Effects of and prognostic factors affecting endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical outcome and factors affecting the prognosis of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion were treated with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, and the recanalization rate, clinical outcomes at three months, modified DWI-PC-ASPECTS, and MRA-BATMAN scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Following acute mechanical thrombectomy, the TICI 2B-3 score was achieved in all patients (100%). At three-month evaluation, 56 (67.5%) patients had good prognosis with the mRS score of 0-2, including 13 (23.2%) patients who had arterial occlusion caused by emboli and 43 (76.8%) who had atherosclerotic stenosis. In analyzing factors affecting the prognosis, a significant difference (P < 0.05) existed between patients with good (mRS 0-2) and poor (mRS 3-6) prognosis in the NIHSS (17.3 vs. 31.2, P = 0.000001), modified DWI-PC-ASPECTS (10.4 vs. 7.8, P = 0.021), and MRA-BATMAN (6.3 vs. 4.6, P = 0.003) scores. Univariate Logistic regression analysis demonstrated NIHS score ≥ 21, modified DWI-PC-ASPECTS score ≤ 8.5, and MRA-BATMAN score ≤ 6.5 to be the risk factors for poor prognosis. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed NIHSS score ≥ 21 as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is safe and effective in recanalizing occluded vertebrobasilar artery occlusion, and NIHS score ≥ 21, modified DWI-PC-ASPECTS score ≤ 8.5, and MRA-BATMAN score ≤ 6.5 are the risk factors for poor prognosis.

Comparison of the Effects of TIPS versus BRTO on Bleeding Gastric Varices: A Meta-Analysis.

Background and Aim. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a threat to patients with gastric varices (GVs). Previous studies have concluded that both transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) are effective treatments for patients with GV. We aimed to compare the efficiency and outcomes of these two procedures in GV patients through meta-analysis. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords: GV, bleeding, TIPS, and BRTO to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The overall survival (OS) rate, imminent haemostasis rate, rebleeding rate, technical success rate, procedure complication rate (hepatic encephalopathy and aggravated ascites), and Child-Pugh score were evaluated. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TIPS and BRTO for GV due to portal hypertension were included in our meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed the study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% CIs using random effects models. Results: A total of nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference between TIPS and BRTO in the OS rate (RR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.98); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90). Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, BRTO brought more benefits to patients, with a higher OS rate and lower rebleeding rate. BRTO is a feasible method for GVB.