SPINE20 recommendations 2023: One Earth, one family, one future WITHOUT spine DISABILITY.

Introduction: The purpose is to report on the fourth set of recommendations developed by SPINE20 to advocate for evidence-based spine care globally under the theme of "One Earth, One Family, One Future WITHOUT Spine DISABILITY". Research question: Not applicable. Material and methods: Recommendations were developed and refined through two modified Delphi processes with international, multi-professional panels. Results: Seven recommendations were delivered to the G20 countries calling them to:-establish, prioritize and implement accessible National Spine Care Programs to improve spine care and health outcomes.-eliminate structural barriers to accessing timely rehabilitation for spinal disorders to reduce poverty.-implement cost-effective, evidence-based practice for digital transformation in spine care, to deliver self-management and prevention, evaluate practice and measure outcomes.-monitor and reduce safety lapses in primary care including missed diagnoses of serious spine pathologies and risk factors for spinal disability and chronicity.-develop, implement and evaluate standardization processes for spine care delivery systems tailored to individual and population health needs.-ensure accessible and affordable quality care to persons with spine disorders, injuries and related disabilities throughout the lifespan.-promote and facilitate healthy lifestyle choices (including physical activity, nutrition, smoking cessation) to improve spine wellness and health. Discussion and conclusion: SPINE20 proposes that focusing on the recommendations would facilitate equitable access to health systems, affordable spine care delivered by a competent healthcare workforce, and education of persons with spine disorders, which will contribute to reducing spine disability, associated poverty, and increase productivity of the G20 nations.

What is the role of CT-based Hounsfield unit assessment in the evaluation of bone mineral density in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative spinal pathologies? A prospective study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Computed tomography-based vertebral attenuation values (CT-based HU) have been shown to correlate with T-scores on DEXA scan; and have been acknowledged as an independent factor for predicting fragility fractures. Most patients undergoing lumbar surgeries require CT as part of their preoperative evaluation. PURPOSE: The current study was thus planned to evaluate the role of lumbar CT as an opportunistic investigation in determining BMD preoperatively in patients undergoing lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients older than 45 years, who underwent one- to two-level lumbar (L3-S1 levels) fusions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of the quantitative assessment of osteoporosis using Hounsfield Units (HU) on CT (L1-L5) and mean lumbar T-scores on DEXA (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry). HYPOTHESIS: HU on CT is comparable to T-score on DEXA as a suitable modality for the assessment of osteoporosis in patients undergoing one- to two-level lumbar fusion. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted between January and December 2021. Patients older than 45 years, who underwent one- to two-level lumbar (L3-S1 levels) fusions and had complete clinico-radiological records, were prospectively enrolled. A comparison was drawn between the HU (measured by placing an oval region of interest [ROI] over axial, sagittal and coronal images of lumbar vertebrae) on CT and T-scores on DEXA, and analyzed statistically. The HU values correlating best with normal (group A), osteopenia (B) and osteoporosis (C) categories (classified based on T-scores of lumbar spines) were determined statistically. RESULTS: Overall, 87 patients (mean age of 60.56±11.63 years; 63 [72.4%] female patients) were prospectively studied. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean age (p=.01) and sex distribution (predominantly female patients; p=.03) of patients belonging to groups B (osteopenic) and C (osteoporotic patients), as compared with group A. The greatest correlation between T-score (on DEXA) and HU (on CT) for differentiating osteopenia (group B) from group A was observed at levels L1 (p<.001), L2 (p<.001) and L3 (p<.001). Based on receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the cut-off values for HU for identifying osteopenia were 159 (at L1; sensitivity 81.6 and specificity 80) and 162 (at L2; sensitivity 80 and specificity 71.1). In addition, there was statistically significant correlation between T-score (on DEXA) and HU at all the lumbar levels for distinguishing osteoporosis (group C), although the difference was most evident at the upper lumbar (L1 and L2) levels (p<.001). Based on ROC analysis, cut-off HU values for defining osteoporosis were 127 (at L1; sensitivity 71.3 and specificity 70) and 117 (at L2; sensitivity 65.5 and specificity 90). CONCLUSION: Based on our study, the measurement of HU on CT at upper lumbar levels can be considered as "surrogate marker" for BMD in the diagnosis of osteopenia (cut-off: 159 at L1, 162 at L2) and osteoporosis (cut-off: 127 at L1, 117 at L2) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgeries. The HU measurements on CT at the lower lumbar levels (L4 and L5) are less reliable in this preoperative scenario.

