Tocilizumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis in Scotland: a report on behalf of the Scottish Society for Rheumatology standards subgroup.

Objectives: The aim was to describe a modern National Health Service (NHS) Scotland cohort of patients with GCA over 12 months of care to include clinical presentation, practices relating to assessment and treatment, and specifically, the use of tocilizumab. Methods: A multicentre audit of patients newly diagnosed with GCA between November 2019 and October 2021 was established on behalf of the Scottish Society for Rheumatology. Clinical data were collected retrospectively by rheumatology teams at participating NHS centres using electronic patient records. An extended cohort of patients from NHS Lothian was examined to investigate outcomes of tocilizumab use for >1 year. Results: Sixty-three patients from three NHS Scotland health boards were included, with analysis of data from 216 clinic episodes. Mean follow-up was 371 days. Mean age was 71 years; 62% were female. The most common presenting features were headache (93.6%), scalp tenderness (82.5%) and ocular symptoms (24%). At baseline, 63% of patients had at least one existing risk factor for adverse outcomes from high-dose CS use, namely hypertension (57.1%), diabetes (24%) and osteoporosis (11%). Thirty per cent of all patients (19 of 63) received tocilizumab, with only 11% (7 of 63) receiving tocilizumab owing to glucocorticoid risk factors at baseline. One-quarter of all patients (16 of 63) experienced relapse of GCA during follow-up, of whom six were subsequently treated with tocilizumab. Conclusion: This multicentre audit demonstrates that despite its availability for patients with risk factors for CS adversity and those who suffer relapse of GCA, tocilizumab is used in less than one-quarter of patients who might benefit. The reasons for this require further exploration.

The investigative burden of membranous nephropathy in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Membranous nephropathy (MN) represents two distinct disease entities. Primary MN is now recognized as an autoimmune condition associated with the anti-PLA2R antibody and secondary MN occurs in tandem with malignancy, infection, drug therapy and other autoimmune conditions. Prior to the development of accessible enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, the diagnosis of MN was one of exclusion. We studied whether the introduction of serum anti-PLA2R antibody testing leads to a reduction in the frequency of investigations in MN patients. METHODS: Patients from three UK centres with a diagnosis of MN between 2009 and 2014 were identified. We compared patients who had a positive anti-PLA2R test within 6 months of biopsy with those who had no test or a negative test. Records were reviewed for investigations that took place 6 months prior to and 6 months following the biopsy date to see if these were normal or identified a secondary cause of MN. RESULTS: In total, 184 patients were included: 80 had no test, 66 had a negative anti-PLA2R test and 38 had a positive test within 6 months of diagnosis. In 2012, 46.5% of patients had an anti-PLA2R test, increasing to 93.3% in 2014. From 2012 to 2014 the number of screening tests dropped from 10.03 to 4.29 and the costs from £497.92 to £132.94. CONCLUSIONS: Since its introduction, a progressively higher proportion of patients diagnosed with MN had an anti-PLA2R test. This has led to a reduction in the number of screening tests and in the cost of investigations carried out. The anti-PLA2R test has the potential to reduce this burden as its use becomes more widespread.