Telmisartan but not candesartan affects adiponectin expression in vivo and in vitro.

To examine the effects of telmisartan on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation, we compared the effects of telmisartan with those of candesartan on adipocytokines and glucose and lipid metabolism in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, 56 patients with both type 2 diabetes and hypertension were enrolled and randomized to receive either telmisartan (40 mg) or candesartan (8 mg) for 3 months. Serum adiponectin, HbA1c levels, lipid profiles and blood pressure were recorded at the beginning and 3 months later. In vitro, differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with telmisartan, candesartan, pioglitazone or vehicle for 24 h, and then adiponectin mRNA and protein levels were measured. The results showed that most of the metabolic parameters, including the lipid profiles, did not change significantly during the study in either group. However, the changes in serum adiponectin and plasma glucose over 3 months were significantly greater in the telmisartan group than in the candesartan group. In vitro, although the protein level of adiponectin was not significantly elevated, the mRNA expression of adiponectin was elevated 1.5-fold by telmisartan in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Our findings suggest that telmisartan may have beneficial effects in type 2 diabetes beyond its antihypertensive effect.

Switching from premixed human insulin to premixed insulin lispro: a prospective study comparing the effects on glucose control and quality of life.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical effects of switching from premixed human insulin to a premixed rapid-acting insulin analogue in type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty patients, who were treated with a twice-daily injection of premixed human insulin, were enrolled and randomized to (i) 50/50 premixed insulin lispro twice-daily at the same daily dose as premixed human insulin (analogue mix group), or (ii) continued premixed human insulin (control group). The doses of insulin were adjusted every month by registered diabetologists to achieve adequate blood glucose levels. At the beginning of the study, and again 4 months later, HbA1c and blood glucose levels were measured, and the amount of insulin required and BMI were recorded in both groups. Insulin therapy-related quality of life (ITR-QOL) and the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) were also assessed in the analogue mix group at the beginning of the study and again 4 months later. RESULTS: Although HbA1c levels did not change significantly over the duration of the study in the control group (7.33 +/- 0.58 vs 7.29 +/- 0.65%), HbA1c did improve significantly in the analogue mix group (7.59 +/- 0.44 vs 7.24 +/- 0.49%; p<0.05). The dose of insulin required in the analogue mix group did not change significantly (0.37 +/- 0.11 vs 0.38 +/- 0.14 U/kg/day), but increased in the control group from 0.34 +/- 0.15 to 0.37 +/- 0.16 U/kg/day (p<0.05). The switch to the premixed insulin analogue did not affect ITR-QOL and DTSQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that switching from premixed human insulin to 50/50 premixed insulin lispro improved blood glucose control without compromising QOL. This finding suggests that a premixed rapid-acting insulin analogue is more effective than human insulin for Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.