Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplant Proc ; 52(1): 89-96, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32000943

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After renal transplantation (RTx) hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality resulting in lower patient and graft survival. Few studies have investigated the evolution of renal transplant patients with cirrhosis owing to HCV. The objectives were to evaluate the post-transplant evolution of cirrhotic patients and to compare them with noncirrhotic patients considering the outcomes, including hepatic decompensation, graft loss, and death. METHODS: The retrospective-cohort study analyzed the data of patients undergoing RTx between 1993 and 2014, positive anti-HCV, HCV-RNA before RTx, and availability of data for assessment of cirrhosis. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were compared between the groups according to the outcomes. The same were made between cirrhotic patients with and without portal hypertension (PH). Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier test and compared by the log-rank test. Variables associated with the outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: This study included noncirrhotic (n = 201) and cirrhotic patients (n = 23). In cirrhotic patients, they were significantly older (49 vs 41.6 years) and mostly male (87% vs 65%), with a greater number of previous RTx (48% vs 18%), less frequent use of azathioprine (26% vs 54%), cyclosporine (13% vs 46.5%), more frequent use of tacrolimus (87% vs 55%), lower count of platelets × 1000 cells/mm3(110 vs 187), and higher pre-RTx international normalized ratio (1.20 vs 1.1).The Kaplan-Meier survival differed in cirrhotic vs noncirrhotic patients only in hepatic decompensation. Cox regression analysis identified pretransplant cirrhosis (hazard ratio 6.64, 95% confidence interval, 2.59-17.06) and tacrolimus (hazard ratio 3.17,95% confidence interval, 1.05-9.58) as variables independently associated with decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCV and cirrhosis exhibit higher morbidity when submitted to RTx than noncirrhotic patients, with a higher risk of hepatic decompensation. However, no difference was observed in liver-related mortality, suggesting that RTx is a feasible option in cirrhotic patients without decompensation, even if they have PH.


Assuntos
Hepacivirus , Hepatite C/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/virologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(9): 1141-1147, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30964809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and clinical epidemiological profile of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have changed over time. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate these changes in renal transplant recipients (RTx) comparing two different decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RTx with HCV referred to RTx from 1993 to 2003 (A) and from 2004 to 2014 (B) were studied retrospectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics and different outcomes were compared between groups A and B. Variables that were statistically different were tested for inclusion in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model predicting patient survival within the group. RESULTS: Among 11 715 RTx, the prevalence of HCV was 7% in A and 4.9% in B. In the more recent period (B), the mean age was older (46.2 vs. 39.5 years), with more males (72 vs. 60.7%), larger number of deceased donors (74 vs. 55%), higher percentage of previous RTx (27 vs. 13.7%), less frequent history of blood transfusion (81 vs. 89.4%), lower prevalence of hepatitis B virus coinfection (4.7 vs. 21.4%), and higher percentage of cirrhotic patients (13 vs. 5%). Patients of group B more frequently underwent treatment of HCV (29 vs. 9%), less frequently used azathioprine (38.6 vs. 60.7%) and cyclosporine (11.8 vs. 74.7%), and more frequently used tacrolimus (91 vs. 27.3%). In the outcomes, graft loss showed no difference between periods; however, decompensation was more frequent (P = 0.007) and patients' survival was lower in the more recent period (P = 0.032) compared with the earlier one. CONCLUSION: The profile of RTx with HCV has changed over the last 20 years. Despite a decrease in the prevalence of HCV, new clinical challenges have emerged, such as more advanced age and a higher prevalence of cirrhosis.


Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Hepatite C Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Brasil , Feminino , Hepatite C Crônica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA