A randomized phase III study comparing standard dose BEP with sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) plus stem-cell support in males with poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer. An intergroup study of EORTC, GTCSG, and Grupo Germinal (EORTC 30974).

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of one cycle of standard dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) plus three cycles of high-dose VIP followed by stem-cell infusion [high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT arm)] to four cycles of standard cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP) in patients with poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer (GCC). PATIENT AND METHODS: Patients with poor-prognosis GCC were assigned to receive either BEP or VIP followed by HD-CT. To show a 15% improvement in a 1-year failure-free survival (FFS), the study aimed to recruit 222 patients but closed with 137, due to slow accrual. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were included in this analysis. The complete response rates in the HD-CT and in the BEP arm did not differ: (intention to treat) 44.6% versus 33.3% (P = 0.18). There was no difference in FFS between the two treatment arms (P = 0.057, 66 events). At 2 years, the FFS rate was 44.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.5-56.4] and 58.2%, respectively (95% CI 48.0-71.9); but this 16.3% (standard deviation 7.5%) difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.060). Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (log-rank P > 0.1, 47 deaths). CONCLUSION: This study could not demonstrate that high-dose chemotherapy given as part of first-line therapy improves outcome in patients with poor-prognosis GCC.

Docetaxel plus oblimersen sodium (Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide): an EORTC multicenter, randomized phase II study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomized, phase II study assessed the activity of oblimersen sodium, a Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide, administered before docetaxel (Taxotere) to patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression and testosterone < or = 0.5 ng/ml received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 or oblimersen 7 mg/kg/day continuous i.v. infusion on days 1-7 with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 5 every 3 weeks for < or = 12 cycles. Primary end points were confirmed PSA response (Bubley criteria) and major toxic events. RESULTS: Confirmed PSA response was observed in 46% and 37% of 57 and 54 patients treated with docetaxel and docetaxel-oblimersen, respectively. Partial response (RECIST) was achieved in 18% and 24%, respectively. Oblimersen added to docetaxel was associated with an increase in the incidence of grade > or = 3 fatigue, mucositis, and thrombocytopenia. Major toxic events were reported in 22.8% and 40.7% of patients with docetaxel and docetaxel-oblimersen, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The primary end points of the study were not met: a rate of confirmed PSA response >30% and a major toxic event rate <45% were not observed with docetaxel-oblimersen.

A phase II multicentre study of irinotecan (CPT 11) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in metastatic or locally advanced penile carcinoma (EORTC PROTOCOL 30992).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine efficacy and feasibility of the combination regimen irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with cisplatin advanced penile cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T3, T4, N1, N2, N3 or M1 cisplatin advanced penile cancer were treated with a combination of irinotecan (60 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8 and 15 and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) administered every 28 days. Patients were treated either in the neo-adjuvant setting for T3 or N1-N2 disease with a maximum of four cycles before surgery or up to eight cycles for T4 or N3 or M1 disease. The study was designed with the aim to exclude a response rate (complete response + partial response) <30% (alpha = 10%, power = 95%). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included and evaluated for toxicity, and 26 eligible patients were evaluated for response. Toxicity was acceptable with three cases of grade 3 diarrhoea and two cases of grade 4 neutropenic fever. There were eight responses (two complete response and six partial response) (30.8%, 80% confidence interval 18.8% to 45.1%): three patients undergoing histological verification after chemotherapy had no evidence of malignancy. CONCLUSION: The study fails to demonstrate a response rate significantly >30%. The observation regarding M0 patients suggests to repeat this study in the neo-adjuvant setting.

Germ cell-like telomeric length homeostasis in nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors.

Telomere maintenance plays an important role in cell proliferation and tumor survival. Human male germ cells, which carry long telomeres and express telomerase, give rise to a highly heterogeneous group of malignant tumors. We compared telomeric length and telomerase activity between two major histological types of primary testicular germ cell tumors. Fifteen out of 16 seminoma samples revealed telomeric restriction fragment (TRF) length below 13 kb; the remaining seminoma showed a major TRF fraction of 18 kb and a distinct minor fraction of above 23 kb length. In contrast, all 13 samples from nonseminomas showed TRF length >/=23 kb, which is similar to that reported in human sperm. Nine out of 11 seminoma specimens and six out of seven nonseminomas studied showed moderate to high telomerase activity, the only telomerase-negative nonseminoma being pure mature teratoma. These results indicate to a major difference in telomeric length between seminomas and nonseminomas, which is apparently unrelated to the presence of telomerase activity, and suggest a germline-like homeostasis of telomeric length is preserved in human nonseminomas. Oncogene (2000) 19, 4075 - 4078.

A report comparing the use of tropisetron (Navoban), a 5-HT3 antagonist, with a standard antiemetic regimen of dexamethasone and metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated patients under conditions of severe emesis.

This report of a double-blind, randomized study performed to evaluate the comparative antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland), a new 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist, focuses on treatment during stages of chemotherapy when nausea and vomiting are particularly severe. One hundred fifteen chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant disease were administered either tropisetron (n = 58) or a dexamethasone dose plus a metoclopramide dose (n = 57) during 5 days of two successive cycles of chemotherapy. Within the first 24 hours after receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy, 76% of patients in the tropisetron group remained free of vomiting (with 59% of patients free of nausea) compared with 39% of patients free of vomiting in the conventionally treated group (30% of patients free of nausea). Improved control of emesis also was observed over 4 consecutive days of follow-up in the tropisetron group. The difference in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the patient groups was statistically significant (P < .05). The efficacy of tropisetron was well maintained during the second consecutive chemotherapy cycle; during the first 24 hours, 72% and 62% of patients remained free of vomiting and nausea, respectively. Tropisetron appears to be a highly effective, well tolerated, and simple to use antiemetic agent for patients receiving chemotherapy.