Dexamethasone and overall survival and progression free survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Glioblastomas, the most common primary malignant brain tumors in adults, still hold poor prognosis. Corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone, are usually prescribed to reduce peritumoral edema and limit neurological symptoms, although potential detrimental effects of these drugs have been described. The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the association of dexamethasone with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for pertinent studies following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis checklist. Pooled multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model and the heterogeneity among studies was assessed using I2. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, pooling data of 1,257 patients, with age varying from 11 to 81 years. Glioblastoma patients on pre- or peri-operative dexamethasone were associated with a significantly poorer overall survival (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.55; 7 studies; I2: 59.9%) and progression free survival (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.97; 3 studies; I2: 71.1%) compared to patients not on dexamethasone. The quality of evidence was moderate for overall survival and low for progression free survival. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone appeared to be associated with poor survival outcomes of glioblastoma patients.

A comparison of the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in treating cauda equina syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) in treating cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted, searching relevant databases for studies investigating MIS and/or OS in treating CES. Pooled outcomes and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were meta-analyzed via random-effects models. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled mean operation times were shorter for MIS (75.4 min; 95 %CI: 40.8, 110.0) than OS (155.1 min; 121.3, 188.9). Similarly, mean hospital stay was shorter for MIS (4.08 days; 2.77, 5.39 vs. 8.85 days; 6.56, 11.13). Mean blood loss was smaller for MIS (71.7 mL; 0, 154.5 vs. 366.5; 119.1, 614.0). Mean post-op lumbar/back visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower for MIS (3.65; 2.75, 4.56 vs. 5.80; 4.55, 7.05). Mean post-op leg VAS score was 1.27 (0.41, 21.4) for MIS and 1.29 (0.47, 2.12) for OS. Mean complete bladder recovery rate was 81.0% (55.0%, 94.0%) for MIS and 75.0% (44.0%, 92.0%) for OS. Mean complete motor recovery rate was larger for MIS (70.0%; 48.0, 85.0 vs. 42.0%; 34.0, 51.0). Mean percentages of "excellent" patient outcomes were equal for MIS (64.0%; 48.0%, 77.0%) and OS (64.0%; 22.0%, 92.0%). CONCLUSION: MIS for CES was associated with reduced operative time, length of stay, and blood loss, compared to OS. MIS was also associated with better post-operative lumbar/back and leg VAS scores and complete motor and bladder recovery rates. MIS and OS produced an equal average percentage of "excellent" patient outcomes.

Fertility after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with prolactinomas: A meta-analysis.

Pituitary prolactinomas in women often lead to amenorrhea, galactorrhea, or infertility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) in restoring fertility in women with proloactinomas. A systematic search of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines through 6/13/2017. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were utilized to select studies reporting on patients with pituitary prolactinomas removed via TSS. Outcomes extracted included pre- and post-operative rates of menses, lactation, and fertility. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects. After removal of duplicates, 900 articles remained, of which 14 were meta-analyzed. The mean difference between pre- and post-operative prolactin level was 186.9 (95% CI = 133.7, 240.1; I2 = 69.9%; P-heterogeneity<0.01; 7 studies). The pooled prevalence of pre-operative amenorrhea was 96% (95% CI = 92%, 98%; I2 = 45.8%; P-heterogeneity = 0.09; 11 studies) and significantly larger than post-operative amenorrhea of 40% (95% CI = 27%, 55%; P- I2 = 85%; heterogeneity<0.01; 11 studies); (P-interaction comparing the 2 groups <0.01). The pooled prevalence of pre-operative galactorrhea was 84% (95% CI = 74%, 90%; I2 = 66.9%; P-heterogeneity<0.01; 10 studies) and significantly larger than post-operative galactorrhea of 29% (95% CI = 17%, 44%; I2 = 76.5%; P-heterogeneity<0.01; 7 studies) (P-interaction<0.01). Univariate meta-regression on age, continent, publication year, study design, quality, duration, or timing revealed these covariates were not effect modifiers for any of the 3 outcomes (all P > 0.05). No evidence of publication bias was seen using Begg's and Egger's tests (all P > 0.05). Transsphenoidal surgery appeared to improve fertility measures in women with pituitary prolactinomas.

