ß-lactam resistant phenotypes reported by VITEK®2 advanced expert systemTM (AES) compared to whole genome sequencing in Enterobacterales from North and Latin America.

The VITEK®2 AES ß-lactam phenotypes of 488 Enterobacterales from North and Latin America generated by the VITEK®2 were compared to the resistance genotypes provided by whole genome sequencing (WGS). The AES provided phenotypic reports for 447 (91.6 %) isolates, including isolates harbouring carbapenemases (195; 43.6 %), ESBLs (103; 23.0 %) and transferable AmpCs (tAmpC; 28; 6.3 %) genes, as well as wildtype isolates (WT; 121; 27.1 %). Overall, the AES report was accurate for 433/447 (96.9 %) isolates. The AES accurately reported carbapenemase, ESBL, and tAmpC phenotypes for 93.7 %, 93.7 %, and 98.4 % of isolates, respectively, and sensitivity/specificity rates were 96.4 %/91.7 %, 98.1 %/92.4 %, 82.1 %/99.5 %, and 100 %/98.8 %. 14 isolates carrying carbapenemase (7 total; 3 KPC, 2 MBL, 2 OXA-48-like), ESBL (2), and tAmpC-encoding genes (5) were not correctly identified by AES. The AES phenotypic report detected resistance mechanisms among Enterobacterales rapidly and could significantly aid future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives and patient care.

Multicenter evaluation of the Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping antimicrobial susceptibility testing system.

The Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping (NGP) system (Charlestown, MA) is a new antimicrobial susceptibility testing system that utilizes two sequential assays performed on all wells of doubling dilution series to determine MICs. A multicenter evaluation of the performance of the Selux NGP system compared with reference broth microdilution was conducted following FDA recommendations and using FDA-defined breakpoints. A total of 2,488 clinical and challenge isolates were included; gram-negative isolates were tested against 24 antimicrobials, and gram-positive isolates were tested against 15 antimicrobials. Data is provided for all organism-antimicrobial combinations evaluated, including those that did and did not meet FDA performance requirements. Overall very major error and major error rates were less than 1% (31/3,805 and 107/15,606, respectively), essential agreement and categorical agreement were >95%, reproducibility was ≥95%, and the average time-to-result (from time of assay start to time of MIC result) was 5.65 hours.

Trends in the susceptibility of U.S. Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates to minocycline, 2014-2021.

IMPORTANCE: Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are opportunistic, non-fermentative Gram-negative organisms that can cause serious hospital-acquired infections in immunocompromised patients. These pathogens are inherently resistant to several common drug classes and often acquire other resistance mechanisms, making them difficult to treat. In this study, we analyzed the trends of susceptibility of over 2,500 U.S. bacterial isolates collected from hospitalized patients over an 8-year period to minocycline, which is used to treat infections caused by these pathogens. These in vitro data suggest that minocycline is a useful treatment option for infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Vaborbactam increases meropenem susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates displaying MexXY and AmpC upregulation.

To evaluate the resistance mechanisms among Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates exhibiting meropenem (MEM) MIC values higher than meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV). P. aeruginosa clinical isolates collected in US hospitals from 2014 to 2019 were susceptibility tested. Whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing were performed. Results were analyzed for strain typing, acquired ß-lactamases, and mutations in chromosomal genes; gene expression was measured for known ß-lactam resistance contributors. Results were compared to a control group of 10 P. aeruginosa isolates displaying MIC values at 8 mg/L for meropenem ± vaborbactam (MEM = MEV). Out of 88 isolates displaying MEM > MEV, 33 (37.5%) isolates had reproducibly lower MIC values for meropenem-vaborbactam compared to meropenem when retested. The expression of mexX, mexY, mexZ, and ampC was significantly greater among a higher percentage of the MEM > MEV isolates. Furthermore, the association of mexXY and ampC overexpression was detected in 17/33 MEM > MEV isolates and only 1/10 MEM = MEV isolate. In addition, the Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase amino acid substitution R79Q was detected among 33.3% of the isolates displaying MEM > MEV, and none of the isolates displayed MEM = MEV. Other resistance mechanisms were not observed or were equally observed in both groups. In rare cases, vaborbactam plays a role in lowering the meropenem MIC values in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates likely due to the inhibition of the AmpC gene that was overexpressed in the presence of upregulation of MexXY with or without alterations in the AmpC gene. IMPORTANCE Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are intrinsically resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents and meropenem is an important therapeutic option to treat infections caused by this organism. Meropenem-vaborbactam activity is similar to that of meropenem alone against P. aeruginosa isolates. Isolates belonging to this species that display lower meropenem-vaborbactam compared to meropenem are rare. We initiated this study to understand the resistance mechanisms that could lead to lower meropenem-vaborbactam MIC values when compared to meropenem alone. We documented that isolates displaying lower meropenem-vaborbactam exhibited overexpression of MexXY and AmpC. In addition, isolates displaying the R79Q PDC (AmpC) mutation were more likely to display lower meropenem-vaborbactam when compared to isolates displaying the same MIC values for these agents.

