Characterization of Aphanomyces euteiches Pathotypes Infecting Peas in Western Canada.

Aphanomyces root rot, caused by the soilborne oomycete Aphanomyces euteiches Drechs., has developed into a serious disease in the pea- and lentil-producing areas of the Great Plains of North America. Based on six pea differentials previously used to differentiate 11 pathotypes in France, pathotypes were identified among field isolates from Saskatchewan (14) and Alberta (18). Four isolates from the U.S.A. and standard isolates for pathotypes I and III designated in the French study were also included. Each isolate was tested twice in replicated experiments by inoculating French pea differentials 'Baccara', 'Capella', MN 313, 902131, 552, and PI 80693, along with the Canadian susceptible pea cultivar 'CDC Meadow' and partially resistant USDA line PI 660736 under controlled conditions. Pea plants grown in vermiculite were inoculated 10 days after seeding by pipetting 5 ml of a suspension containing 1 × 103 zoospores ml-1 to the base of each plant. Root discoloration was scored 10 days postinoculation using a 0 to 5 scale. Testing revealed that 38 of the isolates, including standard pathotype I isolate RB84, belonged to pathotype I; four isolates including standard pathotype III isolate Ae109 were pathotype III; and U.S.A. isolate Ae16-01 was a pathotype II isolate. An alfalfa isolate from Quebec was avirulent on all pea genotypes. These findings indicate that pathotype I is predominant on the Canadian prairies.

Assessment of the Effect of Seed Infection with Ascochyta pisi on Pea in Western Canada.

The role of seed infection with Ascochyta pisi using naturally infected seeds with an incidence from 0.5 to 14.5% was studied in field pea experiments in western Canada at locations with historically low inoculum pressure. A significant effect of A. pisi seed infection on the emergence of seedlings was observed in one experiment and when all data were pooled, but emergence was only reduced minimally, and symptoms of A. pisi on the aerial parts of the seedlings were rarely observed. The level of seed infection at planting had no impact on A. pisi disease severity on mature plants, on seed yield and size, or on the incidence of A. pisi infection of harvested seeds although A. pisi was the dominant species recovered from seeds. Results suggest that the disease did not progress significantly from seeds to seedlings, hence did not contribute to infection of aerial parts of the plants, and therefore infected seeds cannot be regarded as a source of inoculum in the epidemiology of this pathogen under western Canadian growing conditions. Assessing seed components of seeds with varying levels of A. pisi infection and seed staining revealed that the pathogen was present in all components of the seed, regardless of the severity of seed staining. This indicates that infected seeds may be an important way for the pathogen to survive in nature.