Associations between Latino ethnicity and the use of emotional support and completion of advance directives.

OBJECTIVES: Latino patients have been shown to engage in advance care planning (ACP) at much lower rates than non-Latino White patients. Coping strategies, such as the use of emotional support, may differentially relate to engagement in ACP among Latino and non-Latino patients. The present study sought to examine the moderating effect of ethnicity on the relationship between the use of emotional support as a coping strategy and completion of advance directives. METHODS: The present study employed a weighted sample (Nw = 185) of Latino and non-Latino White patient participants in Coping with Cancer III, an National Institutes of Health-sponsored, multisite, longitudinal, observational cohort study of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers and oncology providers designed to evaluate Latino/non-Latino disparities in ACP and end-of-life cancer care. Main and interaction effects of Latino ethnicity and use of emotional support on patient use of advance directives were estimated as odds ratios. RESULTS: Use of emotional support was associated with dramatically lower do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order completion to a greater extent among Latino as compared to non-Latino patients (interaction AOR = 0.33, p = 0.005). Interaction effects were not statistically significant for living will or health-care proxy form completion. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Use of emotional support is associated with lower odds of completing DNRs among Latino than among non-Latino patients. Seeking and/or receiving emotional support may deter Latino patients from completing DNR orders. Research is needed to address both emotional needs and practicalities to ensure high quality end-of-life care among Latino patients with cancer.

Understanding Perceived Barriers to Colposcopy Follow-Up Among Underserved Women at an Urban Teaching Hospital: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Loss to follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening disproportionately impacts underserved populations. Our objective was to identify perceived barriers to follow-up after abnormal Pap smear among underserved women. METHODS: Women with abnormal Pap smear presenting for colposcopy at an urban teaching hospital were asked to participate in qualitative interviews. A topic guide was developed to assess knowledge about cervical cancer screening and perceived barriers to follow-up. A demographic survey was completed and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Responses were coded and placed into a framework: intrapersonal, interpersonal, and community barriers. Major themes and subthemes were identified. Demographic data were reported descriptively. RESULTS: Of 24 women enrolled, 18 (75%) completed full interviews. Median age was 38 years (range = 21-64). Participants were racially diverse: 10 (56%) Hispanic, 7 (39%) non-Hispanic White, 1 (5.5%) non-Hispanic Black, and 1 (5.5%) Asian, and all had public insurance. Seven (39%) presented for their 1st colposcopy visit and 11 (61%) had previous visits. Seventeen (94%) had a positive human papillomavirus test and 7 (39%) had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. The most common themes identified were related to knowledge gaps, including lack of understanding of Pap smears/human papillomavirus and cervical cancer risk factors. Most participants were satisfied with provider communication but dissatisfied with communication with the office, like scheduling appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Despite positive patient perception of physician communication, knowledge was most commonly identified as a barrier to colposcopy follow-up. Implementing a web-based intervention addressing knowledge gaps may improve abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up among this population.

Cultural adaptation of meaning-centered psychotherapy for latino families: a protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Literature suggests couple-based interventions that target quality of life and communication can lead to positive outcomes for patients with cancer and their partners. Nevertheless, to date, an intervention to address the needs of Latino families coping with advanced cancer has not been developed. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that culturally adapted evidenced-based intervention targeting a specific cultural group is four times more effective. Our goal is to culturally adapt a novel psychosocial intervention protocol entitled 'Caregivers-Patients Support to Latinx coping advanced-cancer' (CASA). We hypothesised that combine two evidence-based interventions and adapting them, we will sustain a sense of meaning and improving communication as patients approach the end of life among the patient-caregiver dyad. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To culturally adapt CASA, we will follow an innovative hybrid research framework that combines elements of an efficacy model and best practices from the ecological validity model, adaptation process model and intervention mapping. As a first step, we adapt a novel psychosocial intervention protocol entitled protocol entitled 'Caregivers-Patients Support to Latinx coping advanced-cancer' (CASA). The initial CASA protocol integrates two empirically based interventions, meaning-centred psychotherapy and couple communication skills training. This is an exploratory and prepilot study, and it is not necessary for a size calculation. However, based on recommendations for exploratory studies of this nature, a priori size of 114 is selected. We will receive CASA protocol feedback (phase 1b: refine) by conducting 114 questionnaires and 15 semistructured interviews with patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. The primary outcomes of this study will be identifying the foundational information needed to further the develop the CASA (phase IIa: proof-of-concept and phase IIb: pilot study). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board of Ponce Research Institute approved the study protocol #1907017527A002. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

Using Focus Group Feedback to Identify Patient-Centered Initiatives for Older Persons with HIV.