Comparative activity of newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US medical centres (2020-2021).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in-vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam and comparator agents against contemporary Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals. METHODS: In total, 3184 isolates were collected consecutively from 71 US medical centres in 2020-2021, and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute breakpoints were applied. RESULTS: Ceftazidime-avibactam [97.0% susceptible (S)], ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.0%S), imipenem-relebactam (97.3%S) and tobramycin (96.4%S) were the most active agents against the aggregate P. aeruginosa isolate collection, and retained good activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and multi-drug-resistant (MDR) isolates. All other antimicrobials tested showed limited activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and MDR isolates. The most common infections were pneumonia (45.9%), skin and skin structure infections (19.0%), urinary tract infections (17.0%) and bloodstream infections (11.7%); ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam showed consistent activity against isolates from these infection types. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem was lower among isolates from pneumonia compared with other infection types. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam were highly active, and exhibited similar coverage against a large contemporary collection of P. aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals. Cross-resistance among the newer ß-lactams/ß-lactam inhibitors (BL/BLIs) varied markedly; ≥72.1% of isolates resistant to one of the three newer BL/BLIs approved for P. aeruginosa treatment remained susceptible to at least one of the other two BL/BLIs, indicating that all three should be tested in the clinical laboratory. These three BL/BLIs represent valuable therapeutic options for P. aeruginosa infection.

Performance of the Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System (AES) as a Rapid Tool for Reporting Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) in Enterobacterales from North and Latin America.

This study evaluated the performance of the Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System (AES) confidence level report as a rapid tool for reporting antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results for a challenging set of Enterobacterales isolates from North and Latin America. Enterobacterales isolates (n = 513) were tested by CLSI broth microdilution (BMD) and Vitek 2 (N802 and XN15 AST cards). Wild-type isolates and isolates harboring acquired ß-lactamases by whole-genome sequencing were included. The AES assessment of confidence level (green, yellow, and red reports) was compared to BMD results and known genotypes and reviewed by a microbiologist for accuracy. Totals of 148 (28.8%) wild-type isolates and 365 (71.2%) Enterobacterales isolates harboring carbapenemase (211 [41.1%]), extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) (122 [23.8%]), and/or transferrable AmpC (tAmpC) (32 [6.2%]) genes were evaluated. The AES confidence level was assessed for 488 isolates, and a phenotype was recognized for 447 (91.6%) isolates. Green, yellow, and red AES reports were noted for 382 (78.3%), 65 (13.3%), and 41 (8.4%) isolates, respectively. Compared to BMD, 96.3% of green AES reports could be confidently and rapidly auto-released, enabling rapid adjustments to antimicrobial therapy. In addition, 69.2% of yellow reports were acceptable, and recommendations to address current AES limitations were made. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) reports are one of the most important clinical microbiology laboratory tasks. AST reports are essential to drive antimicrobial therapy, provide information to monitor antimicrobial resistance rates, and trigger further tests to detect outbreaks or confirm new mechanisms of resistance. Commercial AST devices are frequently used to generate AST reports, and an advanced expert system (AES), such as the Vitek 2 AES, incorporates extensive knowledge to recognize certain susceptibility patterns as indicative of specific phenotypes. Moreover, the Vitek 2 AES also provides a level of confidence for auto-releasing the reports. In this study, the performance of the Vitek 2 AES was compared to state-of-the-art methodologies for AST, broth microdilution and ß-lactamase gene detection, whole-genome sequencing, against a collection of 513 Enterobacterales clinical isolates harboring various ß-lactamase genes, including carbapenemase, ESBL, and transferrable AmpC genes, from 73 medical centers in 7 countries in North and Latin America.

