Understanding the variability of the electrophysiologic laryngeal adductor reflex.

OBJECTIVE: The laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) is vital for airway protection and can be electrophysiologically obtained under intravenous general anesthesia (IGA). This makes the electrophysiologic LAR (eLAR) an important tool for monitoring of the vagus nerves and relevant brainstem circuitry during high-risk surgeries. We investigated the intra-class variability of normal and expected abnormal eLAR. METHODS: Repeated measures of contralateral R1 (cR1) were performed under IGA in 58 patients. Data on presence/absence of cR2 and potential confounders were also collected. Review of neuroimaging, pathology and clinical exam, allowed classification into normal and expected abnormal eLAR groups. Using univariate and multivariate analysis we studied the variability of cR1 parameters and their differences between the two groups. RESULTS: In both groups, cR1 latencies had coefficients of variation of <2%. In the abnormal group, cR1 had longer latencies, required higher activation currents and was more frequently desynchronized and unsustained; cR2 was more frequently absent. CONCLUSIONS: cR1 latencies show high analytical precision for measurements. Delayed onset, difficult to elicit, desynchronized and unsustained cR1, and absence of cR2 signal an abnormal eLAR. SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding the variability and behavior of normal and abnormal eLAR under IGA can aid in the interpretation of its changes during monitoring.

Pediatric Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Mapping and Monitoring in Brain Surgery.

SUMMARY: Similar to adults, children undergoing brain surgery can significantly benefit from intraoperative neurophysiologic mapping and monitoring. Although young brains present the advantage of increased plasticity, during procedures in close proximity to eloquent regions, the risk of irreversible neurological compromise remains and can be lowered further by these techniques. More so, pathologies specific to the pediatric population, such as neurodevelopmental lesions, often result in medically refractory epilepsy. Thus, their successful surgical treatment also relies on accurate demarcation and resection of the epileptogenic zone, processes in which intraoperative electrocorticography is often employed. However, stemming from the development and maturation of the central and peripheral nervous systems as the child grows, intraoperative neurophysiologic testing in this population poses methodologic and interpretative challenges even to experienced clinical neurophysiologists. For example, it is difficult to perform awake craniotomies and language testing in the majority of pediatric patients. In addition, children may be more prone to intraoperative seizures and exhibit afterdischarges more frequently during functional mapping using electrical cortical stimulation because of high stimulation thresholds needed to depolarize immature cortex. Moreover, choice of anesthetic regimen and doses may be different in pediatric patients, as is the effect of these drugs on immature brain; these factors add additional complexity in terms of interpretation and analysis of neurophysiologic recordings. Below, we are describing the modalities commonly used during intraoperative neurophysiologic testing in pediatric brain surgery, with emphasis on age-specific clinical indications, methodology, and challenges.

Intraoperative Cerebral Hemodynamic Monitoring during Carotid Endarterectomy via Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Objective: This pilot study aims to show the feasibility of noninvasive and real-time cerebral hemodynamic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) via diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Methods: Cerebral blood flow index (CBFi) was measured unilaterally in seven patients and bilaterally in seventeen patients via DCS. In fourteen patients, hemoglobin oxygenation changes were measured bilaterally and simultaneously via NIRS. Cerebral autoregulation (CAR) and cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) were estimated using CBFi and arterial blood pressure data. Further, compensatory responses to the ipsilateral hemisphere were investigated at different contralateral stenosis levels. Results: Clamping of carotid arteries caused a sharp increase of CVR (~70%) and a marked decrease of ipsilateral CBFi (57%). From the initial drop, we observed partial recovery in CBFi, an increase of blood volume, and a reduction in CVR in the ipsilateral hemisphere. There were no significant changes in compensatory responses between different contralateral stenosis levels as CAR was intact in both hemispheres throughout the CEA phase. A comparison between hemispheric CBFi showed lower ipsilateral levels during the CEA and post-CEA phases (p < 0.001, 0.03). Conclusion: DCS alone or combined with NIRS is a useful monitoring technique for real-time assessment of cerebral hemodynamic changes and allows individualized strategies to improve cerebral perfusion during CEA by identifying different hemodynamic metrics.

