Promoting diversity in neurosurgery through a virtual symposium.

OBJECTIVE: The rates of women and underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (UREM) students successfully matching into neurosurgical residency are extremely low and do not reflect the makeup of the general population. As of 2019, only 17.5% of neurosurgical residents in the United States were women, 4.95% were Black or African American, and 7.2% were Hispanic or Latinx. Earlier recruitment of UREM students will help to diversify the neurosurgical workforce. Therefore, the authors developed a virtual educational event for undergraduate students entitled "Future Leaders in Neurosurgery Symposium for Underrepresented Students'' (FLNSUS). The primary objectives of the FLNSUS were to expose attendees to 1) neurosurgeons from diverse gender, racial, and ethnic backgrounds; 2) neurosurgical research; 3) opportunities for neurosurgical mentorship; and 4) information about life as a neurosurgeon. The authors hypothesized that the FLNSUS would increase student self-confidence, provide exposure to the specialty, and reduce perceived barriers to a neurosurgical career. METHODS: To measure the change in participant perceptions of neurosurgery, pre- and postsymposium surveys were administered to attendees. Of the 269 participants who completed the presymposium survey, 250 participated in the virtual event and 124 completed the postsymposium survey. Paired pre- and postsurvey responses were used for analysis, yielding a response rate of 46%. To assess the impact of participant perceptions of neurosurgery as a field, pre- and postsurvey responses to questions were compared. The change in response was analyzed, and a nonparametric sign test was performed to check for significant differences. RESULTS: According to the sign test, applicants showed increased familiarity with the field (p < 0.001), increased confidence in their abilities to become neurosurgeons (p = 0.014), and increased exposure to neurosurgeons from diverse gender, racial, and ethnic backgrounds (p < 0.001 for all categories). CONCLUSIONS: These results reflect a significant improvement in student perceptions of neurosurgery and suggest that symposiums like the FLNSUS may promote further diversification of the field. The authors anticipate that events promoting diversity in neurosurgery will lead to a more equitable workforce that will ultimately translate to enhanced research productivity, cultural humility, and patient-centered care in neurosurgery.

Solitary Fibrous tumor of the lumbar spine mimicking a sequestered disc fragment.

Solitary fibrous tumor in the lumbar spine is a rare pathology with non-specific radiographic features, sometimes resulting in misdiagnosis. Our patient was a 41-year old female who presented with low back pain and bilateral leg pain. Initial MRI showed a lesion misdiagnosed for a sequestered disc at the mid L4-5 level, which was subsequently characterized appropriately and treated surgically, with resolution of symptoms. Pathologic diagnosis was most consistent with a solitary fibrous tumor due to STAT 6 and CD 34 reactivity. Long-term follow up is recommended in these patients to monitor tumor recurrence and evidence of metastasis.

Osteomyelitis-Discitis at the Thoracolumbar Junction and the Development of Postinfectious Spinal Deformity: A Surgical Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Progressive spinal deformity and neural compromise are the main indications for surgical management of vertebral osteomyelitis-discitis. However, when such pathology presents at the thoracolumbar (TL) junction, it remains unclear what the appropriate intervention is. The therapeutic dilemmas of decompression with or without instrumented fusion, the need for circumferential decompression and reconstruction, as well as the prognostic factors for progression of kyphosis, all remained ill-defined in the literature. The objective of this study is to evaluate risk factors for instrumentation at TL junction in spinal osteomyelitis-discitis. METHODS: A review of patients at a single center with osteomyelitis-discitis at the TL junction between 2014 and 2018 was performed. Patients were 18 years or older with infectious pathologies at T10 to L2. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included. Indication for instrumentation included progression of kyphosis following prior laminectomy/medical management. Of the 16 patients, 4 patients received laminectomy at initial treatment versus 12 patients receiving medical management alone. All 4 patients receiving laminectomy experienced progressive kyphosis requiring revision with instrumented fusion versus only 4 of 12 of the medically managed. Laminectomy, epidural compression, and vertebral body collapse were significant risk factors for kyphosis progression requiring instrumentation. The average time to surgical intervention for the indication of progressive kyphosis was 2.6 months after prior laminectomy and 6 months after initiation of medical management. CONCLUSIONS: Given the proclivity for kyphotic deformity at the TL junction, patients may benefit from long segment instrumentation in addition to decompression at the initial surgery. Laminectomy alone may hasten kyphosis progression.

Assessment of Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability and Accuracy to Evaluate Apical Vertebral Rotation Using Four Methods: An Experimental Study Using a Saw Bone Model.

STUDY DESIGN: After placing a thoracic three-vertebra segment saw bones model on a standardized turntable, a series of anteroposterior (AP) radiographs were obtained and then set in increments to 90° rotation. Then the specimen was instrumented with 35-mm pedicle screws bilaterally and the rotation process and image acquisition were repeated. OBJECTIVE: Assess reliability and accuracy of spine surgeons evaluating apical vertebral rotation (AVR) through surgeon's visual x-ray estimation, Nash-Moe system, Upasani trigonometric method, and Upasani grading system. BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Accurate assessment of AVR is one measure surgeons can evaluate the success of intervention and potential loss of correction in scoliotic deformities. METHODS: Eighty-four representative images of uninstrumented and instrumented vertebral segments were blinded. AVR was estimated by five experienced spinal deformity surgeons using the four techniques. The surgeons' grading, estimates, and errors compared to actual rotation were calculated. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated using interclass correlation (ICC). RESULTS: Each surgeon's error for simple visual estimation for uninstrumented segments was 8.7° to 17.4° (average error = 12.4°), and for instrumented segments it was 7.7° to 11.3° (average error = 9.5°). Error for the Upasani trigonometric method was -6.7° to 11.6° (average error = 0.9°). There was relatively poor accuracy for Nash-Moe system (38.2%-53.9%) compared with the Upasani grading system (76.74%-80.23%). Interobserver reliability using the Nash-Moe method was good (0.844), with intraobserver reliability from fair to excellent (0.684-0.949). Interobserver reliability for the Upasani grading method was good (0.829), with intraobserver reliability from fair to good (0.751-0.869). We found excellent interobserver reliability for Upasani trigonometric classification (0.935) with fair to excellent intraobserver reliability (0.775-0.991). The interobserver reliability of surgeons' visual estimates was good (0.898) and the intraobserver reliability from good to excellent (0.866-0.99) without pedicle screws, and interobserver reliability was excellent (0.948) and intraobserver reliability also excellent (0.959-0.986) with pedicle screws. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that both techniques described by Upasani have good reliability and accuracy, appearing more accurate than surgeon's visual estimates or Nash-Moe system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Are Traditional Radiographic Methods Accurate Predictors of Pedicle Morphology?

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric in vitro computed tomography (CT) imaging study. OBJECTIVE: To examine minimum pedicle diameter from transverse and coronal CT reconstructions of thoracolumbar spine specimens and compare their degree of disparity, if any. Pedicle angulation in coronal and transverse planes was measured and their contribution to the disparity in minimum pedicle diameter was assessed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal minimum pedicle diameter can be obtained from both transverse and coronal CT reconstructions; however, the degree of disparity in these measurements has not been described previously. Angulation of the pedicle in transverse and coronal planes may contribute to a disparity in minimum pedicle diameter acquired from reconstructions. This also has not been described previously. This study examined whether the disparity could be predicted by spinal level, as pedicle angulations vary in both coronal and transverse planes. METHODS: Five thoracolumbar specimens (T1-L5, age 48-59 yrs, male) were CT scanned utilizing clinical protocols. Minimum pedicle diameters and pedicle angulations were acquired in transverse and coronal reconstructions. Disparities between minimum pedicle diameters were measured and the correlation between this disparity and spinal level was characterized. RESULTS: A significant difference (P < 0.001) in minimum pedicle diameter existed between measures from coronal and transverse reconstructions. There was a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between the difference in minimal pedicle diameter and the transverse pedicle angle as well as the coronal pedicle angle. CONCLUSION: An overestimation of minimum pedicle diameter in the transverse reconstruction occurs when the coronal pedicle angulation increases, and in the coronal reconstruction when the transverse pedicle angulation increases. Therefore, pedicle angle should be determined using both coronal and transverse reconstructions and utilized to reduce the risk of overestimation of the true pedicle diameter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Analysis of Factors Contributing to Infections After Cranioplasty: A Single-Institution Retrospective Chart Review.

OBJECTIVE: Cranioplasty is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures, yet has one of the greatest rates of infection among cranial operations. Although studies have reported on cranioplasty complications, it is unclear what factors contribute to the high rate of infection. This study aims to determine which patient characteristics and operative factors lead to postcranioplasty infections. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 186 patients. Factors analyzed included sex, reason for cranioplasty, type of infection, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors. RESULTS: The overall infection rate was 24%. Skin flora was the most common pathogen. Wound dehiscence and presence of a postoperative fluid collection were associated significantly with a greater rate of infection (P < 0.001), whereas the use of autologous bone flap and a state of immunosuppression trended toward statistical significance (P = 0.075 and P = 0.089, respectively). Male sex, history of previous infection, history of craniectomy for trauma, cranioplasty size, and time to cranioplasty were not found to be significant factors related to cranioplasty infection. CONCLUSIONS: Although wound dehiscence and postoperative fluid collections were associated significantly with infection in this study, the number in each sample size was small, and further studies with a larger number of patients in each subgroup is necessary to validate our findings.