RESUMO
AIMS: To describe the extent of prisoner/detainee cuffing and characterize cuffing methods. BACKGROUND: Thousands of prisoners and detainees receive medical treatment in Israeli hospitals every year. According to the Israeli law, cuffing during hospital stay should be an exceptional measure, to be considered only in cases of real threat of violence or escape, based on individual assessment. There is no documentation of cuffing rates in hospitals. METHODS: A multi-center study in 12 hospitals was performed during 2020-2021. Data were collected prospectively or retrieved retrospectively from security records, when available. RESULTS: A total of 1857 prisoners/detainees were documented, of whom 1794 (96.6%) were cuffed. Of the 241 hospitalized patients, 230 (95.4%) were cuffed. Details regarding cuffing methods were available for 185 hospitalized patients, revealing that at least 63 patients (68% of patients for whom details regarding cuffing to bed were available) were cuffed to the bed with opposite arm and leg in a cross position. Cuffing rates of prisoners under custody of the Prisons Authority, police and the Israeli Defense Forces, were 98.5%, 96.6%, and 83%, respectively. Impaired mobility for medical reasons was documented in 64 cases, of whom 85.9% were cuffed regardless. CONCLUSIONS: Cuffing of prisoners/detainees in Israeli hospitals is performed non-selectively, in violation of the law. During hospitalization, cuffing is usually performed in a cross position, severely impairing mobility. Our findings highlight the need for routine documentation of cuffing due to its medical consequences and the responsibility of medical staff towards patients according to rules of ethics and regulations.
Assuntos
Prisioneiros , Hospitais , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Polícia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
ABSTRACT: As part of the development of the TUMMY-UC, a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC), we aimed to explore agreement on UC symptoms between children and their caregivers. We conducted 44 interviews with children ages 8-12âyears, who completed the PRO version of the TUMMY-UC, and their caregivers, who completed the observer-reported outcome (obsRO) version. There was excellent agreement between the total TUMMY-UC PRO and obsRO scores (intra-class correlation coefficientâ=â0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.74-0.98]). The obsRO scores were always within the same disease-activity category as the corresponding PRO score (ie, remission, mild and moderate-severe disease). There was a strong correlation of the TUMMY-UC PRO and obsRO scores with physician global assessment of disease activity (râ=â0.94 and râ=â0.90, respectively, Pâ<â0.001) and the pediatric UC activity index (râ=â0.95 and râ=â0.96; Pâ<â0.001). These data support conceptual equivalence between the PRO and obsRO TUMMY-UC versions, and provide support for their incorporation into one score.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Médicos , Cuidadores , Criança , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Humanos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: In this quality improvement program, named quality in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, we constructed a nation-wide platform that prospectively recorded clinically important quality indicators in pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases (PIBD), aiming at improving clinical management across the country. METHODS: Representatives of all 21 PIBD facilities in Israel formed a Delphi group to select quality indicators (process and outcomes), recorded prospectively over 2âyears in children with Crohn's disease 2-18âyears of age seen in the outpatient clinics. Monthly anonymized reports were distributed to all centers, allowing comparison and improvement. Trends were analyzed using the Mann-Kendall test, reporting τ (tau) values. RESULTS: The indicators of 3254 visits from 1709 patients were recorded from September 2017 to September 2019 (mean age 14.7â±â3.1âyears, median disease duration 1.8âyears (interquartile range 0.69-4.02)). An increase in three of five process indicators was demonstrated: obtaining drug levels of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (τâ=â0.4; Pâ=â0.005), utilization of fecal calprotectin (τâ=â0.38; Pâ=â0.008) and bone density testing (τâ=â0.45; Pâ=â0.002). Among outcome indicators, three of nine improved as measured during the preceding year: calprotectin <300âµg/mg (τâ=â0.35; Pâ=â0.015), and "resolution of inflammation" defined as a composite of endoscopy, imaging and fecal calprotectin (τâ=â0.39; Pâ=â0.007). Endoscopic healing reached borderline significance (τâ=â0.28; Pâ=â0.055). An increase in the use of biologics throughout the study was observed (τâ=â0.47; Pâ=â0.001) with a concurrent decrease in the use of immunomodulators (τâ=â-0.47; Pâ=â0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement nationwide programs can be implemented with limited resources while facilitating standardization of care, and may be associated with improvements in measured indicators.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Adolescente , Biomarcadores , Criança , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Fezes , Humanos , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
Background: Early treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with positive outcomes but a significant diagnostic delay has been reported in most countries. Aim: We aimed to develop and validate IBD-REFER criteria, intended for primary care physicians, to screen patients at risk for IBD. Methods: A Delphi group of 10 experts generated a list of symptoms associated with the onset of IBD, supplemented by a review of the literature. The list was reduced in an iterative process and graded based on importance. For data-driven statistical formatting, the charts of 200 IBD (100 children, 100 adults) and 100 non-IBD controls but with gastrointestinal symptoms were reviewed. The IBD-REFER items were scored for each subject, as well as the contending Red Flag criteria from the International Organization for the Study of IBD. External validation was performed on additionally enrolled cohorts of 100 IBD patients and 50 controls. Results: The Delphi process retained 5 items as major criteria (≥1 item required for early referral) and 11 as minor (≥2 items required). Following the removal of uninformative items and further formatting in the data-driven stage, 10 core items were retained: 3 as major and 7 as minor. In the external validation, the final IBD-REFER criteria had a sensitivity/specificity of 98%/96% in adults and 96%/96% in children, significantly higher than achieved by the Red Flag criteria (71%/84% and 60%/88%, respectively; P < 0.001). Conclusion: The IBD-REFER criteria may guide the selection of patients for expedited gastrointestinal investigation.