Electroencephalography, electrocorticography, and cortical stimulation techniques.

Electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) are two important neurophysiologic techniques used in the operating room for monitoring and mapping electrical brain activity. In this chapter, we detail their principle, recording methodology, and address specifics of their interpretation in the intraoperative setting (e.g., effect of anesthetics), as well as their clinical applications in epilepsy and non-epilepsy surgeries. In addition, we address differences between scalp, surface, and deep cortical recordings that will help towards a more reliable interpretation of the significance of electrophysiologic parameters such as amplitude and morphology as well as in differentiation between abnormal and normal patterns of electrical brain activity. Electrical stimulation is used for intraoperative mapping of different cortical functions such as language, parietal, and motor. Stimulation paradigms used in clinical practice vary with regard to stimulation frequencies and probes being used. Parameters, such as the number of phases per pulse, pulse/phase duration, pulse frequency, organization, and polarity, define their characteristics, including their safety, propensity to trigger seizures, efficiency and reliability of stimulation, and the mapping thresholds. Specifically, in this chapter, we will address differences between monopolar and bipolar stimulation; anodal and cathodal polarity; monophasic and biphasic pulses; constant voltage, and constant current paradigms.

Neurophysiology during epilepsy surgery.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) complements modern presurgical investigations by providing information about the epileptic focus as well as real-time identification of critical functional tissue and assessment of ongoing neural integrity during resective epilepsy surgery. This chapter summarizes current IONM methods for mapping the epileptic focus and for mapping and monitoring functionally important structures with direct brain stimulation and evoked potentials. These techniques include electrocorticography, computerized high-frequency oscillation mapping, single-pulse electric stimulation, cortical and subcortical motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, visual evoked potentials, and cortico-cortical evoked potentials. They may help to maximize epileptic tissue resection while avoiding permanent postoperative neurologic deficits.

Monitoring in carotid endarterectomy.

Cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy occurs via several mechanisms: inadequate collateral blood flow during carotid cross-clamping, thromboembolism due to carotid manipulation, and/or rethrombosis at the surgical site. Perioperative strokes increase not only the morbidity of endarterectomy but also its short- and long-term mortality. However, while several predictors of cerebral ischemia have been identified, precise individual risk is hard to assess. Since nonselective shunting during carotid cross-clamping is neither risk-free nor eliminates perioperative stroke, it is advisable to apply intraoperative monitoring techniques for detection and reversal of cerebral ischemia, which may occur at various stages of the procedure. This chapter addresses the methods available for monitoring, with an emphasis on neurophysiologic techniques, which are preferable given their direct assessment of how a decrease in cerebral blood flow impacts brain function. These include electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, and transcranial motor evoked potentials. Details regarding the methodology, advantages, disadvantages, and interpretation of these tests will be discussed within the anatomic, physiologic, surgical, and anesthetic contexts.

Neuromonitoring during descending aorta procedures.

Thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (TAA) repair carries a significant risk of spinal cord infarction. The latter results from irreversible changes in the spinal cord arterial network, e.g., sacrifice of the segmental arteries. Intra-operative neurophysiology with somatosensory and especially motor evoked potential (SEP and MEP respectively) monitoring, has emerged as an effective tool to assess the efficiency of the collateral blood flow, detect reversible spinal cord ischemia and guide the peri-operative multidisciplinary management to prevent postoperative paraplegia. The main roles of such monitoring include diagnosis of spinal cord vs peripheral limb ischemia, titration of mean arterial pressure during aortic clamping, the guidance of selective re-implantation of critical segmental arteries, and management of hemodynamics in the immediate postoperative period. In addition, manipulation of the aortic arch and proximal descending aorta, adds the risk of cerebral infarction from both low flow state and/or thromboembolic events. As such, EEG monitoring may be a useful add-on for either assessment of the efficiency of cerebral cooling as a neuroprotective method and/or for detection and treatment of reversible cerebral ischemia. This chapter presents the multimodality approach to open TAA monitoring as a versatile tool for the prevention of devastating postoperative neurologic deficits.