Objectives: This study assessed how few community-based programs target older people living with HIV.Methods: We conducted four focus groups comprised of people 50 and older with HIV (N = 32; gay/bisexual men, heterosexual men, women, and Spanish-speakers) to inform HIV program development by exploring the services in which participants were actively involved, along with the services they wanted to receive.Results: Using inductive thematic qualitative analysis, four themes were identified pertaining to program development: (a) types of currently utilized HIV service organizations; (b) dissatisfaction with HIV programming and services; (c) participants' preferred programming, courses, groups, or activities; and (d) desire to serve as peer mentors.Conclusions: Results highlight the need for community-based organizations to address social engagement and isolation among older people living with HIV.Clinical implications: These findings exemplify the need for programs to be specifically designed for OPH, and created with the primary goals of socialization and helping develop social support networks.

Evaluating relationships between lung cancer stigma, anxiety, and depressive symptoms and the absence of empathic opportunities presented during routine clinical consultations.

OBJECTIVE: Empathic communication in clinical consultations is mutually constructed, with patients first presenting empathic opportunities (statements communicating emotions, challenges, or progress) to which clinicians can respond. We hypothesized that lung cancer patients who did not present empathic opportunities during routine consultations would report higher stigma, anxiety, and depressive symptoms than patients who presented at least one. METHODS: Audio-recorded consultations between lung cancer patients (N = 56) and clinicians were analyzed to identify empathic opportunities. Participants completed questionnaires measuring sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics. RESULTS: Twenty-one consultations (38 %) did not contain empathic opportunities. Unexpectedly, there was a significant interaction between presenting empathic opportunities and patients' race on disclosure-related stigma (i.e., discomfort discussing one's cancer; F = 4.49, p = .041) and anxiety (F = 8.03, p = .007). Among racial minority patients (self-identifying as Black/African-American, Asian/Pacific Islander, or other race), those who did not present empathic opportunities reported higher stigma than those who presented at least one (t=-5.47, p = .038), but this difference was not observed among white patients (t = 0.38, p = .789). Additional statistically significant findings emerged for anxiety. CONCLUSION: Disclosure-related stigma and anxiety may explain why some patients present empathic opportunities whereas others do not. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should intentionally elicit empathic opportunities and encourage open communication with patients (particularly from diverse racial backgrounds).

Incorporating shared decision making into communication with older adults with cancer and their caregivers: Development and evaluation of a geriatric shared decision-making communication skills training module.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a Communication Skills Training (CST) module for health care providers (HCPs) applying a shared decision-making approach to a meeting with an older adult with cancer and his/her family. METHODS: Ninety-nine HCPs from community-based centers, cancer centers, and hospitals in the Northeastern U.S. who worked primarily with older adult patients participated in a CST module entitled Geriatric Shared Decision Making. Participants completed pre- and post-training Standardized Patient Assessments (SPAs) and a survey on their confidence in and intent to utilize skills taught. RESULTS: Results indicated high HCP satisfaction with the module, with over 95 % of participants reporting high endorsement to all five evaluation items. HCPs' self-efficacy in utilizing communication skills related to geriatric shared decision making significantly increased pre- to post-training. In standardized patient assessments among a subset of providers (n = 30), HCPs demonstrated improvements in three shared decision-making skills: declare agenda, invite agenda, and check preference. CONCLUSION: A geriatric shared decision-making CST workshop for HCPs showed feasibility, acceptability, and improvement in self-efficacy as well as skill uptake. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This Geriatric Shared Decision-Making CST module provides an intervention for improving provider-patient-family member communication in the context of cancer care for older adults.

An examination of Latino advanced cancer patients' and their informal caregivers' preferences for communication about advance care planning: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Latino-advanced cancer patients engage in advance care planning (ACP) at lower rates than non-Latino patients. The goal of the present study was to understand patients' and caregivers' preferred methods of communicating about ACP. METHODS: Patients and caregivers were interviewed about cultural, religious, and familial beliefs that influence engagement in ACP and preferences for ACP communication. RESULTS: Findings highlighted that Latino patients respect doctors' medical advice, prefer the involvement of family members in ACP discussions with doctors, hold optimistic religious beliefs (e.g., belief in miracles) that hinder ACP discussions, and prefer culturally competent approaches, such as using their native language, for learning how to discuss end-of-life (EoL) care preferences. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Key cultural, religious, and familial beliefs and dynamics influence Latino engagement in ACP. Patients prefer a family-centered, physician informed approach to discussing ACP with consideration and incorporation of their religious medical beliefs about EoL care. Promising targets for improving the communication of and engagement in ACP include integrating cultural and religious beliefs in ACP discussions, providing information about ACP from the physician, involving family members in ACP discussions and decision-making, and giving instructions on how to engage in ACP discussions.

