How can we improve support for women with perinatal anxiety in primary care? A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Perinatal anxiety (PNA) occurs during pregnancy and up to 12 months post-partum. PNA affects more than 21% of women and can impact adversely on mothers, children and their families. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance identified evidence gaps around non-pharmacological interventions for PNA. AIM: This qualitative study aimed to understand the perspectives of a variety of Perinatal Mental Health (PMH) stakeholders about non-pharmacological interventions for PNA. METHOD: Ethics approval. Semi-structured interviews with women with lived experience of PNA, healthcare professionals (HCPs), voluntary community and social enterprise (VCSE) stakeholders and commissioners. Topic guide modified in response to emerging themes. Interviews digitally recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. A patient advisory group was involved throughout the study. RESULTS: There were 25 interviews conducted. Women with PNA expressed a wish to choose from a range of non-pharmacological interventions, which are often delivered by VSCE organisations or not commissioned within the NHS. HCPs described a hierarchy of interventions that can be offered to women, often related to severity of a woman's PNA. PMH VCSE stakeholders emphasised that their services are flexible and accessible for women with PNA. CONCLUSION: Tension exists between what is currently recommended by NICE and thus commissioned, and the types of intervention that women want to access, including support from VCSE services. Clinicians should be aware of local VCSE organisations which provide care for women with PNA. There is an evidence gap around the effectiveness of various interventions delivered by VCSE organisations, which requires further exploration.

Could primary care records be used to identify women at risk of perinatal anxiety? A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Perinatal anxiety (PNA) occurs throughout the antenatal period or up to 1 year after childbirth, with a prevalence of 21%. AIM: To investigate if primary care records could be used to identify women at 'higher risk' of PNA. METHOD: Mixed-methods approach using quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data analysis used Clinical Practice Research Datalink and IQVIA Medical Research Data to identify risk factors for PNA. Interviews explored the lived experiences of women with PNA about predisposing factors for PNA and acceptability of being informed of risk; and perspectives of primary healthcare professionals and Voluntary, Community, and Social Enterprise practitioners about risk communication. Interviews were conducted online, digitally recorded with consent, transcribed, and anonymised prior to analysis. Data were thematically analysed. Patient and clinical advisory groups informed each stage of the research. RESULTS: Women reflected on both positive and negative impacts of being identified at higher risk of PNA, a lack of understanding of how primary care records are used, and who has access to them. All interview participants suggested predisposing factors that would not be coded in primary care records. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that some predisposing factors for PNA can be identified in a woman's primary care records. Initial analysis suggests associations between PNA and infant health and healthcare use. CONCLUSION: While identification of higher risk of PNA may be acceptable, some factors that may contribute to PNA are not coded in primary care records. Identifying and managing PNA is needed to improve infant health.

Using the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive to explore the characteristics and healthcare use of older housebound patients in England: protocol for a retrospective observational study and clinician survey (the CHiP study).

BACKGROUND: Older housebound people are an under-researched group for whom achieving good primary health care can be resource intensive. AIMS: To describe the characteristics and healthcare use of older (≥65 years) housebound people; explore clinician views on delivery of care to housebound people; and assess the feasibility of using a new network of healthcare professionals to deliver high quality research. DESIGN & SETTING: Retrospective observational study of electronic GP records and clinician survey in England. METHOD: Clinical members of a new UK research network called the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT) will collect the data. For part A, around 20 GP practices will be recruited and clinicians will identify 20 housebound and 20 non-housebound people, matched by age and gender (around 400 total in each group). Anonymised data will be collected on characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation decile), long-term conditions, prescribed medicines, quality of healthcare (via Quality Outcomes Framework targets), and continuity of care. Reports with benchmarked practice-level data will be provided to practices to identify areas for quality improvement and to enhance engagement. For part B, 2-4 clinicians will be recruited from around 50 practices in England (around 150 clinicians) to complete a survey about delivery of healthcare for housebound people. For part C, data will be collected to assess the feasibility of using the PACT network to deliver primary care research. CONCLUSION: Older housebound people are a neglected group both in terms of research and clinical care. Understanding the characteristics and use of primary healthcare of housebound people will help identify how to improve their care.

Non-pharmacological interventions for the management of perinatal anxiety in primary care: a meta-review of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Perinatal anxiety (PNA), anxiety that occurs during pregnancy and/or up to 12 months postpartum, is estimated to affect up to 21% of women, and may impact negatively on mothers, children, and their families. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has called for further research around non-pharmacological interventions in primary care for PNA. AIM: To summarise the available international evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for women with PNA in a primary care population. DESIGN & SETTING: A meta-review of systematic reviews (SRs) with narrative synthesis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. METHOD: Systematic literature searches were conducted in 11 health-related databases up to June 2022. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were dual-screened against pre-defined eligibility criteria. A variety of study designs were included. Data were extracted about study participants, intervention design, and context. Quality appraisal was performed using the AMSTAR 2 tool (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). A patient and public involvement group informed and contributed towards this meta-review. RESULTS: Twenty-four SRs were included in the meta-review. Interventions were grouped into the following six categories for analysis purposes: psychological therapies; mind-body activities; emotional support from healthcare professionals (HCPs); peer support; educational activities; and alternative or complementary therapies. CONCLUSION: In addition to pharmacological and psychological therapies, this meta-review has demonstrated that there are many more options available for women to choose from that might be effective to manage their PNA. Evidence gaps are present in several intervention categories. Primary care clinicians and commissioners should endeavour to provide patients with a choice of these management options, promoting individual choice and patient-centred care.