Intraoperative thalamocortical tract monitoring via direct cortical recordings during craniotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Neuromonitoring of primary motor regions allows preservation of motor strength and is frequently employed during cranial procedures. Less is known about protection of sensory function and ability to modulate movements, both of which rely on integrity of thalamocortical afferents (TCA) to fronto-parietal regions. We describe our experience with TCA monitoring and their cortical relays during brain tumor surgery. METHODOLOGY: To study its feasibility and usefulness, continuous somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) recording via a subdural electrode was attempted in 32 consecutive patients. RESULTS: Median and posterior tibial SSEP were successfully monitored in 31 and 17 patients respectively. SSEP improved lesion localization and prevented unnecessary cortical stimulation in 9 and 16 cases respectively. A threshold of ≥30% SSEP amplitude decrease influenced management in 10 patients while a decrement of ≥50 % had a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 1 in detecting worsening of sensory function. Simultaneous motor evoked potentials (MEP) and SSEP monitoring were performed in 10 cases, 9 of which showed short-lived fluctuations of the former. CONCLUSION: Direct cortical SSEP monitoring is feasible, informs management and predicts outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: Early intervention prevents sensory deficit. Concomitant MEP fluctuations may reflect modulation of motor activity by TCA.

Neurophysiologic Mapping of Thalamocortical Tract in Asleep Craniotomies: Promising Results From an Early Experience.

BACKGROUND: Subcortical mapping of the corticospinal tract has been extensively used during craniotomies under general anesthesia to achieve maximal resection while avoiding postoperative motor deficits. To our knowledge, similar methods to map the thalamocortical tract (TCT) have not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: To describe a neurophysiologic technique for TCT identification in 2 patients who underwent resection of frontoparietal lesions. METHODS: The central sulcus (CS) was identified using the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) phase reversal technique. Furthermore, monitoring of the cortical postcentral N20 and precentral P22 potentials was performed during resection. Subcortical electrical stimulation in the resection cavity was done using the multipulse train (case #1) and Penfield (case #2) techniques. RESULTS: Subcortical stimulation within the postcentral gyrus (case #1) and in depth of the CS (case #2), resulted in a sudden drop in amplitudes in N20 (case #1) and P22 (case #2), respectively. In both patients, the potentials promptly recovered once the stimulation was stopped. These results led to redirection of the surgical plane with avoidance of damage of thalamocortical input to the primary somatosensory (case #1) and motor regions (case #2). At the end of the resection, there were no significant changes in the median SSEP. Both patients had no new long-term postoperative sensory or motor deficit. CONCLUSION: This method allows identification of TCT in craniotomies under general anesthesia. Such input is essential not only for preservation of sensory function but also for feedback modulation of motor activity.

Dynamic mapping of the corticospinal tract in open cordotomy and myelomeningocele surgery.

OBJECT: Spinal cord surgeries carry a high risk for significant neurological impairments. The initial techniques for spinal cord mapping emerged as an aid to identify the dorsal columns and helped select a safe myelotomy site in intramedullary tumor resection. Advancements in motor mapping of the cord have also been made recently, but exclusively with tumor surgery. We hereby present our experiences with dynamic mapping of the corticospinal tract (CST) in other types of spinal cord procedures that carry an increased risk of postoperative motor deficit, and thus could directly benefit from this technique. CASE REPORTS: Two patients with intractable unilateral lower extremity pain due to metastatic disease of the sacrum and a thoraco-lumbar chordoma, respectively underwent thoracic cordotomy to interrupt the nociceptive pathways. A third patient with progressive leg weakness underwent cord untethering and surgical repair of a large thoracic myelomeningocele. In all three cases, multimodality intraoperative neurophysiologic testing included somatosensory and motor evoked potentials monitoring as well as dynamic mapping of the CST. CONCLUSION: CST mapping allowed safe advancement of the cordotomy probe and exploration of the meningocele sac with untethering of the anterior-lateral aspect of the cord respectively, resulting in postoperative preservation or improvement of motor strength from the pre-operative baseline. Stimulus thresholds varied likely with the distance between the stimulating probe and the CST as well as with the baseline motor strength in the mapped myotomes.

