Ageism and nursing students, past or reality?: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to summarise and update existing knowledge about ageism among nursing students through the following research question: what is the perception and attitudes of ageism among student nurses? DESIGN: A systematic review of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies of ageism in nursing students was carried out. DATA SOURCES: The literature search was conducted in the scientific databases Pubmed and Scopus in February 2021. REVIEW METHODS: After the screening process, 22 studies meeting the selection criteria were selected; 8 more were identified after manually searching the selected paper' reference lists. A total of 30 studies were included in the review. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists for Analytical Cross-Sectional studies and for Cohort Studies were used to appraise the articles' quality. RESULTS: There was large variability in the manifestation of ageism among student nurses, as well as in the instruments used for assessment. Most of the articles analysed attitudes towards old age, the majority of which were positive. Being a female student, being on the final year of study and having regular contact or cohabitation with an older adult were three of the main determinants in the expression of positive attitudes towards the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that student nurses generally have positive attitudes towards old age, although ageist beliefs and discriminatory behaviours were identified and should be studied in greater depth. Training programs for future care professionals have a responsibility to educate from a non-stereotypical perspective based on current societal needs.

Frequency and phenotype of headache in covid-19: a study of 2194 patients.

To estimate the frequency of headache in patients with confirmed COVID-19 and characterize the phenotype of headache attributed to COVID-19, comparing patients depending on the need of hospitalization and sex, an observational study was done. We systematically screened all eligible patients from a reference population of 261,431 between March 8 (first case) and April 11, 2020. A physician administered a survey assessing demographic and clinical data and the phenotype of the headache. During the study period, 2194 patients out of the population at risk were diagnosed with COVID-19. Headache was described by 514/2194 patients (23.4%, 95% CI 21.7-25.3%), including 383/1614 (23.7%) outpatients and 131/580 (22.6%) inpatients. The headache phenotype was studied in detail in 458 patients (mean age, 51 years; 72% female; prior history of headache, 49%). Headache was the most frequent first symptom of COVID-19. Median headache onset was within 24 h, median duration was 7 days and persisted after 1 month in 13% of patients. Pain was bilateral (80%), predominantly frontal (71%), with pressing quality (75%), of severe intensity. Systemic symptoms were present in 98% of patients. Headache frequency and phenotype was similar in patients with and without need for hospitalization and when comparing male and female patients, being more intense in females.Trial registration: This study was supported by the Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), code 07.04.467804.74011 and Regional Health Administration, Gerencia Regional de Salud, Castilla y Leon (GRS: 2289/A/2020).

Asistir y castigar: nuevos usos de viejos dispositivos de gobierno / Attending and punish: new uses of old devices government

En el marco de la era progresista de gobierno, este artículo se propone discutir las orientaciones de algunas de las políticas dirigidas a la extrema pobreza en Uruguay. Se intenta dar cuenta de razones para considerar que algunas de ellas configuran una penalización creciente de la precariedad social. Las intervenciones actuales y las orientaciones que expresan, señalarían una sociedad con creciente hegemonía conservadora incluso en el discurso social de izquierda. Algunas de las preguntas que orientan nuestra reflexión son las siguientes: ¿es posible hablar de una forma de gobierno en nuestro país que, combina más estado social y más estado penal en el gobierno del precariado?, ¿cómo se combinan hoy, asistencia y control social y qué efectos socializadores tiene ese nuevo patrón? En síntesis, colocamos en debate cómo es alcanzada hoy, en nuestro país, la normalización de los pobres y en la búsqueda de qué objetivos (algunos aparentemente contrapuestos). Para ello, nos valemos de una mirada que prioriza el análisis de los problemas y sujetos que construyen dichas prácticas. Nuestro análisis se basa en aportes de Wacquant (2007, 2010), Topalov (2004) y Bauman (1998) entre otros, y el estudio de distintos planes y discursos gubernamentales.

This paper aims to discuss the guidance of some of the policies targeted to extreme poverty in the Uruguayan progressive government framework. It intends to consider that some of these policies characterize/illustrate/report an increasingly criminalization of social insecurity. Current interventions and the orientations they expresse, would point out the increasingly hegemony of a conservative society even in the leftist social discourse. The following are some of the questions that orientate our thoughts: is it possible to speak about a form of government, in our country, that combines more social state and more criminal state, in the government of precariat?, how do social assistance and social control combine today and which socializing effects this new pattern has? In short, we debate how our country actually reaches the standardization of the poor and the goals it pursuits (some apparently conflicting/contending). To achieve this debate, we use a perspective that prioritizes the analysis of issues and persons that build such practices. Our analysis is based in Wacquant (2007, 2010), Topalov (2004) and Bauman (1998) perspectives, among others, and the study of various plans and government speeches.