Factors affecting the evaluation and use of a hemoglobin A2 method - Lot-to-lot variation, long-term deviation and carry-over.

BACKGROUND: We compared two Hb A2 methods, high pressure liquid chromatography and capillary zone electrophoresis, at two occasions. In 2014 the methods showed good agreement, while in 2020 HPLC results were clearly higher than CE results. This finding prompted us to investigate the external quality assessment (EQA) outcome and our total patient results obtained by high pressure liquid chromatography over several years. METHODS: The methods compared were Bio-Rad Variant II Beta-Thal Short Program (HPLC) and Sebia Capilllarys Flex Piercing (CE). RESULTS: Our annual patient results obtained by HPLC increased significantly from 2014 to 2020. A similar trend was also seen in our EQA results. When patient results were grouped according to different reagent lots it became evident that method comparisons might be severely affected by lot-to-lot variation. We also noticed that samples analyzed with the HPLC method following a sample containing a high proportion of Hb E where prone to give falsely increased Hb A2 results. CONCLUSION: Standardization of the measurement of Hb A2 is urgently needed. Furthermore, the lot-to-lot variation must be minimized. While waiting for these improvements each laboratory ought to repeatedly evaluate their distribution of patient Hb A2 results.

Validation of a competitive ELISA assay for the quantification of human serum hepcidin.

BACKGROUND: Hepcidin-25 is a potential marker for iron disorders with a demand for accessible assays. This study aimed to evaluate a commercial competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for hepcidin quantitation. METHODS: Serum samples; 95 healthy subjects (HS), six patients with iron deficiency (ID), 84 patients with liver disorders (LD) and 220 hemodialysis patients (HD), were analyzed. Controls were used for imprecision, while accuracy was evaluated by quantitating hepcidin-25 with LC-MS/MS in 149 samples. Cross-reactivity for hepcidin-20 and hepcidin-22 was tested. Hepcidin-mRNA expression in 37 liver biopsies was measured. RESULTS: S-hepcidin ranged from 8-76 and 2-31 µg/L in healthy men and women. Levels in ID, LD and HD significantly differed from HS. Total coefficients of variation (CV) for controls were 24% and 22%. Within-sample CV was 10%. Despite a good correlation with LC-MS/MS (r = 0.89), the cELISA showed higher values and detected hepcidin-20 and hepcidin-22. Hepcidin-mRNA correlated well with S-hepcidin using cELISA and LC-MS/MS (r = 0.69 and 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation with LC-MS/MS is good and the examined kit can differentiate between patient groups although it is not specific for hepcidin-25. Considering ELISA's capacity to readily be set up, the investigated kit can be applied. Specific reference ranges are required.

Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance protein 1 and artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa.

Plasmodium falciparum response mechanisms to the major artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are largely unknown. Multidrug-resistance protein (MRP)-like adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette transporters are known to be related to multidrug resistance in many organisms. Therefore, we hypothesized that sequence variation in pfmrp1 can contribute to decreased parasite sensitivity to ACT. Through sequencing of the pfmrp1 open reading frame for 103 geographically diverse P. falciparum infections, we identified 27 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), of which 21 were nonsynonymous and 6 synonymous. Analyses of clinical efficacy trials with artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine detected a specific selection of the globally prevalent I876V SNP in recurrent infections after artemether-lumefantrine treatment. Additional in silico studies suggested an influence of variation in amino acid 876 on the ATP hydrolysis cycle of pfMRP1 with potential impact on protein functionality. Our data suggest for the first time, to our knowledge, the involvement of pfMRP1 in P. falciparum in vivo response to ACT.

In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum parasites carrying the chloroquine-susceptible pfcrt K76 allele after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine in Africa.