"Satellite pedicle screws" - A novel technique of pedicle screw insertion in obese patients undergoing lumbar fusion.

The presence of thick sub-cutaneous fat and bulky paraspinal musculature mandates extensive surgical dissection in obese patients undergoing open Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Securing a 'converging' pedicle screw trajectory becomes difficult by the counterforces of the erector spinae muscles and thick sub-cutaneous fat in obese patients, especially at the L5-S1 level. We describe the use of a limited standard posterior midline exposure and a separate, far lateral 'satellite' incision to insert pedicle screws in an optimal trajectory in obese patients. Through proper pre-operative planning of the axial and sagittal MRI, the appropriate entry site is determined which is executed intra-operatively to insert pedicle screws freehand. Through a single 1.5 cm incision, both L5-S1 screws were inserted. Fourteen obese patients (mean BMI was 30.5 ± 1.1) received 56 satellite pedicle screws for TLIF at L5-S1 level. The mean age was 48.3 ± 9.7 years. The mean blood loss was 244.8 ± 114 ml and the mean operative time was 126.7 ± 82.8 min. In all patients, the screws were inserted as per pre-operative planning without any difficulties. All wounds healed well without wound complications. There were no screw related complications, and in the antero-posterior and lateral radiographs, there were no screw breaches. Satellite free-hand pedicle screws are safe and easily reproducible. They enable limited dissection of the main surgical wound and well-medialised converging pedicle screws in obese patients.

Preoperative pain sensitivity predicts postoperative pain severity and analgesics requirement in lumbar fusion surgery - a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND CONTENT: The goal of postoperative pain management is to facilitate the patient's return to normal activity and decrease the detrimental effects of acute postsurgical pain. In order to provide more tailored and successful pain treatment, it is necessary to identify individuals who are at a high risk of experiencing severe postoperative pain. The most precise way to assess pain sensitivity is by determining the pressure pain threshold and heat pain threshold by objective methods using a digital algometer and neurotouch respectively. PURPOSE: The primary aim of the study is to assess the preoperative pain threshold and its influence on postoperative pain severity and analgesics requirements in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty patients requiring a single-level lumbar fusion surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative pain intensity and the amount of postoperative analgesics consumption. METHODS: In our patients, preoperative pain sensitivity was assessed by pressure pain threshold measurements with the help of a digital algometer, and heat pain threshold using a neurotouch instrument. In addition, pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ) were used in all our patients to determine pain sensitivity. Preoperative psychosocial and functional assessments were performed by Hospital anxiety-depression scores (HADS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) respectively. Preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score was determined at three instances of needle prick (phlebotomy, glucometer blood sugar, and intradermal antibiotic test dose) and during the range of movements of the lumbar spine region. Postoperative VAS score and postoperative breakthrough analgesic requirements were recorded in all of these patients from day 0 to day 3. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 51.11±13.467 years and 70% were females. Females had lower mean algometry values (72.14±7.56) compared to males (77.34±6.33). Patients with higher HADS (p<.0016), higher PSQ (p<.001), higher ODI scores(p<.001), and female gender significantly correlated with a lower algometer average indicating high pain sensitivity. Patients with lower preoperative VAS scores and with higher neurotouch scores showed lower postoperative VAS scores at different time periods. Preoperative VAS scores, algometer average scores, neurotouch scores, and HADS scores were considered as independent variables (predictors) for postoperative VAS at 6 hours period. By the multivariate analysis, factors like preoperative VAS scores, algometer average scores, and HADS scores were statistically significant (p<.05). There was a significant correlation between algometer average scores (p<.001) with the breakthrough analgesics. CONCLUSION: Preoperative assessment of pain sensitivity can predict postoperative analgesic requirements and aid in recovery. Patients with a lower pain threshold should be counseled preoperatively and also receive a better titration of analgesics perioperatively.

Do all Isler's type sacral fractures necessarily require surgical fixation?

INTRODUCTION: A unilateral vertical sacral fracture that exits medial or through the L5-S1 facet joint is considered to affect the lumbo-sacral integrity, and it is denoted as an indication for surgical fixation. However, no studies have analysed the outcomes after non-operative treatment of such injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review of all sacral fractures treated over a five-year period was performed to identify patients with Isler's fractures. Demographic and surgical data, all pre-operative and follow-up images (AP radiographs, CT images), functional outcomes based on VAS, SF-12 and return to work were documented for all patients. RESULTS: The incidence of Isler's fractures was 18% (34/181). The mean age was 42.12 ± 16.3 years. As per Isler's subtypes, fractures passed through L5-S1 joint in 13 (Type 2a) and medial to it in 15 (Type 2b), fractures of L5 or S1 facets in 3 (Type 1), Type 3 injuries were not detected. All patients had concomitant pelvic ring injuries. Sixteen fractures (neurologically intact, < 1 cm displacement, anterior ring stable, no facetal dislocation) were treated non-operatively while 18 patients underwent surgery. At a mean of 15.2 months, the fractures had united in all patients radiographically. The mean VAS score for low back pain (1.4 ± 1.01 vs 1.5 ± 0.79), ability to squat and sit cross-legged (56.3% vs 55.6%) and return to work (68.8% vs 66.7%), and Majeed score (77.2 ± 3.9 vs 79.6 ± 4.1) were similar in non-surgical and surgical groups, respectively, at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that 47% of Isler's fractures were mechanically stable and could be effectively treated non-operatively with good radiological and functional outcomes.

A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis-An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Modified Delphi Consensus and Observational Study. OBJECTIVE: Instability in spinal tuberculosis (STB) leads to disabling spinal deformity and neurodeficit. Identifying and estimating instability remains subjective, mainly based on experience. This study aims to develop an objective scoring system to determine instability in STB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 4 phases. (1) A panel of 10 experienced spine surgeons developed a questionnaire based on literature. (2) 68 spine surgeons from 12 countries opined on the importance of each factor in a survey. Five factors deemed important by >70% of participants were further analyzed (3) 60 representative cases of STB were analyzed for instability. A preliminary scoring system was developed, a threshold score for determining instability was derived, and (4) Results were validated. RESULTS: All the 5 factors ("Spine at risk" signs, severity of vertebral body loss, Cervicothoracic/Thoracolumbar junction involvement, age ≤15, and kyphotic deformity ≥30°) considered important by >70% of participants were associated with instability and included in scoring: age ≤15 years (P-value, 0.05), cervicothoracic/thoracolumbar junction involvement (P-value, 0.028), sagittal deformity angle ratio (DAR) ≥ 15° (P-value, <.001), vertebral body loss-segmental ratio ≥.5 (P-value, <.001), and presence of spine at risk signs (P-value, <.001). A total score of ≥3/09 indicated definite instability with good sensitivity (77%) and excellent specificity (100%). Repeatability assessment showed a good agreement (.9625), and Cohen's kappa coefficient was strong (.809). CONCLUSION: A simple objective scoring system for predicting instability in STB has been developed using 5 main factors; young age, junctional involvement, severity of the deformity, vertebral body loss, and presence of spine at risk signs.

