National Rapid Genome Sequencing in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Importance: National implementation of rapid trio genome sequencing (rtGS) in a clinical acute setting is essential to ensure advanced and equitable care for ill neonates. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic efficacy, and clinical utility of rtGS in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) throughout Israel. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, public health care-based, multicenter cohort study was conducted from October 2021 to December 2022 with the Community Genetics Department of the Israeli Ministry of Health and all Israeli medical genetics institutes (n = 18) and NICUs (n = 25). Critically ill neonates suspected of having a genetic etiology were offered rtGS. All sequencing, analysis, and interpretation of data were performed in a central genomics center at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Rapid results were expected within 10 days. A secondary analysis report, issued within 60 days, focused mainly on cases with negative rapid results and actionable secondary findings. Pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and highly suspected variants of unknown significance (VUS) were reported. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic rate, including highly suspected disease-causing VUS, and turnaround time for rapid results. Clinical utility was assessed via questionnaires circulated to treating neonatologists. Results: A total of 130 neonates across Israel (70 [54%] male; 60 [46%] female) met inclusion criteria and were recruited. Mean (SD) age at enrollment was 12 (13) days. Mean (SD) turnaround time for rapid report was 7 (3) days. Diagnostic efficacy was 50% (65 of 130) for disease-causing variants, 11% (14 of 130) for VUS suspected to be causative, and 1 novel gene candidate (1%). Disease-causing variants included 12 chromosomal and 52 monogenic disorders as well as 1 neonate with uniparental disomy. Overall, the response rate for clinical utility questionnaires was 82% (107 of 130). Among respondents, genomic testing led to a change in medical management for 24 neonates (22%). Results led to immediate precision medicine for 6 of 65 diagnosed infants (9%), an additional 2 (3%) received palliative care, and 2 (3%) were transferred to nursing homes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this national cohort study, rtGS in critically ill neonates was feasible and diagnostically beneficial in a public health care setting. This study is a prerequisite for implementation of rtGS for ill neonates into routine care and may aid in design of similar studies in other public health care systems.

The new face of cystic fibrosis in the era of population genetic carrier screening.

BACKGROUND: Population genetic carrier screening (PGCS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been offered to couples in Israel since 1999 and was included in a fully subsidized national program in 2008. We evaluated the impact of PGCS on CF incidence, genetic and clinical features. METHODS: This was a retrospective national study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of children with CF born in Israel between 2008 and 2018 were obtained from the national CF registry and from patients' medical records. Data on CF births, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), pregnancy termination and de-identified data from the PGCS program were collected. RESULTS: CF births per 100,000 live births decreased from 8.29 in 2008 to 0.54 in 2018 (IRR = 0.84, p < 0.001). The CF pregnancy termination rate did not change (IRR = 1, p=  0.9) while the CF-related PGT rate increased markedly (IRR = 1.33, p < 0.001). One hundred and two children were born with CF between 2008 and 2018 with a median age at diagnosis of 4.8 months, range 0-111 months. Unlike the generally high uptake nationally, 65/102 had not performed PGCS. Even if all had utilized PGCS, only 51 would have been detected by the existing genetic screening panel. Clinically, 34 % of children were pancreatic sufficient compared to 23 % before 2008 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Since institution of a nationwide PGCS program, the birth of children with CF decreased markedly. Residual function variants and pancreatic sufficiency were more common. A broader genetic screening panel and increased PGCS utilization may further decrease the birth of children with CF.

Lessons learned from the first national population-based genetic carrier-screening program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

PURPOSE: To summarize the results of first year implementation of pan-ethnic screening testing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and present the ensuing challenges. METHODS: Data acquisition for this study was performed by retrospective search of Ministry of Health registry for reports of all laboratories performing genetic screening tests. DMD testing was performed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology. In case of single-exon deletion, sequencing of the specific exon was performed to rule out underlying single-nucleotide variant. RESULTS: Of overall 85,737 DMD tests, 82 clinically significant findings were noted (0.095%, or 1:1,046 women). In addition, 80 findings with uncertain clinical significance were detected (0.093%, or 1:1072), as well as 373 cases (0.4%, or 1:230) of single-exon deletions subsequently identified as false positives because of underlying single-nucleotide variant, mostly variants in exon 8 in North African Jewish population, and in exon 48 in Arab Muslim population. CONCLUSION: Interpretation of population-based DMD carrier screening is complex, occasionally requiring additional genetic testing methods and ethical considerations. Multicenter data registry, including ethnic origin and familial segregation in selected cases, is crucial for optimal definition of the results during genetic counseling and informed decisions regarding prenatal testing.

