Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Active surveillance of prostate cancer has emerged as a viable treatment option for men with features of low risk disease. Five prospective studies have enrolled patients for active surveillance with varying inclusion criteria. We evaluated the pathological outcomes of men meeting published criteria for active surveillance who elected immediate radical prostatectomy to assess the risk of under grading and under staging in candidates for active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from our institutional urological oncology database for all men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1996 and 2007. The primary outcome was pathological up staging, defined as the occurrence of extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement. Pathological upgrading was identified as a secondary outcome. We determined the proportion of men who would have qualified for each published active surveillance study and the respective rates of upgrading and up staging in each group. RESULTS: We identified 1,097 men who underwent radical prostatectomy with a mean age of 59 years. Overall 28% of the men experienced a Gleason upgrade, 21% had extracapsular extension and 11% had seminal vesicle involvement. In men qualifying based on published active surveillance inclusion criteria, rates of upgrading varied between 23% and 35%, the incidence of extracapsular extension ranged from 7% to 19% and seminal vesicle involvement ranged from 2% to 9%. CONCLUSIONS: Varying entry criteria for active surveillance show different rates of adverse pathological features at radical prostatectomy. Predictably fewer men met the more stringent criteria but these men had a lower incidence of seminal vesicle involvement and extracapsular extension. Such data can be used to advise men of the risks of active surveillance.

A working group classification of focal prostate atrophy lesions.

Focal atrophy is extremely common in prostate specimens. Although there are distinct histologic variants, the terminology is currently nonstandardized and no formal classification has been tested for interobserver reliability. This lack of standardization hampers the ability to study the biologic and clinical significance of these lesions. After informal and formal meetings by a number of the authors, focal atrophy lesions were categorized into 4 distinct subtypes as follows: (i) simple atrophy, (ii) simple atrophy with cyst formation, (iii) postatrophic hyperplasia, and (iv) partial atrophy. In phase 1 of the study, pathologists with varying levels of experience in prostate pathology were invited to view via the Internet a set of "training" images with associated descriptions of lesions considered typical of each subtype. In phase 2 of the study, each participant provided diagnoses on a series of 140 distinct "test" images that were viewed over the Internet. These test images consisted of the 4 subtypes of atrophy and images of normal epithelium, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and carcinoma. The diagnoses for each image from each pathologist were compared with a set of "standard" diagnoses and the kappa statistic was computed. Thirty-four pathologists completed both phases of the study. The interobserver reliability (median kappa) for classification of lesions as normal, cancer, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or focal atrophy was 0.97. The median kappa for the classification of atrophy lesions into the 4 subtypes was 0.80. The median percent agreement with the standard diagnosis for the atrophy subtypes were: simple 60.6%, simple with cyst formation 100%; postatrophic hyperplasia 87.5%; partial atrophy 93.9%. The lower percentage for simple atrophy reflected a propensity to diagnose some of these as simple atrophy with cyst formation. Seven pathologists completed the phase 2 analysis a second time, and their intraobserver reproducibility was excellent. Three of 4 pathologists with low agreement with the standard diagnosis for simple atrophy improved their scores after repeating the analysis after re-examination of the "training set" of images. In conclusion, these criteria for variants of focal prostate atrophy may facilitate studies to examine the relation between various patterns of prostate atrophy and prostate cancer.

Clinical response to therapy targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: impact of patient characteristics and Von Hippel-Lindau gene status.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship among patient characteristics, Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene status and clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients receiving vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with metastatic RCC who received therapy with interferon-alpha plus bevacizumab, SU11248 or AG013736 at the authors' institution were considered. Clinical features were collected and activation status of the VHL gene (VHL) was determined from baseline paraffin-embedded tumour samples. Tumour response, time to tumour progression (TTP) and overall survival were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were evaluable for determination of VHL status and clinical response. There was an objective response in 18 patients (43%; 95% confidence interval 28-59%). The median TTP for the entire cohort was 8.1 months. There was an improved clinical outcome in patients with the following clinical features: male gender, lack of hepatic metastases, no previous radiation therapy and higher baseline haemoglobin level. Twenty-six patients (60%) had evidence of VHL mutation or promoter methylation; such patients had an objective response rate of 48%, vs 35% in patients with no VHL mutation or methylation. Patients with VHL methylation or a mutation predicted to truncate or shift the VHL reading frame had a median TTP of 13.3 months, vs 7.4 months in patients with none of these features (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: VEGF-targeted therapy is active in metastatic RCC and the response can be associated with certain clinical features. The TTP with VEGF-targeted therapy might be prolonged in patients with VHL methylation or mutations that truncate or shift the VHL reading frame. Further investigation of VHL pathway components is needed to understand the biology of the response to VEGF-targeted agents in metastatic RCC.

Maximal COX-2 immunostaining and clinical response to celecoxib and interferon alpha therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays a major role in the development of cancer through numerous mechanisms. COX-2 is expressed in the majority of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors and correlates with stage, grade, and microvessel density. Based on potential additive or synergistic antitumor effects, interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) and celecoxib, an oral COX-2 inhibitor, were given to metastatic RCC patients in a Phase II trial. METHODS: Patients with untreated, metastatic RCC received IFNalpha 3 million units (MU) daily and celecoxib 400 mg orally (p.o.) twice daily continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pretreatment, paraffin-embedded RCC tumor samples were immunohistochemically stained for COX-2 expression and plasma basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were assayed to determine predictive or prognostic potential. RESULTS: There were three partial responses among 25 patients treated (objective response rate, 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3-31%). The observed median time to disease progression (TTP) for the entire cohort was 3.3 months. A significant association between maximal COX-2 staining and clinical response was observed: all patients who experienced an objective response demonstrated 3+ COX-2 tumor immunostaining (trend test: P=0.03). Therapy was well tolerated without cardiac or other notable toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of celecoxib to IFNalpha did not increase the objective response rate or TTP of this unselected cohort. Maximal COX-2 tumor immunostaining may identify RCC patents more likely to achieve clinical benefit with COX-2 inhibition in combination with IFNalpha. Further investigation of this combination in 3+ COX-2-overexpressing RCC tumors is warranted.