Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Georgian Med News ; (348): 105-108, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807402

RESUMO

Aim - to improve the methodology for collecting material from lesions of the oral mucosa for exfoliative cytological examination. A group of patients diagnosed with B37.0 Candida stomatitis was examined. To clarify the diagnosis, various methods of collecting biological material from the tongue of patients were used, namely, the method using a cytobrush with subsequent fixation of cytological material on a slide. The microbiota of the back of the tongue was analyzed in 12 patients with glossitis and 12 healthy subjects (the control group). The microscopic method of research was used - using an immersion microscope MICROmed@XS-3330, and the morphological and tinctorial properties of microorganisms were determined. In ten fields of view, the number of leukocytes, the nature of epithelial cells, and the presence of various microorganisms were detected and counted. A comparison of the quality of the use of the microscope method for the study of the tongue microbiota of patients with candidal glossitis was performed under the conditions of taking pathological material using a dental scalpel and an oral cytobrush. For a reasonable interpretation of the results and determination of their significance, a statistical analysis was performed to determine the frequency of detection of microorganisms in patients with glossitis and healthy subjects, depending on the nature of the material taken from the back of the tongue using a dental scalpel or cytobrush. The studies showed that the etiologic structure of glossitis pathogens was dominated by Candida yeast-like fungi, but cases of leptotrichosis aetiology were observed (16.7%). Monococci and gram-negative monobacteria were detected in all studied groups. An increase in the diversity of microorganisms was found when the material was taken with a cytobrush. The microbiota of all subjects differed depending on the type of instrument used for sampling. Thus, in the group of healthy individuals, the interdental brush helped to detect twice as many streptococci as a scalpel. In patients with candidiasis, a brush biopsy showed a 2.7-fold increase in gram-positive diplococci, twice as many streptococci and gram-positive bacilli, three times as many staphylococci, 2.25 times as many clusterforming gram-negative cocci, and 2.3 times as many gram-negative diplococci. A significant increase in the diversity of microorganisms was observed with the cytobrush compared to the use of a dental scalpel. In patients with glossitis, the accumulation of keratinized epithelial cells was significantly higher compared to the presence of young cells in healthy subjects, regardless of the method of sampling.


Assuntos
Mucosa Bucal , Língua , Humanos , Mucosa Bucal/microbiologia , Mucosa Bucal/patologia , Língua/microbiologia , Língua/patologia , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Feminino , Microbiota , Glossite/diagnóstico , Glossite/microbiologia , Glossite/patologia , Adulto , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Candidíase Bucal/diagnóstico , Candidíase Bucal/microbiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA