Subcutaneous foslevodopa in akinetic crisis. A case report from the neurological intensive care unit.

Introduction: Akinetic crisis is a severe deterioration of motor performance occurring in syndromes with pre- or postsynaptic dopaminergic deficit, necessitating effective dopamine replacement therapy. The subcutaneously applicable levodopa derivative foslevodopa represents a new therapeutic option for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease as a continuous therapy. However, its potential role as a parenteral treatment option for akinetic crisis has not been investigated, yet. The case: A 78 year-old patient who had developed akinetic-rigid symptomatology in the context of normal pressure hydrocephalus was admitted to our intensive care unit after experiencing an acute exacerbation of akinesia in the context of pulmonary infection. Off-label administration of subcutaneous foslevodopa was initiated after repeated failures to insert a gastric tube for enteral application of levodopa and contraindications against amantadine and apomorphine. Results: Following the administration of a subcutaneous test dose, continuous application of foslevodopa via a B. Braun syringe pump was gradually increased to 0.3 mL/h during the daytime and 0.15 mL/h at night, corresponding to a levodopa equivalent dosage of 1,020 mg/d. This was accompanied by an improvement of the MDS-UPDRS III score from 85 points to 59 points after 72 h. Discussion: Treatment of an akinetic crisis with subcutaneous foslevodopa in an intensive care unit setting has proven to be safe and effective in a patient with acute akinesia associated with dopamine-sensitive hydrocephalus. Due to the pathophysiological distinction from Parkinson's disease, there may be differences in therapeutic response and side effects. Nevertheless, the method used here can serve as a protocol basis for the treatment of akinetic crises with foslevodopa in general and as a starting point for further research.

Heart Rate Variability and Functional Outcomes of Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between heart rate variability (HRV) changes potentially indicating autonomic dysregulation following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and functional outcome has not yet been fully elucidated. This study investigated the effects of HRV during the initial 96 h after admission on 90-day functional outcome in ICH patients. METHODS: We included patients with spontaneous ICH in a prospective cohort single-center study. Continuous HR data were retrieved from the Intellispace Critical Care and Anesthesia information system (Philips Healthcare) and analyzed within the following time intervals: 0-2, 0-8, 0-12, 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, and 8-16, 16-24, 24-48, 48-72, 72-96 h after admission. HRV was determined from all available HR values by calculating the successive variability (SV), standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV). Low HRV was set as SD ≤ 11.4 ms, and high HRV as SD > 11.4 ms. The clinical severity of ICH was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Good functional outcome was defined as mRS 0-2. RESULTS: The cohort included 261 ICH patients (mean age ± SD 69.6 ± 16.5 years, 48.7% female, median NIHSS 6 (2, 12), median ICH score 1 (0, 2), of whom 106 (40.6%) had good functional outcome. All patients had the lowest HRV at admission, which increased during the first two days. Comparing ICH patients with low HRV (n = 141) and high HRV (n = 118), those with good outcome showed significantly lower HRV during the first three days (0-72 h: HRV SD good outcome 10.6 ± 3.5 ms vs. poor outcome 12.0 ± 4.0 ms; p = 0.004). Logistic regression revealed that advanced age, high premorbid mRS, and high NIHSS at admission were significant predictors of poor functional outcome, while reduced SD of HRV showed a non-significant trend towards good functional outcome (0-72 h: OR 0.898; CI 0.800-1.008; p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate autonomic dysfunction with sympathetic hyperactivity after spontaneous ICH, as reflected by the evidence of the lower HRV in the first days. Initially increased sympathetic tone appears to have a protective effect, as suggested by the comparatively lower HRV in patients with good functional outcome at the first days.

Amantadine for NeuroenhaNcement in acutE patients Study - a protocol for a prospective pilot proof of concept phase IIb study in intensive and intermediate care unit patients (ANNES).

BACKGROUND: Persisting coma is a common complication in (neuro)intensive care in neurological disease such as acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Amantadine acts as a nicotinic receptor antagonist, dopamine receptor agonist and non-competitive N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. Amantadine is a long-known drug, originally approved for treatment of influenza A and Parkinson`s Disease. It has been proven effective in improving vigilance after traumatic brain injury. The underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown, albeit anti-glutamatergic and dopaminergic effects might be most relevant. With limited evidence of amantadine efficacy in non-traumatic pathologies, the aim of our study is to assess the effects of amantadine for neuroenhancement in non-traumatic neurointensive patients with persisting coma. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, monocenter, phase IIb proof of concept open-label pilot study will be carried out. Based on the Simon design, 43 adult (neuro)intensive care patients who meet the clinical criteria of persisting coma not otherwise explained and < 8 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) will be recruited. Amantadine will be administered intravenously for five days at a dosage of 100 mg bid. The primary endpoint is an improvement of at least 3 points on the GCS. If participants present as non-responders (increase < 3 points or decrease on the GCS) within the first 48 h, the dosage will be doubled from day three to five. Secondary objectives aim to demonstrate that amantadine improves vigilance via alternative scales. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse events will be investigated and electroencephalography (EEG) will be recorded at baseline and end of treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of our study will help to systematically assess the clinical utility of amantadine for treatment of persisting coma in non-traumatic brain injury. We expect that, in the face of only moderate treatment risk, a relevant number of patients will benefit from amantadine medication by improved vigilance (GCS increase of at least 3 points) finally leading to a better rehabilitation potential and improved functional neurological outcome. Further, the EEG data will allow evaluation of brain network states in relation to vigilance and potentially outcome prediction in this study cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05479032.