Direct comparison of runoff of residual and knockdown herbicides in sugarcane using a rainfall simulator finds large difference in runoff losses and toxicity relative to diuron.

Runoff losses of herbicides have rarely been compared simultaneously under the same conditions. Our aim was to directly compare herbicide runoff losses, normalised for the amount present (relative runoff loads) and in absolute terms. Toxicity and runoff concentrations were combined to provide a risk ranking relative to diuron. Four rainfall simulation trials were conducted in sugarcane in the Great Barrier Reef catchment. Herbicides studied were older PSII residuals (atrazine, ametryn, diuron, hexazinone), alternative residuals (isoxaflutole, imazapic, metribuzin, metolachlor, pendimethalin) and knockdown herbicides (glyphosate, 2,4-D, fluroxypyr) and the tracer bromide (Br). Simulations were conducted two days after spraying, before differences due to half-lives were apparent. Two trials had bare soil and two had sugarcane trash. Herbicide runoff losses and concentrations were closely related to the amount applied, runoff amounts and partitioning coefficients. Relative runoff losses and absolute losses were similar for most older and alternative residual herbicides, 2,4-D and Br. Glyphosate and pendimethalin relative runoff losses were low, due to greater sorption. Isoxaflutole, imazapic, and fluroxypyr are applied at much lower rates and runoff losses were low. Herbicides were lost in the dissolved phase, except pendimethalin. There was a large range in toxicity relative to diuron. There is a range of herbicide choices posing less offsite risk than diuron and ametryn, which have high application rates and high toxicity. Herbicide choice should consider application rate, runoff losses, sorption, and toxicity.

Pesticide Behavior, Fate, and Effects in the Tropics: An Overview of the Current State of Knowledge.

This special issue presents a collection of papers covering the environmental fate, effects, and risk of pesticides in tropical environments, which is expected to facilitate improved management of pesticides. Environmental monitoring programs of surface and ground waters in the tropics, including areas of high ecological value, have detected several relatively polar pesticides at concentrations that are of ecological concern. Novel monitoring techniques have the capacity to reveal the spatial and temporal extent of such risks. To best manage these pesticides, their sorption, dissipation rates, leaching, and runoff potential need to be better understood. On these aspects, important insights have been provided by several studies within this issue. Improved understanding of the environmental fate, effects, and risks through studies presented in this special issue is crucial for minimizing the nontarget impacts of pesticides on biodiversity-rich tropical regions.

Spot Spraying Reduces Herbicide Concentrations in Runoff.

Rainfall simulator trials were conducted on sugar cane paddocks across dry-tropical and subtropical Queensland, Australia, to examine the potential for spot spraying to reduce herbicide losses in runoff. Recommended rates of the herbicides glyphosate, 2,4-D, fluoroxypyr, atrazine, and diuron were sprayed onto 0, 20, 40, 50, 70, or 100% of the area of runoff plots. Simulated rainfall was applied 2 days after spraying to induce runoff at one plant cane and three ratoon crop sites. Over 50% of all herbicides were transported in the dissolved phase of runoff, regardless of the herbicide's sediment-water partition coefficient. For most sites and herbicides, runoff herbicide concentrations decreased with decreasing spray coverage and with decreasing herbicide load in the soil and cane residues. Importantly, sites with higher infiltration prior to runoff and lower total runoff had lower runoff herbicide concentrations.

Relating sediment impacts on coral reefs to watershed sources, processes and management: a review.

Modification of terrestrial sediment fluxes can result in increased sedimentation and turbidity in receiving waters, with detrimental impacts on coral reef ecosystems. Preventing anthropogenic sediment reaching coral reefs requires a better understanding of the specific characteristics, sources and processes generating the anthropogenic sediment, so that effective watershed management strategies can be implemented. Here, we review and synthesise research on measured runoff, sediment erosion and sediment delivery from watersheds to near-shore marine areas, with a strong focus on the Burdekin watershed in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. We first investigate the characteristics of sediment that pose the greatest risk to coral reef ecosystems. Next we track this sediment back from the marine system into the watershed to determine the storage zones, source areas and processes responsible for sediment generation and run-off. The review determined that only a small proportion of the sediment that has been eroded from the watershed makes it to the mid and outer reefs. The sediment transported >1 km offshore is generally the clay to fine silt (<4-16 µm) fraction, yet there is considerable potential for other terrestrially derived sediment fractions (<63 µm) to be stored in the near-shore zone and remobilised during wind and tide driven re-suspension. The specific source of the fine clay sediments is still under investigation; however, the Bowen, Upper Burdekin and Lower Burdekin sub-watersheds appear to be the dominant source of the clay and fine silt fractions. Sub-surface erosion is the dominant process responsible for the fine sediment exported from these watersheds in recent times, although further work on the particle size of this material is required. Maintaining average minimum ground cover >75% will likely be required to reduce runoff and prevent sub-soil erosion; however, it is not known whether ground cover management alone will reduce sediment supply to ecologically acceptable levels.