Prophylactic Minocycline for Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a potentially severe form of acute encephalopathy. Minocycline has neuroprotective effects in animal models of neurologic diseases; however, data from human studies remain scarce. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the neuroprotective effect of minocycline prevent delirium occurrence in critical ill patients? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted in four ICUs. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible and randomized to receive minocycline (100 mg, twice daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was delirium incidence within 28 days or before ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included days in delirium during ICU stay, delirium/coma-free days, length of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, and hospital mortality. The kinetics of various inflammatory (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-10, and C-reactive protein) and brain-related biomarkers (brain-derived neurotrophic factor and S100B) were used as exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were randomized, but one patient in the placebo group died before treatment; thus the data from 159 patients were analyzed (minocycline, n = 84; placebo, n = 75). After the COVID-19 pandemic it was decided to stop patient inclusion early. There was a small but significant decrease in delirium incidence: 17 patients (20%) in the minocycline arm compared with 26 patients (35%) in the placebo arm (P = .043). No other delirium-related outcomes were modified by minocycline treatment. Unexpectedly, there was a significant decrease in hospital mortality (39% vs. 23%; P = .029). Among all analyzed biomarkers, only plasma levels of C-reactive protein decreased significantly after minocycline treatment (F = 0.75, P = .78, within time; F = 4.09, P = .045, group × time). INTERPRETATION: Our findings in this rather small study signal a possible positive effect of minocycline on delirium incidence. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of this drug as a preventive measure in critically ill patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04219735; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Enoxaparin improves COVID-19 by reducing Neutrophils Extracellular Traps (NETs) production.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 causes consequences such as imbalance of the immune system and thrombotic events. During the infection process, NETs in excess induce a pro-inflammatory response and disseminated intravascular coagulation. We evaluated the role of enoxaparin as a potential inhibitor of NETs. METHODS: K18-hACE2 animals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and a group of 23 individuals admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 treated with enoxaparin or without treatment and controls without the disease were included. RESULTS: Enoxaparin decreased the levels of NETs, reduced the signs of the disease and mitigated lung damage in the animals infected with SARS-CoV-2. These effects were partially associated with prevention of SARS-CoV-2 entry and NETs synthesis. Clinical data revealed that treatment with enoxaparin decreased the levels of inflammatory markers, the levels of NETs in isolated neutrophils and the organ dysfunction. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for the beneficial effects of enoxaparin in COVID-19 in addition to its anticoagulant role.

Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Breast Implant Rupture Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most common aesthetic operation performed in the United States and worldwide; 1,862,506 breast augmentation procedures were performed in 2018, an increase of 27.6 percent compared to 2014 data. METHODS: In the present study, the authors performed a systematic review to identify the accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing breast prosthesis rupture. Studies in which the ultrasound diagnostic test was compared to a surgical finding as a reference standard were reviewed. RESULTS: As a result, 20 primary studies were included in the analyses, with a total of 1987 patients and 3297 prostheses. The use of ultrasound for diagnosis of breast prosthesis rupture presented the following results: pooled sensitivity, 73.7 percent (95 percent CI, 70.2 to 77.1 percent); pooled specificity, 87.8 percent (95 percent CI, 86.5 to 89.0); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.7762; diagnostic odds ratio, 11.04 (95 percent CI, 5.79 to 21.08). CONCLUSION: This study supports that ultrasound of breast prostheses is an adequate tool in the diagnosis of rupture.

Evaluation of the arachidonic acid pathway in bipolar disorder: a systematic review.

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mood psychiatric disorder described by changes between depressive, hypomanic, or manic episodes. The aimed of the present study was evaluated possible changes in the AA pathway in BD through a systematic review of observational studies. A search in the electronic databases was proceeded, on Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Google Scholar and the British Library for studies published until August 2020. A search strategy was developed using the terms: "Bipolar Disorder" and "Phospholipase A2" or "Arachidonic Acids" or "Cyclooxygenase 2" or "Prostaglandins E" as text words and Medical Subject Headings (i.e., MeSH and EMTREE). Seven primary studies were included in the systematic review, with a total of 246 BD patients, 20 depression patients, and 425 heathy controls (HC). The studies showed contradictory results in the AA and PLA2, no primary articles with COX and PGE2 assessments were included in this review. According to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality score scale (NOS), our systematic review presented high quality. The investigation of the inflammatory pathway of AA still needs further investigation and evidence, given the growing number of studies suggesting the efficacy of anti-inflammatory drugs as adjunctive therapy in the pharmacological treatment of BD.

Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

The objective of this work was to estimate the accuracy of mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian cancer. A quantitative systematic review was performed. A comprehensive search of the Medline, LILACS, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Biomed Central, and ISI Web of Science databases was conducted from January 1990 to June 2015. For inclusion in this systematic review, the papers must have measured mesothelin levels in at least two histological diagnoses; ovarian cancer (borderline or ovarian tumor) vs. benign or normal ovarian tissue. For each study, 2 x 2 contingency tables were constructed. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. The verification bias was performed according to QUADAS-2. Statistical analysis was performed with the software Stata 11, Meta-DiSc(r) and RevMan 5.2. Twelve studies were analyzed, which included 1,561 women. The pooled sensitivity was 0.62 (CI 95% 0.58 - 0.66) and specificity was 0.94 (CI 95% 0.92 - 0.95). The DOR was 38.92 (CI 95% 17.82 - 84.99). Our systematic review shows that mesothelin cannot serve alone as a biomarker for the detection of ovarian cancer.