[MOH SCREENING FOR TBCD IN COCHIN JEWS: COLLABORATION BETWEEN MEDICAL, RESEARCH AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN ACHIEVING PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS].

INTRODUCTION: PEBAT (Progressive Encephalopathy, Early-Onset, with Brain Atrophy and Thin Corpus Callosum) is a rare disease characterized by a significant and progressive, neurological deficit. The disease has autosomal recessive etiology and is caused by bi-allelic variants in the gene TBCD (Tubulin-Specific Chaperone D). In 2017 the disease was diagnosed in two sisters from Jewish Cochin ethnicity (originating in Karela in south India) in Israel. Genetic testing for the girls revealed the homozygous TBCD variant c.1423G>A (p.Ala475Thr). This variant was reported simultaneously in another unrelated patient of Cochin origin.

[SUMMARY AND UPDATES IN THE FIELD OF GENETIC TESTING IN ISRAEL - AS OF 2022].

INTRODUCTION: Considerable progress has been observed in the field of genetic counseling and testing in Israel, including the availability and funding of services. The purpose of the article is to summarize the management and present the updates in the field of genetic testing in Israel, as of 2022. The progress in the field of pregnancy-related genetic testing includes an ancestry-based annually updated genetic screening, which has significantly reduced the incidence of several severe and common hereditary diseases. A comprehensive and uniform genetic screening test was submitted for approval by the next basket committee.

Community data-driven approach to identify pathogenic founder variants for pan-ethnic carrier screening panels.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recently published new tier-based carrier screening recommendations. While many pan-ethnic genetic disorders are well established, some genes carry pathogenic founder variants (PFVs) that are unique to specific ethnic groups. We aimed to demonstrate a community data-driven approach to creating a pan-ethnic carrier screening panel that meets the ACMG recommendations. METHODS: Exome sequencing data from 3061 Israeli individuals were analyzed. Machine learning determined ancestries. Frequencies of candidate pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants based on ClinVar and Franklin were calculated for each subpopulation based on the Franklin community platform and compared with existing screening panels. Candidate PFVs were manually curated through community members and the literature. RESULTS: The samples were automatically assigned to 13 ancestries. The largest number of samples was classified as Ashkenazi Jewish (n = 1011), followed by Muslim Arabs (n = 613). We detected one tier-2 and seven tier-3 variants that were not included in existing carrier screening panels for Ashkenazi Jewish or Muslim Arab ancestries. Five of these P/LP variants were supported by evidence from the Franklin community. Twenty additional variants were detected that are potentially pathogenic tier-2 or tier-3. CONCLUSIONS: The community data-driven and sharing approaches facilitate generating inclusive and equitable ethnically based carrier screening panels. This approach identified new PFVs missing from currently available panels and highlighted variants that may require reclassification.

The anxiety caused by abnormal results of Down syndrome screening tests.

The objective of our survey was to evaluate the anxiety experienced by women receiving abnormal results of prenatal Down syndrome screening by an electronic anonymous survey. Anxiety level was evaluated by a six-item Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Of 559 respondents, high anxiety scores were reported in the majority (86.0%). Higher anxiety scores were noted in women informed of the abnormal result by the caregiver vs. written answer. 59.1% of the respondents preferred the risk reported as percentage, while only 4.4% gave precedence to the current form (e.g. 1 in 100). The participants noted several factors which could relieve their anxiety, including an explanatory booklet (72.4%) or a website (77.9%). In conclusion, women receiving abnormal results of Down syndrome screening experience significant anxiety. Efforts should be made to relieve this distress, including changing the historical ratio risk format to percentage, adding a non-directive verbal annotation, an explanatory website and improving health professionals' understanding of the exact statistical meaning of the risk.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Abnormal results of prenatal screening for Down syndrome might cause the women significant anxiety. Several simple methods are able to relieve this distress; however, they are frequently not implemented in the routine practice.What the results of this study add? We show that abnormal results of the screening tests are associated with high anxiety scores in the majority of women (86.0%). The majority of the respondents preferred the risk reported as percentage (vs. historical representation as a ratio). The participants noted several factors which could relieve their anxiety, including an explanatory booklet or a website.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on the results, we discuss the numerous ways able to available alleviate the distress.

Refining the Phenotypic Spectrum of KMT5B-Associated Developmental Delay.

The role of lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) and demethylases (KDMs) in the regulation of chromatin modification is well-established. Recently, deleterious heterozygous variants in KMT5B were implicated in individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder. We describe three unrelated patients with global developmental delay (GDD) or ID, macrocephaly and additional features. Using whole exome sequencing, each of the probands was found to harbor a distinct de novo heterozygous disease-causing variant in KMT5B: c.541C > G (p.His181Asp); c.833A > T (p.Asn278Ile); or c.391_394delAAAG (p.Lys131GlufsTer6). We discuss herein their clinical presentations, and compare them to those of previously reported patients. Furthermore, using a three-dimensional computational model of the KMT5B protein, we demonstrate the predicted structural effects of the two missense variants. Our findings support the role of de novo missense and nonsense variants in KMT5B-associated GDD/ID, and suggest that this gene should be considered in the differential diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders accompanied by macrocephaly and/or overgrowth.

Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000-2019) and Israel (2011-2019).

Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50-70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel. Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000-2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011). Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000-2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013-2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years. Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors.

A single center experience with publicly funded clinical exome sequencing for neurodevelopmental disorders or multiple congenital anomalies.

Exome sequencing (ES) is an important diagnostic tool for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) and/or multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). However, the cost of ES limits the test's accessibility for many patients. We evaluated the yield of publicly funded clinical ES, performed at a tertiary center in Israel, over a 3-year period (2018-2020). Probands presented with (1) moderate-to-profound global developmental delay (GDD)/intellectual disability (ID); or (2) mild GDD/ID with epilepsy or congenital anomaly; and/or (3) MCA. Subjects with normal chromosomal microarray analysis who met inclusion criteria were included, totaling 280 consecutive cases. Trio ES (proband and parents) was the default option. In 252 cases (90.0%), indication of NDD was noted. Most probands were males (62.9%), and their mean age at ES submission was 9.3 years (range 1 month to 51 years). Molecular diagnosis was reached in 109 probands (38.9%), mainly due to de novo variants (91/109, 83.5%). Disease-causing variants were identified in 92 genes, 15 of which were implicated in more than a single case. Male sex, families with multiple-affected members and premature birth were significantly associated with lower ES yield (p < 0.05). Other factors, including MCA and coexistence of epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder, microcephaly or abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging findings, were not associated with the yield. To conclude, our findings support the utility of clinical ES in a real-world setting, as part of a publicly funded genetic workup for individuals with GDD/ID and/or MCA.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results in pregnancies with sonographic diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum anomalies (CCA) or posterior fossa anomalies (PFA). METHODS: All CMA tests in pregnancies with CCA or PFA performed between January 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated from the Israeli Ministry of Health database. The rate of CMA with clinically significant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) findings was calculated and compared to a local Israeli cohort of 5,541 pregnancies with normal ultrasound. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two pregnancies were enrolled: 102 cases with CCA and 89 with PFA (9 cases had both). Clinically significant CMA results were found in 7/102 of CCA (6.9%) and in 7/89 of PFA (7.9%) cases. The CMA detection rate in pregnancies with isolated CCA (2/57, 3.5%) or PFA (2/50, 4.0%) was lower than in nonisolated cases, including additional CNS and/or extra-CNS sonographic anomalies (CCA-5/45, 11.1%; PFA-5/39, 12.8%), but this was not statistically significant. However, the rate among pregnancies that had extra-CNS anomalies, with or without additional CNS involvement (CCA-5/24, 20.8%; PFA-5/29, 17.2%), was significantly higher compared to all other cases (p = 0.0075 for CCA; p = 0.035 for PFA). Risk of CMA with clinically significant results for all and nonisolated CCA or PFA pregnancies was higher compared to the background risk reported in the control cohort (p < 0.001), but was not significant for isolated cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CMA testing is beneficial for the genetic workup of pregnancies with CCA or PFA, and is probably most informative when additional extra-CNS anomalies are observed.

The yield of chromosomal microarray in pregnancies with congenital cardiac defects and normal noninvasive prenatal screening.

