Characteristics of joint involvement and relationships with systemic inflammation in systemic sclerosis: results from the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research Group (EUSTAR) database.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of and independent factors associated with joint involvement in a large population of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: This study was cross-sectional, based on data collected on patients included in the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) registry. We queried this database to extract data regarding global evaluation of patients with SSc and the presence of any clinical articular involvement: synovitis (tender and swollen joints), tendon friction rubs (rubbing sensation detected as the tendon was moved), and joint contracture (stiffness of the joints that decreased their range of motion). Overall joint involvement was defined by the occurrence of synovitis and/or joint contracture and/or tendon friction rubs. RESULTS: We recruited 7286 patients with SSc; their mean age was 56 +/- 14 years, disease duration 10 +/- 9 years, and 4210 (58%) had a limited cutaneous disease subset. Frequencies of synovitis, tendon friction rubs, and joint contractures were 16%, 11%, and 31%, respectively. Synovitis, tendon friction rubs, and joint contracture were more prevalent in patients with the diffuse cutaneous subset and were associated together and with severe vascular, muscular, renal, and interstitial lung involvement. Moreover, synovitis had the highest strength of association with elevated acute-phase reactants taken as the dependent variable. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the striking level of articular involvement in SSc, as evaluated by systematic examination in a large cohort of patients with SSc. Our data also show that synovitis, joint contracture, and tendon friction rubs are associated with a more severe disease and with systemic inflammation.

Sustained improvement of vascular endothelial function during anti-TNFalpha treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular endothelial function and common carotid artery intima-medial thickness (CCA-IMT) are well-established surrogate markers for early atherosclerotic disease, which accounts for 30-40% of excess mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Our aim was to investigate whether long-term treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha agents can modulate endothelial function and CCA-IMT. METHODS: Twelve patients with RA (mean age 54.8+/-15 years) on anti-TNFalpha treatment (seven adalimumab, five infliximab) due to uncontrolled disease activity, with mean Disease Activity Score (DAS28) 5.7 (range 4.6-6.9) despite disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), were studied prospectively. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 18 months for endothelial-dependent vasodilatation, assessed by flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD), endothelial-independent vasodilatation and CCA-IMT. RA disease activity and response to therapy were assessed by the DAS28 index. RESULTS: After 18 months of treatment, 67% of the patients were responders according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Anti-TNFalpha treatment improved FMD (from 7+/-4.3% to 11.1+/-3.8%, p = 0.026) whereas CCA-IMT did not change significantly [from 0.67 (0.4-1) to 0.68 (0.39-1.2) mm; mean change 0.01 (-0.06 to 0.08) mm]. Endothelial-independent vasodilatation remained stable (20.4+/-7.3% to 22.9+/-6.5%, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort of patients with RA and no clinically overt cardiovascular disease (CVD), after 18 months of treatment with anti-TNFalpha agents, endothelial function improved significantly while CCA-IMT remained stable. Longitudinal studies using more patients are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings in relation to the risk of atherosclerosis.

Evidence-based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: results of the Hellenic working group of the 3E Initiative in Rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE: The 3E (Evidence, Experts and Exchange) Initiative is a multi-national effort that involves a large number of experts and practicing rheumatologists addressing specific questions relevant to everyday clinical practice, concerning the management of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Within this multinational group, the Hellenic working group, addressed specific issues complementary to the international ones, and formulated evidence-based recommendations, in order to improve everyday clinical practice for patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. METHODS: A scientific committee of rheumatologists specializing in AS formulated a set of 7 questions in three domains: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. Literature search in MedLine for papers published up to August 2006 was conducted. The evidence to support each proposition was evaluated and scored. To avoid any conflict of interest with the sponsor issues related to the use of biologics were not discussed. After extensive discussion among 50 rheumatologists and one Delphi round of votes, the final recommendations were formulated. RESULTS: A literature search resulted in a total of 320 relevant papers of which 29 were evaluated. A total of seven recommendations were formulated: two concerning diagnosis (role of HLA-B27 and MRI) and prognosis, one concerning monitoring for extra-articular manifestations and four concerning treatment (analgesics, disease modifying agents and physical therapy) were made. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation were reported. The compiled agreement among experts ranged from 90% up to 100%. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for the management of AS were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by physicians' consensus with high level of agreement. These are complementary to existing ones, and address specific domains of everyday clinical practice.

An open label, single dose study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and effects on CD25 expression of ciclosporin in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate and infliximab.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety, efficacy, and lymphocyte activation of a triple therapeutic regimen with infliximab, methotrexate (MTX), and ciclosporin A (CsA) by an open label, pilot study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 19 patients (mean age 52.9 years) with active rheumatoid arthritis (mean DAS28 7.3) after a mean of 16.8 infliximab infusions and dose adjustments of both infliximab and MTX were enrolled. CsA was added to a stable therapeutic regimen. Disease activity was evaluated by the DAS28. Lymphocyte activation was evaluated by assessing CD25 expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Primary end points were safety and efficacy according to the EULAR response criteria at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Eight patients (42%) discontinued treatment: adverse events (3), inefficacy (2) or non-compliance (2). One patient had a stroke and died. 5/11 (45%) patients who completed 24 weeks' treatment were moderate responders. CD25 expression, both on unstimulated and phytohaemagglutinin stimulated PBMCs in five patients assessed, was reduced (mean (SD) values from 37 (34)% to 15 (10)% and from 50 (15)% to 29 (20)%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this group of patients with refractory, highly active disease, addition of CsA reduced lymphocyte activation, and resulted in a modest response and a high rate of discontinuation. In such patients, other new approaches need to be explored.

Low dose of infliximab is inadequate in most patients with spondylarthropathies.

OBJECTIVES: The recommended starting dose for infliximab for ankylosing spondylitis 5mg/kg is higher than that for rheumatoid arthritis. Because of the high expense of the drug lower doses may be considered. We report our experience with lower initial doses. METHODS: Thirty patients with active SpA (16 psoriatic arthritis, 12 ankylosing spondylitis and 2 undifferentiated) received 6 infliximab infusions. Patients had substantial axial disease (mean BASDAI at baseline 5.5). Concomitant therapy (methotrexate or prednisolone) remained stable throughout treatment period. The mean initial dose of infliximab was 3.5 mg/kg/infusion. Clinical efficacy was assessed by BASDAI. The criterion for dose adjustment was a BASDAI improvement of less than 50%. The primary end-points were the proportion of patients requiring a dose adjustment and the percentage of patients achieving 50% improvement in BASDAI after 6 infusions. RESULTS: In this cohort, 2 patients discontinued therapy, 1 for pulmonary infection and 1 for allergic reaction. Twelve patients (40%) showed 50% improvement in BASDAI between baseline and prior to the 7th infusion, while 15 patients (50%) had an improvement > 2 points. To achieve clinical response the frequency and/or the dose of infliximab infusions were increased in 63% of patients. The mean infliximab dose increased from 3.5 mg/kg at the first infusion to 4.3 mg/kg (p < 0.001) at the 7th infusion, resulting in a cumulative dose at the end of the study period comparable to the recommended one. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of our SpA patients low starting doses of infliximab required subsequent adjustment. In these patients infliximab should be administered at the recommended dose of 5mg/kg/infusion.