A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Staging laparoscopy (SL) has become commonplace in the preoperative staging pathway for oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. SL is often performed before curative treatment to examine for macroscopic peritoneal metastases (PM) or positive peritoneal cytology (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop an objective risk scoring system to predict both PM and PPC at SL. METHODS: A prospectively collected and maintained database of all OG cancer patients treated between 2006 and 2020 was reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both PM and PPC at SL. A risk score was produced for both PM and PPC, and then validated internally. RESULTS: Among 968 patients who underwent SL, 96 (9.9%) had PM and 81 (8.4%) had PPC at SL. Tumour site (p < 0.001), computed tomography (CT) T stage (p < 0.001) and N stage (p = 0.029) were significantly associated with PM at SL (p < 0.001). Tumour site (p < 0.001), biopsy histology (p = 0.041), CT T stage (p < 0.001) and N stage (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with PPC. The risk scoring model for PM included cancer site and CT T stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.730). The risk scoring model for PPC included cancer site, CT T and N stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (AUROC = 0.773). CONCLUSIONS: The current risk scores are valid tools with which to predict the risk PM and PPC in patients undergoing SL for OG cancer and may help to avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary SL.

Causes of recurrences after open inguinal herniorrhaphy.

PURPOSE: One of the most important measures of success of open inguinal herniorrhaphy is the incidence of recurrence. Reports suggest that up to 13% of all inguinal hernia repairs worldwide, irrespective of the approach, are repaired for recurrence. The reason as to why inguinal hernias recur is most likely multifactorial. The aim of this review is to evaluate the risk factors responsible for these recurrences in open suture and mesh techniques. METHODS: A search of the Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents and PubMed databases identified English language, peer-reviewed articles on the causes of recurrence following open inguinal herniorrhaphy published between 1990 and 2018. The search terms included 'Inguinal hernia'; 'Open methods'; 'Suture repair'; 'Mesh repair', 'Recurrence', 'Causes', 'Humans'. RESULTS: The literature revealed several contributing modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors that were responsible for recurrence following open suture and mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy. These included perioperative, patient and hernia factors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advent of laparoscopic techniques, open inguinal herniorrhaphy remains one of the most common surgical operations. With open inguinal hernia repairs, risk factors for recurrence can be broadly classified into perioperative, patient and hernia factors. Certain patient and technical risk factors are modifiable and could reduce the recurrence rate. However, many others factors are non-modifiable. It is therefore imperative that the outcome of open inguinal herniorrhaphy must be optimised by careful planning and education for both surgeons and patients to achieve the lowest possible risk of subsequent surgery for recurrence.