Association between advanced cancer patient-caregiver agreement regarding prognosis and hospice enrollment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced, incurable cancer who understand their illness is incurable are more likely to prefer hospice care at the end of life compared with patients who believe their illness is curable. To the authors' knowledge, it is unclear whether patient-caregiver agreement regarding perceived prognosis is associated with hospice enrollment. METHODS: The current study examined the prospective relationship between patient-caregiver agreement concerning perceived prognosis and hospice enrollment in the last 30 days of life. Data were collected during a cluster randomized controlled trial examining a communication intervention for oncologists and patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. At the time of study entry, patients and caregivers (141 dyads) were categorized as endorsing a "good" prognosis if they: 1) reported a >50% chance of surviving ≥2 years; or if they 2) predicted that the patient's quality of life 3 months into the future would be ≥7 on an 11-point scale. RESULTS: Approximately one-fifth of dyads agreed on a poor prognosis whereas approximately one-half disagreed regarding prognosis. In approximately one-third of dyads, patients and caregivers both believed the patient's future quality of life would be good (34%) and that the patient would live for ≥2 years (30%). Patients in these dyads were less likely to enroll in hospice compared with patients in dyads who disagreed and those who agreed on a shorter life expectancy and poor future quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Dyadic understanding of patients' projected life expectancy and future quality of life appears to be predictive of care received at the end of life. Improving rates of hospice enrollment may be best achieved with dyadic interventions.

Coping strategies among colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery and the role of the surgeon in mitigating distress: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Distress is common among cancer patients and leads to worse postoperative outcomes. Surgeons are often the first physicians to have in-depth conversations with patients about a new colorectal cancer diagnosis; therefore, it is important that these surgeons understand how patients cope with the distress of a diagnosis and how they can help patients manage this distress. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer were recruited from an outpatient surgery clinic. Purposive sampling was used to recruit patients if they were either planning to undergo surgery or had undergone surgery within six months. In-depth, open-ended, individual qualitative interviews were performed. Grounded theory was used to develop themes regarding patients' coping strategies and beliefs regarding the role of the surgeon in helping them cope. RESULTS: Patients described their own internal coping strategies using problem-focused, emotion-focused, and meaning-focused techniques. Patients also reported the importance of their social support network for coping. Patients believed surgeons and their teams should help patients manage the emotional components of their cancer diagnosis and surgical experience, especially if patients were experiencing high levels of distress or had inadequate coping skills. They did not believe surgeons themselves should be primarily responsible for helping them cope. CONCLUSION: In order for surgeons to guide diagnosis and initial management of distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery, they should screen patients for distress, identify and strengthen patients' own coping strategies, facilitate a strong social support network, and provide patients with the option to obtain further support from the surgeon's office.

Impact of Immigrant Status on Aggressive Medical Care Counter to Patients' Values Near Death among Advanced Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about disparities in end-of-life (EoL) care between U.S. immigrants and nonimmigrants. OBJECTIVE: To determine immigrant/nonimmigrant advanced cancer patient differences in receipt of values-inconsistent aggressive medical care near the EoL. DESIGN: Analysis of data from Coping with Cancer, a federally funded, prospective, multi-institutional cohort study of advanced cancer patients with limited life expectancies recruited from 2002 to 2008. SETTING/SUBJECTS: U.S. academic medical center and community-based clinics. Self-reported immigrant (n = 41) and nonimmigrant (n = 261) advanced cancer patients with poor prognoses who died within the study observation period. MEASUREMENTS: The primary independent/predictor variable was patient immigrant status. Primary outcome variables: (1) aggressive medical care near death, operationalized as the use of mechanical ventilation, resuscitation, feeding tube, and/or antibiotics in the last week of life and (2) receipt of values inconsistent aggressive care, operationalized as receiving aggressive care inconsistent with stated preferences for comfort-focused EoL care. RESULTS: In a propensity-weighted sample (N = 302), in which immigrant and nonimmigrant groups were weighted to be demographically similar, immigrants were significantly more likely than nonimmigrants to receive aggressive medical care [OR 1.9; 95% CI (1.0-3.6); p = 0.042] and values-inconsistent aggressive medical care [OR 2.1; 95% CI (1.1-4.2); p = 0.032] near death. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant, as compared with nonimmigrant, advanced cancer patients are not only more likely to receive aggressive EoL care, but also more likely to receive care counter to their wishes. These findings indicate potential disparities in, rather than differences in preference for, aggressive care and a need for further investigation into potential causes of these disparities.

How much time is left? Associations between estimations of patient life expectancy and quality of life in patients and caregivers.

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether life-expectancy estimates of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers are associated with patient existential, social, or emotional quality of life (QOL) or caregiver emotional QOL. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers (n = 162 dyads) reported estimates of the chance the patient would live for 2 years or more from 0% (most pessimistic) to 100% (most optimistic). They also completed self-report measures of QOL. RESULTS: Adjusting for sociodemographic confounds and multiple comparisons, more pessimistic caregiver and patient life-expectancy estimates were associated with worse caregiver emotional QOL and worse patient existential QOL. Discrepancies between patient and caregiver estimates were not associated with patient or caregiver QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Pessimistic life-expectancy estimates are associated with worse existential QOL in patients and worse emotional QOL in caregivers. Prospective research to establish causal relationships is needed, and interventions to address the relationship between beliefs about life expectancy and existential and emotional QOL should be considered. Providing these interventions to patients and caregivers receiving information on life expectancy may mitigate the negative impact of life-expectancy information on patient existential quality of life.

Evidence of palliative care stigma: The role of negative stereotypes in preventing willingness to use palliative care.

OBJECTIVE: Although palliative care is critical to managing symptoms, pain, and transitions to end-of-life care among those facing serious or chronic illness, it is often underused, which may be due to stigma associated with palliative care representing giving up fighting one's illness. The goal of the present studies was to test the theoretical framework of stigma within the context of palliative care to inform future work on intervention development that addresses potential barriers to palliative care utilization. METHOD: In study 1, participants (n = 152) had an oncologist describe two treatment options to a terminally ill cancer patient: (1) palliative care and (2) chemotherapy. Participants were then randomly assigned to read that the patient chose palliative care or chemotherapy. In study 2, these stereotypes about those receiving palliative care were examined as a potential mediator between perceived palliative care stigma and prospective palliative care use. Participants (n = 199) completed self-report measures of palliative care stigma, negative stereotypes about palliative care users, and prospective use of palliative care. Mediation analysis tested the mediational effects of stereotypes on the relationship between palliative care stigma and prospective usage of palliative care. RESULT: In study 1, those in the palliative care condition endorsed significantly higher levels of negative stereotypes about the patient, viewed the decision more negatively, and saw the patient as less afraid of death. In study 2, palliative care stigma was associated with less prospective usage of palliative care for self and for one's family member. This relationship was mediated by negative stereotypes about individuals receiving palliative care. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Results suggest that palliative care stigma exists (study 1) and that this stigma may be a barrier to the utilization of palliative care (study 2). Future research should examine stigma reduction as a potential intervention target to improve palliative care utilization.

Illness Understanding and End-of-Life Care Communication and Preferences for Patients With Advanced Cancer in South Africa.

PURPOSE: The understanding of patients with cancer of their condition and their wishes regarding care as they approach end of life (EoL) have been studied more in high-income countries than in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed from a cohort study (N = 221) of patients with advanced cancer who were recruited from a palliative care center in Soweto, South Africa (LMIC), between May 2016 and June 2017. Patients were asked about their understanding of their illness, estimated life expectancy, EoL care communication, and EoL care preferences. RESULTS: Only 13 patients (5.9%) acknowledged that they were terminally ill; nine patients (4.1%) estimated accurately that they had months, not years, left to live. A total of 216 patients (97.7%) reported that they had not had an EoL care discussion with their physician, and 170 patients (76.9%) did not want to know their prognosis even if the doctor knew it. Most patients preferred comfort care (72.9%; n = 161) to life-extending care (14.0%; n = 31), and did not want to be kept alive using extreme measures (80.5%; n = 178) or have their doctors do everything possible to extend their lives (78.3%; n = 173). Finally, 127 patients (57.5%) preferred to die at home, and 51 (23.1%) preferred to die in the hospital. Most patients (81.0%; n = 179) had funeral plans. CONCLUSION: South African patients demonstrated less awareness of the fact that they were terminally ill, were less likely to have discussed their prognosis with their doctor, and more strongly preferred comfort care to life-extending EoL care than US and other LMIC patients in prior research. These differences highlight the need for culturally appropriate, patient-centered EoL care for South African patients with advanced cancer as well as to determine individual preferences and needs in all EoL settings.

