95% CI -7.21: -0.74) at 48 months, with a significant AF status by time interaction (P = .03). In HF-ACTION, among 1,814 patients with available KCCQ data, AF was associated with a significantly lower KCCQ-OSS (-3.67; 95% CI -6.21: -1.41) at 24 months but there was no significant AF status by time interaction. In both trials, the type of AF was not associated with significant changes in KCCQ-OSS score. CONCLUSION: Ιn patients with both HFpEF and HFrEF, AF was independently associated with worse HRQoL measured by KCCQ.

Aortic Regurgitation as a Complication of Electrophysiologic Ablation Techniques: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a well-established treatment for several cardiac arrhythmias. Arrhythmias originating from the left side of the heart including ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia and ectopy can be successfully ablated through either transseptal or retrograde aortic approach. Although these techniques have a generally low rate of complications, aortic valve injury is a potential complication of ablation at the left cardiac side that warrants more investigation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the incidence of iatrogenic aortic valve regurgitation and explore the potential mechanisms and risk factors that might contribute to aortic valve injury during radiofrequency ablation. Additionally, the course and progression of aortic regurgitation in the reported cases will be described. METHODS: Authors searched PubMed for articles using the keywords "ablation" AND "aortic insufficiency" OR "aortic valve injury" OR "aortic regurgitation". Case reports and series as well as retrospective and prospective studies were included, and relevant review articles and editorial comments were used as a supplementary source of data. A total of 19 references were used and a detailed description of patient characteristics, procedural techniques, and incidence, predictors, and fate of aortic regurgitation were reported by 11 clinical studies. RESULTS: There is a small risk of significant iatrogenic aortic regurgitation after radiofrequency ablation of left-sided cardiac arrhythmias, especially techniques performed via a retrograde aortic approach. CONCLUSION: Although the risk is not confined to procedures applying direct energy to the aortic cusp region, a more aggressive ablation applied in the vicinity of the valvular complex seems to be associated with a higher risk. Routine post-procedural surveillance should be adopted to detect de novo aortic valve injury following radiofrequency ablation techniques.