European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines on end of life and palliative care in the intensive care unit.

The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) has developed evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions about end-of-life (EoL) and palliative care for critically ill adults to optimize patient-centered care, improving outcomes of relatives, and supporting intensive care unit (ICU) staff in delivering compassionate and effective EoL and palliative care. An international multi-disciplinary panel of clinical experts, a methodologist, and representatives of patients and families examined key domains, including variability across countries, decision-making, palliative-care integration, communication, family-centered care, and conflict management. Eight evidence-based recommendations (6 of low level of evidence and 2 of high level of evidence) and 19 expert opinions were presented. EoL legislation and the importance of respecting the autonomy and preferences of patients were given close attention. Differences in EoL care depending on country income and healthcare provision were considered. Structured EoL decision-making strategies are recommended to improve outcomes of patients and relatives, as well as staff satisfaction and mental health. Early integration of palliative care and the use of standardized tools for symptom assessment are suggested for patients at high risk of dying. Communication training for ICU staff and printed communication aids for families are advocated to improve outcomes and satisfaction. Methods for enhancing family-centeredness of care include structured family conferences and culturally sensitive interventions. Conflict-management protocols and strategies to prevent burnout among healthcare professionals are also considered. The work done to develop these guidelines highlights many areas requiring further research.

Reviewing Ethical Guidelines for the Care of Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders after 30 Years: Rethinking Our Approach at a Time of Transition.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) opposes automatic reversal of do-not-resuscitate orders during the perioperative period, instead advocating for a goal-directed approach that aligns decision-making with patients' priorities and clinical circumstances. Implementation of ASA guidelines continues to face significant barriers including time constraints, lack of longitudinal relationships with patients, and difficulty translating goal-focused discussion into concrete clinical plans. These challenges mirror those of advance care planning more generally, suggesting a need for novel frameworks for serious illness communication and patient-centered decision-making. This review considers ASA guidelines in the context of ongoing transitions to serious illness communication and increasingly multidisciplinary perioperative care. It aims to provide practical guidance for the practicing anesthesiologist while also acknowledging the complexity of decision-making, considering limitations inherent to anesthesiologists' role, and outlining a need to conceptualize delivery of ethically informed care as a collaborative, multidisciplinary endeavor.

What Are the Real Issues in Providing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support: A Survey.

INTRODUCTION: By using a novel survey our study aimed to assess the challenges ECMO and Critical Care (CC) teams face when initiating and managing patient's ECMO support. METHODS: A qualitative survey-based observational study was performed of members of 2 Critical Care Medicine organizations involved in decision-making around the practice of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). The range of exploratory questions covered ethical principles of informed consent, autonomy and goals of care discussions, beneficence, non-maleficence (offering life-sustaining treatments in end-of-life care), and justice (insurance-related limitations of treatment). Questions also covered pragmatic practice and quality improvement areas, such as exploring whether palliative care or ethics teams were involved in such decision-making. RESULTS: 305 members received the survey links, and a total of 61 completed surveys were received, for an overall response rate of 20% among all eligible members. Only 70% of the participants who manage ECMO patients are involved in the ECMO initiation decision process. The majority do not involve Ethics or Palliative care at the initial ECMO initiation decision step. Of the ethical and moral dilemmas reported, the majority revolved around 1. Prognostication of patients receiving VV and VA ECMO support, 2. Lack of knowledge of patient's wishes and goals, 3. Disconnect between expectations of families and outcomes and 4. Staff moral distress around when to stop ECMO in case of futility. CONCLUSION: Our survey highlights areas of distress and dilemma which have been stressed before in the initiation, management, and outcomes of ECMO patients, however with the increasing use of this modality of cardiopulmonary mechanical support being offered, the survey results can offer a guidance using sound ethical principles.

Examining the Role of Race in End-of-Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Background: Prior studies have shown variation in the intensity of end-of-life care in intensive care units (ICUs) among patients of different races. Objective: We sought to identify variation in the levels of care at the end of life in the ICU and to assess for any association with race and ethnicity. Design: An observational, retrospective cohort study. Settings: A tertiary care center in Boston, MA. Participants: All critically ill patients admitted to medical and surgical ICUs between June 2019 and December 2020. Exposure: Self-identified race and ethnicity. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes included "code status," markers of intensity of care, consultation by the Palliative care service, and consultation by the Ethics service. Results: A total of 9083 ICU patient encounters were analyzed. One thousand two hundred fifty-nine patients (14%) died in the ICU; the mean age of patients was 64 years (standard deviation 16.8), and 44% of patients were women. A large number of decedents (22.7%) did not have their race identified. These patients had a high rate of interventions at death. Code status varied by race, with more White patients designated as "Comfort Measures Only" (CMO) (74%) whereas more Black patients were designated as "Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate (DNR/DNI) and DNR/ok to intubate" (12.1% and 15.7%) at the end of life; after adjustment for age and severity of illness, there were no statistical differences by race for the use of the CMO code status. Use of dialysis at the end of life varied by self-identified race. Specifically, Black and Unknown patients were more likely to receive renal replacement therapy, even after adjustment for age and severity of illness (24% and 20%, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Our data describe a gap in identification of race and ethnicity, as well as differences at the end of life in the ICU, especially with respect to code status and certain markers of intensity.

Misconceptions about women in leadership in academic medicine.

