Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Scoliosis: A Mid-Term Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the factors related to progression of scoliosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using longitudinal cohort data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thirty percent of patients with RA have lumbar scoliosis. However, the effectiveness of current treatment methods in preventing the progression of scoliosis is not well-understood due to a lack of longitudinal studies. METHODS: We enrolled 180 patients with RA who were followed up for over two years, all of whom underwent standing spinal X-rays. These patients were categorized based on their disease activity score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) into two groups: those in remission (n=76) and those in non-remission (n=104). We evaluated various radiographic measures, including C7 center sacral vertical line (C7-CSVL), pelvic obliquity, major Cobb angle, and curve location. RESULTS: Fifty-three (29.4%) patients presented progression of scoliosis during a mean follow-up period of 4.8 years. Patients in the non-remission showed larger Cobb angle at baseline and final follow-up, compared to those in remission. The annual progression rate of the curve was also greater in the non-remission group (1.04 degree /year), than in the remission group (0.59 degree /year, P=0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of new vertebral fractures. The presence of a baseline cobb angle of 10 degree or more (OR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.38-7.13; P=0.006), glucocorticoid use (OR: 2.88; 95% CI: 1.18-7.06; P=0.021), and non-remission at baseline (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.25-6.41; P=0.012) were significant risk factors for progression of scoliosis. CONCLUSION: RA disease activity is linked to progression of scoliosis in patients with RA. Patients with RA who present with an initial scoliosis of 10 degrees or greater, require glucocorticoids for treatment and are in non-remission at baseline may be at high risk for scoliosis progression.

Prognostic Factors after Surgical Treatment for Spinal Metastases.

Study Design: A retrospective multicenter case series was conducted. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate survival and prognostic factors after surgery for a metastatic spinal tumor. Overview of Literature: Prognostic factors after spinal metastasis surgery remain controversial. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted. The study participants included 345 patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases from 2010 to 2020 at nine referral spine centers in Japan. Data for each patient were extracted from medical records. To identify the factors predicting survival prognosis after surgery, univariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The mean age was 65.9 years. Common primary tumors were lung (n=72), prostate (n=61), and breast (n=39), and 67.8% (n=234) presented with osteolytic lesions. The epidural spinal cord compression scale score 2 or 3 was recognized in 79.0% (n=271). Frankel grade A paralysis accounted for 1.4% (n=5), and 73.3% (n=253) were categorized as intermediate or high risk according to the new Katagiri score. The overall survival rates were -71.0% at 6 months, 57.4% at 12, and 43.3% at 24. In the univariate analysis, Frankel grade A (hazard ratio [HR], 3.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-10.50; p<0.05), intermediate risk (HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.10-5.32; p<0.01), and high risk (HR, 7.77; 95% CI, 4.72-12.8; p<0.01) in the new Katagiri score were significantly associated with poor survival. On the contrary, postoperative chemotherapy (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.36; p<0.01), radiation therapy (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.70; p<0.01), and both adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.32; p<0.01) were suggested to improve survival. Conclusions: Surgical indications for patients with Frankel grade A or intermediate or high risk in the new Katagiri score should be carefully considered because of poor survival. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy should be considered after surgery for better survival.

Low Hounsfield unit values on computed tomography as a potential predictor of vertebral fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: The KURAMA cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Hounsfield units (HU) measured using computed tomography (CT) have gained considerable attention for the detection of osteoporosis. This study aimed to investigate whether opportunistic CT could predict vertebral fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A total of 233 patients with RA who underwent chest CT were included in this study. The HU values of the anterior 1/3 of the vertebral bodies based on the sagittal plane at T11-L2 after reconstruction were measured. The incidence of vertebral fractures was investigated with respect to the HU value. RESULTS: Vertebral fractures were identified in 32 patients during a mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. In patients who experienced vertebral fractures within 2 years of CT imaging, the HU values of the vertebral bodies (T11-L2) were lower than those in patients who did not experience fractures. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified that a T11 HU value of <125 was a risk factor for vertebral fracture within 2 years. Multivariate analysis showed that a T11 HU value of <125 and the existence of prevalent vertebral fractures were significant risk factors for fracture. CONCLUSION: HU measurements of the anterior 1/3 of the vertebral body are a potential predictor for vertebral fractures in patients with RA.