Factors that modify the risk of intraoperative seizures triggered by electrical stimulation during supratentorial functional mapping.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative mapping via electrical stimulation is the gold standard technique for surgeries close to the eloquent cortex. However, it can trigger seizures which immediately impact patient's safety. We studied whether administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) prior to and/or at the beginning of the surgery decreases the probability of triggering seizures, while adjusting for other risk factors. METHODS: 544 consecutive intraoperative mapping cases performed at a tertiary care center for epilepsy and brain tumor surgery were included in the study. Using a multivariate logistic regression analysis, we analyzed the independent impacts of AED loading at time of surgery, preoperative AED maintenance, history of seizures, type of stimulation paradigm, lobar location of stimulation, age, opioid administration and pathology on the probability of triggering seizures. RESULTS: Seizures were identified in 135 patients. Intravenous loading with AED decreased the odds of triggering seizures by 45% (OR = 0.55, p = 0.01), Penfield (versus multipulse train) stimulation and diffuse (versus well circumscribed) pathology increased it twice (OR = 1.97, p = 0.01) and 2.4 times (OR = 2.42, p = 0.003) respectively. No other factors had a significant impact. CONCLUSIONS: Seizures triggered during mapping occur frequently and are multifactorial. SIGNIFICANCE: Loading with AED independently reduces the risk of their occurrence.

Receptor tyrosine kinase gene amplification is predictive of intraoperative seizures during glioma resection with functional mapping.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative seizures during craniotomy with functional mapping is a common complication that impedes optimal tumor resection and results in significant morbidity. The relationship between genetic mutations in gliomas and the incidence of intraoperative seizures has not been well characterized. Here, the authors performed a retrospective study of patients treated at their institution over the last 12 years to determine whether molecular data can be used to predict the incidence of this complication. METHODS: The authors queried their institutional database for patients with brain tumors who underwent resection with intraoperative functional mapping between 2005 and 2017. Basic clinicopathological characteristics, including the status of the following genes, were recorded: IDH1/2, PIK3CA, BRAF, KRAS, AKT1, EGFR, PDGFRA, MET, MGMT, and 1p/19q. Relationships between gene alterations and intraoperative seizures were evaluated using chi-square and two-sample t-test univariate analysis. When considering multiple predictive factors, a logistic multivariate approach was taken. RESULTS: Overall, 416 patients met criteria for inclusion; of these patients, 98 (24%) experienced an intraoperative seizure. Patients with a history of preoperative seizure and those treated with antiepileptic drugs prior to surgery were less likely to have intraoperative seizures (history: OR 0.61 [95% CI 0.38-0.96], chi-square = 4.65, p = 0.03; AED load: OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.26-0.80], chi-square = 7.64, p = 0.01). In a univariate analysis of genetic markers, amplification of genes encoding receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) was specifically identified as a positive predictor of seizures (OR 5.47 [95% CI 1.22-24.47], chi-square = 5.98, p = 0.01). In multivariate analyses considering RTK status, AED use, and either 2007 WHO tumor grade or modern 2016 WHO tumor groups, the authors found that amplification of the RTK proto-oncogene, MET, was most predictive of intraoperative seizure (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a previously unreported association between genetic alterations in RTKs and the occurrence of intraoperative seizures during glioma resection with functional mapping. Future models estimating intraoperative seizure risk may be enhanced by inclusion of genetic criteria.

Correction to: Is the new ASNM intraoperative neuromonitoring supervision "guideline" a trustworthy guideline? A commentary.

The article Is the new ASNM intraoperative neuromonitoring supervision "guideline" a trustworthy guideline? A commentary, written by Stanley A. Skinner, Elif Ilgaz Aydinlar, Lawrence F. Borges, Bob S. Carter, Bradford L. Currier, Vedran Deletis, Charles Dong, John Paul Dormans, Gea Drost, Isabel Fernandez­Conejero, E. Matthew Hoffman, Robert N. Holdefer, Paulo Andre Teixeira Kimaid, Antoun Koht, Karl F. Kothbauer, David B. MacDonald, John J. McAuliffe III, David E. Morledge, Susan H. Morris, Jonathan Norton, Klaus Novak, Kyung Seok Park, Joseph H. Perra, Julian Prell, David M. Rippe, Francesco Sala, Daniel M. Schwartz, Martín J. Segura, Kathleen Seidel, Christoph Seubert, Mirela V. Simon, Francisco Soto, Jeffrey A. Strommen, Andrea Szelenyi, Armando Tello, Sedat Ulkatan, Javier Urriza and Marshall Wilkinson, was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 05 January 2019 without open access. With the author(s)' decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 30 January 2019 to © The Author(s) 2019 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The original article has been corrected.

Neural encoding and production of functional morphemes in the posterior temporal lobe.

Morphemes are the smallest meaning-carrying units in human language, and are among the most basic building blocks through which humans express specific ideas and concepts. By using time-resolved cortical stimulations, neural recordings, and focal lesion evaluations, we show that inhibition of a small cortical area within the left dominant posterior-superior temporal lobe selectively impairs the ability to produce appropriate functional morphemes but does not distinctly affect semantic and lexical retrieval, comprehension, or articulation. Additionally, neural recordings within this area reveal the localized encoding of morphological properties and their planned production prior to speech onset. Finally, small lesions localized to the gray matter in this area result in a selective functional morpheme-production deficit. Collectively, these findings reveal a detailed division of linguistic labor within the posterior-superior temporal lobe and suggest that functional morpheme processing constitutes an operationally discrete step in the series of computations essential to language production.

Extended Motor Evoked Potentials Monitoring Helps Prevent Delayed Paraplegia After Aortic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring can promptly detect spinal cord ischemia (SCI) from aortic clamping during open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair (OTAAR) with distal aortic perfusion (DAP) and thus help decrease the risk of immediate postoperative SCI (IP-SCI). However, neither stable MEPs during aortic clamp interval (ACI) nor absence of IP-SCI eliminate the possibility of delayed postoperative SCI (DP-SCI). We hypothesized that extension of MEPs monitoring beyond ACI can also help decrease the risk of DP-SCI. METHODS: We identified 150 consecutive patients at our institution between April 2005 and October 2014 who underwent OTAAR with DAP and MEPs monitoring and had no IP-SCI. Using logistic regression analysis, we studied the independent effect of extended MEPs monitoring on the risk of developing DP-SCI. We used a propensity score analysis to adjust for potential confounders, such as poorly controlled hypertension, previous aneurysm surgery, splenectomy, acute aortic dissection, aneurysm type, older age, and history of diabetes and smoking. RESULTS: From the 150 patients, 129 (86%) remained neurologically intact whereas 21 (14%) developed DP-SCI. Nineteen of these twenty-one patients (90%) had no extended monitoring. Fifty-seven of fifty-nine (97%) patients who benefited from extended monitoring had no DP-SCI (p = 0.003). Extended MEPs monitoring was independently associated with decreased risk of DP-SCI (odds ratio = 0.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.03, 0.65; p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: MEPs detect the lowest systemic blood pressure that ensures appropriate spinal cord perfusion in the postoperative period. Thus, they inform the hemodynamic management of patients post-OTAAR, particularly in the absence of a reliable neurological exam.

Burst-Suppression Ratio on Electrocorticography Depends on Interelectrode Distance.

INTRODUCTION: With deepening of anesthesia-induced comatose states, the EEG becomes fragmented by increasing periods of suppression. When measured from conventional EEG recordings, the binary burst-suppression signal (BS) appears similar across the scalp. As such, the BS ratio (BSR), quantifying the fraction of time spent in suppression, is clinically considered a global index of brain function in sedation monitoring. Recent studies indicate that BS may be considerably asynchronous when measured with higher spatial resolution such as on electrocorticography. The authors investigated the magnitude of BSR changes with cortical recording interelectrode distance. METHODS: The authors selected fronto-parietal electrocorticography recordings showing propofol-induced BS recorded via 8-electrode strips (1-cm interelectrode distance) during cortical motor mapping in 31 patients. For 1-minute epochs, bipolar recordings were computed between each electrode pair. The median BSR, burst duration (BD), and bursting frequency were derived for each interelectrode distance. RESULTS: At 1-cm interelectrode distance, with increasing BSR, BD decreased exponentially. For a BSR between 50% and 80%, BD reached a plateau of 2.1 seconds while the bursting frequency decreased from 14 to 6 bursts per minute. With increasing interelectrode distance, BD increased at a rate of 0.2 seconds per cm. This correlated with a decrease in BSR with distance that reached the rate of -4.4 percentage per centimeters during deepest anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing cortical interelectrode recording distance, burst summation leads to an increasing BD associated with a reduction in BSR. Standardization of interelectrode distance is important for cortical BSR measurements.

Intra-stimulation discharges: an overlooked cortical electrographic entity triggered by direct electrical stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-stimulation discharges (IDs) can occur during language mapping, are largely unrecognized, and may precede the occurrence of after-discharges (ADs) and seizures. This study aimed to identify predictors of ID occurrence and determine whether IDs increase the probability of triggered ADs. METHODS: A total of 332 stimulation events performed during language mapping were analyzed in 3 patients who underwent intracranial EEG recordings during evaluations for epilepsy surgery. IDs were identified in 76 stimulation events. The relationships between IDs and the stimulus current intensity, stimulation duration, and proximity to regions of abnormal cortical excitability [characterized by the presence of baseline epileptiform discharges (BEDs)] were determined using regression analysis. RESULTS: The presence of BEDs in close proximity to stimulation, an increase in stimulus intensity by 1 mA, and an increase in stimulation duration by 1s independently increased the odds of triggering IDs by 7.40, 1.37, and 1.39 times, respectively. All IDs were triggered during stimulations in the temporal lobe. The occurrence of IDs increased the odds of triggering ADs 5-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Longer stimulations, higher currents, and the presence of BEDs at the stimulation site increase the probability of ID occurrence, which in turn increases the probability of triggering ADs. SIGNIFICANCE: Attention to IDs may improve the safety and precision of neurophysiologic mapping.

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring decreases EEG burst suppression ratio during deep general anesthesia.

PURPOSE: The burst suppression (BS) EEG patterns induced by general anesthesia can react to somatosensory stimuli. We investigated this reactivity by studying the effect of peripheral nerve stimulation used for routine intraoperative spinal cord monitoring by somatosensory evoked potentials on BS patterns. METHODS: The relative time spent in suppression expressed as BS ratio (BSR) and mean burst duration were measured before (BSR(Pre)), during (BSR(Stim)), and after (BSR(Post)) a 60-second repetitive electrical ulnar nerve stimulation in nine patients under total intravenous general anesthesia with propofol. The BS reactivity was measured as BSR(Pre)-BSR(Stim). RESULTS: Overall, 27 trials were included with BSR(Pre) up to 77%, indistinguishable from BSR(Post). During stimulation, the mean BSR transiently decreased from 42% to 35%. For each 1% increase in BSR(Pre), the BS reactivity increased with 0.6%, whereas the burst duration remained approximately 3 seconds. For BSR(Pre) below 30%, the BS reactivity was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study show that somatosensory input can evoke bursts, altering the "spontaneous" deep BS patterns (BSR(Pre) >30%). Further studies are necessary to objectively assess the clinical relevance of stimulus-induced BS reactivity during deep general anesthesia.