RESUMO
Background and Aims: Although the clinical benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on cardiovascular outcomes has been widely investigated, the impact of this revascularization strategy compared to other alternatives on the degree of left ventricular function recovery is poorly demonstrated. In this regard, we investigated whether time delays between the presentation of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and PCI in reperfusion strategies have different impacts on left ventricular function recovery. Methods: In this single-center study, all the patients who presented with STEMI and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) were enrolled. Included patients were subjected to four different treatment groups of primary, rescue (immediate transfer for angioplasty due to failed fibrinolytic therapy), facilitated (fibrinolytic therapy followed by angioplasty within 24 h), and deferred (successful fibrinolytic therapy and PCI after 24 h) PCI based on hospital facilities. Echocardiography was performed for all the patients at the time of hospitalization and 6 months later. Results: A total of 128 patients were included in this study. The LVEF improved by 15.3 ± 6.3%, 11.5 ± 3.61%, 4.0 ± 1.0%, and -1.3 ± 7.0% in primary, rescue, facilitated, and deferred PCI groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing deferred PCI experienced a significantly lower improvement in LVEF compared with primary and rescue PCI (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Primary PCI demonstrated the most promising recovery in left ventricular function following STEMI compared to other alternative strategies. Performing PCI as soon as possible provides better recovery of LVEF.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Atorvastatin can decrease cardiac injury after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We compared the effects of 80 and 40 mg of atorvastatin per day on the levels of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) after an isolated CABG. METHODS: This randomized single-blind parallel clinical trial enrolled 125 patients (mean age = 60.59 ± 8.37 years) who were candidates for elective isolated CABG at the Tehran Heart Center between May 2017 and December 2017. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either 80 mg (n = 62) or 40 mg of atorvastatin (n = 63) per day, 5 days before surgery. The levels of cTnT and CK-MB, used as myocardial injury markers, were measured at baseline and then at 8 and 24 hours after CABG. RESULTS: The levels of CK-MB and cTnT at baseline and at 8 and 24 hours following CABG were not significantly different between the two groups. Our repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the levels of CK-MB and cTnT increased significantly over time (P < .001). No significant interaction was observed between time and the atorvastatin dosage on the levels of either CK-MB (P = .159) or cTnT (P = .646). In addition, the between-group effects were not significant for CK-MB (P = .632) and cTnT (P = .126). CONCLUSION: The higher dose of atorvastatin (80 mg) did not exert a more protective effect than the standard dose of atorvastatin (40 mg) after CABG surgery.