Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(2): 194-200, 2017 Jan 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27893332

RESUMO

Purpose Adjuvant carboplatin is one of three management strategies that may follow inguinal orchiectomy in clinical stage I seminoma. However, little is known about the outcome of patients who experience a relapse after such treatment. Patients and Methods Data from 185 patients who relapsed after adjuvant carboplatin between January 1987 and August 2013 at 31 centers/groups from 20 countries were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival. Secondary outcomes were time to, stage at, and treatment of relapse as well as rate of subsequent relapses. Results With a median follow-up of 53 months (95% CI, 48 to 60 months) the 5-year disease-free survival was 82% (95% CI, 77% to 89%), and the 5-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI, 95% to 100%). The median time from orchiectomy to relapse was 19 months (95% CI, 17 to 23 months); 15% (95% CI, 10% to 21%) of relapses occurred > 3 years after treatment. The majority of relapses were detected by computed tomography scan during routine follow-up, 98% in the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good prognosis group. Chemotherapy was administered to 92% of patients, mostly as standard first-line treatment corresponding to stage; 8% of patients had additional local treatments. Only 28 patients experienced a second relapse. At last follow-up, 174 (94%) of 185 patients were alive without disease, and four patients with disease. Seven patients died, three of whom due to progressive disease. Conclusion Within the limitations of a retrospective analysis, the results suggest that the majority of patients who experience a relapse after adjuvant carboplatin for clinical stage I seminoma can be successfully treated with a cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen adequate for stage. Because 15% of the relapses occurred > 3 years after adjuvant treatment, a minimum of 5 years follow-up is recommended.


Assuntos
Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Seminoma/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Orquiectomia , Recidiva , Seminoma/mortalidade , Neoplasias Testiculares/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Radiol Oncol ; 50(2): 212-7, 2016 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27247554

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hepatic splenosis is rare condition, preceded by splenectomy or spleen trauma, the term refers to nodular implantation of normal splenic tissue in the liver. In patients with history of malignancy in particular, it can be mistaken for metastases and can lead to unnecessary diagnostic procedures or inappropriate treatment. CASE REPORT: Twenty-two-year old male was treated for immature teratoma linked to undescended right testicle after birth. On regular follow-up examinations no signs of disease relapse or long-term consequences were observed. He was presented with incidental finding of mature cystic teratoma after elective surgery for what appeared to be left-sided inguinal hernia. The tumour was most likely a metastasis of childhood teratoma. Origin within remaining left testicle was not found. Upon further imaging diagnostics, several intrahepatic lesions were revealed. Based on radiologic appearance they were suspicious to be metastases. The patient underwent two ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Cytologic diagnosis was inconclusive. Histology of laparoscopically obtained tissue disclosed presence of normal splenic tissue and led to diagnosis of hepatic splenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Though hepatic splenosis is rare, it needs to be included in differential diagnosis of nodular hepatic lesions. Accurate interpretation of those lesions is crucial for appropriate management of the patient. If diagnosis eludes after cytologic diagnostics alone, laparoscopic excision of nodular lesion is warranted before considering more extensive liver resection.

3.
World J Surg Oncol ; 12: 267, 2014 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25141773

RESUMO

Carotid paragangliomas are usually slowly enlarging and painless lateral neck masses. These mostly benign lesions are recognized due to their typical location, vessel displacement and specific blood supply, features that are usually seen on different imaging modalities. Surgery for carotid paraganglioma can be associated with immediate cerebrovascular complications or delayed neurological impairment.We are reporting the case of a 36-year-old man who presented with a painless mass on the right side of his neck 11 months after being treated for testicular cancer. After a fine-needle aspiration biopsy, he was diagnosed with a testicular cancer lymph node metastasis. Neck US and fluorine [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET-CT showed no signs of hypervascularity or vessel displacement. The patient underwent a level II to V functional neck dissection. During the procedure, suspicion of a carotid paraganglioma was raised and the tumour was carefully dissected from the walls of the carotid arteries with minimal blood loss and no cranial nerve dysfunction.The histology report revealed carotid paraganglioma with no metastasis in the rest of the lymph nodes. The patient's history of testicular germ cell tumour led to a functional neck dissection during which a previously unrecognized carotid paraganglioma was removed.Surgery for carotid PG can be associated with complications that have major impact on quality of life. A thorough assessment of the patient and neck mass must therefore be performed preoperatively in order to perform the surgical procedure under optimal conditions.


Assuntos
Tumor do Corpo Carotídeo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/secundário , Paraganglioma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/secundário , Adulto , Tumor do Corpo Carotídeo/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Masculino , Esvaziamento Cervical , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Paraganglioma/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia
4.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 13(2): 159-74, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22195646

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Belarus, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and the Ukraine represent a collection of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries in which the epidemiology and treatment of cancer varies greatly between and within countries. Current challenges include non-adherence to current treatment guidelines, restrictions in access and reimbursement for new therapies, and a lack of basic oncology programs. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a malignancy with historically poor prognosis. In CEE countries, the incidence and mortality rates of mRCC are among the highest in the world. Fortunately, mRCC represents a cancer for which a number of new targeted therapies have recently demonstrated benefit, resulting in new evidence-based treatment guidelines. Incorporating these mRCC treatment recommendations into the routine care of patients with mRCC in CEE countries would represent a major step forward for cancer care in this region. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the unique challenges faced by the aforementioned Eastern European countries in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer, in an attempt to assist health-care providers in providing the best care possible for their European patients. EXPERT OPINION: Despite a wealth of clinical trial data supporting the use of targeted therapies for first-line treatment of mRCC, cytokine-based immunotherapy is still used in some of these European countries. With implementation and adherence to existing guidelines, treatment can be clinically and economically optimized in patients with mRCC from this region.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/economia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/economia , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Fatores de Risco
5.
J Cancer Surviv ; 4(3): 274-8, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20602187

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Testicular cancer affects men mostly in their reproductive age with a cure rate over 90% and fertility is one of the main concerns of survivors. To further elucidate the question of fertility after treatment for testicular cancer, we performed a survey in patients treated in our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sent a questionnaire to patients treated for testicular cancer at our institute from 1976 to 2002 (n = 490) of whom 297 (60.6%) responded. We considered the patients to have conserved fertility if they had children after treatment without assisted reproductive technologies. RESULTS: Before treatment 119/297 (40.1%) of patients and after treatment 150/297 (50.5%) of patients tried to have children (p = 0.019). Of 119 patients who tried to have children before treatment for testicular cancer 98 (82.4%) succeeded and 74/150 (49.3%) were successful after treatment (p < 0.001). After treatment patients had 1-3 (median 1) children. The median time to birth of first child from diagnosis was 12 years. The post-treatment fatherhood in patients treated with surgery only (orchidectomy +/- retroperitoneal lymphnode dissection-RPLND) was 59%, in those with additional radiotherapy 68%, and chemotherapy 50% (p = 0.233). Fertility rate in patients where a non nerve sparing RPLND was performed was only 37%, 62% in patients with nerve sapring RPLND, and 77% in patients where RPLND was not performed (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Fertility rate after treatment for testicular cancer is reduced. From our data, the most important treatment modality that influences fertility is non nerve sparing RPLND that should be avoided whenever possible in order improve the quality of life our patients.


Assuntos
Fertilidade , Infertilidade Masculina/etiologia , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/etiologia , Sobreviventes , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Orquiectomia/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Radioterapia , Espaço Retroperitoneal , Fatores de Risco , Seminoma/complicações , Seminoma/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias Testiculares/complicações , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA