Functional electrostimulation therapy for vastus medialis decreases the varus thrust during gait.

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate whether modification of vastus medialis activity can delay the varus thrust. [Participants and Methods] Ten participants (Kellgren-Laurence grades I: n=2, II: n=6, and III: n=2) diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were enrolled. The intervention involved free walking on a 10-m walkway at any speed after donning a functional electrical stimulation set to contract the vastus medialis before heel contact. Using a Vicon Nexus ground reaction force meter and a wireless electromyograph DELSYS, varus thrust, maximal knee extension angle, maximal knee adduction moment, and vastus medialis onset time were assessed both before and after intervention. [Results] A significant difference in varus thrust was detected from before to after the intervention (2.7 ± 1.1° vs. 2.2 ± 1.3°). Both the vastus medialis activation time (-0.06 ± 0.09 vs. -0.21 ± 0.1) and the knee-joint extension angle (8.7 ± 5.1° vs. 5.5 ± 5.9°) decreased following intervention, whereas the knee adduction moment significantly increased (0.50 ± 0.20° vs 0.56 ± 0.18°). [Conclusion] Wearing the functional electrical stimulation set caused the vastus medialis to act earlier in response to heel strike, thereby improving the knee-joint extension angle and suppressing varus thrust.

Effect of lateral wedge insole on medial meniscus extrusion and its association with knee osteoarthritis progression.

BACKGROUND: Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) is associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression because of increased loading stress in the medial compartment of the knee. Using a lateral wedge insole (LWI) decreases loading stress and immediately reduces MME. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the wearing duration of LWI affects the midterm response to MME and is associated with knee OA progression. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with knee OA who were conservatively treated with LWI were classified according to the duration of the LWI wear per day: less than 5 h (short-duration group) or over 5 h (long-duration group). MME was evaluated in the single-leg standing position by ultrasound. Knee OA progression and limb alignment were evaluated radiographically. These evaluations were performed thrice: at the initial office visit as a baseline without LWI (time 0), with LWI (LWI-time 0), and 1 year after intervention with LWI (LWI-1 year). RESULTS: In both groups, the MMEs at LWI time 0 were significantly decreased compared with those at time 0. In the long-duration group, this reduction in MME was maintained 1 year after the intervention compared with time 0 (time 0: 3.9 ± 0.9, LWI-1 year: 2.6 ± 1.1), but this improvement was not observed in the short-duration group (time 0: 3.8 ± 1.7, LWI-1 year: 3.6 ± 1.7). In addition, three of four patients demonstrated OA progression, and varus alignment had significantly progressed compared with that at time 0 in the short-duration group. However, the long-duration group showed OA progression only in one patient and maintained limb alignment. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of wearing LWI affects the midterm reduction of MME and knee OA progression while maintaining limb alignment.

Total knee arthroplasty for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis improves trunk movement during gait.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that the kinematics of the knee joint affect the trunk and pelvis during gait. However, the factors that influence trunk movement in knee osteoarthritis patients during gait after surgery remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on trunk movement during gait by comparing knee osteoarthritis patients with healthy controls. METHODS: Fourteen medial knee osteoarthritis patients who underwent initial unilateral TKA and 11 controls participated in this study. Knee and hip joint flexion and trunk and pelvic tilts during gait were acquired using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Knee joint range of motion, pain, and kinematic data were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively for knee osteoarthritis patients. RESULTS: Knee extension limitation and pain significantly improved postoperatively compared with preoperative stages. Preoperatively, the peak anterior trunk tilt during the stance phase was significantly larger in osteoarthritis patients than in controls. The peak anterior trunk tilt during the stance phase was significantly smaller postoperatively than at preoperative stages. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that after TKA, the trunk movements of knee osteoarthritis patients were approximately equal to those of controls, with improvement in clinical outcomes such as knee extension limitation and pain.

The Relationship between Knee Biomechanics and Clinical Assessments in ACl Deficient Patients.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between knee biomechanics and clinical assessments in ACL deficient patients. Subjects included 22 patients with unilateral ACL rupture and 22 healthy controls. Knee kinematics and kinetics during walking and running were examined using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system. The passive knee joint laxity, range of motion of knee joint, and knee muscle strength were also measured. Correlations between the knee kinematic and kinetic data and clinical assessments were evaluated. In the ACL deficient patients, there were no significant relationships between tibial translation during walking and running and passive knee joint laxity. The correlations between knee kinematics and kinetics and range of motion of knee joint were also not significant. Additionally, there were no significant correlations between knee kinematics during walking and knee muscle strength. However, there were several significant correlations between knee kinematics during running and knee muscle strength. The results demonstrate the importance of knee muscle strength for knee kinematics and kinetics during running in ACL deficient patients. Patients with stronger knee muscle strength may demonstrate more nearly normal knee joint movement during dynamic activities such as running.