BACKGROUND: Evidence comparing the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis to noninvasive prenatal screening in pregnancies with congenital heart anomalies is currently limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in fetuses with congenital heart defects by its various subtypes following a normal noninvasive prenatal screening. STUDY DESIGN: Using a population-based, countrywide computerized database, we retrieved the reports of all pregnancies undergoing chromosomal microarray analysis because of congenital heart defects through the years 2013-2019. We examined the risk of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis results and compared it with the results of a local cohort of low-risk pregnancies. Of 5541 fetuses, 78 (1.4%) showed abnormal results. The residual risk of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis results was calculated using several options-trisomies 21, 18, and 13; sex chromosome aneuploidies; 22q11.2 deletion, and deletions and duplications of at least 10 MB in size (genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening)-following the exclusion of theoretically detectable noninvasive prenatal screening anomalies. RESULTS: Of the 1728 fetuses with congenital heart defects, 93 (5.4%) showed clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-3.1). The result of pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects was compared with the results of the control population. Unique variants were found in 15 pregnancies (16.1%). The detection rate of noninvasive prenatal screening in isolated congenital heart defects varied from 1.0% (aimed at 3 common trisomies) to 2.2% (aimed at 5 common aneuploidies and 22q11.2 deletion) using noninvasive prenatal screening. In nonisolated congenital heart defects, the noninvasive prenatal screening detection rates ranged from 7.8% (aimed at common autosomal trisomies) to 9.2% using genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results following normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 2.0% to 2.8% in isolated congenital heart defects and 4.5% to 5.9% in nonisolated cases and was significantly higher than those of the control cohort in all noninvasive prenatal screening options. In addition, the residual risk following noninvasive prenatal screening aimed at chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y was significantly higher than those of the control cohort for most specific congenital heart defect subtypes, except for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery. CONCLUSION: The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects following normal noninvasive prenatal screening was higher than those in pregnancies with normal ultrasound in most isolated and nonisolated congenital heart defect subtypes. This information should be taken into account by obstetricians and genetic counselors when considering the option of diagnostic testing.

The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies.

PURPOSE: To analyze the risk for clinically significant microarray aberrations in pregnancies with polyhydramnios. METHODS: Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) performed due to polyhydramnios between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the Ministry of Health Database. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) CMA findings in isolated and non-isolated polyhydramnios cohorts was compared to a local control group of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound, in which 78 (1.4%) abnormal results were demonstrated. Subgroup analyses were performed by the degree of polyhydramnios, week of diagnosis, maternal age, and the presence of additional sonographic anomalies. RESULTS: In the isolated polyhydramnios cohort, 19/623 (3.1%) clinically significant CMA aberrations were noted, a significantly higher rate compared to the control population. However, the risk for abnormal CMA results in the 158 cases with mild polyhydramnios (AFI 25-29.9, or maximal vertical pocket 8-11.9 cm) did not significantly differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. Of 119 cases of non-isolated polyhydramnios (most frequently associated with cardiovascular (26.1%) and brain (15.1%) anomalies), 8 (6.7%) abnormal CMA findings were noted, mainly karyotype-detectable. CONCLUSION: Mild polyhydramnios was not associated with an increased rate of clinically significant microarray results, compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound. An extensive anatomical sonographic survey should be performed in pregnancies with polyhydramnios, with consideration of fetal echocardiography.

Is fetal isolated double renal collecting system an indication for chromosomal microarray?

Introduction: Duplication of the renal collecting system is one of the most common variants of urinary tract anatomy. The objective of our study was to examine the risk for chromosomal aberrations in this isolated prenatal sonographic finding.Methods: Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) reported to the Ministry of Health between January 2013 and September 2017 were retrospectively obtained from a computerized database. All pregnancies with a sonographic diagnosis of the isolated duplex renal collecting system and documentation of CMA result were included. Rate of abnormal CMA findings was compared to the general population risk, based on a systematic review encompassing 9272 cases with normal ultrasound and a local data of 5541 pregnancies undergoing CMA due to maternal request.Results: Two pathogenic CMA finding was found amongst 143 pregnancies with double collecting system (1.4%), not significantly different from the risk for abnormal CMA results in the general population. In addition, five variants of unknown significance were demonstrated (3.5%).Conclusion: To our best knowledge, this analysis is the first report describing the rate of chromosomal anomalies in pregnancies with isolated duplex renal collecting system. Its results suggest that routine invasive prenatal testing with CMA analysis in such cases is no more useful than in the general population. Prospective well-adjusted studies are needed to guide the optimal management of these pregnancies.

Chromosomal microarray should be performed for cases of fetal short long bones detected prenatally.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of pathogenic and likely-pathogenic variants detected by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), among pregnancies with fetal short long bones diagnosed by ultrasound. METHODS: The study cohort was based on cases of chromosomal microarray analyses performed nationwide for the indication of short long bones. RESULTS: CMA was performed in 66 cases of short long bones. There were 4 cases with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic result (6%). The rate of chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher compared to the background risk for copy number variations (CNVs) in pregnancies with no sonographic anomalies (P < 0.001). The yield of CMA in our cohort was significantly higher for both isolated and non-isolated cases, for cases in which the lowest estimated bone length percentile was above the 3rd percentile (below 5th percentile), and for cases diagnosed with short long bones after 22 weeks but not for cases diagnosed after 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: The yield of CMA in cases with short long bones (both isolated and non-isolated) is significantly higher than the background risk for chromosomal anomalies in pregnancies with no sonographic anomalies. This suggests that CMA should be offered in pregnancies with a diagnosis of fetal short long bones.