Dexamethasone Administration and Mortality in Patients with Brain Abscess: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone has been used to treat cerebral edema associated with brain abscess. Whereas some argue that dexamethasone might aid antibiotic treatment, others believe that because of its immunosuppressive characteristics, it might have a negative impact on outcomes. How corticosteroid use affects overall mortality of brain abscess patients remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were utilized to identify all studies related to patients diagnosed with a brain abscess treated with dexamethasone. The main outcome of interest was mortality. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, 1681 articles were extracted from the literature of which 11 were included. These included 7 cohort studies and 4 case series. Indications to administer dexamethasone were either hospital brain abscess protocol or clinical presentation of cerebral edema. The 7 cohort studies involving 571 patients with brain abscesses comprised of 330 patients treated with standard of care (SOC) plus dexamethasone and 241 patients treated with SOC alone, after aspiration or surgical management of the abscess in either group. Pooling results from all seven cohort studies demonstrated a nonsignificant mortality benefit comparing SOC and dexamethasone patients to SOC patients (FE: risk ratio [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.37; RE: RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 049-1.82; I2 = 53.9%; P for heterogeneity = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a brain abscess treated with antibiotics, the use of dexamethasone was not associated with increased mortality.

A prognostic role for Low tri-iodothyronine syndrome in acute stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Low triiodothyronine (T3) syndrome could be a powerful prognostic factor for acute stroke; yet, a prognostic role for low T3 has not been given enough importance in stroke management. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether low T3 among acute stroke patients could be used as a prognostic biomarker for stroke severity, functional outcome, and mortality. METHODS: Studies that investigated low T3 prognostic roles in acute stroke patients were sought from PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases through 11/23/2016. Pooled estimates of baseline stroke severity, mortality, and functional outcomes were assessed from fixed-effect (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies (1,203 patients) provided data for low-T3 and normal-T3 patients and were meta-analyzed. Using the FE model, pooled results revealed low-T3 patients exhibited a significantly higher stroke severity, as assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission (mean difference = 3.18; 95%CI = 2.74, 3.63; I2 = 61.9%), had 57% higher risk of developing poor functional outcome (RR = 1.57; 95%CI = 1.33,1.8), and had 83% higher odds of mortality (Peto-OR = 1.83; 95%CI = 1.21, 1.99) compared to normal-T3 patients. In a univariate meta-regression analysis, the low-T3 and stroke severity association was reduced in studies with higher smokers% (slope = -0.11; P = 0.02), higher hypertension% (slope = -0.11; P = 0.047), older age (slope = -0.54; P = 0.02), or longer follow-up (slope = -0/17, P < 0.01). RE models yielded similar results. No significant publication bias was observed for either outcome using Begg's and Egger's tests. CONCLUSIONS: Low-T3 syndrome in acute stroke patients is an effective prognostic factor for predicting greater baseline stroke severity, poorer functional outcome, and higher overall mortality risk.

Coiling Versus Microsurgical Clipping in the Treatment of Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Open microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms has long been the gold standard, yet advancements in endovascular coiling techniques have begun to challenge the status quo. OBJECTIVE: To compare endovascular coiling with microsurgical clipping among adults with unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCAA) by conducting a meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted from January 2011 to October 2015 to update a previous meta-analysis. All studies that reported unruptured MCAA in adults treated by microsurgical clipping or endovascular coiling were included and cumulatively analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies including 3352 patients were included. Using the random-effects model, pooled analysis of 11 studies of microsurgical clipping (626 aneurysms) revealed complete aneurysmal obliteration in 94.2% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.6%-97.4%). The analysis of 18 studies of endovascular coiling (759 aneurysms) revealed complete obliteration in 53.2% of cases (95% CI: 45.0%-61.1%). Among clipping studies, 22 assessed neurological outcomes (2404 aneurysms), with favorable outcomes in 97.9% (95% CI: 96.8%-98.6%). Among coiling studies, 22 examined neurological outcomes (826 aneurysms), with favorable outcomes in 95.1% (95% CI: 93.1%-96.5%). Results using the fixed-effect models were not materially different. CONCLUSION: This updated meta-analysis demonstrates that surgical clipping for unruptured MCAA remains highly safe and efficacious. Endovascular treatment for unruptured MCAAs continues to improve in efficacy and safety; yet, it results in lower rates of occlusion.