Plain Language Summary of the PAISLEY study: deucravacitinib as a treatment for people with systemic lupus erythematosus.

What is this summary about?This plain language summary describes the results of the phase 2 study called PAISLEY which tested deucravacitinib, a new medicine under investigation before approval, in people living with lupus. In this trial, researchers wanted to find out if deucravacitinib would be safe and reduce the symptoms and disease activity in people living with lupus. PAISLEY looked at the type of lupus known as systemic lupus erythematosus, shortened to SLE.What happened in the study?The study included 363 people from 17 countries who had SLE and were between 18 and 75 years of age. The participants were divided into 4 groups at random. One group was given placebo (a fake or dummy pill that contains no medicine) and the other 3 groups took deucravacitinib, a pill taken by mouth. Each of the groups taking deucravacitinib took a different dose, either 3 milligrams (mg) twice daily, 6 mg twice daily, or 12 mg once daily. After 32 and 48 weeks, researchers measured the number of people in each group who had improvements in their SLE symptoms and disease activity, as measured by different tests. They also looked at any side effects people experienced, which may or may not have been caused by the medicine.What do the results mean?After 32 weeks of treatment, SLE symptoms and disease activity improved in more people in each of the deucravacitinib dose groups compared with the people taking placebo (the dummy pill). After 48 weeks of treatment, SLE symptoms and disease activity were still improved in more people taking deucravacitinib compared with people taking placebo, and this was measured in several different ways. The best results were seen in people taking deucravacitinib 3 mg twice daily. The number of serious side effects was similar for people taking deucravacitinib and those taking placebo. The most common side effects that were seen in people taking deucravacitinib were infections such as sore throat, cough, or bronchitis (upper respiratory tract), infltion in the nose (nasopharyngitis), headaches, and urinary tract infections. More people taking deucravacitinib than placebo had acne, rash, and cold sores (oral herpes). These were not serious and did not have any long-term effects on patient health or lead to patients stopping treatment.How to say (double click sound icon to play sound)… Systemic lupus erythematosus: SIS-teh-MIC LOO-puhs Eh-RE-the-ma-TOE-susDeucravacitinib: doo-KRAV-a-sih-ti-nibEnzyme: EN-zimeInterferon: in-tur-FER-onPlacebo: pluh-SEE-bohTyrosine kinase: TY-ruh-seen KY-naysTYK2: TIK-tu.

Absolute and Relative Bioavailability of Oral Solid Dosage Formulations of Deucravacitinib in Humans.

Deucravacitinib is an oral, selective, allosteric inhibitor of tyrosine kinase 2, an intracellular signaling kinase involved in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. The absolute and relative bioavailability (BA) were evaluated in phase 1, open-label studies in healthy adults to assess (1) the absolute BA of the deucravacitinib tablet formulation following single oral administration of a 12-mg tablet and an intravenous microdose infusion of 0.1-mg carbon-13 and nitrogen-15-labeled deucravacitinib ([13 C2 , 15 N3 ] deucravacitinib) solution in 8 subjects, and (2) the relative oral BA of deucravacitinib tablet and capsule formulations at the 3- and 12-mg dose levels in 20 subjects. The absolute oral availability of deucravacitinib in the tablet formulation was near complete at approximately 99%. The total clearance (254 mL/min) was low relative to hepatic blood flow, and volume of distribution (∼140 L) was greater than total body water, indicating extravascular distribution. Deucravacitinib systemic exposure (maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma drug concentration curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable nonzero concentration, and area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity) after administration of the tablet formulation were similar to the capsule at the tested 3- and 12-mg doses. In both studies, deucravacitinib was safe with no clinically relevant changes in laboratory values, electrocardiogram parameters, or vital signs.

Deucravacitinib, a Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric inhibitor of TYK2, in a phase II trial in adult patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Adults with active SLE were enrolled from 162 sites in 17 countries. Patients (n = 363) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive deucravacitinib 3 mg twice daily, 6 mg twice daily, 12 mg once daily, or placebo. The primary end point was SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response at week 32. Secondary outcomes assessed at week 48 included SRI-4, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index 50 (CLASI-50), Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), and improvements in active (swollen plus tender), swollen, and tender joint counts. RESULTS: At week 32, the percentage of patients achieving SRI-4 response was 34% with placebo compared to 58% with deucravacitinib 3 mg twice daily (odds ratio [OR] 2.8 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5, 5.1]; P < 0.001 versus placebo), 50% with 6 mg twice daily (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.0, 3.4]; P = 0.02 versus placebo), and 45% with 12 mg once daily (OR 1.6 [95% CI 0.8, 2.9]; nominal P = 0.08 versus placebo). Response rates were higher with deucravacitinib treatment for BICLA, CLASI-50, LLDAS, and joint counts compared to placebo. Rates of adverse events were similar across groups, except higher rates of infections and cutaneous events, including rash and acne, with deucravacitinib treatment. Rates of serious adverse events were comparable, with no deaths, opportunistic infections, tuberculosis infections, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thrombotic events reported. CONCLUSION: Deucravacitinib treatment elicited higher response rates for SRI-4 and other end points compared with placebo, with an acceptable safety profile, in adult patients with active SLE.

Efficacy and safety of selective TYK2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, in a phase II trial in psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oral selective tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, deucravacitinib, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: In this double-blind, phase II trial, 203 patients with PsA were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg once a day or 12 mg once a day. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology-20 (ACR-20) response at week 16. RESULTS: ACR-20 response was significantly higher with deucravacitinib 6 mg once a day (52.9%, p=0.0134) and 12 mg once a day (62.7%, p=0.0004) versus placebo (31.8%) at week 16. Both deucravacitinib doses resulted in significant improvements versus placebo (p≤0.05) in the multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints of change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score and in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index-75 response. Improvements were also seen in multiple exploratory endpoints with deucravacitinib treatment. The most common adverse events (AEs) (≥5%) in deucravacitinib-treated patients were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, sinusitis, bronchitis, rash, headache and diarrhoea. There were no serious AEs and no occurrence of herpes zoster, opportunistic infections and major adverse cardiovascular events, or differences versus placebo in mean changes in laboratory parameters with deucravacitinib treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the selective TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib was well tolerated and resulted in greater improvements than placebo in ACR-20, multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints and other exploratory efficacy measures in patients with PsA. Larger trials over longer periods of time with deucravacitinib are warranted to confirm its safety profile and benefits in PsA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03881059.

Lack of Electrocardiographic Effects of Deucravacitinib in Healthy Subjects.

Deucravacitinib is a novel, oral, selective inhibitor of the intracellular signaling kinase tyrosine kinase 2. This phase 1, randomized, partially double-blind, 4-period crossover study in healthy adults was conducted to determine whether deucravacitinib 12 mg (therapeutic dose) or 36 mg (supratherapeutic dose) had a clinically relevant effect on the corrected QT interval and other electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters. Subjects received 1 of 4 sequences of placebo, deucravacitinib 12 mg, deucravacitinib 36 mg, and moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control) in a randomized crossover fashion. The placebo-corrected change from baseline for the QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia method (QTcF), ECG parameters, and safety measures were evaluated. A clinically meaningful QTcF prolongation of >10 milliseconds was not found for deucravacitinib at tested doses. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated by the observation of known QT effects of moxifloxacin in the study. Deucravacitinib had no clinically relevant effect on other parameters and was generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild, and all AEs resolved by study's end. Three treatment-related serious AEs of pharyngitis, cellulitis, and lymphadenopathy occurred in 1 subject following administration of deucravacitinib 12 mg, but resolved by end of study. This study demonstrated that a single oral dose of deucravacitinib 12 or 36 mg did not produce a clinically relevant effect on the corrected QT interval or other measured ECG parameters in healthy adults.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of BMS-986166, a Novel Selective Sphingosine-1-Phosphate-1 Receptor Modulator, and Exposure-Response Assessment of Lymphocyte Counts and Heart Rate in Healthy Participants.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) binding to the S1P-1 receptor (S1P1R) controls the egress of lymphocytes from lymphoid organs and targets modulation of immune responses in autoimmune diseases. Pharmacologic modulation of S1P receptors has been linked to heart rate reduction. BMS-986166, a prodrug of the active phosphorylated metabolite BMS-986166-P, presents an improved cardiac safety profile in preclinical studies compared to other S1P1R modulators. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and pharmacodynamics of BMS-986166 versus placebo after single (0.75-5.0 mg) and repeated (0.25-1.5 mg/day) oral administration were assessed in healthy participants after a 1-day lead-in placebo period. A population model was developed to jointly describe BMS-986166 and BMS-986166-P pharmacokinetics and predict individual exposures. Inhibitory sigmoid models described the relationships between average daily BMS-986166-P concentrations and nadir of time-matched (day -1) placebo-corrected heart rate on day 1 (nDDHR, where DD represents ∆∆) and nadir of absolute lymphocyte count (nALC). Predicted decreases in nDDHR and nALC were 9 bpm and 20% following placebo, with maximum decreases of 10 bpm in nDDHR due to drug effect, and approximately 80% in nALC due to drug and placebo. A 0.5-mg/day dose regimen achieves the target 65% reduction in nALC associated with a 2-bpm decrease in nDDHR over placebo.

The safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel, selective S1P1R modulator in healthy participants.

Background: Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BMS-986166, a novel sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 modulator, were assessed.Research design and methods: Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase l studies were conducted in healthy participants. In the single ascending dose study (N = 70), BMS-986166 was administered as a single dose, upwardly titrated daily doses or a single dose in participants who were fed, fasted or administered famotidine. In the multiple ascending dose study (N = 32), BMS-986166 was administered daily for 28 days. Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC]) were assessed.Results: BMS-986166 was generally well tolerated; treatment-related adverse events were mild. Dose-related, clinically insignificant reductions in time-matched heart rate were recorded versus placebo. Pharmacokinetics were linear and stationary with approximately dose-related increases in blood exposure of BMS-986166. Decreases in ALC percent change from baseline with multiple doses of BMS-986166 versus placebo were dose-related. Between Day 0 and 35, median nadir lymphocyte reductions were 53.7%, 75.9% and 81.9% with 0.25-, 0.75- and 1.5-mg BMS-986166 doses. ALC recovery began 14, 14-21 and 7 days after last dose of 0.25, 0.75 and 1.5 mg.Conclusions: BMS-986166 was generally well tolerated in this population and warrants further investigation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02790125, NCT03038711.

Treatment and discharge patterns among patients hospitalized with non-valvular atrial fibrillation transitioning from the inpatient to outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inpatient oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment, discharge location, and post-discharge OAC treatment for patients hospitalized with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective study using claims data linked to hospital electronic health records (EHR). Patients (n = 2,484) were hospitalized with a primary (38%) or secondary (62%) diagnosis of AF without evidence of mitral valvular heart disease or valve replacement between January 2009 and September 2013. Inpatient OAC treatment was identified from EHR data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inpatient and post-discharge OAC treatment [direct OAC (DOAC; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran), warfarin, no OAC] and discharge location (long-term care, home health-care, home self-care). RESULTS: Mean age was 72.6 years, 61.2% were male, and 89.5% had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. Overall, 6.4% received a DOAC, 38.0% warfarin, and 55.6% no OAC during hospitalization. Compared to other treatment groups, patients receiving DOAC were younger and more likely to be male. The majority (72.2%) were discharged to home health-care, 13.2% home self-care, and 6.0% long-term care. Among patients who were treated with warfarin during hospitalization, 40.3% filled a warfarin prescription within 30 days post-discharge, whereas among patients who were treated with a DOAC, 52.4% filled a DOAC prescription within 30 days post-discharge. Some NVAF patients not treated with an OAC during hospitalization filled a prescription for warfarin (18.0%) or DOAC (1.9%) within 30 days post-discharge. Results were similar among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients hospitalized for NVAF were discharged to home support, and the majority did not have OAC treatment during hospitalization or the 30 days post-discharge. Additional investigation should be conducted on trends beyond 30 days post-hospitalization, and the reasons for not receiving anticoagulation therapy in patients at moderate-to-severe risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Helping to avoid preventable strokes is an important goal for public health.

Comparison of hospital length of stay between hospitalized non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with either apixaban or warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Hospital length of stay (LOS) is an important cost driver for hospitals and payers alike. Hospitalized non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with apixaban may have shorter LOS than those treated with warfarin because of the absence of need for INR monitoring in apixaban. Thus, this study compared hospital LOS between hospitalized NVAF patients treated with either apixaban or warfarin. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study based on a large US database including diagnosis, procedure, and drug administration information from >600 acute-care hospitals. Patients selected for study were aged ≥18 years and had a hospitalization record with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for atrial fibrillation (AF) in any position from 1 January 2013 to 28 February 2014 (index hospitalization). Patients with diagnoses indicative of rheumatic mitral valvular heart disease or a valve replacement procedure during index hospitalization were excluded. Patients were required to have been treated with either apixaban or warfarin, and not treated with rivaroxaban or dabigatran, during index hospitalization. Apixaban patients were propensity score (PS) matched to warfarin patients at a 1:1 ratio, using patient demographic/clinical and hospital characteristics. The study outcome was hospital LOS, calculated as discharge date minus admission date; a sensitivity analysis calculated hospital LOS as discharge date minus first anticoagulant administration date. Sub-analyses were conducted among patients with a primary diagnosis of AF. RESULTS: The study included 832 apixaban patients matched to 832 warfarin patients. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] and median hospital LOS were significantly (p < 0.001) shorter in apixaban patients (4.5 [4.2] and 3 days) than in warfarin patients (5.4 [5.0] and 4). Results were consistent in the sensitivity and sub-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Among NVAF patients, apixaban treatment was associated with shorter hospital LOS when compared with warfarin treatment. These findings may have important clinical and economic implications for hospitals, payers, and patients.

Prasugrel as a safe alternative for clopidogrel-associated arthritis.

Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine derivative antiplatelet compound. The antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel originate through noncompetitive antagonism of the platelet ADP receptor, P2Y12, resulting in inhibition of platelet activation. Clopidogrel is now widely used in acute coronary syndromes and after percutaneous coronary interventions to reduce the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. We report a case of acute migratory polyarthritis associated with the use of clopidogrel. This serves as only the second documented case of clopidogrel-associated arthritis in the United States, and the first to show that prasugrel may be considered as an alternative agent without short-term reoccurrence.

Characteristics of exercise-induced intrapulmonary arteriovenous fistula in patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea.

Dynamic appearance of intrapulmonary arteriovenous fistula (AVF) during exercise may be associated with unexplained exertional dyspnea (UED) and can be diagnosed with an agitated saline contrast study during exercise echocardiography. However, the occurrence of AVF during exercise in patients with UED has not been well described. Thus, the frequency of exercise-induced intrapulmonary AVF in the outpatients with UED was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-nine outpatients (age: 53 ± 12, 33 female) with UED underwent symptom-limited supine bicycle exercise echocardiography. Ten patients (26%) developed exercise-induced intrapulmonary AVF. Patients with and without AVF showed the similar peak exercise heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and rate-pressure product. The patients with AVF demonstrated a small but significant decrease in arterial oxygen saturation with exercise as compare to baseline (95.6 ± 2.8% at peak, vs. 97.5 ± 2.5% at baseline, P < 0.05 with a paired Student t-test). Our study suggests that exercise-induced intrapulmonary AVF is relatively common in the outpatients with UED and associated with mild exercise desaturation; however, the mechanism of desaturation could not be determined by this study. Further investigation to characterize and determine the clinical significance of AVF is warranted.

Use of bicycle exercise echocardiography for unexplained exertional dyspnea.

Unexplained exertional dyspnea is a common and perplexing clinical problem. Myocardial ischemia and left ventricular systolic dysfunction are important cardiac causes, but are often not detected in these patients. Recently, exercise-induced left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and exercised-induced pulmonary hypertension have emerged as common alternative mechanisms. While conventional exercise treadmill echocardiography effectively diagnoses left ventricular systolic dysfunction and myocardial ischemia, it has limited ability to detect exercise-induced diastolic dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension. The latest advances in exercise echocardiography, including utilization of tissue Doppler imaging and harmonic imaging, make noninvasive evaluation of both conventional and alternative cardiac causes of exertional dyspnea possible. These advancements, when coupled with newly designed supine exercise platforms for bicycle exercise echocardiography (BE), facilitate the detection of exercise-induced diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. Moreover, BE using supine ergometry additionally permits the dynamic evaluation of valvular function and interatrial shunting and detection of pulmonary arteriovenous fistula, uncommon but important causes of unexplained exertional dyspnea. Therefore, we propose that because of its superior diagnostic capabilities, BE should be included as part of a comprehensive cardiac evaluation of patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea.

Risk of major bleeding with concomitant dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving long-term warfarin therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To characterize the safety of concomitant aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to identify patient characteristics that increase the risk of hemorrhage. DESIGN: Retrospective, matched cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center and affiliated outpatient offices. PATIENTS: The active group consisted of 97 patients who underwent PCI from January 1, 2000-September 30, 2005, and received warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel; the control group consisted of 97 patients who were individually matched to patients in the active group by procedure type, procedure year, age, and sex. Control patients received aspirin and clopidogrel. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical data were collected from inpatient records, outpatient physician office records, and telephone surveys administered to patients or caregivers. The primary end point was major bleeding. The median duration of follow-up after index procedure was 182 days (range 0-191 days) in the active group and 182 days (range 0-213 days) in the control group. Fifty-seven (59%) of the 97 patients in the active group received warfarin for atrial fibrillation. There were 14 major bleeds in the active group (including 1 death) and 3 major bleeds in the control group during the study period. Mean international normalized ratio at the time of bleeding was 3.4. Hazard ratio for major bleeding was 5.0 in patients receiving warfarin therapy (95% confidence interval 1.4-17.8, p=0.012). Aspirin dose, age, sex, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, intraprocedural glycoprotein IIb-IIIa or anticoagulant type, and postprocedural anticoagulant use did not have a significant effect on the risk of major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Warfarin was an independent predictor of major bleeding after PCI in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. Prospective data to further characterize the safety of concomitant warfarin and dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI are needed.