Sex Distributions in Non-ABCA4 Autosomal Macular Dystrophies.

Purpose: We sought to explore whether sex imbalances are discernible in several autosomally inherited macular dystrophies. Methods: We searched the electronic patient records of our large inherited retinal disease cohort, quantifying numbers of males and females with the more common (non-ABCA4) inherited macular dystrophies (associated with BEST1, EFEMP1, PROM1, PRPH2, RP1L1, and TIMP3). BEST1 cases were subdivided into typical autosomal dominant and recessive disease. For PRPH2, only patients with variants at codons 172 or 142 were included. Recessive PROM1 and recessive RP1L1 cases were excluded because these variants give a more widespread or peripheral degeneration. The proportion of females was calculated for each condition; two-tailed binomial testing was performed. Where a significant imbalance was found, previously published cohorts were also explored. Results: Of 325 patients included, numbers for BEST1, EFEMP1, PROM1, PRPH2, RP1L1, and TIMP3 were 152, 35, 30, 50, 14, and 44, respectively. For autosomal dominant Best disease (n = 115), there were fewer females (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29-48%; P = 0.015). For EFEMP1-associated disease (n = 35), there were significantly more females (77%; 95% CI, 60%-90%; P = 0.0019). No significant imbalances were seen for the other genes. When pooling our cohort with previous large dominant Best disease cohorts, the proportion of females was 37% (95% CI, 31%-43%; P = 1.2 × 10-5). Pooling previously published EFEMP1-cases with ours yielded an overall female proportion of 62% (95% CI, 54%-69%; P = 0.0023). Conclusions: This exploratory study found significant sex imbalances in two autosomal macular dystrophies, suggesting that sex could be a modifier. Our findings invite replication in further cohorts and the investigation of potential mechanisms.

Representation of Women Among Individuals With Mild Variants in ABCA4-Associated Retinopathy: A Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Previous studies indicated that female sex might be a modifier in Stargardt disease, which is an ABCA4-associated retinopathy. Objective: To investigate whether women are overrepresented among individuals with ABCA4-associated retinopathy who are carrying at least 1 mild allele or carrying nonmild alleles. Data Sources: Literature data, data from 2 European centers, and a new study. Data from a Radboudumc database and from the Rotterdam Eye Hospital were used for exploratory hypothesis testing. Study Selection: Studies investigating the sex ratio in individuals with ABCA4-AR and data from centers that collected ABCA4 variant and sex data. The literature search was performed on February 1, 2023; data from the centers were from before 2023. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to test whether the proportions of women among individuals with ABCA4-associated retinopathy with mild and nonmild variants differed from 0.5, including subgroup analyses for mild alleles. Sensitivity analyses were performed excluding data with possibly incomplete variant identification. χ2 Tests were conducted to compare the proportions of women in adult-onset autosomal non-ABCA4-associated retinopathy and adult-onset ABCA4-associated retinopathy and to investigate if women with suspected ABCA4-associated retinopathy are more likely to obtain a genetic diagnosis. Data analyses were performed from March to October 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of women per ABCA4-associated retinopathy group. The exploratory testing included sex ratio comparisons for individuals with ABCA4-associated retinopathy vs those with other autosomal retinopathies and for individuals with ABCA4-associated retinopathy who underwent genetic testing vs those who did not. Results: Women were significantly overrepresented in the mild variant group (proportion, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.56-0.62; P < .001) but not in the nonmild variant group (proportion, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.46-0.54; P = .89). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. Subgroup analyses on mild variants showed differences in the proportions of women. Furthermore, in the Radboudumc database, the proportion of adult women among individuals with ABCA4-associated retinopathy (652/1154 = 0.56) was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.05-0.15) higher than among individuals with other retinopathies (280/602 = 0.47). Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis supports the likelihood that sex is a modifier in developing ABCA4-associated retinopathy for individuals with a mild ABCA4 allele. This finding may be relevant for prognosis predictions and recurrence risks for individuals with ABCA4-associated retinopathy. Future studies should further investigate whether the overrepresentation of women is caused by differences in the disease mechanism, by differences in health care-seeking behavior, or by health care discrimination between women and men with ABCA4-AR.

