Exploring private sector perspectives on barriers and facilitators in availing tuberculosis care cascade services: a qualitative study from the Indian state.

INTRODUCTION: The private sector plays an important role in tuberculosis (TB) elimination by providing access to quality TB care services like diagnosis and treatment, advocacy for preventive measures, innovation to address challenges in TB elimination, vaccines etc. The study aims to understand the perspectives of private practitioners on patients' TB care cascade to reinforce existing interventions by assuring the quality of care to TB patients. METHODS: The study utilized a qualitative design through in-depth interviews of private practitioners and was conducted in Ranchi and Purbi Singhbhum District of Jharkhand State from March-August 2021. The pilot-tested, semi-structured, open-ended interview guide questionnaire collected information from private practitioners on various aspects of the TB care cascade. The data from the provider interviews were transcribed into multiple codes and themes on the TB program. An inductive analysis was carried out with a focus on content credibility to eliminate bias. Ethical approval was received from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), India. Written consent was taken from the private practitioners involved in the study. RESULT: In-depth interviews of 17 private practitioners reveal various factors contributing to delays in TB care cascades, especially delay in access to TB diagnosis and TB Care, delay in providing treatment once after diagnosis and poor adherence to the TB treatment. According to the perception of private practitioners, there was an array of client, provider and system side factors affecting the TB care cascade gaps positively and negatively. Positive aspects mainly emerged from interviews: strong governance, consistent supply chain management, innovative PPP models and financial schemes reducing out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE). Various factors affecting the TB care cascade negatively include awareness among the patient, socio-economic status, approach and decision-making power of providers, adverse effects of drugs, staff capacity building, etc. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging private practitioner in TB elimination efforts is critical to achieving global targets and reducing the burden of TB. The study helps to determine geography-specific barriers and facilitators of the TB care cascade to achieve the aim of providing universal access to TB healthcare with the inclusion of private practitioners.

Deaths among tuberculosis patients of the western state of India: A secondary record based analytical study on its determinants.

INTRODUCTION: India has a significant TB burden, and ongoing attempts are being made to eradicate the disease. Globally, the number of TB deaths is declining, but not quickly enough to meet the End TB Goals. The National Strategic Plan (NSP) 2017-2025 in India set in motion an ambitious effort to expand the scope and efficacy of the National Tuberculosis Elimination Program (NTEP). METHODS: A descriptive retrospective study based on secondary data was conducted on information obtained from the electronic TB notification register for 2019, abstracted from Ni-kshay. Further, descriptive analysis was undertaken to identify the factors associated with deaths and successful treatment outcomes. The binomial logistic regression model estimates the crude relative risk and a 95% confidence interval to describe the association between predictor variables and TB treatment outcomes. RESULTS: After applying the eligibility criteria for the study population, a total of 1,44,643 (88%) TB patients were included in the study. 1,35,934 (94%) TB patients had completed the treatment and survived, while 8709 (6%) TB patients died. A significant association of treatment outcomes was observed in age, gender, key population, site of diseases, type of case, type of health facilities, HIV and Diabetes. When a logistic regression was applied, the model showed the association of the independent variables with the risk of death in TB patients. CONCLUSION: The epidemiological factors associated with treatment outcomes among TB patients should be audited systematically. A structure of TB death surveillance and response system should be established with a mortality audit, including a community-based death review (CBDR) and a facility-based medical audit (FBMA) in case the patient is hospitalized or discharged from a hospital.