Meropenem-Vaborbactam Activity against U.S. Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales Strains, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Isolates.

Carbapenems are a common first-line therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, but carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates have become an urgent health concern. Klebsiella pneumoniae serine carbapenemases (KPCs) now have been disseminated worldwide and are endemic in many hospitals globally. Isolates producing metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) or class D OXA-48 carbapenemases are also increasingly common in Europe, although they are less common in the United States. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination of the carbapenem meropenem and vaborbactam, which is a ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine carbapenemases, including KPC-producing isolates. We examined the susceptibility of U.S. multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam. A total of 1,697 MDR Enterobacterales isolates were collected in 31 U.S. medical centers in 2016 to 2020. Susceptibility testing was performed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for all CRE strains (MIC values of >2 mg/L for imipenem or meropenem). The rate of susceptibility of all MDR Enterobacterales strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, and 86.2% of the isolates were susceptible to meropenem. There were 222 CRE isolates (13.1%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase (81.1%). Thirteen CRE isolates produced NDM (n = 7), VIM (n = 3), and/or OXA-48-like (n = 4) carbapenemases; 29 CRE isolates (13.1%) had no detected carbapenemase. The rate of susceptibility of all CRE strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 93.2%, and the rate of susceptibility of the KPC-producing isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam was 98.9%. The primary carbapenemase in the United States continues to be KPC, while MBL and OXA-48-like carbapenemases remain uncommon. Overall, the rate of susceptibility of these U.S. MDR organisms to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, indicating that meropenem-vaborbactam is a valuable treatment option for Gram-negative infections caused by U.S. MDR organisms. IMPORTANCE Carbapenems are a common first-line therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, but CRE isolates have become an urgent health concern. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination of the carbapenem meropenem and vaborbactam, which is a ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine carbapenemases, including KPC-producing isolates. We examined the susceptibility of U.S. MDR Gram-negative isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam. A total of 1,697 U.S. MDR Enterobacterales isolates collected in 2016 to 2020 were tested. Susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution method. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for all CRE strains (MIC values of >2 mg/L for imipenem or meropenem). The rate of susceptibility of all MDR Enterobacterales strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, and 86.2% of the isolates were susceptible to meropenem. A total of 13.1% of the isolates were CRE strains, and KPC was the most common carbapenemase. Overall, the rate of susceptibility of these U.S. MDR organisms to meropenem-vaborbactam indicates that meropenem-vaborbactam is a valuable treatment option for Gram-negative infections caused by U.S. MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Activity Against Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales Causing Healthcare-Associated Infections in Eight Asian Countries: Report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2016-2018).

Purpose: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from hospitalised patients in Asia. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-established ß-lactamase inhibitor. Methods: A total of 2038 Gram-negative organisms (376 P. aeruginosa and 1662 Enterobacterales) were collected consecutively using a prevalence-based approach from 11 medical centres. Organisms were susceptibility tested by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines. CLSI and EUCAST breakpoint criteria were used. Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 mg/L) ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 91.0% of the isolates at an MIC of ≤4 mg/L. P. aeruginosa exhibited high rates of susceptibility to amikacin (92.0/92.0% [CLSI/EUCAST]) and colistin by EUCAST criteria only (99.2% intermediate [CLSI]/99.2% susceptible [EUCAST]). Ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC50/90, 0.25/16 mg/L; 86.8/86.8% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) and meropenem (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.12 mg/L; 93.0/93.3% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacterales. Isolates displayed susceptibility rates to other ß-lactam agents, ranging from 81.5/77.7% for piperacillin/tazobactam, 66.0/64.5% for cefepime, and 65.3/60.9% for ceftazidime using CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Among the Enterobacterales isolates, 6.8% were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and 29.6% exhibited an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) non-CRE phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype strains of Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.5/8 mg/L; 84.8/84.8% susceptible), but not against isolates with a CRE phenotype (MIC50/90, >32/>32 mg/L). Conclusion: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than the available cephalosporins when tested against Enterobacterales from Asian countries.

Activity of meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates from Europe.