Smoking, Corneal Biomechanics, and Glaucoma: Results From Two Large Population-Based Cohorts.

Purpose: Smoking may influence measured IOP through an effect on corneal biomechanics, but it is unclear whether this factor translates into an increased risk for glaucoma. This study aimed to examine the association of cigarette smoking with corneal biomechanical properties and glaucoma-related traits, and to probe potential causal effects using Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods: Cross-sectional analyses within the UK Biobank (UKB) and Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) cohorts. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to assess associations of smoking (status, intensity, and duration) with corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor, IOP, inner retinal thicknesses, and glaucoma. Two-sample MR analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 68,738 UKB (mean age, 56.7 years; 54.7% women) and 22 845 CLSA (mean age, 62.7 years; 49.1% women) participants were included. Compared with nonsmokers, smokers had a higher CH (UKB, +0.48 mm Hg; CLSA, +0.57 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and corneal resistance factor (UKB, +0.47 mm Hg; CLSA, +0.60 mm Hg; P < 0.001) with evidence of a dose-response effect in both studies. Differential associations with Goldmann-correlated IOP (UKB, +0.25 mm Hg; CLSA, +0.36 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and corneal-compensated IOP (UKB, -0.28 mm Hg; CLSA, -0.32 mm Hg; P ≤ 0.001) were observed. Smoking was not associated with inner retinal thicknesses or glaucoma status in either study. MR provided evidence for a causal effect of smoking on corneal biomechanics, especially higher CH. Conclusions: Cigarette smoking seems to increase corneal biomechanical resistance to deformation, but there was little evidence to support a relationship with glaucoma. This outcome may result in an artefactual association with measured IOP and could account for discordant results with glaucoma in previous epidemiological studies.

Spectrum of Genetic Variants in the Most Common Genes Causing Inherited Retinal Disease in a Large Molecularly Characterized United Kingdom Cohort.

PURPOSE: Inherited retinal disease (IRD) is a leading cause of blindness. Recent advances in gene-directed therapies highlight the importance of understanding the genetic basis of these disorders. This study details the molecular spectrum in a large United Kingdom (UK) IRD patient cohort. DESIGN: Retrospective study of electronic patient records. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with IRD who attended the Genetics Service at Moorfields Eye Hospital between 2003 and July 2020, in whom a molecular diagnosis was identified. METHODS: Genetic testing was undertaken via a combination of single-gene testing, gene panel testing, whole exome sequencing, and more recently, whole genome sequencing. Likely disease-causing variants were identified from entries within the genetics module of the hospital electronic patient record (OpenEyes Electronic Medical Record). Analysis was restricted to only genes listed in the Genomics England PanelApp R32 Retinal Disorders panel (version 3.24), which includes 412 genes associated with IRD. Manual curation ensured consistent variant annotation and included only plausible disease-associated variants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detailed analysis was performed for variants in the 5 most frequent genes (ABCA4, USH2A, RPGR, PRPH2, and BEST1), as well as for the most common variants encountered in the IRD study cohort. RESULTS: We identified 4415 individuals from 3953 families with molecularly diagnosed IRD (variants in 166 genes). Of the families, 42.7% had variants in 1 of the 5 most common IRD genes. Complex disease alleles contributed to disease in 16.9% of affected families with ABCA4-associated retinopathy. USH2A exon 13 variants were identified in 43% of affected individuals with USH2A-associated IRD. Of the RPGR variants, 71% were clustered in the ORF15 region. PRPH2 and BEST1 variants were associated with a range of dominant and recessive IRD phenotypes. Of the 20 most prevalent variants identified, 5 were not in the most common genes; these included founder variants in CNGB3, BBS1, TIMP3, EFEMP1, and RP1. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the most common pathogenic IRD alleles in a large single-center multiethnic UK cohort and the burden of disease, in terms of families affected, attributable to these variants. Our findings will inform IRD diagnoses in future patients and help delineate the cohort of patients eligible for gene-directed therapies under development. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.