Knee biomechanics during walking in recurrent lateral patellar dislocation are normalized by 1 year after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Gait kinematics and kinetics of the knee before and after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in patients with recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (RPD) are unknown. The purpose of this study was to measure knee kinematics and kinetics during gait before and 1 year after anatomical MPFL reconstruction in patients with RPD and compare the results to healthy individuals. METHODS: Eleven RPD patients were treated using an anatomical MPFL reconstruction procedure. Gait analysis was conducted before and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. For comparison, 15 healthy volunteers with no history of orthopaedic problems in their lower limbs were included as the control group. Knee kinematics and kinetics were analysed during gait. RESULTS: Before surgery, the internal knee extension moment in RPD patients was significantly lower than in controls (P = 0.025). At 3 months post-operatively, there was an additional decrease in knee extension moment compared to before surgery, and so it was still significantly lower than in the control group (P < 0.01). One year post-operatively, knee extension moment in the RPD group was significantly increased compared to 3 months post-operatively (P < 0.01). The knee flexion angle in the early stance phase in the RPD group at 3 months post-operatively was significantly lower than that of controls (P < 0.01). Knee kinematics and kinetics were similar to that of controls 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION: Initially, RPD patients had lower knee extension moments during gait compared with controls, but by 1 year after MPFL reconstruction, knee kinematics and kinetics of gait in the RPD patients had returned to normal. These observations indicate that MPFL reconstruction may help to delay prospective knee OA as long as possible by restoring the conformation of the patellofemoral joint and gait biomechanics by surgery.

Courses of change in knee adduction moment and lateral thrust differ up to 1 year after TKA.

PURPOSE: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), dynamic knee loading may loosen the artificial joint and bone or cause polyethylene wear after prolonged use. TKA decreases knee adduction moment at 6 months, but this effect is lost by 1 year post-operatively. However, lateral thrust after TKA has not been clarified. We hypothesized that like knee adduction moment, lateral thrust would return to baseline levels by 1 year post-operatively. METHODS: Participants were 15 patients who underwent TKA for medial knee OA. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, numeric rating scale, and gait analysis (measurement of peak knee adduction moment, knee varus angle at peak knee adduction moment, lateral thrust, and gait speed) were performed preoperatively (baseline) and 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year post-operatively. RESULTS: JOA score improved from 55 ± 9.8 to 78 ± 12.1 at 1 year post-operatively, and pain decreased significantly from baseline at each follow-up (p < 0.001). Significant increases in gait speed were observed at 6 months and 1 year (p < 0.001). Peak knee adduction moment during stance phase was significantly lower at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months compared to baseline (p < 0.05), but no significant changes were seen at 1 year. Knee varus at peak knee adduction moment did not differ significantly between any measurement points, while lateral thrust was decreased at 6 months and 1 year compared to baseline (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Temporal courses of changes up to 1 year after TKA differed between knee adduction moment and lateral thrust, so our hypothesis was rejected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Effect of post-trochanteric groove support on stance control associated with the pelvic-lumbar system: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Many stroke and neuromuscular patients with paraplegia or severe hemiparesis cannot control trunk balance. OBJECTIVE: To support the pelvis/hip of paresis patients, a new pelvic/hip support system was developed bearing a convex pressing member placed over the post-trochanteric groove, a cutaneous landmark sited on the lateral portion of the gluteus maximus muscle and indicating the posterior aspect of the greater trochanter. STUDY DESIGN: Preliminary study. METHODS: Stance control differences in two paretic patients (Guillain-Barré syndrome and stroke sequelae) with or without post-trochanteric groove support were examined. The contact pressure on the post-trochanteric groove was examined in eight healthy volunteers using an impact force sensor. The pelvic-lumbar movement was also examined using three-dimensional motion analysis, and the gluteus muscles activity was evaluated using surface electromyography. RESULTS: Without post-trochanteric groove support, total three-dimensional displacement of the sacral marker was longer in the paresis patients than in normal controls, while post-trochanteric groove support decreased this distance. Post-trochanteric groove support provided compression pressure on the post-trochanteric groove, and all subjects showed a more upright trunk position, providing more anterior pelvic tilting. Six of eight subjects showed increased lumbar lordosis. Five of eight subjects showed gluteus maximus and/or gluteus medius muscle activation. CONCLUSION: The mechanisms of post-trochanteric groove support were suggested to be spino-pelvic coordination and gluteal muscle activation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The post-trochanteric groove is a cutaneous landmark located behind the pelvis/hip joint. Applying pressure to the post-trochanteric groove from behind pushes the trunk to adopt a more upright position, leading to improved stance control. Underlining mechanisms appear to be spino-pelvic coordination and gluteal muscle activation.