The Yield of Chromosomal Microarray in Pregnancies Complicated with Fetal Growth Restriction Can Be Predicted According to Clinical Parameters.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis in pregnancies complicated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) according to specific clinical parameters. METHODS: The study was based on national records from the Israeli Ministry of Health. Chromosomal microarray analyses of amniocenteses performed nationwide for the indication of FGR, from January 2016 to March 2018, were included. The CMA yield was compared to 2 cohorts that reported the background risk. RESULTS: Of 174 tests performed for the indication of FGR, there were 11 cases with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic result (6.3%). The yield of CMA was significantly higher in cases with major structural findings (29.4 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.001), compared to isolated FGR but not for minor structural findings (6.1 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.5). The rate of chromosomal aberrations was significantly higher for all cases with FGR, when compared to the background risk of a cohort of normal pregnancies (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% CI 2.5-9 and OR 6.09, 95% CI 3.2-11.4) but not for isolated cases or cases diagnosed after 24 weeks of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Chromosomal microarray analysis should be performed for all pregnancies complicated with FGR diagnosed before 24 weeks and for cases with major structural anomalies.

Colchicine treatment increases the risk for fetal chromosomal aberrations-an observational study and systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the risk for chromosomal aberrations in fetuses of colchicine-treated patients in a large cohort, and to perform a systematic literature review on the subject. METHODS: For the observational study, a retrospective search was performed through the Ministry of Health computerized database, for all invasive tests performed due to parental colchicine treatment over the years 2003-19. The rate of aberrant karyotypes in pregnancies exposed to colchicine was compared with a local cohort of 2752 normal pregnancies, yielding six (0.2%) karyotype-detectable findings. In addition, a systematic literature search was conducted for studies examining the rate of chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies exposed to colchicine. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 755 pregnancies karyotyped due to colchicine exposure. A marked decrease due to this indication was noted over the years (i.e. 67 cases in 2003 vs 8 in 2019). Five (0.66%) chromosomal aberrations were noted: 47,XXY; 45,X0; 47,XYY; and two fetuses with trisomy 21. This rate was significantly increased compared with the control population [relative risk 2.2 (95% CI: 1.1, 4.2)]. Literature search yielded four studies encompassing 740 pregnancies. The rate of chromosomal aberrations ranged from 'none' (in three studies) up to 1.5%. Quality assessment of the evidence was defined as 'low'. CONCLUSION: The results of our observational study support the concern that colchicine treatment is associated with increased risk for fetal chromosomal aberrations; however, the absolute risk is relatively low (one in 151 pregnancies). This information should be taken into account when considering invasive testing in such pregnancies.

Risk of Clinically Significant Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Findings in Fetuses With Nuchal Translucency From 3.0 mm Through 3.4 mm.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis findings in fetuses with nuchal translucency from 3.0-3.4 mm. In addition, we aimed to define the yield of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in such pregnancies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included results of all chromosomal microarray analysis tests performed owing to a nuchal translucency measurement from 3.0-3.4 mm, without ultrasonographic anomalies, retrieved from the Israeli Ministry of Health computerized database. Rates of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) microarray findings were compared with a previously published local control population, encompassing 2,752 fetuses with normal ultrasound findings and nuchal translucency less than 3.0 mm. RESULTS: Overall, 619 chromosomal microarray analyses were performed owing to isolated nuchal translucency from 3.0-3.4 mm. Of these, 29 (4.7%) cases had clinically significant copy number variants, a significantly higher risk compared with control-group pregnancies (relative risk 3.3, 95% CI 2.6-7.2). Divided by tenths of millimeters, the risk for abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings remained significantly increased, except for the subgroup of 198 fetuses with nuchal translucency measurements of 3.0 mm. Noninvasive prenatal testing for the five common chromosome aneuploidies would have missed 41.4% of the abnormal copy number variants-1.9% of overall cases, or 1 in 52 fetuses with nuchal translucency from 3-3.4 mm. Genome-wide NIPT, as well as traditional karyotyping, could have missed an abnormal finding in 9 of 619 (1.5%), or 1 in 69 fetuses. CONCLUSION: Our outcomes show that the rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings in fetuses with nuchal translucency from 3.1-3.4 mm is significantly higher compared with fetuses with normal ultrasound findings.