A multicentric Spanish study on the characteristics and survival of gastric adenocarcinoma under the age of 60.

INTRODUCTION: In Europe, gastric adenocarcinoma (GADC) is commonly regarded as a disease of the elderly. This study aims to assess the proportion, characteristics, and survival of patients diagnosed with GADC under the age of 60. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentric, and analytical study conducted at four tertiary Spanish hospitals. All patients diagnosed with GADC between 2008 and 2015 were included. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and survival data were retrieved. A multivariate analysis was performed to compare GADC in young (age≤60 years) and elderly patients. RESULTS: A total of 1374 patients with GADC were included. The mean age was 74 years (SD:11.1); 62.2% were males. There were 177 patients under the age of 60 (12.9%, 95% CI: 11.2-14.8%). GADC was frequently encountered as a metastatic disease in both young and elderly patients (Stage IV: 45.7% and 41%, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, alcohol abuse, ASA functional status I-II, diffuse subtype, neoadjuvant, and palliative therapy were independently associated (P<0.05) with age ≤60 years. No differences were found in 2-year survival (GADC ≤60: 39% vs. 35%, P=0.45). Curative-intent surgery, TNM stage I-II, body mass index<30kg/m2, and better functional status at diagnosis were independent predictors of survival in GADC under the age of 60. CONCLUSIONS: One out of eight cases of GADC were diagnosed under the age of 60. Metastatic disease was frequent at diagnosis and overall survival was poor regardless of age. Factors associated with localized disease correlated with improved survival in younger patients. Our results underline the need for early diagnosis strategies in our country.

Rate of missed oesophageal cancer at routine endoscopy and survival outcomes: A multicentric cohort study.

Background: Missed oesophageal cancer (MEC) at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is poorly documented. Objective: The objectives of this study were: (1) to assess the rate, predictors and survival of MEC; (2) to compare MEC and non-MEC tumours. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at four tertiary centres. Oesophageal cancers (ECs) diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were included. Patients with a premalignant condition (Barrett, achalasia), prior diagnosis of EC or oesophagogastric junction tumour of gastric origin were excluded. MEC was defined as EC detected within 36 months after negative UGE. Results: 123,395 UGEs were performed during the study period, with 502 ECs being diagnosed (0.4%). A total of 391 ECs were finally included. Overall MEC rate was 6.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 4.4-9.3%). The interval between negative and diagnostic UGE was less than 2 years in 84% of the cases. Multivariate analysis showed that a negative endoscopy was associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and less experienced endoscopists. MEC was smaller than non-MEC at diagnosis (25 versus 40 mm, p = 0.021), more often flat or depressed (p = 0.013) and less frequently diagnosed as metastatic disease (p = 0.013). Overall 2-year survival rate was similar for MEC (20%) and non-MEC (24.1%) (p = 0.95). Conclusions: MEC accounted for 6.4% of all ECs and was associated with poor survival. High-quality UGE and awareness of MEC may help to reduce its incidence.

Severe obscure gastrointestinal bleeding successfully treated with idarucizumab.

Idarucizumab is a monoclonal antibody that rapidly reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran. The experience with this drug in the setting of gastrointestinal bleeding is scarce. We present the case of an 84-year-old male with known history of non-valvular atrial fibrillation anticoagulated with dabigatran who presented to the emergency room with melena. During his stay in the emergency department he suddenly worsened with hemodynamic derangement and massive melena so idarucizumab was administered. Gastroscopy and colonoscopy were performed without identifying a bleeding source. After the administration of idarucizumab, the patient did not presented signs of ongoing bleeding. Anticoagulation was resumed on the sixth day and no rebleeding or thromboembolic events have been recorded after six months of follow-up. This case and the limited information available in the literature suggest that idarucizumab can be useful and safe in cases of severe gastrointestinal bleeding with recent intake of dabigatran.

Do patients with iron deficiency without anemia benefit from an endoscopic examination?

OBJECTIVE: The need for endoscopic investigation in patients with iron deficiency without anemia (ID) is not established. METHODS: Data from patients with ID (serum ferritin ≤20 ng/mL, normal hemoglobin) studied with upper and lower endoscopies were retrospectively analyzed. Patients evaluated for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) served as controls, matched by sex and age in the proportion of 2:1. The groups were compared for the presence, type, location and age distribution of endoscopic findings. RESULTS: Altogether 109 patients (55% women; mean age 59.6 ± 13.5 years; aged <50 years [27.5%]; 50-69 years [43.1%]; ≥70 years [29.4%]) were included in the ID group and 218 matched controls in the IDA group. Lesions were found in a similar proportion of patients (53.2% in the ID group vs 49.1% in the IDA group, P = 0.48) irrespective of age (P = 0.92). The colonoscopy diagnostic yield was low in both the ID and IDA subgroups of aged <50 years (6.3% vs 4.2%, P = 0.76). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant relationship between age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.06) and male sex (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.18-4.39) with a positive colonoscopy. Malignancy was significantly less frequent in the ID group (1.8% vs 14.2%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of gastrointestinal lesions in patients with and without anemia was similar but malignancy was eight times less frequent in the ID group. Systematic endoscopic evaluation in patients with ID is therefore questionable.

Incidencia de hemorragia en usuarias de dispositivo intrauterino, Hospital de San Jose, Centro de Salud No. 6. Bogota Enero de 1981, Diciembre de 1986 / Incidence of genital hemorrhage in users of intra uterine dispositive, Hospital San Jose, health center No. 6. Bogota. January 1981, December 1986

En el centro de salud No 6 del D.E. de Bogota, se lleva a cabo el programa de planificacion familiar, en el cual las usuarias tienen acceso a la utilizacion de DIU, Asa de Lippes y T de cobre, metodos que aunque son efectivos de un 90 a 95% pueden llegar a ocasionar efectos secundarios como la hemorragia, que constituye una de las quejas mas frecuentes en las ususarias. La hemorragia parece estar relacionada con variables tales como edad, gestaciones, tipo de DIU y tiempo de uso del mismo, razon por la cual el objetivo general del presente trabajo no solo es determinar la incidencia, sino tambien conocer algunos factores de riesgo y algunas caracteristicas de la hemorragia en mujeres que planifican con DIU. Los principios o bases teoricas seleccionadas para sustentar cientificamente esta investigacion, tienen que ver con la historia y los antecedentes del uso de los DIU, con las clases de DIU y los mecanismos de accion de cada uno de ellos, con la prescripcion, procedimiento de insercion y contraindicaciones para el uso de DIU, con los efectos secundarios y las complicaciones que pueden sobrevenir a la usuaria, y finalmente con las formas de hemorragia, sus causas y consecuencia. Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior se pudo concluir: -Los tipos de hemorragiaque mas se presenta independiente del tipo del dispositivo son la hipermenorrea y la hemorragia. -Se aprecia que 4 de cada 100 usuarias de T de cobre tienen riesgo de presentar mas de una clase de hemorragia (mixta); en el grupo de edad de 24 a 33 anos y primigestantes. -Con relacion a las usuarias de Asa de Lippes..