Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Psychol ; 13: 794616, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35242078

RESUMO

Prior research supports the learnability of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). However, researchers have yet to compare novice ratings on the AMPD's Level of Personality Functioning Scale and the 25 pathological personality traits with expert ratings. Furthermore, the AMPD has yet to be examined with the idiographic Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP). We compared the aggregated AMPD clinical profile of a group of psychology doctoral students who learned the AMPD to high levels of reliability to that of an expert rater using the crucible of the classical case of "Madeline G." Examination of AMPD and SWAP ratings of "Madeline G." revealed excellent overall concordance but suggests that novice raters tend to perceive lower levels of personality impairment.

2.
Personal Disord ; 12(4): 320-330, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32730062

RESUMO

The construct composition of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS; Criterion A) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition alternative model for personality disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) was examined in a clinical vignette rating study. Multiple indices of level of personality functioning, psychiatric and psychosocial impairment, Criterion B maladaptive personality traits, and conceptually divergent variables (intellectual level, socioeconomic status, and likability) were used to deconstruct the LPFS. Most variables were highly intercorrelated, but partial correlational analyses showed the LPFS possesses meaningful personality construct variance not fully explained by severity of pathological traits, psychiatric and psychosocial impairment, or the conceptually divergent variables. This exploratory study offers initial evidence that the LPFS contains substantive LPF variance beyond PD severity. Results are framed and discussed in terms of the known conceptual and empirical overlap between Criterion A and Criterion B as well as the differing ways a dimension of personality disorder (PD) severity may be interpreted. We propose the LPFS is more than statistical artifact created by empirical covariation but less than a true latent dimension of PD severity. The LPFS may be understood as a methodologically pragmatic but theoretically substantive dimension of PD severity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Transtornos da Personalidade , Personalidade , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Determinação da Personalidade , Transtornos da Personalidade/diagnóstico , Inventário de Personalidade
3.
Pain Manag ; 10(1): 13-22, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31999222

RESUMO

Aim: To investigate the 20-year relationship between anxiety, depression and pain medication use. Patients: A total of 521 individuals reporting chronic pain from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the USA (MIDUS) study. Methods: Structural equation modeling of 20-year longitudinal survey data. Results: Over 20 years, a bidirectional relationship between depression and anxiety in individuals with chronic pain was indicated. Pain medication utilization predicted later use at 10 years. Pain medication use was not strongly related to later anxiety; however, heightened anxiety was associated with later use. Conclusion: Depression and anxiety show an extensive long-term bidirectional relationship. While there was little indication of a relationship between pain medication use and later negative mood, anxiety was associated with subsequent pain medication use.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
J Pers Assess ; 100(6): 593-602, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29902081

RESUMO

The DSM-5 Section III alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) is a personality disorder (PD) nosology based on severity of personality dysfunction and pathological traits. We examined the degree to which the personality constructs identified by McAdams and Pals (2006; dispositional traits, characteristic adaptations, narrative identity) and the paradigms of personality assessment described by Wiggins (2003; psychodynamic, interpersonal, personological, multivariate, empirical) are represented within the AMPD. Nine raters expert with the AMPD and personality evaluated elements of Criterion A and the 25 trait facets of Criterion B for presence of type and degree of personality constructs and paradigms, as well as level of inference. Criterion B showed higher rater agreement compared to Criterion A. Criteria A and B reflect different configurations of construct, paradigm, and level of inference. The characteristic adaptation construct and interpersonal paradigm were strongly reflected in both Criteria A and B. The psychodynamic and personological paradigms and the narrative identity construct were highly correlated, and the multivariate, empirical, and dispositional traits variables were highly correlated. Results illustrate differential conceptual emphases as well as areas of overlap with Criteria A and B. This characterization highlights that PD nosology rests on personality theory and suggests implications for integrative PD assessment.


Assuntos
Modelos Psicológicos , Determinação da Personalidade/normas , Transtornos da Personalidade/diagnóstico , Personalidade , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Inventário de Personalidade/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Avaliação de Sintomas
5.
Infant Child Dev ; 27(1)2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29755295

RESUMO

Emotional availability (EA) characterizes a warm, close relationship between caregiver and child. We compared patterns (clusters) of EA on risk factors, including those for borderline personality disorder (BPD). We sampled 70 children aged 4 to 7 years from low-socioeconomic backgrounds, 51% of whose mothers had BPD. We coded filmed interactions for EA: mothers' sensitivity, structuring, non-intrusiveness, non-hostility, and children's responsiveness to, and involvement of, mothers. We additionally coded children's over-responsiveness and over-involvement. Using person-centered analyses, we identified four clusters: high-functioning, low-functioning, asynchronous (mothers above average on two of four dimensions, children below) and below average. Mothers in the low-functioning cluster had lower income, less social support, more of the borderline feature of negative relationships and more depression than did mothers in the high-functioning cluster. The children in the low-functioning group had more risk factors for BPD (physical abuse, neglect, and separation from, or loss of caregivers, and negative narrative representations of the mother-child relationship in their stories) than did children in the high-functioning group. The asynchronous group included older girls who were over-responsive and over-involving with their mothers in an apparent role reversal. Interventions targeting emotional availability may provide a buffer for children facing cumulative risks and help prevent psychopathology.

6.
J Pers Assess ; 100(6): 612-620, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29505282

RESUMO

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed. [DSM-5]; American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ) Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) represents a novel approach to the diagnosis of personality disorder (PD). In this model, PD diagnosis requires evaluation of level of impairment in personality functioning (Criterion A) and characterization by pathological traits (Criterion B). Questions about clinical utility, complexity, and difficulty in learning and using the AMPD have been expressed in recent scholarly literature. We examined the learnability, interrater reliability, and clinical utility of the AMPD using a vignette methodology and graduate student raters. Results showed that student clinicians can learn Criterion A of the AMPD to a high level of interrater reliability and agreement with expert ratings. Interrater reliability of the 25 trait facets of the AMPD varied but showed overall acceptable levels of agreement. Examination of severity indexes of PD impairment showed the level of personality functioning (LPF) added information beyond that of global assessment of functioning (GAF). Clinical utility ratings were generally strong. The satisfactory interrater reliability of components of the AMPD indicates the model, including the LPF, is very learnable.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Personalidade/diagnóstico , Inventário de Personalidade/normas , Personalidade , Adulto , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA