Rice bodies in a shoulder bursa: a cadaveric and histologic case report.

INTRODUCTION: The subacromial/subdeltoid bursa can develop inflammation and effusion related to autoimmune, infectious, and musculoskeletal disorders. Rice bodies, or loose bodies within bursa, have been described as an uncommon complication of bursitis and have been the subject of case studies over a number of years. However, they have not been described in anatomical or physical therapy-related literature. METHODS: A donor body dissected for a physical therapy anatomy course was found to have an enlarged subacromial/subdeltoid bursa. This bursa, along with the biceps brachii tendon sheath, and the subscapularis muscle bursa, were filled with numerous rice-like bodies. The bursal wall was well developed and thickened. Tissue specimens were obtained of the suspected rice bodies, the subacromial/subdeltoid bursal wall, and the biceps brachii tendon sheath. The tissue was embedded, sectioned, and processed with hematoxylin and eosin or Masson's Trichrome staining for blinded histologic assessment. RESULTS: The tissue samples from within the bursa were identified as tissue similar to that in prior descriptions of rice bodies. Tissue samples from the bursal wall and tendon sheath were identified as similar to synovial membranes. CONCLUSIONS: Rice bodies found within the cadaveric body were similar histologically to those described in rheumatology, radiology, and orthopedic literature. Anatomists teaching future health-care providers and practicing physical therapists should be familiar with rice bodies as a potential finding in cadavers, and patients.

Assessment of computer workstations for compliance with ergonomic guidelines: A field study.

BACKGROUND: Computer workstation use is a risk factor for the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Governmental guidelines have been developed as a resource for workstation set-up to minimize this risk. The degree of worksite compliance with guidelines has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine workstations using the VDT Workstation Checklist to determine compliance, and potential modifications. METHODS: Subjects were recruited from a variety of work settings in Erie, PA. Workstations were assessed with the worker present, using the VDT Workstation Checklist. Adjustments and recommendations were made as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 60 workstations examined, 48%did not receive a passing score. All but one were correctable to an acceptable level with minimal low-cost modifications. The recommendation for wrist rests (43%), changes in monitor height (30%) or position (27%) and reposition of the keyboard (13.3%) and mouse (13.3%) were the most frequent modifications. Ten (16.7%) workstations did not require modification. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of workstations reviewed were not in compliance with current guidelines, however almost all (98%) could be brought into compliance with simple modifications. Office workers need guidance in setting up workspace and adjusting ergonomic equipment to provide comfortable and safe work settings and minimize musculoskeletal symptoms.