BACKGROUND: Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is a major and highly effective artemisinin-based combination therapy that is becoming increasingly important as a new first-line therapy against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. However, recrudescences occurring after AL treatment have been reported. Identification of drug-specific parasite determinants that contribute to treatment failures will provide important tools for the detection and surveillance of AL resistance. METHODS: The findings from a 42-day follow-up efficacy trial in Tanzania that compared AL with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) were analyzed to identify candidate markers for lumefantrine tolerance/resistance in the chloroquine resistance transporter gene (pfcrt) and multidrug resistance gene 1 (pfmdr1). The findings were corroborated in vitro with genetically modified isogenic P. falciparum parasite lines. RESULTS: Treatment with AL selected for the chloroquine-susceptible pfcrt K76 allele (P < .0001) and, to a lesser extent, the pfmdr1 N86 (P = .048) allele among recurrent infections. These genotypes were not selected during SP treatment. No pfmdr1 gene amplifications were observed. Isogenic pfcrt-modified parasite lines demonstrated a 2-fold increase in susceptibility to lumefantrine, which was directly attributable to the K76T mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the pfcrt K76T mutation is a drug-specific contributor to enhanced P. falciparum susceptibility to lumefantrine in vivo and in vitro, and they highlight the benefit of using AL in areas affected by chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum malaria.

The role of pfmdr1 in Plasmodium falciparum tolerance to artemether-lumefantrine in Africa.

OBJECTIVE: Artemether-lumefantrine (AL), presently the most favoured combination therapy against uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Africa, has recently shown to select for the pfmdr1 86N allele. The objective of this study was to search for the selection of other mutations potentially involved in artemether-lumefantrine tolerance and/or resistance, i.e. pfmdr1 gene amplification, pfmdr1 Y184F, S1034C, N1042D, D1246Y, pfcrt S163R and PfATP6 S769N. METHODS: The above mentioned SNPs were analysed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism and pfmdr1 gene amplification by real-time PCR based protocols in parasites from 200 children treated with AL for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Zanzibar. RESULTS: A statistically significant selection of pfmdr1 184F mostly in combination with 86N was seen in reinfections after treatment. No pfmdr1 gene amplification was found. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that different pfmdr1 alleles are involved in the development of tolerance/resistance to lumefantrine.

Efficacy of artesunate plus amodiaquine versus that of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated childhood Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zanzibar, Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: This is the first clinical trial comparing the efficacy of artesunate plus amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL)--the major artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) candidates for treatment of malaria in Africa--that involved an extended, 42-day follow-up period, polymerase chain reaction-adjusted parasitological cure rates (PCR APCRs), and systematic analyses of genetic markers related to quinoline resistance. METHODS. A total of 408 children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zanzibar, Tanzania, were enrolled. Children who were 6-8 months of age and/or who weighed 6-8 kg were assigned to receive ASAQ for 3 days. Children who were 9-59 months of age and who weighted > or =9 kg were randomly assigned to receive either ASAQ or AL for 3 days in standard doses. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: Age- and weight-adjusted PCR-APCRs by follow-up day 42 were 91% (188 of 206 patients) in the ASAQ group and 94% (185 of 197 patients) in the AL group (odds ratio [OR] for the likelihood of cure, 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-5.10; P=.115). A total of 5 and 7 recrudescences occurred after day 28 in the ASAQ and AL groups, respectively. On the assumption that 10 malaria episodes with uncertain PCR results were recrudescences, PCR-APCRs decreased to 88% in the ASAQ group and to 92% in the AL group. Unadjusted cure rates by day 42 were 56% (116 of 206 patients) in the ASAQ group versus 77% (151 of 197 patients) in the AL group (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.66-3.91; P<.001). Rates of reinfection by day 42 were 36% (65 of 181 patients) in the ASAQ arm versus 17% (31 of 182 patients) in the AL arm (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.60; P<.001). A significant selection of P. falciparum multidrug resistance gene 1 allele 86N was found in isolates associated with reinfection after AL treatment, compared with isolates at baseline (2.2-fold increase; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were highly efficacious, but AL provided stronger prevention against reinfection. The high proportion of recrudescences found after day 28 and the genetic selection by the long-acting partner drug underlines the importance of long follow-up periods in clinical trials. A long follow-up duration and performance of PCR genotyping should be implemented in programmatic surveillance of antimalarial drugs.

In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 86N coding alleles by artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem).

Artemisinin derivative-based combination therapy is expected to suppress the development of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Africa. We have performed an artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem; Novartis) follow-up clinical trial in Zanzibar, in which pfcrt K76T and pfmdr1 N86Y frequencies were determined before drug administration and in all recurrent parasites during a follow-up period of 42 days. A significant increase in pfmdr1 86N was observed after exposure to the drug. This points to 86N as a potential marker of lumefantrine resistance in vivo, while suggesting that Coartem is not robust enough to avoid selection of resistance-associated mutations in some malarial settings.