Perioperative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery-a double blinded, randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND CONTENT: Posterior cervical spine surgery (PCSS) are typically open surgeries and entail significant postoperative pain. Current perioperative pain management in PCSS is reliant on multimodal analgesia. While perioperative epidural anesthetic infusion can be used in lumbar surgeries, this is not an option in the cervical spine. Pre-emptive regional analgesia through erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has shown significant perioperative analgesic benefits in lumbar spine surgeries. There are no such clinical studies in PCSS. PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB for perioperative analgesia in PCSS. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eighty-six patients requiring sub-axial PCSS with or without instrumentation were randomized into two groups, those who underwent ESPB with multimodal analgesia (case) and those with only multimodal analgesia (control). OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and surgical data (blood loss, duration of surgery, perioperative total opioid consumption, muscle relaxants used) were assessed. Postoperatively, the surgical site pain, alertness scale, satisfaction score, time to mobilization and complications were recorded. METHODS: After anesthesia and prone position, case patients received ultrasound-guided ESPB at the T1 level using 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 8 mg Dexamethasone bilaterally while the control patients received only standard postoperative multimodal analgesia. RESULTS: There were 43 patients in each group; the two groups were identical in demographic and surgical profile. The intraoperative opioid consumption (119.53±40.35 vs. 308.6±189.78; p<.001) in mcg), muscle relaxant usage (50.00±0.00 mg vs. 59.53±3.75 mg, p<.001), surgical duration (124.77±26.63/ 156.74±37.01 min; p<.01) and intraoperative blood loss (310.47±130.73 ml vs. 429.77±148.50 ml; p<.05) were significantly less in the ESPB group. In the postoperative period, the control group's pain score was significantly higher (p<.001). The Modified Observer Alertness/Sedation Score (MOASS) score and satisfaction scores also showed significant differences between the case and control groups (p<.001). The mean time required to ambulate (sitting/walking) was statistically less in cases (15.81±6.15/20.72±4.02 h) when compared to controls (16.86±6.18/ 23.05±8.88 h; p<.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCSS, ESPB is a safe and effective technique with better outcomes than standard multimodal analgesia alone, in terms of reduced intraoperative opioid requirements and blood loss, better postoperative analgesia and early mobilization.

Thoracic Myelopathy in Ossified Ligamentum Flavum: Surgical Management and Long-Term Outcome Following 2 Different Techniques of Surgical Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Thoracic ossified ligamentum flavum (TOLF) has been reported to present with varying degrees of neuro-deficit and multiple factors have been purported to affect its outcome. Purpose of study was to analyze factors affecting outcome and impact of ultrasonic osteotome (UO). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated for thoracic myelopathy secondary to OLF between 2010 and 2017. 77 patients with complete clinico-radiological records and 2 years follow-up were included. Initial 45 patients, conventional high-speed burr (HSB-group A) was used for decompression. In others, UO was used in combination with HSB (group B). Myelopathy was graded using modified Japanese orthopaedic association grading pre-operatively and each postoperative visit. At final follow-up, recovery rate was calculated. Radiological details including location, morphology, dural ossification, signal change and spinal ossifications were recorded. RESULTS: Mean mJOA at presentation and final follow-up were 4.3±1.8 and 7.6±1.9 respectively (p = 0.001). HRR was 49.9±23 at final follow-up. A significant reduction in dural tear (12.5%; 29%) and surgical time (125.8±49.5; 189.4±52.5) were observed in group B (p = 0.00). However, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.18) in recovery rates between groups A (44.8±26.1) and B (52.8±24.3). Symptom duration (p = 0.00), severity of myelopathy (p = 0.04) and cord signal changes on MRI (p = 0.02) were important predictors of outcome. CONCLUSION: Use of UO significantly reduced operative time and dural tears, although resulted in similar recovery rate as compared with HSB. Pre-operative severity of myelopathy, symptom duration and presence of cord signal change were the most significant predictors of outcome.

Efficacy of Non-Fusion Surgeries in the Management of AO Type C Injuries of the Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spine: A Retrospective Study.

Background: The initial descriptions of successful management of non-fusion surgeries in the management of unstable burst injuries of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine (TTLS) were published by Osti in 1987 and Sanderson in 1999. These were further supported by prospective studies and meta-analyses establishing comparable results between fusion and non-fusion surgeries. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the efficacy of non-fusion surgeries in the management of AO type C injuries. Objective, Materials and Methods: The study aims to determine the efficacy of open posterior instrumented stabilization without fusion in AO type C injuries of the TTLS. Patients with AO type C injuries of the TTLS (T4-L2 levels) with normal neurology who underwent open, posterior, long segment instrumented stabilization without fusion between January 2015 and June 2018 were included. The regional kyphotic angle, local kyphotic angle, AP (anterior and posterior wall) ratio, and cumulative loss of disc space angle were assessed on radiographs. Functional outcome was assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the AO Spine patient-reported outcome spine trauma (PROST) instrument. Results and Conclusion: The study included 35 patients with AO type C injury of the TTLS and a normal neurology who underwent open posterior instrumented stabilization and had a mean follow-up of 43.2 months (range 24-60 months). The mean preoperative regional kyphotic angle decreased from 19.8 ± 13.7° to 6.6 ± 11.3° after surgery but showed an increase to 9.21 ± 10.5° at final follow-up (P = 0.003). The cumulative loss of disc space angle was significant at final follow-up (2.4 ± 5° [P = 0.002]). Twenty-eight out of 35 patients had minimal while seven had moderate disability on the ODI score. The AO Spine PROST revealed that patients regained 95.7 ± 4.2% of their pre-injury functional status at final follow-up. Posterior instrumented stabilization without fusion in the management of AO type C injuries of the TTLS gives satisfactory results with acceptable functional and radiological outcomes.

Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis Prevalence, Characteristics, and Associated Comorbidities: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1815 Whole Spine CT Scans.

STUDY DESIGN: A Retrospective Study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of DISH using whole spine CT scans and to evaluate the association of DISH with co-morbidities and other ossified lesions. METHOD: A retrospective study of whole-spine CT scans of polytrauma patients from 2018-2021 above the age of 20 years. The screening was done using modified Resnick criteria. Overall and age-specific prevalence, characteristics, and associations with obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), ischemic heart disease (IHD), aortic calcification (AC), ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and ossified ligamentum flavum (OLF) were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 1815 patients, 347 had DISH, with a prevalence rate of 19.1% and a mean age of 61.7 years. The highest prevalence of DISH was seen in individuals over 80 years of age (45.5%). The prevalence among males (20.2%) was higher than for females (14.9%). The most commonly involved level was T8-T9 (95.4%), followed by T9-T10 (91.9%), and the most common vertebra involved was T9 (96%). All the cases involving T9 had ossification on the right anterior aspect of the vertebral body. The presence of DM, high BMI, and IHD was found to be significantly higher in patients with DISH (P value < .001). The incidence of aortic calcification was 22.5%, OPLL was 13.3%, and OLF was 4.9% in patients with DISH. CONCLUSION: This study reports a prevalence rate of 19.1% for DISH, with the highest prevalence among individuals above 80 years of age (45.5%). DISH has a higher propensity to affect the right anterior aspect of the vertebral body in the thoracic spine and is strongly associated with obesity, DM, IHD, and AC.

SPINE20 recommendations 2021: spine care for people's health and prosperity.

PURPOSE: The focus of SPINE20 is to develop evidence-based policy recommendations for the G20 countries to work with governments to reduce the burden of spine disease, and disability. METHODS: On September 17-18, 2021, SPINE20 held its annual meeting in Rome, Italy. Prior to the meeting, the SPINE20 created six proposed recommendations. These recommendations were uploaded to the SPINE20 website 10 days before the meeting and opened to the public for comments. The recommendations were discussed at the meeting allowing the participants to object and provide comments. RESULTS: In total, 27 societies endorsed the following recommendations. SPINE20 calls upon the G20 countries: (1) to expand telehealth for the access to spine care, especially in light of the current situation with COVID-19. (2) To adopt value-based interprofessional spine care as an approach to improve patient outcomes and reduce disability. (3) To facilitate access and invest in the development of a competent rehabilitation workforce to reduce the burden of disability related to spine disorders. (4) To adopt a strategy to promote daily physical activity and exercises among the elderly population to maintain an active and independent life with a healthy spine, particularly after COVID-19 pandemic. (5) To engage in capacity building with emerging countries and underserved communities for the benefit of spine patients. (6) To promote strategies to transfer evidence-based advances into patient benefit through effective implementation processes. CONCLUSIONS: SPINE20's initiatives will make governments and decision makers aware of efforts to reduce needless suffering from disabling spine pain through education that can be instituted across the globe.

Patterns of Traumatic Spinal Injuries in the Developing World: A Five-Year Longitudinal Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. PURPOSE: A 5-year longitudinal study documenting and comparing patterns of traumatic spinal injuries (TSIs) observed in developing countries. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Current knowledge of the patterns and epidemiology of TSI are based on evidence from developed countries and there is a lack of data from developing countries to enable a comparison of information to formulate healthcare policies. METHODS: A review of case records of all patients treated at a tertiary level trauma center over a 5-year period (2015-2019) was performed. Epidemiological, clinical, and radiological data were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of spinal trauma was 6.2% (2,065/33,072) among all trauma patients. Among these 2,065 patients, the mean age was 43.4±16.3 years and 77.3% (n=1,596) were aged 21-60 years. The major cause of injury was falls (52.1%, n=1,069) and 49.8% were high-energy falls (>10 feet [=3.048 m]). In patients with TSI due to falls, injuries occurred at the workplace (n=376), home (n=309), trees (n=151), wells (n=77), and electric poles (n=57). Road traffic accidents contributed to 42% (n=862) of TSIs and predominantly affected motorcyclists (52%, n=467). Around half (53.5%, n=1,005) of all patients were in the lower socioeconomic strata. The most common injury level was thoracic region (37.2%, n=769). Spinal cord injury (SCI) occurred in 49% (n=1,011) of patients and 49.7% (n=1,028) had injuries associated with other organs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated different demographic patterns and epidemiological features of TSI compared with the Western literature, including a preponderance of young male patients, falls from heights, motorcycle accidents, and a larger percentage of SCI. The high number of falls at workplace indicates a lack of knowledge among the public and policy makers about safety measures.

SPINE20 A global advocacy group promoting evidence-based spine care of value.

PURPOSE: The Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) Studies have estimated that low back pain is one of the costliest ailments worldwide. Subsequent to GBD publications, leadership of the four largest global spine societies agreed to form SPINE20. This article introduces the concept of SPINE20, the recommendations, and the future of this global advocacy group linked to G20 annual summits. METHODS: The founders of SPINE20 advocacy group coordinated with G20 Saudi Arabia to conduct the SPINE20 summit in 2020. The summit was intended to promote evidence-based recommendations to use the most reliable information from high-level research. Eight areas of importance to mitigate spine disorders were identified through a voting process of the participating societies. Twelve recommendations were discussed and vetted. RESULTS: The areas of immediate concern were "Aging spine," "Future of spine care," "Spinal cord injuries," "Children and adolescent spine," "Spine-related disability," "Spine Educational Standards," "Patient safety," and "Burden on economy." Twelve recommendations were created and endorsed by 31/33 spine societies and 2 journals globally during a vetted process through the SPINE20.org website and during the virtual inaugural meeting November 10-11, 2020 held from the G20 platform. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that international spine societies have joined to support actions to mitigate the burden of spine disorders across the globe. SPINE20 seeks to change awareness and treatment of spine pain by supporting local projects that implement value-based practices with healthcare policies that are culturally sensitive based on scientific evidence.

Macrodystrophia Lipomatosa of Thoracic Spine Causing Progressive Neurodeficit: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

CASE: We report the first case of a 21-year-old male patient with macrodystrophia lipomatosa (MDL), with local gigantism involving the thoracic spine and progressively worsening neurodeficit. Imaging studies revealed fatty infiltration and hypertrophied intercostal nerves, dextroscoliosis, osseous hypertrophy between C4 and T2, and severe canal stenosis at the T4 to T5 level secondary to lamino-facetal hypertrophy. He underwent debulking of the lesion and posterior instrumented decompression in a staged manner. His neurodeficit improved postoperatively and was ambulant without support at the end of the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Surgery in patients with MDL is technically challenging and fraught with complications such as neurological deficit and significant blood loss.