Sagittal Section Hounsfield Units of the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Vertebral Fractures Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine an accurate and convenient screening method for predicting proximal junctional fractures (PJFr) following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) using computed tomography (CT)-based measurement of Hounsfield units (HUs). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: CT-based measurement of HUs is an alternative tool for assessing bone mineral density. However, the optimal method for predicting adjacent vertebral fractures following spinal fusion using HUs remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 42 patients who underwent reconstructive surgery for ASD. Elliptical regions of interest (ROIs) on the axial section and rectangular ROIs on the sagittal section were placed at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), UIV+1, and UIV+2. In addition, the HU value of the L2 vertebra was used as the representative. RESULTS: PJFr occurred in 28.6% of patients within 2 years following surgery. The HU values obtained from the axial sections of L2, UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 were not significantly associated with the incidence of PJFr within 2 years, except for the ROI set in the lower region of the L2 vertebra. However, the HU value of the anterior third of the UIV in the sagittal section was significantly lower in the PJFr group than in the nonPJFr group (87.0 vs. 160.3, p =0.001). A UIV HU value of <100 was associated with a higher incidence of PJFr than an HU vaue of >100 (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of HU in the anterior one-third of the UIV in the sagittal section demonstrated predictive ability for PJFr following ASD surgery. A UIV HU value of <100 emerged as a risk factor for PJFr.

Effect of high disease activity on spinal sagittal malalignment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Atlantoaxial subluxation is a well-known serious complication encountered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is unknown whether RA affects global spinal alignment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high disease activity in patients with RA exacerbates spinal sagittal malalignment. METHODS: The authors included 197 patients with RA who were followed up for > 2 years; standing spinal radiographs were obtained in all patients. Patients were divided into persistent moderate disease activity/high disease activity (pMDA/HDA; n = 64) and non-pMDA/HDA (n = 133) groups based on the disease activity at follow-up visits. Radiographic parameters assessed included pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). RESULTS: Over an average 5-year follow-up, increases in SVA, PT, and TK and a decrease in LL were observed. The pMDA/HDA group had a larger increase in PT and a higher incidence of vertebral fractures than the non-pMDA/HDA group. After adjusting variables using propensity score matching, the authors still found a higher rate of increase in PT (0.79°/year vs 0.01°/year, p = 0.001) in the pMDA/HDA group than in the non-pMDA/HDA group. This trend remained consistent even when patients who developed vertebral fractures were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal sagittal alignment deteriorates over time in patients with RA. High disease activity in RA exacerbates spinal deformity.

Pressure Dynamics on Intervertebral Disc Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cadaver Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the change in pressure on the cage during compression manipulation in lumbar interbody fusion. While the procedure involves applying compression between pedicle screws to press the cage against the endplate, the exact compression force remains elusive. We hypothesize that an intact facet joint might serve as a fulcrum, potentially reducing cage pressure. METHODS: Pressure on the intervertebral disc cage was measured during compression manipulation in 4 donor cadavers undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. Unilateral facetectomy models with both normal and parallel compression and bilateral facetectomy models were included. A transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with a built-in load cell measured the compression force. RESULTS: Pressure data from 14 discs indicated a consistent precompression pressure average of 68.16 N. Following compression, pressures increased to 125.99 N and 140.84 N for normal and parallel compression postunilateral facetectomy, respectively, and to 154.58 N and 150.46 N for bilateral models. A strong linear correlation (correlation coefficient: 0.967, P < 0.0001) between precompression and postcompression pressures emphasized the necessity of sufficient precompression pressure for achieving desired postcompression outcomes. None of the data showed a decrease in compression force to the cage with the compression maneuver. CONCLUSIONS: Both normal and parallel compression maneuvers effectively increased the pressure on the cage, irrespective of the facet joint resection status. Compression manipulation consistently enhanced compressive force on the cage. However, when baseline pressure is low, the manipulation might not yield significant increases in compression force. This underlines the essential role of meticulous precompression preparation in enhancing surgical outcomes.

Strontium-loaded 3D intramedullary nail titanium implant for critical-sized femoral defect in rabbits.

