A prospective comparison of cardiac imaging using intracardiac echocardiography with transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: the intracardiac echocardiography guided cardioversion helps interventional procedures study.

BACKGROUND: The Intracardiac Echocardiography Guided Cardioversion Helps Interventional Procedures study evaluated the concordance of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with AF undergoing right heart catheterization underwent left atrium (LA) and interatrial septal (IAS) imaging by TEE and ICE. A blinded comparison of the 2 modalities was performed at a core laboratory. Ninety-five patients aged 58 ± 12 years completed the study. The LA was profiled in all patients with both techniques, and concordance for image quality was 96%. LA appendage (LAA) imaging was achieved in 85% with ICE and 96% with TEE. There was no difference in the presence of spontaneous echo contrast between ICE and TEE during LA imaging, but there was a trend toward a greater incidence in the LAA with TEE (P = 0.109). Intracardiac thrombus was uncommonly seen (TEE, 6.9%; ICE, 5.2%). The concordance for the presence or absence of thrombus was 97% in the LA and 92% in the LAA, but the latter was detected more frequently with TEE. IAS imaging was achieved in 91% with ICE and in 97% with TEE (P = 0.177). Concordance for patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysms was 100% and 96%, respectively. A negative ICE examination was associated with absence of dense echo contrast or thrombus on TEE in 86%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides validation for the use of ICE for LA and IAS imaging. ICE imaging was less sensitive compared to TEE for LAA thrombus identification. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00281073.

Intracardiac echocardiography-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy: technique and clinical application.

BACKGROUND: We undertook a pilot investigation to evaluate the feasibility of a novel technique using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for intraoperative assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: We evaluated ICE intraoperative imaging of left ventricular (LV) function and aortic valvular flow as well as safety of implementation. ICE was used to guide CRT system lead placement, assess impact of pacing modes, and optimization of device programming. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients underwent ICE imaging. ICE showed global hypokinesis in six patients, regional wall motion abnormality only in 10 patients, and both in seven patients. Optimized CRT modes included mean atrioventricular (AV) interval of 170 ms and interventricular timing using simultaneous right ventricular (RV)-LV pacing (five patients), LV pacing only (one patient), and sequential LV to RV stimulation (15 patients) or RV to LV stimulation (two patients). ICE-guided CRT acutely improved mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 24 +/- 9% to 41 +/- 1% (P < 0.00001). During follow-up of 3-24 (mean 11) months, New York Heart Association class improved in all patients from a mean of 3.2 +/- 0.4 at implant to 1.6 +/- 0.7 (P < 0.0001), with improvement of LVEF from 19 +/- 7% to 34 +/- 12% (P = 0.0001). Actuarial survival was 83% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: (1) ICE imaging is reliable and safe for continuous intraoperative imaging of LV wall motion, and assesses baseline status and impact of CRT interventions.(2) Intraoperative ICE-guided CRT optimization resulted in an increase in LVEF acutely and consistent improvement in heart failure.(3) Sequential biventricular pacing and longer AV interval programming were more often used in ICE-guided CRT.

Dose and time-dependent effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition on fracture-healing.

BACKGROUND: Fracture-healing is impaired in mice lacking a functional cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene or in rats continuously treated with COX-2 inhibitors. These observations indicate that COX-2 is a critical regulator of fracture repair. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used to treat pain associated with musculoskeletal trauma and disease. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit COX-2 function and in so doing can impair fracture-healing. The goal of the present study was to determine how variations in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy ultimately affect fracture-healing. METHODS: Closed femoral fractures were made in female Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were treated with different doses of celecoxib (a COX-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) or were treated for different periods before or after fracture with celecoxib. Eight weeks after the fracture, healing was assessed with radiography and destructive torsional mechanical testing. The effect of celecoxib treatment on fracture callus prostaglandin E2 and F(2alpha) levels was determined as a measure of cyclooxygenase activity. RESULTS: Celecoxib doses as small as 2 mg/kg/day reduced fracture callus mechanical properties and caused a significant increase in the proportion of nonunions. Similarly, treatment with celecoxib at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day for just five days reduced fracture callus mechanical properties and significantly increased the proportion of nonunions. Conversely, celecoxib therapy prior to fracture or initiated fourteen days after fracture did not significantly increase the proportion of nonunions. Celecoxib treatment at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day reduced fracture callus prostaglandin E2 and F(2alpha) levels by >60%. CONCLUSIONS: COX-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy during the early stages of fracture repair significantly reduced fracture callus mechanical properties at later stages of healing and increased the proportion of nonunions in this animal model.

A comparison between the effects of acetaminophen and celecoxib on bone fracture healing in rats.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the acute treatment effects of systemic analgesics with (celecoxib) and without anti-inflammatory activity (acetaminophen) on bone fracture healing. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal time study of fracture healing in rats. METHODS: Closed, mid diaphyseal femur fractures were produced in female Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were treated for 10 days after fracture with 60 or 300 mg/kg of acetaminophen, 3 or 6 mg/kg of celecoxib, or vehicle by once-daily oral dosing. Fracture healing was measured after 8 weeks by radiographic examination, mechanical testing, and histology. RESULTS: Radiographic scoring indicated that acute celecoxib treatment significantly impaired fracture healing; acetaminophen treatment had no negative effect. Mechanical testing supported the radiographic observations. No negative effects of celecoxib or acetaminophen treatment on the structural properties (peak torque and torsional rigidity) of the healing femurs were detected. In contrast, celecoxib treatment, but not acetaminophen treatment, significantly reduced the material properties (maximum shear stress and shear modulus) of the healing femurs (P < 0.001). Post-mechanical testing examination of the healing femurs found that 73% of the vehicle-treated or acetaminophen-treated femurs had healed as unions (30/41), 27% failed as incomplete unions (11/41), and none failed as nonunions (0%). In contrast, only 21% of the fractured femurs from the celecoxib treated rats had healed as unions (7/34), 53% failed as incomplete unions (18/34), and 26% failed as nonunions (9/34). The proportion of nonunions among the celecoxib-treated rats was significantly higher compared with the control and acetaminophen-treated rats (P < 0.001). Histologic examination indicated that similar to previous studies, celecoxib treatment, but not acetaminophen treatment, altered normal fracture callus morphology in which cartilage rather than new bone abuts the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: No negative effect from acute acetaminophen treatment on fracture healing was detected. In contrast, acute treatment with celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity, significantly impaired fracture healing.

Cyclo-oxygenase 2 function is essential for bone fracture healing.

Despite the molecular and histological similarities between fetal bone development and fracture healing, inflammation is an early phase of fracture healing that does not occur during development. Cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) is induced at inflammation sites and produces proinflammatory prostaglandins. To determine if COX-2 functions in fracture healing, rats were treated with COX-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to stop COX-2-dependent prostaglandin production. Radiographic, histological, and mechanical testing determined that fracture healing failed in rats treated with COX-2-selective NSAIDs (celecoxib and rofecoxib). Normal fracture healing also failed in mice homozygous for a null mutation in the COX-2 gene. This shows that COX-2 activity is necessary for normal fracture healing and confirms that the effects of COX-2-selective NSAIDs on fracture healing is caused by inhibition of COX-2 activity and not from a drug side effect. Histological observations suggest that COX-2 is required for normal endochondral ossification during fracture healing. Because mice lacking Cox2 form normal skeletons, our observations indicate that fetal bone development and fracture healing are different and that COX-2 function is specifically essential for fracture healing.