Vision loss reduction with avacincaptad pegol for geographic atrophy: a 12-month post hoc analysis of the GATHER1 and GATHER2 trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of reduction in geographic atrophy (GA) lesion growth on visual acuity in the GATHER trials using categorical outcome measures. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled phase 3 trials. PARTICIPANTS: Aged ≥50 years with non-center point involving GA and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 25-80 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in the study eye. METHODS: GATHER1 consisted of 2 parts. In Part 1, 77 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to avacincaptad pegol (ACP) 1 mg, ACP 2 mg, and sham. In Part 2, 209 patients were randomized 1:2:2 to ACP 2 mg, ACP 4 mg, and sham. In GATHER2, patients were randomized 1:1 to ACP 2 mg (n=225) and sham (n=223). A post hoc analysis of 12-month data for pooled ACP 2 mg and sham groups is reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of study eyes that experienced ≥10-, ≥15-, or ≥20-BCVA ETDRS letter loss from baseline to month 12; time-to-event analysis of persistent vision loss of ≥10-, ≥15-, or ≥20-BCVA letters from baseline at ≥2 consecutive visits over 12 months; proportion of study eyes with BCVA loss to a level below driving eligibility threshold at month 12 among those eligible to drive at baseline. RESULTS: Lower proportions of study eyes experienced ≥10-, ≥15-, or ≥20-BCVA letter loss from baseline over 12 months with ACP 2 mg (11.6%, 4.0%, and 1.6%, respectively) vs sham (14.1%, 7.6%, and 4.5%, respectively). There was a reduction in the risk of persistent loss of ≥15-BCVA ETDRS letters with ACP 2 mg (3.4%) vs sham (7.8%) through 12 months. A lower proportion of study eyes treated with ACP 2 mg reached the threshold for driving ineligibility vs sham by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ACP 2 mg delayed the risk of progression to persistent vision loss (ie, ≥10-, ≥15-, and ≥20-BCVA letter loss or BCVA loss to a level below driving eligibility threshold) vs sham over 12 months.

Screen failures in clinical trials in retina.

PURPOSE: Disparities in clinical trials are a major problem due to significant underrepresentation of certain gender, racial and ethnic groups. Several factors including stringent eligibility criteria and recruitment strategies hinder our understanding of retinal disease. Thus, we aimed to study the various reasons of screen failures and specific patient and study characteristics among screen failures. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional retrospective study METHODS: Screening data of 87 trials from 6 centers were analyzed. Study characteristics (disease studied, phase of trial, route of drug administration) and patient demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and employment status) were compared among different causes of screen failures. Screen failures were broadly classified into six categories: exclusion due to vision-based criteria, exclusion due to imaging findings, exclusion due to other factors, patient-related criteria, physician related criteria and miscellaneous. Descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determine the prevalence of various reasons for screen failures in multiple trials and its trend among different study and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Among 87 trials and 962 patients, 465(48.2%) patients were successfully randomized and 497(51.8%) patients were classified as screen failures. The trials were conducted for various retinal diseases. Mean age was 76.50 ±10.45 years and 59.4% were females. Predominantly whites(93.4%) and unemployed/retired patients(66.6%) were screened. Of the 497 screen failures, most were due to patients not meeting inclusion criteria of imaging findings (n=221[44.5%]) followed by inclusion of vision-based criteria (n=73 [14.7%]), exclusion due to other factors (n=75[15.1%]), patient-related (n=34[6.8%]), physician-related (n=28[5.6%]) and miscellaneous reasons (n= 39[17.8%]). Reason for screen failure was not available for 27(5.4%) patients. A higher proportion of patients screened for surgical trials (15%) declined to participate in the study compared to non-invasive trials involving topical drugs and photobiomodulation (0%).(p=0.02) CONCLUSION: Patients not meeting the imaging and vision-cased criteria were the most common reasons for screen failures. Whites and unemployed patients predominantly participated in clinical trials. Patients are more inclined to continue participation in non-invasive clinical trials compared to surgical trials. Better recruitment strategies and careful consideration of study criteria can aid in decreasing the rate of screen failures.