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates have disseminated worldwide. CREs usually produce a carbapenemase; however, some isolates are negative for known carbapenemases. In this study, we evaluated the activity of meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against CREs without a carbapenemase (nonCP CREs) collected from European hospitals from 2016 to 2019. Materials and methods: 23 043 Enterobacterales clinical isolates were collected in 41 hospitals located in 20 countries. Susceptibility (S) testing was performed using the broth microdilution method. CLSI/EUCAST (2021) interpretive criteria were used. 978 CREs were identified with MICs >2 mg/L to meropenem or imipenem. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on each CRE isolate. 125 isolates were negative for carbapenemase genes, including bla KPC, bla NDM, bla IMP, bla VIM and bla OXA-48-like. NonCP CRE isolates were analysed for the presence of other ß-lactamases, multilocus sequence types (ST) and mutations in outer membrane protein (OMP) sequences. Results: Most nonCP CRE were Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN; n = 97/125). 84.0% of nonCP CRE (n = 105) were from Poland, including 88 KPN. The most common ß-lactamase was bla CTX-M-15 in 92/125 isolates. OMP disruptions or alterations were noted among 76 KPN. Among KPN isolates that had MLST typing, 30 belonged to ST11, 18 to ST152 and 17 to ST147, while 13 other STs were observed. Susceptibility to meropenem/vaborbactam was 96.0/97.6% (CLSI/EUCAST) while meropenem was 2.4/8.0%S. Conclusions: Meropenem/vaborbactam had potent in vitro activity against CRE isolates that lacked known carbapenemases. Resistance mechanisms observed among nonCP CREs included acquired ß-lactamases and OMP alterations. These results indicate that meropenem/vaborbactam may be a useful treatment for infections caused by nonCP CREs.

Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Against Gram-Negative Isolates from Australia and New Zealand as part of the PACTS Surveillance 2016-2018.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is an anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-described ß-lactamase inhibitor. Ceftolozane-tazobactam has enhanced activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and activity against Enterobacterales isolates that produce extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC cephalosporinases. In this study, we analysed the susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates to C-T and comparators collected in Australia and New Zealand from 2016 to 2018 as part of the Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) surveillance. METHODS: A total of 1693 nonduplicate Enterobacterales and 435 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected prospectively from hospitalized patients in six medical centres in Australia and two in New Zealand. Susceptibilities (S) to C-T and comparators were determined using broth microdilution. EUCAST breakpoints were used. Isolates with multi-drug resistant (MDR), extensively drug resistant (XDR), extended-spectrum ß-lactamase non-carbapenem resistant (ESBL, non-CRE) phenotype, and CRE were analysed. RESULTS: For P. aeruginosa, 97.5% were S to C-T while 89.9% were S to meropenem. According to EUCAST criteria, 86.4% were susceptible-increased exposure to piperacillin-tazobactam. MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa isolates had 76.7% and 65.4% S to C-T, respectively; 34.9% and 19.2% S to meropenem, respectively; and 23.3% and 15.4% were susceptible-increased exposure to piperacillin-tazobactam, respectively. Meropenem (99.8% S), amikacin (99.1% S), and C-T (96.5% S) were the most active against Enterobacterales. Susceptibilities to C-T were 94.3% for ESBL, non-CRE phenotype, and 78.4% for MDR isolates. Only three CRE and five XDR isolates were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data indicate that C-T is a potent antimicrobial with activity against MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa, as well as ESBL, non-CRE phenotype isolates and MDR Enterobacterales.

Antimicrobial activity of dalbavancin against Gram-positive bacteria isolated from patients hospitalized with bloodstream infection in United States and European medical centers (2018-2020).

Dalbavancin and comparators were susceptibility tested against 8643 Gram-positive bacteria from 74 hospitals located in Europe and the United States by broth microdilution method. The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (45.2%), Enterococcus faecalis (12.2%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (8.9%), but rank order varied markedly by geographic region. Dalbavancin demonstrated potent activity and broad spectrum, with MIC90 values of 0.03 mg/L for Staphylococcus aureus, ß-haemolytic streptococci, and viridans group streptococci; 0.06 mg/L for Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis; and 0.12 mg/L for vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium. All organisms, except vancomycin-resistant enterococci and 1 Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolate, were inhibited at ≤ 0.25 mg/L of dalbavancin.