The treatment of critical-sized bone defects has long been a major problem for surgeons. In this study, an intramedullary nail shaped three-dimensional (3D)-printed porous titanium implant that is capable of releasing strontium ions was developed through a simple and cost-effective surface modification technique. The feasibility of this implant as a stand-alone solution was evaluated using a rabbit's segmental diaphyseal as a defect model. The strontium-loaded implant exhibited a favorable environment for cell adhesion, and mechanical properties that were commensurate with those of a rabbit's cortical bone. Radiographic, biomechanical, and histological analyses revealed a significantly higher amount of bone ingrowth and superior bone-bonding strength in the strontium-loaded implant when compared to an untreated porous titanium implant. Furthermore, one-year histological observations revealed that the strontium-loaded implant preserved the native-like diaphyseal bone structure without failure. These findings suggest that strontium-releasing 3D-printed titanium implants have the clinical potential to induce the early and efficient repair of critical-sized, load-bearing bone defects.

Bone ingrowth into a porous structure is achieved by preceding fibrogenesis and vascularization.

Porous structures are frequently used in surgical implants to strengthen the interlocking power produced by bone ingrowth. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism underlying bone ingrowth into a porous structure accompanied by vascularization. A nonbioactive polyetheretherketone implant with a 3D-printed porous structure was prepared and implanted in a bone hole created in the tibias of rabbits. We observed bone ingrowth in the same individual specimens immediately and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation using in-vivo computed tomography (CT). Furthermore, a detailed evaluation with blood vessels of each specimen at 2, 4, and 12 weeks was performed with ex-vivo CT and histological specimen. Additional histological evaluation was performed using thin sections of an implant made with thermoplastic polyurethane having the same structure. As a result, the bone invasion began after four weeks, when the construction of fibrous tissue and the spread of new blood vessels within the voids matured. As the bone matured in the load-bearing area, new blood vessels outside the bone matrix regressed. This longitudinal evaluation study suggests that preceding fibrogenesis and vascularization may be key in developing bone ingrowth. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A porous structure is an essential structure for dental and orthopedic implants because it provides strong fixation through bone invasion. Although it was known that vascularization was involved in this, the details were not known. This in vivo study revealed that in order for bone ingrowth to begin, a preparatory period of approximately 4 weeks was required to establish blood flow inside and outside the implant. Furthermore, it was confirmed that by spreading the fibrous structure in advance, it has an advantageous effect on the migration of cells involved in the formation of bones and blood vessels. We pointed out that it is necessary to consider fibrogenesis and vascularization when creating future implants.

S2 Alar Screw Insertion Accuracy and Factors Associated With Screw Loosening and Lumbosacral Nonunion.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate S2 alar screw (S2AS) accuracy and factors associated with S2AS loosening and lumbosacral nonunion. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent lumbosacral fusion surgery with S2AS addition under fluoroscopy. S2AS loosening and lumbosacral nonunion were analyzed using a 1-year postoperative computed tomography. S2AS insertion accuracy was originally classified as accurate, short, anterior perforation, lateral perforation, and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) deviation among lateral perforation. Clinical data including sex, age, body mass index, fused segments, fusion procedure, primary or revision surgery, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores and complications were collected. Factors associated with S2AS loosening and lumbosacral nonunion were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (74 screws, age: 63.78 ± 13.57 years, female/male: 14/23 patients, body mass index: 23.11 ± 2.53, fused segments: 1-4 levels, revision: 38%) were included. S2AS loosening and lumbosacral nonunion were observed in 18 screws (13%) and 8 patients (22%) respectively. Only 35 screws (47%) were inserted accurately in our classification. Short, lateral perforation, and anterior perforation were observed in 14 screws (19%), 22 screws (30%), and 3 screws (4.1%). SIJ deviation was seen in 15 screws (20%) Factors associated with S2AS loosening were older age (P = 0.038), fusion levels (P = 0.011), and SIJ deviation (P < 0.001). S2AS loosening affects S1 pedicle screw (S1PS) loosening (P = 0.001). Furthermore, S2AS loosening is a risk factor for lumbosacral nonunion (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: S2AS insertion under fluoroscopy is inaccurate. S2AS loosening induces S1PS loosening and lumbosacral nonunion. Surgeons should avoid deviating to SIJ, especially in older patients and relatively longer fusion.

