Clinical Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Stage 1 Glottic Carcinoma: Comparing Accelerated Hyperfractionation and Once-daily Fractionation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Accelerated hyperfractionation (AHF) is used in head and neck cancer to improve the local control (LC) rate, but reports of outcomes for early-stage GC are limited. The outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) for stage 1 glottic carcinoma (GC) were retrospectively analyzed, comparing AHF and once-daily fractionation (ODF) using 2.0-2.4 Gy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients with stage 1 GC underwent RT alone between 2007 and 2021, with 43 in the AHF group and 59 in the ODF group. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. RESULTS: The 5-year LC rate was 98% in the AHF group and 91% in the ODF group (p=0.19). During RT, significantly more patients in the AHF group required opioids due to mucositis than in the ODF group (74% vs. 25%, p<0.001), and the rate of aspiration pneumonia tended to be higher in the AHF group than in the ODF group (7% vs. 0%, p=0.072). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the LC rate between AHF and ODF for stage 1 GC. Moreover, the AHF group required opioids at a higher rate and tended to have a higher risk of developing aspiration pneumonia.

[Accelerated fractionation].

Accelerated repopulation is a reason for loco-regional failure after radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. Accelerated fractionation(AF) is a radiotherapy regimen reducing the total treatment time, with the aim of counteracting tumor cell repopulation. AF administers the same or a similar total dose as conventional treatment in a reduced overall time by giving conventionally-sized or smaller fractions more than once daily. Several different clinical trials on AF have proved to be of benefit in loco-regional control, although no benefit in survival was generally detected. The metaanalysis of altered fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer has showed a benefit with AF with conventional fractionation(CF). However, the magnitude of the survival benefit is lower with AF than with hyperfractionation (HF). In particular, AF using reduced total doses or a split course does not improve treatment benefits. AF that employs continuous RT schedules, without compromising the total dose, improves local control. More data on this AF regimen are needed. Acute morbidity is significantly more frequent with AF. Whether late toxicity is also worse with AF is unclear. Some trials suggest no increase in late toxicity, while others suggest the opposite. The effect of AF seems to be greater for the primary tumor than for the metastatic lymph-nodes. Also, the reduction of the treatment time is more beneficial in well- to moderately-differentiated tumors.

Multiple gastric carcinoids associated with parietal cell hyperplasia: intraoperative detection with a radiolabeled somatostatin analog.

We describe a 30-year-old man in whom upper endoscopy revealed multiple gastric carcinoids. The peripheral blood gastrin level was 2400 ng/ml (normal range, <200 ng/ml). Mucosal biopsy of the gastric body and fundus showed no atrophy; typical type A chronic atrophic gastritis was thus unlikely. Neither abdominal computed tomography nor selective angiography showed any evidence of tumor in the pancreas or at its periphery. However, the possibility of microgastrinoma could not be ruled out. We performed radioguided surgery with a somatostatin analog, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-D-Phe1-octreotide labeled with (111)In (Octreo Scan). The location of the carcinoids was confirmed. Gastrinoma was ruled out. Total gastrectomy was performed, and the gastrin level decreased to the normal range. Macroscopically, 20 carcinoid tumors, measuring 30 mm in maximum diameter, were confirmed. Microscopic examination showed large numbers of endocrine cell micronests. Hyperplasia of parietal cells was observed, suggesting early-stage type A chronic atrophic gastritis. The antrum contained increased numbers of gastrin-positive cells, which probably caused the preoperative hypergastrinemia.

Clinical investigation: Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of quality of life radiation therapy instrument (QOL-RTI) for Japanese patients with head and neck malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Japanese translation of Quality of Life Radiation Therapy Instrument (QOL-RTI) and the head and neck module (H&N) for Japanese patients being treated with radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies. MATERIALS & METHODS: The QOL-RTI/H&N was translated into Japanese by a preliminary QOL research working group of JASTRO and was used in this clinical trial. From 1998 to 2001, 70 patients with head and neck malignancies for whom radical radiotherapy was planned were entered into this study. Patients were requested to answer the questions before radiotherapy at baseline, twice during week 4 of therapy (for test-retest reliability), at the end of treatment, and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years from the beginning of radiotherapy. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was assessed by comparing the results with EORTC-QLQ-C30 and with QOL questionnaire for cancer patients treated with anticancer drugs (QOL-ADC). Patient compliance and test sensitivity were also analyzed. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79 to 0.93 depending on the time point for the evaluation. Test-retest reliability was acceptable, with a Pearson coefficient of 0.83 for QOL-RTI and 0.92 for H&N module. Compliance with this scheme was 98.2%. The QOL-RTI was sensitive enough to detect significant changes in the QOL score during and after the course of radiotherapy. Agreement with the EORTC-C30 was good with a high Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.648 and that with QOL-ADC was also good with a coefficient of 0.566. The factors analyzed consisted of 11 functional/health-oriented questions, 5 emotional/ psychological, 5 socio-economic/ family and 2 general. CONCLUSION: The Japanese version of QOL-RTI with H&N module was found to be reliable and sensitive enough to evaluate variation of QOL in patients with head and neck malignancies during and after radiotherapy.