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: The KINGFISHER Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite the effectiveness of existing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, a need remains for further treatment options to improve response rates and/or reduce injection or monitoring frequency in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab vs aflibercept dosed every 4 weeks in participants with DME. Design, Participants, and Setting: This 52-week, double-masked, phase 3 randomized clinical trial included treatment-naive adults and adults who had previously received anti-VEGF therapy. Data were collected from September 2019 to March 2020, and data were analyzed from April 2020 to February 2021. Intervention: Brolucizumab, 6 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks or aflibercept, 2 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were randomized 2:1 to brolucizumab, 6 mg, or aflibercept, 2 mg. The primary end point was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at week 52. Secondary end points were the proportion of participants with a 2-step improvement or greater from baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, the proportion of eyes with absence of both subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, change from baseline in central subfield thickness, and safety at week 52. Results: A total of 517 participants were randomized to brolucizumab (n = 346) or aflibercept (n = 171); 299 (57.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.7 (10.2) years. Brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score) change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, 12.2-letter improvement; aflibercept, 11.0-letter improvement; difference, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.6 to 2.9; noninferiority margin, 4; P < .001). Brolucizumab was superior to aflibercept for the proportion of eyes without subretinal and intraretinal fluid (brolucizumab, 144 of 346 [41.6%]; aflibercept, 38 of 171 [22.2%]; difference, 20.0%; 95% CI, 12.5to 28.6; P < .001) and mean central subfield thickness change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, -237.8 µm; aflibercept, -196.5 µm; difference, -41.4; 95% CI, -58.9 to -23.8; P < .001). Incidence of intraocular inflammation was 4.0% (14 of 346) in the brolucizumab arm and 2.9% (5 of 171) in the aflibercept arm, incidence of retinal vasculitis was 0.9% (3 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171), respectively, and incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was 0.3% (1 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171). One participant in the brolucizumab arm had retinal artery occlusion. Conclusions and Relevance: In these study participants with DME, no clinically meaningful differences in visual outcomes were noted between the brolucizumab and aflibercept arms; some superior anatomic improvements were noted in the brolucizumab arm. No new safety concerns were identified. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03917472.

Long-Term Control of Retinal Thickness Variability and Vision Following the 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant.

Purpose: To assess the impact of retinal thickness variability (RTV) control on visual and treatment burden outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who received the 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien, Alimera Sciences). Methods: This post hoc analysis examined the outcomes of a 3-year, phase 4, nonrandomized, open-label observational study. Retinal thickness was measured as central subfield thickness (CST). RTV was quantified by CST area under the curve (CST-AUC), retinal thickness amplitude (RTA), and retinal thickness standard deviation (RTSD). Visual outcomes were measured as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and treatment burden was measured as the number of yearly supplemental DME treatments. Results: The percentage of eyes with a CST ≤300 µm fluctuated throughout the study but was significantly increased relative to baseline at 36 months (baseline: 32.9% vs 36 months: 46.8%; P < .05). FAc significantly reduced RTV in all measures more than 36 months (P < .0001). When divided into quartiles, eyes with the best RTV control post FAc had the greatest BCVA gains and improved disease control (ie, reduced need for supplemental therapy). The last-observed BCVA letter score exhibited linear correlations with CST-AUC (R2 = -0.100), RTA (R2 = -0.125), and RTSD (R2 = -0.162). A multivariate linear regression with baseline BCVA as a covariate displayed improved correlations with the last-observed BCVA, CST-AUC (R2 = -0.448), RTA (R2 = -0.432), and RTSD (R2 = -0.436). Conclusions: The sustained corticosteroid release of the 0.19 mg FAc implant reduced RTV in patients with DME, which directly correlated with significantly improved vision and a reduced supplemental treatment burden.

Efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol in patients with geographic atrophy (GATHER2): 12-month results from a randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Geographic atrophy is an advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration that can lead to irreversible vision loss and high burden of disease. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol 2 mg in reducing geographic atrophy lesion growth. METHODS: GATHER2 is a randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, 24-month, phase 3 trial across 205 retina clinics, research hospitals, and academic institutions globally. To be eligible, patients had to be aged 50 years or older with non-centrepoint-involving geographic atrophy and best corrected visual acuity between 20/25 and 20/320 in the study eye. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to monthly avacincaptad pegol 2 mg administered as a 100 µL intravitreal injection or sham for the first 12 months. Randomisation was performed using an interactive response technology system with stratification by factors known to be of prognostic importance in age-related macular degeneration. Patients, investigators, study centre staff, sponsor personnel, and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was geographic atrophy lesion size measured by fundus autofluorescence at baseline, month 6, and month 12. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat and safety populations, respectively. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04435366. FINDINGS: Between June 22, 2020, and July 23, 2021, 1422 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 448 were enrolled and randomly assigned to avacincaptad pegol 2 mg (n=225) or sham (n=223). One patient in the sham group did not receive study treatment and was excluded from analyses. There were 154 (68%) female patients and 71 (32%) male patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group, and 156 (70%) female patients and 66 (30%) male patients in the sham group. From baseline to month 12, the mean rate of square-root-transformed geographic atrophy area growth was 0·336 mm/year (SE 0·032) with avacincaptad pegol 2 mg and 0·392 mm/year (0·033) with sham, a difference in growth of 0·056 mm/year (95% CI 0·016-0·096; p=0·0064), representing a 14% difference between the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and the sham group. Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events in the study eye occurred in 110 (49%) patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and 83 (37%) in the sham group. There were no endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, or ischaemic optic neuropathy events over 12 months. To month 12, macular neovascularisation in the study eye occurred in 15 (7%) patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and nine (4%) in the sham group, with exudative macular neovascularisation occurring in 11 (5%) in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and seven (3%) in the sham group. INTERPRETATION: Monthly avacincaptad pegol 2 mg was well tolerated and showed significantly slower geographic atrophy growth over 12 months than sham treatment, suggesting that avacincaptad pegol might slow disease progression and potentially change the trajectory of disease for patients with geographic atrophy. FUNDING: Iveric Bio, An Astellas Company.

The real-world efficacy and safety of faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the TRUCKEE study - 6 month results.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Investigate real-world patients receiving faricimab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective chart review was conducted on patients treated with faricimab for nAMD from February 2022 to September 2022. Collected data includes background demographics, treatment history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomic changes, and adverse events as safety markers. The main outcome measures are changes in BCVA, changes in central subfield thickness (CST) and adverse events. Secondary outcome measures included treatment intervals and presence of retinal fluid. RESULTS: After one injection of faricimab, all eyes (n = 376), previously-treated (n = 337) and treatment-naïve (n = 39) eyes demonstrated a + 1.1 letter (p = 0.035), a + 0.7 letter (p = 0.196) and a + 4.9 letter (p = 0.076) improvement in BCVA, respectively, and a - 31.3 µM (p < 0.001), a - 25.3 µM (p < 0.001) and a - 84.5 µM (p < 0.001) reduction in CST, respectively. After three injections of faricimab, all eyes (n = 94), previously-treated (n = 81) and treatment-naïve (n = 13) eyes demonstrated a + 3.4 letter (p = 0.03), a + 2.7 letter (p = 0.045) and a + 8.1 letter (p = 0.437) improvement in BCVA, and a - 43.4 µM (p < 0.001), a - 38.1 µM (p < 0.001) and a - 80.1 µM (p < 0.204) reduction in CST, respectively. One case of intraocular inflammation was observed after four injections of faricimab and resolved with topical steroids. One case of infectious endophthalmitis was treated with intravitreal antibiotics and resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Faricimab has demonstrated improvement or maintenance of visual acuity for patients with nAMD, along with rapid improvement of anatomical parameters. It has been well-tolerated with low incidence of treatable intraocular inflammation. Future data will continue to investigate faricimab for real-world patients with nAMD.