Investigating sagittal spinopelvic alignment and equivalent stress on the femoral head in patients with rapidly destructive coxarthrosis.

PURPOSE: Rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC) is a rare syndrome of unknown etiology. This study evaluated sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSPA) in patients with RDC and compared it with that in patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA). In addition, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to investigate the distribution of stress on the femoral head in RDC versus HOA. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty for RDC (n = 33) and HOA (n = 99; age- and sex-matched to patients with RDC) at three hospitals from June 2014 to September 2020. Preoperative SSPA parameters and inflammatory blood markers were compared between the two groups. FEA on the computed tomography data was performed for four patients from each group with similar pelvic tilt (PT) and lateral center-edge angle (LCEA). The distribution of Drucker-Prager equivalent stress was assessed at the loaded area of the femoral head. RESULTS: Patients with RDC had significantly higher PT, lower sacral slope, decreased lumbar lordosis (LL), higher sagittal vertical axis, and higher pelvic incidence minus LL than patients with HOA, indicating sagittal spinal imbalance. Blood test revealed patients with RDC had higher levels of inflammation markers than patients with HOA. FEA revealed no statistically significant difference in the degree of stress concentration or the maximum equivalent stress between the two groups when PT and LCEA were comparable. CONCLUSION: Patients with RDC tend to have sagittally imbalanced spine. Decreased acetabular coverage of the femoral head may heighten mechanical load of the hip joint in patients with RDC.

Are Dental Procedures Associated With Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis?

BACKGROUND: Dental procedures can lead to bacteremia and have been considered a potential risk factor for pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). However, data on the association between dental procedures and PVO are limited. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, are dental procedures associated with an increased risk of PVO? (2) Does antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures effectively decrease the risk of PVO? METHODS: A case-crossover study was conducted to investigate the association between dental procedures and PVO using a Japanese claims database. The advantage of this study design is that confounding factors that do not vary over time are automatically adjusted for, because cases act as their own controls. From April 2014 to September 2021, the database included 8414 patients who were hospitalized for PVO. Of these, 50% (4182 of 8414) were excluded because they had not undergone any dental procedures before the index date, a further 0.1% (10 of 8414) were excluded because they were younger than 18 years at the index date, and a further 7% (623 of 8414) were excluded because they did not have at least 20 weeks of continuous enrollment before the index date, leaving 43% (3599 of 8414) eligible for analysis here. The mean age was 77 ± 11 years, and 55% (1985 of 3599) were men. Sixty-five percent (2356 of 3599) of patients had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 42% (1519 of 3599) of patients had a diagnosis of osteoporosis. We compared the frequency of dental procedures between a 4-week hazard period before the admission date for PVO and two control periods, 9 to 12 weeks and 17 to 20 weeks before the admission date for PVO, within individuals. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Comparing the hazard and matched control periods within individuals demonstrated that dental procedures were not associated with an increased risk of PVO (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.92]; p < 0.001). Additional analysis stratified by antibiotic prophylaxis use showed that antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with a lower OR of developing PVO after dental procedures (with antibiotic prophylaxis: OR 1.11 [95% CI 0.93 to 1.32]; p < 0.26, without antibiotic prophylaxis: OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.83]; p < 0.001). Our sensitivity analyses, in which the exposure assessment interval was extended from 4 to 8 or 12 weeks and exposure was stratified by whether the dental procedure was invasive, demonstrated results that were consistent with our main analysis. CONCLUSION: Dental procedures were not associated with an increased risk of subsequent PVO in this case-crossover study. The effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis was not demonstrated in the additional analysis that categorized exposure according to the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Our results suggest that the association between dental procedures and PVO may have been overestimated. Maintaining good oral hygiene may be important in preventing the development of PVO. The indications for antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures should be reconsidered in view of the potential risk of adverse drug reactions to antibiotic prophylaxis and the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and assess the role of antibiotic prophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Wrong-level spine surgery: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Wrong-level spine surgery is a rare but serious complication of spinal surgery that increases patient harm and legal risks. Although such surgeries have been reported by many spine surgeons, they have not been adequately investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the causes and preventive measures for wrong-level spine surgeries. METHODS: This study analyzed cases of wrong-level spine surgeries from 10 medical centers. Factors such as age, sex, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, surgical details, surgeon's experience, anatomical variations, responses, and causes of the wrong-level spine surgeries were studied. The methods used by the surgeons to confirm the surgical level were also surveyed using a questionnaire for each surgical procedure and site. RESULTS: Eighteen cases (13 men and 5 women; mean age, 61.2 years; mean body mass index, 24.5 kg/m2) of wrong-level spine surgeries were evaluated in the study. Two cases involved emergency surgeries, three involved newly introduced procedures, and five showed anatomical variations. Wrong-level spine surgeries occurred more frequently in patients who underwent posterior thoracic surgery than in those who underwent other techniques (p < 0.01). Twenty-two spinal surgeons described the methods used to confirm the levels preoperatively and intraoperatively. In posterior thoracic laminectomies, half of the surgeons used preoperative markers to confirm the surgical level and did not perform intraoperative fluoroscopy. In posterior thoracic fusion, all surgeons confirmed the level using fluoroscopy preoperatively and intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Wrong-level spine surgeries occurred more frequently in posterior thoracic surgeries. The thoracic spine lacks the anatomical characteristics observed in the cervical and lumbar spine. The large drop in the spinous process can make it challenging for surgeons to determine the positional relationship between the spinous process and the vertebral body. Moreover, unfamiliarity with the technique and anatomical variations were also risk factors for wrong-level spine surgeries.

Blade-Related Vertebral Fracture After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a Zero-Profile Cage: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a case of a 79-year-old man with degenerative cervical myelopathy treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a zero-profile cage. Postoperatively, the patient experienced a rare complication of anchoring blade-related adjacent vertebral fracture leading to construct failure and recurrence of myelopathic symptoms, necessitating revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This case emphasizes the importance of precision in the surgical technique, specifically in the placement of Caspar pins and anchoring blades. It also underscores the need for a high index of suspicion for potential hardware-related complications in patients presenting with recurring symptoms post-ACDF, contributing to the understanding of such rare complications.

Preoperative and Postoperative Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction with Double-Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Introduction: Few articles have investigated patient satisfaction with laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) alone, excluding other diseases, such as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In this study, we aimed to investigate patient satisfaction after double-door laminoplasty for CSM and determine the preoperative and postoperative factors that affect patient satisfaction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of laminoplasty for CSM. We measured sagittal imaging parameters (cervical lordosis [CL], C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA], and T1 slope [T1S]), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, a multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors affecting patient satisfaction. Results: Ninety patients were included in the analysis. After surgery, CL decreased significantly (p<0.01), whereas cSVA increased significantly (p<0.01). No significant differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative T1S values (p=0.61). The JOA, NDI, and VAS scores significantly improved postoperatively (p<0.01). The median patient satisfaction was 85 (range, 12-100) at 1 year postoperatively and 80 (range, 25-100) at 3 months postoperatively. In the multiple regression analysis, lower-extremity sensory disorder in the JOA score at 1 year postoperatively (p<0.01) and VAS scores for neck pain preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively (p=0.01 and p<0.01, respectively) were determined as factors affecting patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Cervical laminoplasty is a useful and satisfactory surgical procedure to restore patient function. However, patients with severe preoperative and postoperative neck pain and those with severe postoperative sensory disorders of the lower extremities may be less satisfied with the procedure. It is important to keep these things in mind when treating patients.

Feasibility of total and partial uncinectomy during anterior cervical approach: MRI-based analysis of 176 patients regarding vertebral artery location.