Strategies used to facilitate the discussion of advance care planning with older adults in primary care settings: A literature review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this literature review was to evaluate strategies used in primary care settings to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations leading to the completion of an advance directive (AD). Approximately 50% of older adults have an AD; few talk to their primary care provider (PCP) about end-of-life wishes. The Institute of Medicine report and recent changes in Medicare reimbursement policies create opportunities for PCPs to address ACP in primary care settings. METHODS: We used a systematic review approach. The search included seven Elton B. Stephens Company databases, limited to English language and peer-reviewed publications from 1991 to 2017 using 10 key words. CONCLUSIONS: Effective interventions were educational materials using various methods of delivery, computer-generated triggers for PCPs, inclusion of multidisciplinary professionals for content delivery, and patient preparation for PCP visit. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The identified strategies provide a starting point for PCPs to consider increasing the ACP discussion with their patients. Primary care providers must create opportunities to meet the needs of their patients and their families. Established guidelines and reimbursement for ACP challenge PCPs to identify and contribute to the formulation of best practices to facilitate AD completion in primary care settings.

The interactive effect of advanced cancer patient and caregiver prognostic understanding on patients' completion of Do Not Resuscitate orders.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced cancer patients' prognostic understanding is associated with completion of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders, which often represent engagement in advance care planning (ACP). Given caregivers' critical roles in patient decision-making about ACP and end-of-life care, caregivers' prognostic understanding may have a large additive effect. The present study examined the association between the main and interactive effects of advanced cancer patient and caregiver prognostic understanding on DNR order completion. METHODS: Data were analyzed from a combined dataset of 2 sequential multi-institutional, longitudinal cohort studies of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers (n = 279 dyads) from 2002 to 2008 (Coping with Cancer 1) and 2010 to 2015 (Coping with Cancer 2). Patients' and caregivers' prognostic understanding regarding life-expectancy (≤ 12 months [prognostic understanding], >12 months [lack of prognostic understanding]) was assessed. DNR order completion was assessed through self-report and confirmed through cross-checking with medical records. RESULTS: Multivariable modeling of the main and interactive effects revealed the interactive effect, but not the individual effects, of patients' and caregivers' prognostic understanding was significantly associated with higher odds of patients' DNR order completion, adjusting for potential confounds (AOR = 5.89, P = 0.04). For dyads in which both the patient and caregiver had prognostic understanding regarding life expectancy of ≤12 months, 70.7% of patients had completed DNR orders compared with 31.6% to 38.9% in which 1 or both lacked prognostic understanding. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the need for ensuring accurate patient and caregiver prognostic understanding in increasing DNR order completion, which may provide a framework for improving engagement in ACP more broadly.

Awareness and Misperceptions of Hospice and Palliative Care: A Population-Based Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the documented benefits of palliative and hospice care on improving patients' quality of life, these services remain underutilized. Multiple factors limit the utilization of these services, including patients' and caregivers' lack of knowledge and misperceptions. OBJECTIVES: To examine palliative and hospice care awareness, misperceptions, and receptivity among community-dwelling adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: New York State residents ≥18 years old who participated in the 2016 Empire State Poll. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Palliative and hospice care awareness, misperceptions, and receptivity. RESULTS: Of the 800 participants, 664 (83%) and 216 (27%) provided a definition of hospice care and palliative care, respectively. Of those who defined hospice care, 399 (60%) associated it with end-of-life care, 89 (13.4%) mentioned it was comfort care, and 35 (5.3%) reported hospice care provides care to patients and families. Of those who defined palliative care (n = 216), 57 (26.4%) mentioned it provided symptom management to patients, 47 (21.9%) stated it was comfort care, and 19 (8.8%) reported it was applicable in any course of an illness. Of those who defined hospice or palliative care, 248 (37.3%) had a misperception about hospice care and 115 (53.2%) had a misperception about palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Most community-dwelling adults did not mention the major components of palliative and hospice care in their definitions, implying a low level of awareness of these services, and misinformation is common among community-dwelling adults. Palliative and hospice care education initiatives are needed to both increase awareness of and reduce misperceptions about these services.

The Effects of Race and Racial Concordance on Patient-Physician Communication: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Racial disparities exist in health care, even when controlling for relevant sociodemographic variables. Recent data suggest disparities in patient-physician communication may also contribute to racial disparities in health care. This study aimed to systematically review studies examining the effect of black race and racial concordance on patient-physician communication. METHODS: A comprehensive search using the PRISMA guidelines was conducted across seven online databases between 1995 and 2016. The search resulted in 4672 records for review and 40 articles for final inclusion in the review. Studies were included when the sample consisted of black patients in healthcare contexts and the communication measure was observational or patient-reported. Data were extracted by pairs of authors who independently coded articles and reconciled discrepancies. Results were synthesized according to predictor (race or racial concordance) and communication domain. RESULTS: Studies were heterogeneous in health contexts and communication measures. Results indicated that black patients consistently experienced poorer communication quality, information-giving, patient participation, and participatory decision-making than white patients. Results were mixed for satisfaction, partnership building, length of visit, and talk-time ratio. Racial concordance was more clearly associated with better communication across all domains except quality, for which there was no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Despite mixed results due to measurement heterogeneity, results of the present review highlight the importance of training physicians and patients to engage in higher quality communication with black and racially discordant patients by focusing on improving patient-centeredness, information-giving, partnership building, and patient engagement in communication processes.

Does Hospital Size Affect Patient Satisfaction?

BACKGROUND: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimbursement is now contingent on quality measures such as patient satisfaction as determined by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS). In providing patient-centered care that is guided by patient satisfaction measures, it is critical to understand system-level factors that may influence how patients assess their care experiences. One important system-level influence to consider is hospital size. METHODS: HCAHPS scores, number of hospital beds, and nursing magnet status were obtained from publically available Hospital Compare, American Hospital Directory, and Magnet Hospitals Web sites, respectively. An aggregate score for patient satisfaction was created across all domains of the HCAHPS. Multilevel regression modeling was performed to examine the associations between hospital size and HCAHPS aggregate and individual dimensions. RESULTS: Hospital size was significantly associated with patient satisfaction such that larger size was associated with lower satisfaction (ß = -.312, P < .001). Hospital size was most strongly associated with less patient satisfaction on the following HCAHPS items: "receiving help as soon as needed" (ß = -.441, P < .001), "room and bathroom cleanliness" (ß = -.286, P < .001), and doctor communication (ß = -.213, P < .001), whereas nurse communication (ß = .194, P < .001) was the one modifiable dimension that was associated with more favorable ratings in larger hospitals. Magnet nursing designation was significantly associated with larger hospital size (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction scores may be lower in large hospitals because of patients' perceptions of hospital cleanliness, receiving help on time, and doctor communication. Focusing on improving these factors may improve patient satisfaction scores for larger hospitals.

The Advance Care Planning Readiness Scale: Development and Validation of a Measure of Willingness to Discuss and Acceptance of End-of-Life Care in Gynecologic Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to develop and validate a scale that assesses the readiness of gynecologic oncology patients to engage in advance care planning. METHODS: The Advance Care Planning Readiness Scale (ACPRS) was validated across 3 independent samples of gynecologic oncology patients. In step I, patients underwent cognitive interviewing to determine if the scale items were comprehensible and applicable to patients. Based on this, modifications to the scale (addition, removal, and merger of items) were completed. In step II, the revised scale was administered to a new sample of patients to assess scale reliability and validity. An exploratory factor analysis determined if the scale loaded onto unique factors. In step III, the revised scale was administered to a third sample of patients, and a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the factor structure proposed in step II. Associations between ACPRS score and completion of advance directives were evaluated. RESULTS: Based on patients' responses, the original ACPRS used in step I was modified to the ACPRS used in step II. The final 8-item ACPRS is a valid, reliable (Cronbach α = 0.81) scale and has 2 primary factors. Women with medical power of attorney documents and living wills had higher ACPRS total scores than those who did not have these advance directives (P = 0.0030). Women with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders had higher ACPRS total scores than women without DNRs (P = 0.0176). CONCLUSIONS: The ACPRS is a valid and reliable 8-item scale that assesses the readiness of gynecologic oncology patients to discuss advance care planning issues.