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against U.S. and European Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates Collected in 2020 as Part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with broad activity against Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Cefiderocol was approved by the FDA for treatment of complicated urinary tract infection, hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for aerobic GN infections in adults with few treatment options. In this study, we analyzed the susceptibility of cefiderocol against GN clinical isolates that were collected from hospitalized patients in the United States and Europe in 2020 as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. GN isolates, including 8,047 Enterobacterales, 2,282 P. aeruginosa, 650 Acinetobacter species, and 338 S. maltophilia isolates, were consecutively collected from patients in 66 hospitals in 19 countries. Susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution method, and cefiderocol was tested in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. Cefiderocol activity against resistant isolates, including CRE and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates, was determined. Enterobacterales susceptibility to cefiderocol was 99.8% (CLSI), and CRE susceptibility was 98.2%. Cefiderocol was the most active antimicrobial against all P. aeruginosa isolates with MIC50/90 values of 0.12/0.5 mg/L, respectively (99.6% susceptible). A total of 256 P. aeruginosa isolates were XDR, 97.3% were susceptible to cefiderocol, and 7.4% were susceptible to meropenem. Acinetobacter susceptibility to cefiderocol was 97.7%. S. maltophilia susceptibility to cefiderocol was 100.0% (CLSI, 2021) and 97.9% (CLSI, 2022). These in vitro data suggest that cefiderocol is an important therapeutic option for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens, including isolates resistant to carbapenems with few therapeutic options. IMPORTANCE Cefiderocol is the first siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin approved for use in the treatment of human bacterial infections. Cefiderocol has broad-spectrum Gram-negative activity against difficult-to-treat bacterial pathogens that can cause serious infections. Our study examines the activity of cefiderocol against a large global collection of Gram-negative clinical isolates collected from hospitalized patients in 2020. In addition, we compare the activities of cefiderocol and recently approved ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against various antimicrobial-resistant pathogen groups including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. as well as isolates resistant to most classes of antimicrobial drugs. Cefiderocol was the most active antimicrobial tested against the isolates in this study. Our in vitro data suggest that cefiderocol may be useful for treatment of serious infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms for patients with limited treatment options.

Antimicrobial performance of two preoperative skin preparation solutions containing iodine and isopropyl alcohol.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a persistent clinical challenge caused primarily by bacteria on the skin. Proper utilization of optimized antiseptic skin preparation solutions helps reduce the prevalence and impact of HAIs by decreasing patient skin microorganisms preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 antimicrobial solutions containing iodine and isopropyl alcohol (IPA): Povidone iodine (PVP-I) with IPA (ie, PVP-I+IPA, PurPrep) and Iodine Povacrylex+IPA (DuraPrep). METHODS: The antimicrobial activity of the test solutions was evaluated in vitro by determinations of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) against 1105 diverse microbial isolates and a time-kill assay to evaluate efficacy against 120 strains of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts. Peel tests were performed between skin samples treated with test solutions and representative drape/dressing materials to determine effects of test solutions on the biomechanical adhesion properties. Finally, an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, randomized, controlled, single-center, partially blinded in vivo study was performed to assess the immediate and persistent antimicrobial activity of the test solutions on the abdomen and groin. RESULTS: Both PVP-I+IPA and Iodine Povacrylex+IPA solutions demonstrated broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity with MIC and MBC at less than 1% of the full-strength concentration of each product against a wide variety of microorganisms. In the time-kill tests, both solutions were able to successfully reduce all microbial populations by 99.99% (ie, 4 log10) at the contact times of 30 seconds, 2 minutes and 10 minutes. The 2 solutions showed relatively similar adhesion results when tested with 3 representative operating room materials. Both PVP-I+IPA and Iodine Povacrylex+IPA met the expected Food and Drug Administration (FDA) efficacy requirements at 10 minutes and 6 hours post-treatment for both anatomic sites (ie, groin, and abdomen) in the clinical study, with no safety issues or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the in vitro antimicrobial activity, biomechanical adhesive strength, and in vivo efficacy of PVP-I+IPA demonstrated similar results compared to Iodine Povacrylex+IPA. Both products were efficacious at reducing or eliminating a wide range of clinically-relevant microorganisms in lab-based and clinical settings, supporting their use as antiseptic skin preparation solutions to reduce bacteria on the skin that can cause infection.