Posterior tibial displacement in the PCL-deficient knee is reduced compared to the normal knee during gait.

PURPOSE: Most individuals with an isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury do not complain of disability even if posterior instability is objectively revealed by a static physical examination, such as the posterior drawer test. This suggests it is insufficient to only evaluate posterior instability under static conditions. Therefore, we have investigated the effect of isolated PCL injury on the detailed kinematics of the knee in a dynamic environment such as during gait. METHODS: Eight unilateral PCL-deficient males and eight healthy control volunteers participated in this study. Isolated PCL injury was diagnosed by clinical examination. Stress X-ray imaging showed an average side-to-side difference of 12.7 ± 3.5 mm. Knee kinematics including anteroposterior tibial displacement were analysed during walking using the point cluster technique. RESULTS: Posterior tibial displacement from initial contact was significantly smaller during 9-22 % of the gait cycle by an average of 0.4 cm in the PCL group, compared to controls. In the PCL-deficient knee, the external rotational angle increased by an average of 3.3° at the loading response during 3-11 % of the gait cycle and the varus angle from initial contact increased by an average of 2.0° during 28-52 % of the gait cycle, compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic changes in the rotation and posterior translation patterns were seen after isolated PCL injury, suggesting the kinematics of PCL-deficient knees might be different to normal knees. These factors may contribute to long-term osteoarthritic change. Consequently, when choosing conservative treatment for PCL injury, these changes should be considered to prevent osteoarthritic change. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Differences between opening versus closing high tibial osteotomy on clinical outcomes and gait analysis.

BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) is mainly performed via two procedures: closing wedge HTO (CW) and opening wedge HTO (OW). In this study, differences between these procedures were assessed by serial clinical evaluation and gait analysis before and after surgery. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent HTO for medial knee OA in 2011 and 2012, with 12 patients undergoing CW and nine undergoing OW. The severity of OA was classified according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score for assessment of knee OA (JOA score), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the femoral tibial angle (FTA) on X-ray were evaluated. For gait analysis, gait speed, varus moment, varus angle and lateral thrust were calculated. RESULTS: The JOA score and NRS were improved significantly one year postoperatively in both groups. The FTA was maintained in both groups at one year. Varus angle and varus moment were significantly improved in both groups at each postoperative follow-up, when compared preoperatively. Lateral thrust was significantly improved at three months postoperatively in both groups. However, the significant improvement in lateral thrust had disappeared in the CW group six months postoperatively, whereas it was maintained for at least one year in the OW group. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that clinical outcomes were well maintained after HTO. OW reduced knee varus moment and lateral thrust, whereas CW had little effect on reducing lateral thrust. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Effects of unloading bracing on knee and hip joints for patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis affects the whole body, thus biomechanical effects on other joints should be considered. Unloading knee braces could be effective for knee osteoarthritis, but their effects on the contralateral knee and bilateral hip joints remain unknown. This study investigated the effects of bracing on the kinematics and kinetics of involved and contralateral joints during gait. METHODS: Nineteen patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were analysed. Kinematics and kinetics of the knee and hip joints in frontal and sagittal planes were measured during walking without and with bracing on the more symptomatic knee. FINDINGS: The ipsilateral hip in the braced condition showed a lower adduction angle by an average of 2.58° (range, 1.05°-4.16°) during 1%-49% of the stance phase, and a lower abduction moment at the second peak during the stance phase than the hip in the unbraced condition (P<0.05 and P<0.005, respectively). With bracing, the contralateral hip showed a more marked peak extension moment and lower abduction moment at the first peak (P<0.05), and the contralateral knee adduction angle increased by an average of 0.32° (range, 0.21°-0.45°) during 46%-55% of the stance phase (P<0.05), compared to no bracing. INTERPRETATION: Unloading bracing modified the contralateral knee adduction angle pattern at a specific time point during gait. It also affected the frontal plane on the ipsilateral hip and the frontal and sagittal planes on the contralateral hip joint. Consideration should be provided to other joints when treating knee osteoarthritis.