Conjunctiva and Tenon's Capsule Handling in the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab Implant Insertion Procedure: Surgical Pearls.

OBJECTIVES: To describe conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule handling during the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) implant insertion procedure including up-front assessments, planning, and instrumentation, with emphasis placed on the peritomy, scleral dissection, and closure steps. METHODS: Surgical pearls based on experience accumulated in the PDS clinical trial program in patients with retinal diseases. RESULTS: Preoperative preparation, specific instruments, and meticulous techniques are key to optimizing surgical outcomes. Before surgery, assessment of factors that affect conjunctival integrity and an in-office conjunctiva examination are conducted. Gentle, purposeful conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule handling with nontoothed forceps and suturing with a BV needle are recommended to prevent tissue damage. The peritomy is 6 mm by 6 mm, centered around the planned implant location in the superotemporal quadrant. A complete sub-Tenon's capsule dissection is achieved using a wide, robust lateral and posterior dissection technique to free tissue from the sclera and minimize tension. The globe is stabilized during scleral cutdown by grasping the sclera with fine-toothed forceps away from the incision edge to prevent tissue delamination. When closing the peritomy, both the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule are completely captured and sutured with scleral anchoring at the apex of the peritomy to help prevent conjunctival retraction and erosion. Mitigation and detection of adverse events is critical to successful surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The PDS implant insertion procedure is straightforward, but it requires planned preoperative preparation, specific instruments, and meticulous techniques. The surgical pearls described here offer insights for optimizing outcomes. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:266-273.].

Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Relaxing Parafoveal Nasal Retinotomy for Refractory Macular Hole Repair.

Purpose: This work aimed to assess postoperative outcomes associated with relaxing parafoveal nasal retinotomy for refractory macular hole repair. Methods: This was a retrospective interventional study of patients with persistent or recurrent macular holes following 1 or more standard repair procedures with pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. Patients received an additional pars plana vitrectomy and relaxing parafoveal nasal retinotomy, followed by fluid-air and air-gas exchange. Key postoperative outcomes included the achievement of macular hole closure and changes in visual acuity from baseline. Results: Thirteen patients with refractory macular holes were included, with a median age of 65 years (range, 49-90 years). The aperture diameter of the 13 macular holes ranged from 180 to 799 µm (median, 538 µm). Vitrectomy and relaxing parafoveal nasal retinotomy were performed in all 13 eyes, and after a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-34 months), anatomical closure was achieved in 12 of 13 eyes (92.3%). Overall, visual acuity (mean ± SE) improved significantly from 1.20 ± 0.15 logMAR (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/320) at baseline to 0.84 ± 0.11 logMAR (Snellen, ∼ 20/125) during postoperative follow-up (P < .05). Central and paracentral scotomas were observed in 8 of 11 eyes with postoperative Humphrey visual field 10-2 and/or 24-2 data available. Conclusions: Relaxing parafoveal nasal retinotomy may be an effective method to promote anatomical closure and improve vision outcomes in patients with recalcitrant macular holes.

