Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The uterine caesarean scar defect, also known as uterine niche or isthmocele, is an irregularity in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a previous cesarean section scar. It is associated with obstetrical complications such as caesarean scar, ectopic pregnancy, uterine rupture, and the placenta accreta spectrum. Women with cesarean scar defects are frequently asymptomatic but may also experience abnormal vaginal bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. METHODS: This systematic review aims to determine the best hysterotomy closure technique to prevent subsequent development of uterine scar defects. An electronic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov was performed from January 2001 until December 2020 for studies evaluating hysterotomy closure techniques. RESULTS: Our systematic search strategy identified 1,781 titles. Six studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The results supported the superiority of the double-layer closure over the single-layer closure. CONCLUSIONS: Hysterotomy closure with continuous running sutures in two layers represents a suitable option to prevent cesarean scar defect formation. Particularly, the first layer should include the decidua and the second layer should overlap the first.

Isolated Tubal Torsion in a Term Pregnancy: Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature of the Last 10 Years.

Objective: Isolated torsion of a fallopian tube is a rare event and it is extremely difficult to be diagnosed in pregnancy. The aim of this study is to present a clinical case report that occurred in our department and to summarize the latest evidence about tubal torsion in pregnancy. Methods: We reported data, ultrasonographic features and an intra-operative image of a case report of tubal torsion in a term pregnancy. Then a review of the literature was performed following the PRISMA statement: we searched all the articles related to tubal torsion in pregnancy in the last 10 years from the international electronic bibliographic database PUBMED. We collected data regarding population characteristics, clinical features, treatment, and feto-maternal outcomes. Results: According to our search strategy, 10 articles were included. The main clinical symptoms were abdominal pelvic pain (100%), nausea, and vomiting (30%). The mean gestational age at the diagnosis was 36 weeks after the last menstrual period in 50% of cases. Ultrasound images showed a cystic lesion in the adnexal area in 70% of cases. In most of the cases, a cesarean section with a contextual salpingectomy was performed. No cases of maternal and fetal death were respectively reported. Conclusion: Isolated torsion of the fallopian tube is a rare obstetric condition but it should be considered in case of acute lower abdominal pain presentation during pregnancy. Depending on gestational age, surgical treatment as soon as possible could prevent a salpingectomy.

Understanding the limits of parametrial resection in radical hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: The aim was to evaluate whether adding specific educational medical illustrations may help gynecologists to better understand the limits of parametrial resection in radical hysterectomy from type A to type C2. Study Design: randomized controlled trial. Material and methods: Institute of Obstetric and Gynecologic Pathology, University of Catania, Italy. Materials and methods: 30 senior Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents and 30 general Ob/Gyn consultants were enrolled in the study, and randomized to two groups of 15 people (group A and group B). Both groups had a copy of the article on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy (2017) for reading comprehension. Group B also had 10 unpublished medical illustrations, prepared for this paper. After one month the level of self-perceived understanding related to parametrectomy limits in radical hysterectomy was evaluated in both groups using a numeric visual analog scale, where each participant evaluated his degree of comprehension. The data were statistically analyzed using the U Mann-Whitney test. Results: Group A participants (only article) had a lower level of comprehension of parametrectomy limits compared to group B participants (article plus drawings). The difference between the mean scale score, reported by group A, equal to 5.9 ±1.4, and that reported by group B, equal to 7.2 ±1.5, was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that educational materials, such as the proposed drawings, may help both Ob/Gyn consultants and residents to better understand the relationship between the extent of parametrial resection and cervical disease severity, and the related postoperative complications.