RESUMO
Objectives: Patient safety incidents (PSIs) are common in healthcare. Open communication facilitated by psychological safety in healthcare could contribute to the prevention of PSIs and enhance patient safety. The aim of the study was to explore medical professionals' responses to a PSI in relation to psychological safety in Slovak healthcare. Methods: Sixteen individual semi-structured interviews with Slovak medical professionals were performed. Obtained qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the conventional content analysis method and the consensual qualitative research method. Results: We identified eight responses to a PSI from medical professionals themselves as well as their colleagues, many of which were active and with regard to ensuring patient safety (e.g., notification), but some of them were passive and ultimately threatening patients' safety (e.g., silence). Five superiors' responses to the PSI were identified, both positive (e.g., supportive) and negative (e.g., exaggerated, sharp). Conclusion: Medical professionals' responses to a PSI are diverse, indicating a potential for enhancing psychological safety in healthcare.
Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Erros Médicos , Segurança do Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Eslováquia , Adulto , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Erros Médicos/psicologia , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , ComunicaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A lower dosage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has shown efficacy in managing short-term toxicity and maintaining a deep molecular response in patients who fail to achieve treatment-free remission. METHOD: From over 700 patients with CML who were treated at two centres over the last three decades, this retrospective study identified eight patients characterised by long-term treatment failure and simultaneous prolonged significant haematologic toxicity that prevented the use of the standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor dosage. RESULTS: Patients had a high or intermediate ELTS risk score, and most had significant comorbidities. Two patients were treated previously with busulfan, and four were aged over 70, which might explain the reduced pool of normal haematopoietic stem cells. However, concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome or the presence of clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential was not demonstrated. Despite prolonged treatment failure, the survival of these patients (who were ineligible for stem cell transplantation) ranged from 45-396 months. Neither mutations in the ABL kinase domain nor additional cytogenetic abnormalities developed during the treatment of these patients, prompting speculation about the low selective pressure of low-dose tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or the absence of mutations at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: It is important not to stop treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors at a low personalised dosage in CML patients with prolonged significant haematologic toxicity despite long-term treatment failure.
RESUMO
Overall survival of patients classified according to the European LeukemiaNet 2020 classification. Chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), blast crisis (BC), low risk (LR), intermediate risk (IR), high risk (HR).
Assuntos
Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Humanos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Crise Blástica/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Clinical guidelines call for the inclusion of exercise interventions in every patient's dialysis session, but these recommendations are rarely adopted. Healthcare providers play a key role in this. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how healthcare providers perceive the benefits, risks and barriers of intradialytic exercise (IDE). METHODS: We conducted 21 individual, semi-structured interviews with 11 nurses, 5 nephrologists, 3 training assistants and 2 managers from two dialysis centres in Slovakia. Verbatim transcripts of digitally recorded interviews were thematically analysed using MAXQDA®. RESULTS: Participants reported the benefits of IDE as improvements in patients' physical and psychosocial functioning, independence and self-efficacy, clinical profile and quality of therapy. As risks of IDE, they most frequently reported exercise-related damage to vascular access, insufficient individualization of training and musculoskeletal injuries. The presence of psychological problems among patients was reported as a major barrier for initiating and maintaining patients' exercise. Other reported barriers included limitations in financial and personnel resources of haemodialysis care. CONCLUSIONS: Safe and sustainable implementation of IDE, which might improve a patient's well-being, need to be prescribed in alignment with the patient's clinical profile, be delivered individually according to the patient's characteristics and requires adjustments in the available resources.