Comparison of prognostic outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical treatment for early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The optimal management strategy for early gastric cancer (EGC) a topic of contention. This study aims to compare the prognostic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical treatment in patients diagnosed with EGC. METHODS: In thisretrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from539 patients diagnosed with EGC between January 2012 and December 2020 from two centers. We compared Clinicopathological features, procedure-related complications, recurrence rate, overall survival, and disease specific survival between the 262 patients who underwent ESD and the 277 patients who underwent surgical treatment. ESD procedures were conducted using a dual knife by experienced endoscopists, while surgical treatments included laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. Regular ollow-up examinations were conducted post-treatment. RESULTS: The two groups exhibited comparable baseline characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified vascular invasion as a risk factor for worse recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with early gastric cancer. The ESD group experienced fewer overall postoperative complications compared to the surgical treatment group. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated no significant differences in recurrence rate or overall survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both ESD and surgical treatment emerged as safe and effective approaches for managing EGC. The choice of treatment should be tailored to individual patient factors. ESD can be considered an alternative treatment option for selected patients who are not suitable candidates for surgery. Further studies are warranted to determine the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgical treatment for EGC.

The influence of pretreatment with PPI on Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In this meta-analysis, we aimed to comprehensively investigate the impact of pretreatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and provide novel inspiration to clinical practice. METHODS: Relevant studies were selected through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2021. Two reviewers performed the selection independently. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was the eradication rate. A modified Jadad scale was used to evaluate literature quality quantitatively. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in this research. The results showed no significant difference between PPI pretreatment and standard treatment on eradication of H. pylori [relative risk (RR): 1.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.0.73-1.88]. There was no significant difference between the PPI pretreatment group and the standard therapy group for conventional triple therapy, PPI and amoxicillin and clarithromycin (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.60-2.77). Similar results were obtained in the therapy strategy of PPI and amoxicillin and metronidazole (RR: 3.01, 95% CI: 0.62-14.74). Interestingly, for the therapy regimen of PPI and clarithromycin and metronidazole, PPI pretreatment indicated superiority on H. pylori eradication rate (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.23-0.97, P < .05). CONCLUSION: PPI pretreatment did not affect the H. pylori eradication rates, regardless of the various types of bacteriostatic antibiotic, except the therapy regimen of PPI and clarithromycin and metronidazole.