Thoracolumbar Fracture Dislocations Without Spinal Cord Injury: Classification and Principles of Management.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Thoracic and lumbar fracture dislocations (TLFD) are high-velocity injuries and frequently result in gross neurological deficit. Very rarely, such patients present with intact neurology. Pathomechanics of injury, radiological assessment, surgical techniques, and principles of fixation in such challenging situations have not been described previously. METHODS: Retrospective review of 36 patients of TLFD without cord injury was performed for demographics, clinical and radiological data, and management. The injuries were classified based on the direction of translation into 4 types: coronal translation (type 1), sagittal translation (type 2), combined translation-antero (type 3a), and combined translation-retro (type 3b). The injuries were managed by meticulous unilateral exposure and temporary fixation, decompression, gradual reduction of dislocation, and long segment fixation. RESULTS: In 36 patients, the injuries were classified as type 1 (n = 9), type 2 (n = 10), type 3a (n = 14), and type 3b (n = 3). Imaging/intraoperative observation showed varying degrees of disintegrity of disc, facet joints, and posterior ligamentous complex in the 4 different injury types. Patients with the different injury types also needed individualistic surgical approaches to aid safe reduction of dislocation. Neurological assessment was performed using American Spinal Injury Association score (ASIA), and 16 patients had minimal neurological deficits (ASIA-D) and all were type 3 injury. The mean anteroposterior and lateral translation were corrected from 8.3 ± 3.4 to 1.7 ± 1.3 mm, and 4.7 ± 4.8 to 0.7 ± 0.8 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the largest case series of TLFD without cord injury. Knowledge of the different injury types and principles of safe surgical reduction of the dislocation are important for the treating surgeon to ensure successful outcomes.

Does preventive care bundle have an impact on surgical site infections following spine surgery? An analysis of 9607 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to analyze the effect of care bundle protocol on SSI in our institution. Postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) pose significant health burden. In spite of the use of prophylactic antibiotics, surgical advances and postoperative care, wound infection continues to affect patient outcomes after spine surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 9607 consecutive patients who underwent spine procedures from 2014 to 2018 was performed. Preventive care bundle was implemented from January 2017 consisting of (a) preoperative bundle-glycemic control, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bath, (b) intra-operative bundle-time specified antibiotic prophylaxis, CHG+ alcohol-based skin preparation (c) postoperative bundle-five moments of hand hygiene, early mobilization and bundle auditing. Patients operated from January 2017 were included in the post-implementation cohort and prior to that the pre-implementation cohort was formed. Data were drawn from weekly and yearly spine audits from the hospital infection committee software. Infection data were collected based on CDC criteria, further sub classification was done based on procedure, spinal disorders and spine level. Variables were analyzed and level of significance was set as < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 7333 patients met the criteria. The overall SSI rate decreased from 3.42% (131/3829) in pre-implementation cohort to 1.22% (43/3504, p = 0.0001) in post-implementation cohort (RR = 2.73, OR = 2.79). Statistically significant reduction was seen in all the groups (a) superficial and deep, (b) early and late and (c) instrumented and uninstrumented groups but was more pronounced in early (p = 0.0001), superficial (p = 0.0001) and instrumented groups (p = 0.0001). On subgroup analysis based on spine level and spinal disorders, significant reduction was seen in lumbar (p = 0.0001) and degenerative group (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed significant reduction of SSI secondary to strict bundle adherence and monitored compliance compared to patients who did not receive these interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Lumbar artery pseudoaneurysm: a rare case of delayed onset incomplete cauda equina syndrome following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Cauda equina syndrome following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is very rare, and the causes implicated include inadequate decompression, retained disc fragments, epidural haematoma, gel foams, fat pad grafts, retained sponges, intradural masses and ischaemia of conus. This is a rare case report of pseudoaneurysm of dorsal branch of lumbar artery presenting with delayed onset incomplete cauda equina syndrome following TLIF. OBJECTIVE: To describe the very rare case of lumbar artery pseudoaneurysm causing delayed onset incomplete cauda equina syndrome following TLIF and its management with endovascular embolisation. METHOD: An 80-year-old female presented with incomplete cauda equina syndrome on 14th post-operative day following TLIF. On evaluation, computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed haematoma with heterogeneous signal intensity, which was pulsatile in ultrasonogram. Doppler and contrast-enhanced CT revealed pseudoaneurysm from posterior branch of left lumbar L4 artery, which was managed with endovascular embolisation. RESULT: After endovascular embolisation, the patient had immediate relief from radiating pain in left lower limb and regained full motor power and perianal sensation at the end of 3 weeks. Post-procedure ultrasonography done on the tenth day revealed complete resolution of the pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSION: This case presentation shows the necessity of diagnosing epidural haematomas due to vascular aneurysm in patients with post-operative radiculopathy and neurodeficit and the effectiveness of endovascular embolisation in treating such a threatening condition.