Comparative activity of newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients hospitalized with pneumonia in European medical centers in 2020.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were consecutively collected from patients with pneumonia in 29 medical centers in 2020 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution method. Ceftazidime-avibactam (95.5% susceptible), imipenem-relebactam (94.3% susceptible), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (93.3% susceptible) were the most active compounds after colistin (99.5% susceptible). Susceptibility rates for the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLIs) varied against isolates resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, and/or ceftazidime. Ceftazidime-avibactam was the most active BL/BLI against resistant subsets from Western Europe, whereas imipenem-relebactam was slightly more active than other BL/BLIs against resistant subsets from Eastern Europe. Susceptibility rates were markedly lower in Eastern Europe than Western Europe.

Surveillance of omadacycline activity tested against clinical isolates from the USA: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2019.

OBJECTIVES: Omadacycline was tested against 7000 bacterial isolates collected prospectively from medical centres in the USA during 2019. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. RESULTS: Omadacycline was active against: Staphylococcus aureus (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L; 98.3% susceptible), including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); Enterococcus faecalis (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible), including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE); Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 mg/L; 99.8% susceptible); viridans group streptococci, including Streptococcus anginosus group (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible); ß-haemolytic streptococci, including Streptococcus pyogenes (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L; 99.2% susceptible); Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 1/8 mg/L; 86.9% inhibited at ≤4 mg/L), including Escherichia coli (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 99.6% inhibited at ≤4 mg/L); Enterobacter cloacae (MIC50/90, 2/4 mg/L; 98.5% susceptible); Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 1/4 mg/L; 93.2% susceptible); Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 mg/L; 90.8% inhibited at ≤4 mg/L); Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible); and Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, ≤0.12/0.25 mg/L). CONCLUSION: The 2019 in vitro activity of omadacycline against key Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens has not changed compared with the prior 3 years of surveillance in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Omadacycline merits further study in serious infections where resistant pathogens may be encountered.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU patients with pneumonia: United States, 2015-2018.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from hospitalized patients with pneumonia in US intensive care units (ICUs) between 2015 and 2018. Activity against all P. aeruginosa and common resistant phenotypes are described to better inform decision-making and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts. METHODS: In total, 781 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from 28 US hospitals. These isolates were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methodology using CLSI (2020) breakpoints. Phenotypes analysed included piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible (NS), cefepime-NS, ceftazidime-NS, meropenem-NS and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR). RESULTS: Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most potent agent tested (minimum inhibitory concentration to inhibit 50% and 90% of isolates of 0.5 and 2 mg/L, respectively, inhibiting 97.2% at the susceptible breakpoint of ≤4 mg/L). Traditional first-line antipseudomonal ß-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime and ceftazidime) demonstrated <33% susceptibility when P. aeruginosa was NS to one or more agent. Although escalation of therapy to meropenem is commonly employed clinically, meropenem susceptibility ranged from 33.6% to 44.9% if P. aeruginosa was NS to any traditional first-line antipseudomonal ß-lactam agent. Conversely, ceftolozane-tazobactam remained active against isolates that were NS to other agents, inhibiting 88.4% of isolates NS to piperacillin-tazobactam, 85.0% of isolates NS to cefepime and ceftazidime, and 90.3% of isolates NS to meropenem. Ceftolozane-tazobactam also maintained activity against 73.0% of DTR isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane-tazobactam maintained high activity against P. aeruginosa isolated from hospitalized patients with pneumonia in US ICUs, and had the greatest activity against isolates NS to one or more antipseudomonal ß-lactams and DTR isolates.

Frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from respiratory samples of patients hospitalized with pneumonia in Western Europe, Eastern Europe and the USA: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2016-19).

BACKGROUND: The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program monitors the frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of organisms from various infection types worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the SENTRY programme results for organisms isolated from respiratory samples of patients hospitalized with probable pneumonia. METHODS: A total of 28 918 bacterial isolates were consecutively collected (one per patient) in 2016-19 from 121 medical centres located in western Europe (W-EU; n = 7966), eastern Europe (E-EU; n = 3182) and the USA (n = 17 770) and then susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods in a central laboratory. RESULTS: Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) represented 76.3%, 88.6% and 69.1% of organisms; non-fermentative (NF) GNB accounted for 26.9%, 51.8% and 34.6% of organisms in W-EU, E-EU and USA, respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem was 75.4% and 76.9% in W-EU, 57.4% and 48.3% in E-EU, and 76.1% and 74.8% in the USA, respectively. Only 10.4% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from E-EU were meropenem susceptible compared with 45.8% in W-EU and 58.8% in the USA. Overall MRSA rates were 21.4% in W-EU and 28.7% in E-EU. In the USA, MRSA rates decreased from 44.8% in 2016 to 40.1% in 2019. Carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales decreased continuously in the USA from 3.0% in 2016 to 1.7% in 2019 (2.4% overall) and was higher in E-EU (16.6%) than W-EU (2.2%). Klebsiella pneumoniae susceptibility to meropenem was 91.3%, 72.5% and 95.3% in W-EU, E-EU and the USA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rank order and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from patients with pneumonia widely varied by geography. MDR NF-GNB represented an important cause of pneumonia.

Minocycline Activity against Unusual Clinically Significant Gram-Negative Pathogens.

The minocycline susceptibility of 3,856 isolates including Burkholderia, Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Aeromonas, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from the SENTRY surveillance (2014 to 2019) were analyzed. The susceptibilities of these species (%S) were Achromobacter spp. (n = 411; 92.6%), Burkholderia cepacia species complex (n = 199; 85.9%), Aeromonas spp. (n = 127; 99.2%), Chryseobacterium spp. (n = 59; 94.9%), Alcaligenes faecalis (n = 42; 88.1%), and S. maltophilia (n = 2,287; 99.5%). These data suggest that minocycline is a useful treatment option for infections caused by unusual Gram-negative pathogens.

Activity of meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against Gram-negative isolates from Eastern and Western European patients hospitalized with pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumonia (2014-19).

OBJECTIVES: Meropenem/vaborbactam has been approved in Europe for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bacteraemia among other indications. Vaborbactam is an inhibitor of class A and C ß-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) enzymes, but not class B or D carbapenemases. We analysed the activity of meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against 6846 Enterobacterales and 3567 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients hospitalized with pneumonia (PHP), including VAP. METHODS: Isolates from PHP were consecutively collected during 2014-19 from 42 European hospitals located in 21 countries and susceptibility tested using the broth microdilution method. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates were molecularly characterized to identify their carbapenem-resistance mechanisms. EUCAST (2020) interpretive criteria were used. RESULTS: The most common Gram-negative pathogens isolated from PHP were P. aeruginosa (n = 3567), K. pneumoniae (n = 1877) and Escherichia coli (n = 1646). Overall, 98.0% of Enterobacterales and 82.1% of P. aeruginosa were susceptible to meropenem/vaborbactam, with 99.8% of Enterobacterales and 89.7% of P. aeruginosa in Western Europe (WE) and 92.7% of Enterobacterales and 69.1% of P. aeruginosa in Eastern Europe (EE). CRE were more common in EE (15.1%) than WE (2.1%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase in WE, while OXA-48-like was the most common carbapenemase in EE. Meropenem/vaborbactam susceptibility was 63.0% for all CRE (92.2% in WE and 51.5% in EE). Meropenem/vaborbactam inhibited 99.1% of KPC-producing isolates and 40.5% of OXA-48-like-producing isolates. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data demonstrate that meropenem/vaborbactam has potent activity against isolates from PHP, including isolates producing KPC, and may be a useful treatment option for PHP, including VAP.

Susceptibility trends of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators when tested against U.S. gram-negative bacterial surveillance isolates (2012-2018).

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a ß-lactamase inhibitor. Ceftolozane/tazobactam has been approved in >60 countries for treating complicated urinary tract infections, acute pyelonephritis, complicated intra-abdominal infections (with metronidazole), and hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults. We analyzed susceptibilities for 35,882 gram-negative isolates collected from patients in 35 US medical centers from 2012 to 2018. The rate of multi-drug resistant Enterobacterales was stable (9.5%-10.1%), while the P. aeruginosa multi-drug resistance rate increased from 15.5% in 2012 to 22.9% in 2018. The carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales rates varied from 0.9% to 2.2% and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase phenotypes increased from 10.5% to 16.8%. The most active drugs against P. aeruginosa were ceftolozane/tazobactam (95.8%-97.5% susceptible) and amikacin (93.9%-98.0%); against Enterobacterales, amikacin (97.9%-98.8%), meropenem (97.7%-98.8%), and ceftolozane/tazobactam (93.3%-95.6%) were the most active. These data suggest that ceftolozane/tazobactam has effective in vitro activity against organisms causing serious gram-negative infections.