PURPOSE: To determine the technical feasibility of uncinate process (UP) resection (uncinectomy) during anterior cervical approach with risk-avoidance of vertebral artery (VA) injury. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-six magnetic resonance imaging images with cervical spondylosis were evaluated. The diameter between UP and VA (UP-VA distance), the presence of a fat plane, and the VA's anterior-posterior position relative to UP (anterior[A], middle[M], posterior[P]) at C3-4 to C6-7 segments were investigated. Subsequently, easy-to-use classifications were developed according to the feasibility of total and partial uncinectomy. Total uncinectomy: easy (distance: > 2 mm); moderate (distance: ≤ 2 and fat plane: +); advanced (no fat plane). Partial uncinectomy: easy (distance: > 2 mm and P, A, or M position); moderate (distance: ≤ 2; fat plane: + and P position), and advanced (no fat plane and P position). RESULTS: UP-VA distance of C5-6 on the right side (left/right: 0.41/0.31 mm) was the smallest. The ratio of no fat plane of C5-6 (46.6%/49.4%) was the highest. C5-6 had a high rate of P position (7.4%/8.5%) while C6-7 had a high rate of A position (19.3%/18.2%). More than 90% individuals were classified as easy for partial uncinectomy at any vertebral segment (C3-7), while more than 30% were classified as advanced at C4-7 with the highest rate at C5-6 for total uncinectomy. CONCLUSION: When performing uncinectomy during the anterior cervical approach, the C5-6 segment may be at the greatest risk of VA injury. Hence, preoperative MR images should be thoroughly evaluated to avoid VA injury.

Recurrence rate after posterior percutaneous screw fixation without anterior debridement for pyogenic spondylitis compared with conservative treatment: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) posterior fixation without anterior debridement for pyogenic spondylitis can improve patient quality of life compared with conservative treatment. However, data on the risk of recurrence after PPS posterior fixation compared with conservative treatment is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the recurrence rate of pyogenic spondylitis after PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement and conservative treatment. METHODS: The study was conducted under a retrospective cohort design in patients hospitalized for pyogenic spondylitis between January 2016 and December 2020 at 10 affiliated institutions. We used propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors, including patient demographics, radiographic findings, and isolated microorganisms. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for recurrence of pyogenic spondylitis during the follow-up period in the matched cohort. RESULTS: 148 patients (41 in the PPS group and 107 in the conservative group) were included. After propensity score matching, 37 patients were retained in each group. PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence compared with conservative treatment with orthosis (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.18-3.59; P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-center retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized for pyogenic spondylitis, we found no association in the incidence of recurrence between PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement and conservative treatment.

Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF.

PURPOSE: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Mis-LLIF) can establish indirect decompression by lifting the vertebra with a large intervertebral cage, which causes less damage to the posterior elements. Thus, Mis-LLIF is expected to reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD). The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of ASD between Mis-LLIF and conventional open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: A total of 156 patients (TLIF group = 88, Mis-LLIF group = 68) who underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion (L2/3, L3/4, or L4/5) at a single institution between 2003 and 2018 with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of symptomatic ASD requiring reoperation (S-ASD) and radiological adjacent segment degeneration (R-ASD) 2 years postoperatively were investigated between 51 paired patients from both groups who were propensity score (PS) matched by demographic and baseline clinical data. The effect of characteristics arising from differences in surgical methods between Mis-LLIF and TLIF, such as the amount of distraction of the index fused level (∆H), on S-ASD and R-ASD was also examined. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of S-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups (adjusted OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.41-3.9). There was no significant difference in the incidence of R-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups both at the cranial (adjusted OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.22-4.5) and caudal level (adjusted OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.44-5.3). On the other hand, ∆H was significantly higher in the Mis-LLIF group than in the TLIF group (3.6 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively, P < 0.0001), and was extracted as a significant independent risk factor for S-ASD (adjusted HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.3) and R-ASD at the cranial side (adjusted HR 6.4; 95% CI 1.7-24) in multivariable analysis with PS adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of R-ASD or S-ASD was not significantly reduced in the Mis-LLIF group compared to the TLIF group, with greater ∆H potentially being a contributing factor. Using a thin cage in both TLIF and Mis-LLIF may decrease the occurrence of ASD.

Osteoradionecrosis of the occipitocervical junction: A rare case of C1 anterior arch disruption.

We report the case of a 57-year-old man who developed osteoradionecrosis (ORN) at the occipitocervical (OC) junction after radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. During soft-tissue debridement using a nasopharyngeal endoscope, the anterior arch of the atlas (AAA) was spontaneously disrupted, which was later spat out. Radiographic examination revealed complete disruption of the AAA that caused OC instability. We performed posterior OC fixation. The patient experienced successful postoperative pain relief. AAA disruption secondary to ORN at OC junction can cause severe instability. Posterior OC fixation alone may be an effective procedure if the necrotic pharyngeal region is mild and endoscopically controllable.