St Andrew's COVID-19 surgery safety (StACS) study: The Burns Centre experience.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has the potential to significantly impact burns patients both directly through infective complications of an immunocompromised cohort, and indirectly through disruption of care pathways and resource limitations. The pandemic presents new challenges that must be overcome to maintain patient safety; in particular, the potential increased risks of surgical intervention, anaesthesia and ventilation. This study comprehensively reviews the measures implemented to adapt referral pathways and mitigate the risk posed by COVID-19 during the height of the pandemic, within a large Burns Centre. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was designed to assess patients treated at the Burns Centre during the UK COVID-19 pandemic peak (April-May 2020), following implementation of new safety measures. All patients were analysed for 30-day mortality. In addition, a prospective controlled cohort study was undertaken on all inpatients and a random sample of outpatients with telephone follow-up at 30 days. These patients were divided into three groups (operative inpatients, non-operative inpatients, outpatients). COVID-19 related data collected included test results, contact with proven cases, isolation status and symptoms. The implemented departmental service COVID-19 safety adaptations are described. RESULTS: Of 323 patients treated at the Burns Centre during the study period, no 30-day COVID-19 related deaths occurred (0/323). Of the 80 patients analysed in the prospective controlled cohort section of the study, 51 underwent COVID-19 testing, 3.9% (2/51) were positive. Both cases were in the operative group, however in comparison to the non-operative and outpatient groups, there was no significant increase in COVID-19 incidence in operative patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found no COVID-19 related mortality during the study period. With appropriate precautions, burns patients were not exposed to an increased COVID-19 risk. Similarly, burns patients undergoing operative management were not at a significantly increased risk of contracting COVID-19 in comparison to non-operative groups.

Treatment of nasal burns: analysis of 150 cases.

Nasal burns present a challenge for the plastic surgeon in terms of immediate management, choice of primary treatment and secondary reconstruction with the goals of good aesthetic and functional outcome. We present a retrospective analysis of the management of 150 patients with nasal burns treated in our center between July 2005 and July 2011. We rationalized our conservative and all surgical treatments of this subset of burns patients and organized them in a simple and structured way. The reconstructive options for most complex full thickness nasal injury is determined by the integrity of adjacent facial tissues which would always be preferred when available. Microsurgical free tissue transfer is dependent upon the fitness of the patient and the availability of unburned skin at the donor site. Secondary nasal reconstruction is based on an assessment of the residual functional and cosmetic problems. Airways narrowing from scar contracture or loss of support are managed using standard plastic surgical and rhinoplasty principles. Cosmetic refinements range from flap debulking to the importation of new tissue on to the nose. Our experience with this challenging group of patients has led us to develop a simple treatment algorithm for the management of nasal burns.

Les brûlures nasales présentent un défi pour le chirurgien plastique en terme de prise en charge immédiate, de traitement primaire ou de reconstruction avec un objectif de bon résultat esthétique et fonctionnel. Nous présentons une analyse rétrospective de 150 patients souffrant de brûlures nasales traités dans notre centre entre Juillet 2005 et Juillet 2011. Nous avons codifié nos traitements chirurgicaux d'une manière simple et structurée. Les options reconstructives dépendent de l'intégrité des tissus faciaux de voisinage qui seront toujours préférés s'ils sont disponibles. Le transfert microchirurgical libre dépend de la condition physique du patient et de la disponibilité d'une zone donneuse. Les reconstructions nasales secondaires dépendent de l'évaluation des séquelles fonctionnelles et esthétiques. Les sténoses en rapport avec le tissu cicatriciel ou la perte de support sous jacent sont soumises aux principes de la chirurgie plastique et de la rhinoplastie .Les améliorations cosmétiques vont du dégraissage des lambeaux au transfert de tissu. Notre expérience avec ce groupe de patients nous a conduit à développer un algorithme de traitement simple pour la prise en charge des brûlures nasales.

Prognostic scoring systems in burns: a review.

Survival after burn has steadily improved over the last few decades. Patient mortality is, however, still the primary outcome measure for burn care. Scoring systems aim to use the most predictive premorbid and injury factors to yield an expected likelihood of death for a given patient. Age, burn surface area and inhalational injury remain the mainstays of burn prognostication, but their relative weighting varies between scoring systems. Biochemical markers may hold the key to predicting outcomes in burns. Alternatively, the incorporation of global scales such as those used in the general intensive care unit may have relevance in burn patients. Outcomes other than mortality are increasingly relevant, especially as mortality after burns continues to improve. The evolution of prognostic scoring in burns is reviewed with specific reference to the more widely regarded measures. Alternative approaches to burn prognostication are reviewed along with evidence for the use of outcomes other than mortality. The purpose and utility of prognostic scoring in general is discussed with relevance to its potential uses in audit, research and at the bedside.

Outbreak of Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a regional burns unit.

Over a 16 month period, 30 individuals (19 patients, one relative and 10 members of staff) on a regional burns and plastics unit became colonised or infected with a single strain of Panton-Valentine leucocidin-producing meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-MRSA). The strain was resistant to ciprofloxacin, neomycin and gentamicin and belonged to a community-associated MRSA lineage known to be circulating in the UK. The outbreak occurred in four stages, the first being in burns outpatients, the second and third being on the burns unit itself and the final stage on a plastics ward. In spite of closing the affected unit and deep cleaning, including steam cleaning and hydrogen peroxide treatment, the outbreak continued. It was not until staff carriage was fully addressed that the outbreak was controlled.

Purpura fulminans skin loss: surgical management protocols at a regional burns centre.

SUMMARY: People with significant skin loss after sepsis frequently require skin grafting; as such, they are often referred to regional burns units for definitive soft-tissue cover. Such individuals have complex requirements after severe sepsis, and usually have complicated wounds. We have developed a protocol for managing these patients and their wounds within a high dependency, intensive-care unit, using allograft as an adjunct in preparing the tissue bed before autografting. This protocol includes optimisation of nutritional needs, microbiological surveillance and definitive soft tissue cover. We retrospectively reviewed all children referred over 18 months for management of skin and soft tissue loss after meningitis purpura fulminans. We reviewed the initial management of the septicaemia, associated co-morbidities, site and size of soft tissue defect, time to presentation for definitive skin cover, surgical procedure performed, timing of surgical intervention, and recovery of the patient's wounds. A total of six people (all children), with a mean age of 7 months (age range 4-21 years) were admitted to our unit between March 2004 and September 2005. Total percentage skin loss was 12% (6-20%). All of the children underwent debridement, received allograft to areas of skin loss and necrosis as a primary procedure, and subsequently underwent autograft. Two children required amputation of one or more limbs, and the stumps were covered with allograft followed by skin autograft. All patients had excellent autograft skin taken using this protocol.

Successful free flap transfer following venous thrombectomy in recipient vessel.

We report the case of a 53-year-old male patient who suffered a high velocity multiple trauma with bilateral open tibial fractures. At definitive orthopaedic and plastic surgical reconstruction 5 days post initial trauma, he was found peroperatively to have an existing deep venous thrombosis in his popliteal vein on one side. He underwent venous thrombectomy and had subsequent successful latissimus dorsi flap transfer using the unblocked popliteal vein as a recipient vessel.

Successful partial ear replantation after prolonged ischaemia time.

We present the case of a 34-year-old male patient who had successful replantation of upper pole of pinna 33 h after amputation. As no vein was anastomosed, systemic heparinisation and subcutaneous injection of heparin to the replanted ear were used to encourage outflow. Complications included arterial spasm and bleeding. Management of similar cases as planned urgent cases rather than emergency cases is discussed.