Despite progress made over the past decade, women are under-represented in positions of leadership in academic medicine. Women physicians face numerous challenges throughout their careers. Despite achieving leadership positions, women in leadership continue to experience the impact of those challenges. In this review, we describe four misconceptions about women in leadership, along with their impact and recommendations. First, we describe differences between mentorship and sponsorship, as well as their impact on attaining leadership positions. Second, the gender pay gap persists throughout women's careers, regardless of leadership positions. Third, we explore the role of self-efficacy in leadership in the context of stereotype threats. Fourth, gendered expectations of leadership characteristics place an undue burden on women, detracting from their leadership effectiveness. Organizations can address the challenges women face by creating robust mentorship and sponsorship networks, establishing transparent and equitable pay policies, promoting and normalizing a broader range of leadership styles, and improving work flexibility and support structure. Ultimately, such changes serve all members of the organization through increased retention and engagement.

RéSUMé: Malgré les progrès réalisés au cours de la dernière décennie, les femmes demeurent sous-représentées dans les postes de direction en médecine universitaire. Les femmes médecins font face à de nombreux défis tout au long de leur carrière. Malgré leur accession à des postes de direction, les femmes occupant ces postes continuent de subir l'impact de ces défis. Dans ce compte-rendu, nous décrivons quatre idées fausses sur les femmes en position de leadership, ainsi que leur impact et quelques recommandations. Tout d'abord, nous décrivons les différences entre le mentorat et le parrainage, ainsi que leur impact sur l'accession à des postes de leadership. Deuxièmement, l'écart de rémunération entre les sexes persiste tout au long de la carrière des femmes, quels que soient les postes de leadership. Troisièmement, nous explorons le rôle de l'auto-efficacité dans le leadership dans le contexte des menaces stéréotypées. Quatrièmement, les attentes genrées à l'égard des caractéristiques recherchées dans le leadership imposent un fardeau indu aux femmes, ce qui nuit à l'efficacité de leur leadership. Les organisations peuvent relever les défis auxquels les femmes sont confrontées en créant de solides réseaux de mentorat et de parrainage, en établissant des politiques salariales transparentes et équitables, en promouvant et en normalisant un éventail plus varié de styles de leadership et en améliorant la flexibilité du travail et les structures de soutien. En fin de compte, de tels changements servent tous les membres de l'organisation grâce à une rétention et une implication accrues.

Understanding the Underlying Causes of Tensions That Arise in ICU Care for Older Patients.

AbstractObjective: We hypothesized that the reasons behind this tension are complex and can be understood better by applying social psychology theory.Design: A qualitative methodology was drawn on for data collection and thematic analysis, with focus group discussions adopted for interviews with patient families and ICU physicians. Additionally, we used a social psychology theory, the reasoned action approach (RAA) framework, to understand these tensions.Setting: Two 15-bedded ICUs of an academic university-affiliated teaching hospital in Singapore.Subjects: A total of 72 physicians and family members of older ICU patients (>70 years old).Measurements and Main Results: The primary analysis revealed five areas of tension around prognostication in the ICU. These dealt with issues of divergent views, different role expectations, conflicting emotional responses, and issues of communication and trust. Further analysis helped to identify underlying factors leading to tensions and behaviors. Differences in prognostication and in expectation of outcomes between clinicians and family members were the main cause of tensions. When the RAA framework was applied, these tensions could be predicted early on and understood more clearly.Conclusions: Tensions revolve around losing control of the patient's care, differences between hopeful expectations and clinical prognostication, perceived biases of physicians, and underlying mistrust between families and physicians.

Discharge Disposition and Loss of Independence Among Survivors of COVID-19 Admitted to Intensive Care: Results From the SCCM Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS).

OBJECTIVES: To describe incidence and risk factors of loss of previous independent living through nonhome discharge or discharge home with health assistance in survivors of intensive care unit (ICU) admission for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). DESIGN: Multicenter observational study including patients admitted to the ICU from January 2020 till June 30, 2021. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that there is a high risk of nonhome discharge in patients surviving ICU admission due to COVID-19. SETTING: Data were included from 306 hospitals in 28 countries participating in the SCCM Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study COVID-19 registry. PATIENTS: Previously independently living adult ICU survivors of COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was nonhome discharge. Secondary outcome was the requirement of health assistance among patients who were discharged home. Out of 10 820 patients, 7101 (66%) were discharged alive; 3791 (53%) of these survivors lost their previous independent living status, out of those 2071 (29%) through nonhome discharge, and 1720 (24%) through discharge home requiring health assistance. In adjusted analyses, loss of independence on discharge among survivors was predicted by patient age ≥ 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.47-3.14, P < .0001), former and current smoking status (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.46, P = .003 and 1.60 (95% CI 1.18-2.16), P = .003, respectively), substance use disorder (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.06, P = .007), requirement for mechanical ventilation (aOR 4.17, 95% CI 3.69-4.71, P < .0001), prone positioning (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.38, P = .02), and requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.55-3.34, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of ICU survivors hospitalized for COVID-19 are unable to return to independent living status, thereby imposing a significant secondary strain on health care systems worldwide.

Massive Trauma and Resuscitation Strategies.

Massive trauma remains the leading cause of mortality among people aged younger than 45 years. In this review, we discuss the initial care and diagnosis of trauma patients followed by a comparison of resuscitation strategies. We discuss various strategies including use of whole blood and component therapy, examine viscoelastic techniques for management of coagulopathy, and consider the benefits and limitations of the resuscitation strategies and consider a series of questions that will be important for researchers to answer to provide the best and most cost-effective therapy for severely injured patients.