Home Monitoring of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Utility of the ForeseeHome Device for Detection of Neovascularization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the real-world utility of the ForeseeHome monitoring device (Notal Vision, Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel) for the detection of conversion from intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD) to neovascular AMD (nAMD) and to compare with results published by the Home Monitoring of the Eye (HOME) study. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of electronic health records. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes prescribed use of the ForeseeHome device across 4 retinal practices in the United States. METHODS: Usage information was collected from the online ForeseeHome portal for all eyes prescribed the device. For a predetermined subset of eyes, additional clinical information was collected through chart review and analyzed for clinical utility. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency and length of use, number of eyes that used the device, number of eyes that established a baseline measurement, number of eyes that converted to nAMD, and number of alerts. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-five eyes of 448 patients were prescribed use of the ForeseeHome device. Six hundred forty-nine eyes (83.7%) used the device at least once; among this population, 478 (73.7%) established a baseline measurement. Patients who established a baseline measurement were significantly younger than those who did not (P < 0.001). Among eyes that established a baseline measurement, 126 (26.4%) had an overall inadequate frequency of use (≥2 tests per week), and 250 (52.3%) did not use the device as frequently as instructed by the manufacturer (≥3 tests per week); 24.7% of eyes discontinued use within 1 year. Of the 136 eyes that established a baseline measurement among 211 eyes prescribed the device at 1 clinical site, 52 alerts were recorded; 3 (6.8%) correctly identified conversion to nAMD and 47 (93.2%) represented false-positive alerts. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the prospective HOME study, the utility of the ForeseeHome device in the current analysis of clinical practice application was limited. A meaningful proportion of eyes never used the device or could not establish a baseline measurement. Overall frequency of use was low, and continuous use of the device decreased over time. A need exists for improvement in home monitoring technology for eyes with iAMD at risk of conversion to nAMD.

When and How to Incorporate Steroids for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: A Discussion of Real-World Treatment Optimization Strategies.

In the United States, diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause of vision loss among people with diabetic retinopathy. Despite the availability of different therapies for DME, up to half of patients with DME show some persistent edema after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment alone, leaving these patients at high risk for vision loss. However, dosing in a similar fashion to that of pivotal anti-VEGF trials is difficult because of real-life challenges faced in clinical practice. This is particularly true for DME, in that the frequency and burden of anti-VEGF injections are a major challenge to patient care. Research evaluating anti-VEGF therapies has shaped the treatment paradigms for patients with DME, and similar benefits have also been noted in clinical trials evaluating the use of intravitreal steroids. Treatment with a long-term intravitreal corticosteroid, which requires fewer injections than treatment with most short-acting therapies, has been found to reduce inflammation and improve vision in a percentage of patients. This roundtable discussion, which took place during the 2018 annual meeting of the Vit-Buckle Society, reviews the current treatment paradigms for DME and evaluates how to customize and optimize treatment strategies geared toward individualized patient care. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:S5-S15.].

ACTINOMYCES NEUII ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INJECTION.

PURPOSE: To describe a case of acute endophthalmitis caused by Actinomyces neuii after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection. METHODS: Observational case report, review of published literature. RESULTS: A 67-year-old white man with wet age-related macular degeneration developed endophthalmitis secondary to A. neuii on the 10th day after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection. Both anterior chamber and vitreous cultures were positive for A. neuii. He was treated successfully with intravitreal injection of vancomycin and ceftazidime. CONCLUSION: This is the first published report of culture-positive endophthalmitis caused by A. neuii after intravitreal injection.

PERIPHERAL RETINOPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH APLASTIC ANEMIA.

PURPOSE: To report a case of severe, bilateral, rapidly progressing peripheral retinal nonperfusion associated with underlying aplastic anemia. METHODS: An interventional case report. RESULTS: A 4-year-old girl presented with decreased visual acuity. On clinical examination, she was found to have a RAPD, elevated intraocular pressure, 360° rubeosis, vitreous hemorrhage, severe exudative retinal detachment, and telangiectasia with severe peripheral retinal nonperfusion. Laboratory workup was significant for pancytopenia, and a bone marrow biopsy showed extreme hypocellularity with no malignant cells. The patient was diagnosed with primary aplastic anemia. She developed dramatic progression of retinal nonperfusion in the left eye, as well as in the fellow right eye. This bilateral retinopathy was poorly responsive to aggressive management, which included laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications. CONCLUSION: Asymmetric, bilateral quickly progressing peripheral retinal ischemia, in conjunction with pancytopenia and otherwise negative workup may be related to underlying bone marrow failure and aplastic anemia.