An examination of antibiotic administration in septorhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Septoplasty and rhinoplasty are common otolaryngological procedures, often combined as septorhinoplasty (SRP), offering aesthetic and functional benefits. These surgeries are believed to potentially risk postoperative infections due to natural bacterial flora in the nares. This study evaluates the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing post-surgical infection complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, focusing on antibiotic use in septoplasty, rhinoplasty, and SRP. The study included randomized control trials, single/double-blind studies, retrospective chart reviews, and prospective cohort studies, excluding pediatric, non-human research, or studies with inaccessible data. Postoperative infection rates were analyzed utilizing R software as a form of Statistic. RESULTS: From 697 articles, 15 studies were chosen for meta-analysis, involving 2225 patients, with 1274 receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 951 as controls. The meta-analysis indicated an odds ratio of 0.65 (95 % CI: [0.23, 1.89]), showing no significant protective effect of prophylactic antibiotics. DISCUSSION: The study found no significant infection rate reduction with prophylactic antibiotic use. Notable were inconsistencies in study designs, antibiotic administration timing, and varied surgical practices. Antibiotic use risks were considered. Study limitations include potential biases and the retrospective nature of many studies. CONCLUSIONS: This review and meta-analysis found no substantial evidence supporting prophylactic antibiotics' effectiveness in reducing postoperative infection rates in septoplasty, rhinoplasty, and SRP, indicating a need to reevaluate practices and develop evidence-based guidelines. Future research should focus on comprehensive, randomized control studies, covering both preoperative and postoperative stages.

From Risk Assessment to Intervention: A Systematic Review of Thrombosis in Plastic Surgery.

Thromboembolism is a feared complication in plastic surgery and is linked to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite extensive research, there is a lack of consistency between recommendations and clinical protocols to be implemented pre and post-surgery to reduce the incidence of thromboembolism. A systematic literature review was conducted using Pubmed and Scopus databases to determine the risk factors, screening methods, and existing treatment models for thromboembolism prevention. Articles in non-English languages were excluded. Analysis indicated that predominant risk factors include age (>35), elevated body mass index, coagulation disorders, smoking, estrogen therapies, genetic predisposition, vascular endothelium damage, stasis, and use of general anesthesia in patients with a history of cancer. Implementation of a proper prophylactic protocol is dependent on understanding the interplay between the aforementioned risk factors and the utilization of well-defined, evidence-based guidelines, such as the 2005 Caprini Risk Assessment Model and ultrasound surveillance. The literature review revealed that mechanical prophylaxis is the primary prevention method, followed by thromboprophylaxis for patients with higher Caprini scores. Plastic surgeons often underestimate the present risk stratification tools available for the prophylactic intervention of thromboembolism due to the fear of bleeding or hematoma complications postoperatively. In summary, this literature review emphasizes the importance of plastic surgeons selecting protocols that is inclusive of the patient's risk profile to yield a reduced risk of thromboembolism.

Elective Hand Surgery in Patients With History of Axillary Node Dissection: Risks and Patient Education.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients with a prior history of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) secondary to breast cancer surgery and other procedures are at an increased risk of postoperative complications including lymphedema and infection following elective upper extremity surgery. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the extent of patient education regarding lymphedema as a possible complication of upper extremity surgery. METHODS: A review of 312 patients presenting to the clinic with upper extremity pathologies was performed of which 15 patients had a history of surgeries secondary to breast cancer and 297 had no prior history of breast cancer. Nine out of 15 patients with prior breast procedures and 66 out of 297 patients with no such history underwent elective hand surgeries, with 22 out of the 75 patients having a history of ALND. Incidences of postoperative complications including lymphedema and infection were recorded. Afterward, a survey inquiring about patient education was conducted to assess whether the patients were educated regarding lymphedema and if so, when and from whom they received the counseling. RESULTS: No patients with a prior history of ALND secondary to breast cancer or other surgeries developed a postoperative infection or onset of lymphedema, and no patients with preoperative lymphedema had any worsening of lymphedema or infection postoperatively. The survey conducted afterward revealed that 61% of the patients with a prior history of breast cancer-related procedures including lymph node dissection were never counseled regarding lymphedema as a possible complication of hand surgery. Furthermore, 75% of the survey participants wished they were given more information about possible causes and complications of, and ways to prevent or minimize the possibility of lymphedema developing postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Prior history of ALND did not make patients more susceptible to postoperative complications, thus a history of isolated ALND or breast cancer surgery including ALND should not preclude elective hand surgical procedures from being performed ipsilaterally. Additionally, improvements in the degree of patient counseling regarding postoperative complications following hand surgery are needed as increased patient education is shown to be associated with a lower rate of complications and faster recovery times.