The approach to managing perinatal anxiety: A mini-review.

Perinatal Anxiety (PNA) is defined as anxiety occurring during pregnancy and up to 12 months post-partum and is estimated to affect up to 20% of women. Risk factors for PNA are multiple and can be classed as psychological, social and biological. PNA negatively impacts on the mother, child and family. PNA is not well-recognized and diagnosis of PNA can be challenging for clinicians. There is currently no validated case-finding or diagnostic test available for PNA. PNA has been less extensively researched than perinatal depression (PND). Clinical guidance currently recommends pharmacological and psychological therapies for the management of women with PNA, however the limited research available suggests that other intervention types may also be effective with some evidence on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in primary care for PNA. This article provides a mini-review of PNA, summarizing current evidence around PNA including risk factors, the impact of PNA, the process of diagnosis of PNA and focussing predominantly on available management options for PNA.

Acceptability of physician associate interns in primary care: results from a service evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Physician associates (PA) form part of the policy-driven response to increased primary care demand and a general practitioner (GP) recruitment and retention crisis. However, they are novel to the primary care workforce and have limitations, for example, they cannot prescribe. The novel 1 year Staffordshire PA Internship (SPAI) scheme, introduced in 2017, was established to support the integration of PAs into primary care. PA interns concurrently worked in primary and secondary care posts, with protected weekly primary care focussed education sessions. This evaluation established the acceptability of PA interns within primary care. METHODS: All ten PAs from the first two SPAI cohorts, the nine host practices (supervising GPs and practice managers) and host practice patients were invited to participate in the evaluation. A conceptual framework for implementing interventions in primary care informed data collection and analysis. Data were gathered at three time points over the internship from practices, through discussions with the supervising GP and/or practice manager, and from the PAs via discussion groups. To enrich discussion data, PA and practices were sent brief surveys requesting information on PA/practice characteristics and PA primary care roles. Patient acceptability data were collected by the host practices. Participation at every stage was optional. RESULTS: By evaluation end, eight PAs had completed the internship. Seven PAs and six practices provided data at every time point. Five practices provided patient acceptability data. Overall PA interns were acceptable to practices and patients, however ambiguity about the PA role and how best to communicate and operationalise PA roles was revealed. An expectation-preparedness gap resulted in PAs needing high levels of supervision early within the internship. SPAI facilitated closure of the expectation-preparedness gap and its funding arrangements made the high supervision requirements more acceptable to practices. CONCLUSIONS: The test-of-concept SPAI successfully integrated new PAs into primary care. However, the identified challenges risk undermining PAs roles in primary care before they have attained their full potential. Nationally, workforce leaders should develop approaches to support new PAs into primary care, including commitments to longer-term, sustainable, cohesive and appropriately funded schemes, including structured and standardised education and supervision.

Exploring women's experiences of identifying, negotiating and managing perinatal anxiety: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Anxiety affects around 15% of women during the perinatal period and can adversely impact both mother and child, with potential implications for long-term health; few studies have examined women's experiences of perinatal anxiety (PNA). In the context of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence prioritising PNA, this study aimed to explore women's experiences of the identification and management of PNA and their engagement with healthcare professionals. DESIGN: Qualitative study with semi-structured interviews and applying thematic analysis. SETTING: Recruitment materials were shared widely through maternal support groups, children's centres, libraries, National Health Service (NHS) providers (primary and secondary care) operating in the West Midlands or North West of England and through social media. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen women (aged 25-42 years) with self-reported anxiety during pregnancy and/or up to 12 months postpartum. Interviews digitally recorded and transcribed with consent. RESULTS: Three main themes and corresponding sub-themes are described around a central concept of PNA as an individualised experience: barriers to disclosing PNA; help-seeking for PNA and establishing and engaging support networks. Disclosing, help-seeking and accessing systems of support were interconnected and contextualised by individualised experiences of PNA and pervaded by stigma. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides new insights into PNA and calls for awareness to be improved to achieve parity alongside depression and avoid missed opportunities in the provision of care for women and families. Future research should seek to develop novel PNA-specific interventions aimed at prevention, management and/or combatting stigma to support more women to disclose mental health concerns and seek help early.

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on identifying and managing perinatal anxiety: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Perinatal mental health problems are those that occur during pregnancy or up to 12 months postpartum, and affect up to 20% of women. Perinatal anxiety (PNA) is at least as common as depression during the perinatal phase and can adversely impact on both mother and child. Despite this, research into anxiety has received less attention than depression. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance on perinatal mental health has identified PNA as a research priority. AIM: To explore the perspectives and experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the identification and management of PNA. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a qualitative study in primary and secondary care set in the West Midlands from February 2017 to December 2017. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews (n = 23) with a range of HCPs. Iterative approach to data generation and analysis, using principles of constant comparison. Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) group was involved throughout the study. RESULTS: Twenty-three HCPs interviewed: 10 GPs, seven midwives, five health visitors, and one obstetrician. Four themes were uncovered: PNA as an 'unfamiliar concept'; reliance on clinical intuition and not clinical tools; fragmentation of care; and opportunities to improve care. CONCLUSION: Awareness and understanding of PNA among HCPs is variable, with debate over what is 'normal' anxiety in pregnancy. HCPs suggested that PNA can be challenging to identify, with mixed views on the use and value of case-finding tools. Opportunistic identification was noted to be significant to aid diagnosis. Care for women diagnosed with PNA was reported to be fragmented and interprofessional communication poor. Potential solutions to improve care were identified.