Ulnar Bowing and Distal Radioulnar Joint Anatomy: A Three-Dimensional, In Situ Clinical Assessment.

Purpose: Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) injuries can be devastating and challenging to manage. The multiplanar curvature exhibited by the ulna impacts the morphology of the DRUJ, making it difficult to assess through two-dimensional radiographs alone. We used full-length, three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography angiography scans to assess the relationship between ulnar bowing, DRUJ ulnar variance (UV), and sigmoid notch angle. The goal of this study was to establish normal anatomic ranges for these landmarks to improve treatment for forearm traumas and DRUJ pathologies. Methods: Eighty-two intact upper extremity computed tomography angiography scans were examined and reconstructed into 3D models. We characterized ulnar bowing and DRUJ metrics using computer-aided design software. Measures of central tendency and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for comparative analysis. Results: The study yielded an average ulnar length of 272.3 mm. We identified the proximal ulnar bow at 36.7% of the bone's total length, possessing a depth of 10.3 mm, a proximal angle of 6.6°, and a distal angle of 3.9°. The distal ulnar bow appeared at 75.3% of the bone's length, characterized by a depth of 4.2 mm, a proximal angle of 2°, and a distal angle of 4.3°. In the coronal plane, the proximal angle of the proximal ulnar bow correlated positively with UV (r = 0.39, P < .001), whereas the distal angle of the distal ulnar bow correlated negatively (r = -0.48, P < .001). We also found significant correlations between the depths of both proximal and distal bows with UV (r = 0.38, P < .001; r = -0.34, P < .001, respectively). Moreover, UV within the DRUJ strongly correlated with the sigmoid notch angle (r = -0.77, P = .01). In contrast, the sagittal plane metrics did not show meaningful correlations with UV. Conclusion: Sagittal alignment and translation at the DRUJ articulation are directly related to ulna bowing at the distal ulna. A nuanced understanding of these 3D relationships can enhance preoperative planning when correcting ulnar-side pathology. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Analysis of variability and trends in medical school clerkship grades.

Background: Medical school clerkship grades are used to evaluate orthopedic surgery residency applicants, however, high interinstitutional variability in grade distribution calls into question the utility of clerkship grades when evaluating applicants from different medical schools. This study aims to evaluate the variability in grade distribution among medical schools and look for trends in grade distribution over recent years. Methods: Applications submitted to Rush University's orthopedic surgery residency program from 2015, 2019, and 2022 were collected from the Electronic Residency Application Service. Applications from the top 100 schools according to the 2023-2024 U.S. News and World Report Research Rankings were reviewed. The percentage of "honors" grades awarded by medical schools for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships were extracted from applicants' Medical Student Performance Evaluation letters. Results: The median percentage of honors given in 2022 was 36.0 % (range 10.0-82.0) for the surgery clerkship and 33.0 % (range 6.7-80.0) for the internal medicine clerkship. Honors were given 6.6 % more in the surgery clerkship in 2022 compared to 2015. There was a negative correlation between a higher (worse) U.S. News and World Report research ranking and the percentage of honors awarded in 2022 for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships. Conclusion: There is substantial interinstitutional variability in the rate that medical schools award an "honors" grade with evidence of grade inflation in the surgery clerkship. Residency programs using clerkship grades to compare applicants should do so cautiously provided the variability demonstrated in this study.

A Pilot Study of E-Cigarette Naïve Cigarette Smokers and the Effects on Craving After Acute Exposure to E-Cigarettes in the Laboratory.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent surveys confirm continued increases in the use of electronic-cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in adolescents and adults. Users often state that e-cigarettes reduce tobacco craving and withdrawal symptoms in addition to their smoking. Data from laboratory studies and clinical trials have confirmed these statements, though there are inconsistencies in the outcomes. In this pilot study, we set out to evaluate the effects of e-cigarettes, as compared to the participants' own cigarettes, on baseline craving and smoking severity. METHODS: Using a within-subjects, placebo-controlled study design, 15 tobacco-dependent, e-cigarette naïve participants sustained abstinence overnight. They completed distinct phases of this protocol during four separate study sessions. Participants were randomized to an e-cigarette device containing one of three doses of nicotine (0, 18, or 36 mg/ml) or their own cigarette. Each study visit was ~3 hours long and separated by at least 7 days. Visits included assessments of craving and smoking severity. RESULTS: The data showed that after 10 puffs in both the Own cigarette and e-cigarette conditions, breath carbon monoxide levels increased significantly in the former but not the latter. Questionnaire of Smoking Urges and Choices to Smoke scores were not statistically different across groups after two distinct bouts of 10 puffs each. Additionally, E-cigarette Perceptions Questionnaire responses were not significantly different according to dose. CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This experiment provides data demonstrating that e-cigarettes did not reduce craving or smoking severity in e-cigarette naïve users. However, since this was a pilot study, the conclusions that can be drawn are limited. (Am J Addict 2019;28:361-366).