Predictors of Successful Outcomes of Selective Nerve Root Blocks for Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Selective nerve root block (SNRB) is an effective, standard interventional procedure for failed medical management in lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, the factors that would predict successful outcomes in patients undergoing SNRB have not been clearly studied. METHODS: Patients with failed conservative treatment for acute LDH, treated with SNRB were periodically followed till 1 year. Patients who failed to have pain relief or had recurrent pain after SNRB, underwent surgery. The pattern of radiculogram during SNRB was classified into 4 types-"arm," "arrow," "linear," and "splash." Various clinical factors, radiological factors, and radiculograms were compared between patients who had consistent pain relief (group A) and those patients who did not (group B). RESULTS: A total of 91 patients underwent SNRB. Sixty-nine had good pain relief maintained till 1 year (75.8% success). Twenty-two patients underwent surgery after failed NRB at a mean of 6.3 weeks. Patients with sensory symptoms (P = .01), higher mean preinjection Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (P = .02), higher mean postinjection ODI score at 3 weeks (P = .004), nonmanual job (P = .01), lumbosacral transitional segment (P = .00 005), and splash pattern of radiculogram (P = .005) were predictive of failed NRB. Logistic regression analysis showed that lumbosacral transitional segment at the level of LDH is the most significant factor predicting poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: SNRB is an effective technique to provide consistent symptom relief at least till 1 year in patients with acute LDH. The study identified several factors that predicted poor outcomes of SNRB and such patients can be forewarned about need for later surgery.

Diagnostic accuracy of whole spine magnetic resonance imaging in spinal tuberculosis validated through tissue studies.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis (TB) is based on a combination of clinical features, laboratory tests and imaging studies, since none of these individual diagnostic features are confirmatory. Despite the high sensitivity of MRI findings in evaluating spinal infections, its efficacy in diagnosing spinal TB is less emphasized and remains unvalidated through tissue studies. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed consecutive patients evaluated for spondylodiscitis with documented clinical findings, MRI spine, and tissue analysis for histopathology, TB culture and genetic TB PCR. MRI features documented include location, contiguous/non-contiguous skip lesions, para/intraosseous abscess, subligamentous spread, vertebral collapse, abscess size/wall, disc involvement, end plate erosion and epidural abscess. Based on the results, patients were divided into two groups-CONFIRMED TB with positive culture/histopathology and NON-TB. The efficacy of MRI findings in accurately diagnosing spinal TB was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 150 patients, 79 patients were TB positive, and 71 were TB negative. Three MRI parameters showed significant differences (p < 0.001), namely subligamentous spread (67/79, 84.8%), vertebral collapse > 50% (55/79, 69.6%) and large abscess collection with thin abscess wall (72/79, 91.1%) being strongly predictive of TB. Combination of MRI findings had a higher predictive value. 97.5% of TB positive patients had at least one of these three MRI features, 89.8% patients had any two and 58.2% had all three. CONCLUSION: Our study validated different MRI findings with tissue studies and showed spinal infections with large abscess with thin wall, subligamentous spread of abscess and vertebral collapse were highly suggestive of spinal tuberculosis. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.