Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 64(5): 574-8, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20395808

RESUMO

Nipple reconstruction often marks completion of breast reconstruction. Although it is important to overall aesthetic results, actual data on outcomes and satisfaction is limited. A retrospective review of patients who underwent nipple reconstruction using the C-V technique was performed. Patient demographics, outcomes, and patient satisfaction (1-5 scale) were assessed. There were 252 nipple reconstructions performed with an average follow-up of 38 months. Complications included: tip necrosis (3.2%), dehiscence (0.8%), and surgical revision (2%). Satisfaction scores: nipple reconstruction (3.8/5), projection (3.2/5), symmetry (4.2/5), and tattooing (3.2/5). Tissue expander reconstructions had the lowest satisfaction in all categories except breast sensation. Latissimus dorsi reconstruction had the highest satisfaction, however, they also had the highest complication rate. The most common complaint was lack of projection (38%). The C-V technique is a safe and effective procedure; patients are satisfied and would undergo the procedure again. Autologous tissue reconstructions had worse sensation, however, patient satisfaction was higher. Although patients are generally satisfied, room for improvement exists.


Assuntos
Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia , Mamilos/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Adulto , Idoso , Estética , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Dispositivos para Expansão de Tecidos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA