Repeatability of quantitative CT indexes of emphysema in patients evaluated for lung volume reduction surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of quantitative computed tomographic (CT) indexes of emphysema and the effect of spirometric gating of lung volume during CT in candidates for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial and same-day repeat routine inspiratory spiral chest CT studies were performed in 29 LVRS candidates (group 1, routine study vs repeat study). In a separate cohort of 29 LVRS candidates, spiral chest CT studies were performed both without and with spirometric gating by using a spirometer to trigger scanning at 90% of vital capacity (group 2, spirometric gating study). In each study, Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the agreement between multiple pairs of whole-lung quantitative CT indexes of emphysema, and mean values were compared with two-tailed paired t tests. RESULTS: Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients were high for all quantitative CT indexes (all > or = 0.92). No significant differences were found between mean values of quantitative CT indexes in group 1. Variation in quantitative CT results was small but more prominent in group 2 than in group 1. The variation in quantitative CT results was primarily related to differences in lung volume (r(2) as great as 0.83). CONCLUSION: Repeatability of quantitative CT test results in LVRS candidates is high and unlikely to improve by using spirometric gating.

Frequency and CT findings of recurrent disease after lung transplantation.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and computed tomographic (CT) findings of recurrence of the primary disease after lung transplantation at six North American lung transplantation centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 1,394 lung transplant recipients were reviewed to identify patients with recurrent primary disease. Their CT scans and pathologic specimens were reviewed. RESULTS: The frequency of disease recurrence in the six transplantation centers was 1% (15 of 1,394 patients), including six previously reported cases. Sarcoidosis recurred in nine (35%) of 26 transplants and was the most common disease to recur. Three (33%) of nine patients with recurrent sarcoidosis had correlative findings at CT. When present, CT findings were usually different at recurrence compared with pretransplantation CT findings. CONCLUSION: A relatively small percentage of patients are at risk for recurrence of primary disease following lung transplantation. Sarcoidosis is the most common disease to recur.

Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.

PURPOSE: To determine the degree of irreversible image compression detectable in conservative viewing conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An image-comparison workstation, which alternately displayed two registered and magnified versions of an image, was used to study observer detection of image degradation introduced by irreversible compression. Five observers evaluated 20 16-bit posteroanterior digital chest radiographs compressed with Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) or wavelet-based trellis-coded quantization (WTCQ) algorithms at compression ratios of 8:1-128:1 and x2 magnification by using (a) traditional two-alternative forced choice; (b) original-revealed two-alternative forced choice, in which the noncompressed image is identified to the observer; and (c) a resolution-metric method of matching test images to degraded reference images. RESULTS: The visually lossless threshold was between 8:1 and 16:1 for four observers. JPEG compression resulted in performance as good as that with WTCQ compression at these ratios. The original-revealed forced-choice method was faster and as sensitive as the two-alternative forced-choice method. The resolution-metric results were robust and provided information on performance above visually lossless levels. CONCLUSION: The image-comparison workstation is a versatile tool for comparative assessment of image quality. At x2 magnification, images compressed with either JPEG or WTCQ algorithms were indistinguishable from unaltered original images for most observers at compression ratios between 8:1 and 16:1, indicating that 10:1 compression is acceptable for primary image interpretation.

Patient selection for lung volume reduction surgery: An objective model based on prior clinical decisions and quantitative CT analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We used whole-lung quantitative CT analysis (QCT)-an objective method of evaluating emphysema severity and distribution based on measurement of lung density-to determine whether subjective selection criteria for lung volume reduction surgery are applied consistently and to model the patient selection process, and assessed the relationship of the model to postoperative outcome. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis using QCT indexes of emphysema and preoperative physiologic test results as the independent variables, and the decision to operate as the dependent variable. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients selected for bilateral lung volume reduction surgery and 32 otherwise operable patients excluded from surgery based on subjective assessment of emphysema morphology on chest radiography, CT, and perfusion scintigraphy. INTERVENTION: Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery in the selected group. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Emphysema in patients selected for surgery was more severe overall and in the upper lungs by multiple QCT indexes (p < 0.01, unpaired two-tailed t test). Physiologic abnormalities were slightly more severe in selected patients (p < 0.05, unpaired two-tailed t test). The range of many QCT and physiologic values overlapped considerably between the selected and excluded groups. The percent severe emphysema (<- 960 Hounsfield units [HU]), upper/lower lung emphysema ratio (- 900 HU threshold), and residual volume were the key variables in the model predicting selection decisions (model r(2) = 0.48; p < 0.0001). The model correctly predicted selection decisions in 87% of all cases, 91% of the selected group, and 78% of the excluded group. Surgical patients with a higher model-derived probability of selection had greater postoperative improvement in FEV(1) and 6-min walk distance. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologic selection criteria are applied consistently to the majority of patients. QCT features are strongly associated with selection decisions, are related to outcome, and may help improve consistency and confidence in patient selection.

Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.

PURPOSE: To compare hard-copy digital chest radiographs obtained with a selenium-based system with wide-latitude asymmetric screen-film radiographs for detection of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography (CT) for suspected pulmonary nodules were recruited to undergo both digital and screen-film posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiography. Three chest radiologists blinded to the CT results independently reviewed each digital and screen-film radiograph, identified each nodule, and graded their confidence for its presence. RESULTS: Seventy-eight pulmonary nodules (mean diameter, 1.5 cm; range, 0.5-3.5 cm; 62 soft tissue, 16 calcified) were identified with CT in 34 patients, while 16 patients had clear lungs. The mean sensitivity for the detection of all nodules by all readers (PA and lateral) was 66% (95% Cl, 54%, 76%) for digital radiographs and 64% (95% Cl, 52%, 74%) for screen-film radiographs. Differences between the two techniques were not statistically significant (P > .05, Student t test). There was no difference in mean false-positive-true-positive ratios (PA, 0.35; lateral, 0.53) or positive predictive values (PA, 74%; lateral, 65%), and no significant difference (P > .05) was seen in mean reader confidence rating. CONCLUSION: In detecting pulmonary nodules, radiologists perform comparably with selenium-based digital and wide-latitude asymmetric screen-film radiographs.

Perceived fidelity of compressed and reconstructed radiological images: a preliminary exploration of compression, luminance, and viewing distance.

The authors' goal was to explore the impact of image compression algorithm and ratio, image luminance, and viewing distance on radiologists' perception of reconstructed image fidelity. Five radiologists viewed 16 sets of four hard-copy chest radiographs prepared for secondary interpretation. Each set included one uncompressed, and three compressed and reconstructed images prepared using three different algorithms but the same compression ratio. The sets were prepared using two subjects, four compression ratios (10:1, 20:1, 30:1, 40:1), and two luminance levels (2,400 cd/m2, standard lightbox illumination, and 200 cd/m2, simulating a typical CRT display). Readers ranked image quality and evaluated obviousness and clinical importance of differences. Viewing distances for image screening, inspection, and comparison were recorded. At 10:1 compression, the compressed and uncompressed images were nearly indistinguishable; the three algorithms were very similar, and differences were rated "not obvious" and "not important." At higher compression, readers consistently preferred uncompressed images, with notable differences between algorithms. The obviousness and clinical importance of differences were rated higher at lightbox luminance. Viewing distances appeared to be idiosyncratic.

Imaging evaluation of the diaphragm.

The diaphragm performs most of the physiologic work of inspiration, and forms an anatomic barrier between the thoracic and abdominal cavities. Disorders of the diaphragm can be related to impairment of either of these functions, and most have radiologic manifestations. Both intrathoracic and intra-abdominal disease processes can alter the normal radiologic appearance of the diaphragm. Abnormalities are usually first detected on chest radiographs, often incidentally in asymptomatic patients, and many require further characterization by other imaging studies for definitive diagnosis. Fluoroscopy, CT, and MR imaging are frequently the most useful additional studies, whereas ultrasonography, barium contrast studies, and liver-spleen scintigraphy are occasionally helpful. Selection of the most appropriate radiologic technique in a given clinical situation can greatly facilitate the diagnosis of diaphragm abnormalities.

MR analysis of lung volume and thoracic dimensions in patients with emphysema before and after lung volume reduction surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to assess the accuracy of determining lung volume in patients with emphysema using MR imaging and then to investigate changes in thoracic dimensions after lung volume reduction surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fast gradient-echo breath-hold MR imaging through the entire thorax at full inspiration and expiration was performed in 21 patients with severe emphysema and was performed again in nine of the patients who underwent surgery. Lung volumes were determined using a semiautomated computerized method of delineating the lungs and summing cross-sectional areas. These summed areas were compared with volumes measured on plethysmography and CT. Postoperative changes in thoracic structure were determined by measuring anteroposterior and transverse lung dimensions and lung height before and after surgery. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients and SEM for determining inspiratory lung volume were MR imaging versus plethysmography, r = .77, SEM = -12% (volume measured as less on MR imaging); CT versus plethysmography, r = .86, SEM = -13% (volume measured as less on CT); and MR imaging versus CT, r = .87, SEM = 4% (volume measured as greater on MR imaging). The correlation coefficients and SEM for determining expiratory volume on MR imaging versus plethysmography were r = .77, SEM = 6% (volume measured as greater on MR imaging). After surgery, decreases were found in all thoracic dimensions, and such decreases were greatest at expiration. CONCLUSION: MR measurements of lung volume are comparable with those of CT and differ from those of plethysmography. Changes in thoracic dimensions after lung volume reduction surgery are consistent with improved respiratory mechanics.

Preoperative and postoperative imaging in the surgical management of pulmonary emphysema.

For patients with emphysema, imaging studies have been useful for diagnostic purposes and for preoperative patient selection for surgical intervention, such as bullectomy, lung transplantation, and LVRS. Chest radiography is useful in evaluating hyperinflation. Inspiratory and expiratory films are used to estimate diaphragmatic excursion and air-trapping. CT scan is used to evaluate the anatomy and distribution of emphysema throughout the lungs, providing information clinically unobtainable by other means. Both imaging techniques are useful for detecting other disease processes. Radionuclide lung scanning also provides an estimate of target areas, volume occupying but nonfunctioning lung. Cohort studies utilizing these imaging techniques have demonstrated associations between preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcome. The imaging studies, especially the chest radiograph, have also played an important role in postoperative management. Many other imaging options are available, such as HRCT scan, quantitative CT scan, and single photon emission CT scan. Other techniques, such as MR imaging, may play a future role as well.

Pulmonary emphysema: comparison of preoperative quantitative CT and physiologic index values with clinical outcome after lung-volume reduction surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare quantitative computed tomographic (CT) and preoperative physiologic values in emphysema with outcome after lung-volume reduction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 46 patients, emphysema was quantified by measuring lung attenuation on preoperative CT scans. Quantitative CT and preoperative physiologic values and postoperative outcomes (1-second forced expiratory volume, PaO2, and 6-minute walk distance) were compared. RESULTS: Moderately strong correlations were found between several quantitative CT and preoperative physiologic values (magnitude of r = .29-.58, P < .05) and several quantitative CT and outcome measures (magnitude of r = .31-.47, P < .05). With stratification, postoperative outcome was better with mean lung attenuation greater than -900 HU; 75% or greater of upper lung below -900 HU (emphysema index); greater than 25% of lung below -960 HU (severe emphysema index); ratio of upper- and lower-lung emphysema indexes 1.5 or greater; volume of normally attenuated lung (-850 to -701 HU) greater than 1 L; and full width at half maximum of attenuation-frequency distribution 80 HU or less. Differences in outcome measures between groups stratified with quantitative CT values were often two- to threefold; patients with greater numbers of favorable quantitative CT values had better outcome. Correlations between preoperative physiologic measures and outcome were few. CONCLUSION: In emphysema, quantitative CT values correlate with outcome. Quantitative assessment of emphysema in candidates for lung-volume reduction surgery is potentially useful.

Perfusion scintigraphy in the evaluation for lung volume reduction surgery: correlation with clinical outcome.

PURPOSE: To identify preoperative pulmonary perfusion scintigraphic findings that might be associated with clinical outcomes after lung volume reduction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative perfusion scintigrams in 103 patients (56 men, 47 women; age range, 41-76 years; mean age, 61 years +/- 9) were reviewed and graded for emphysematous heterogeneity (from isolated areas to diffuse distribution), extent of maximally perfused lung, and lobar predominance (upper-lobe vs lower-lobe asymmetry). These findings were correlated with clinical outcome on the basis of pulmonary function, arterial blood gas levels, and exercise test results before and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 96 patients who survived surgery, there was an average improvement of 47% in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), of 20% in arterial oxygen tension, and of 20% in the 6-minute walking distance. Scintigraphic markers correlated best with FEV1 improvement. The strongest scintigraphic predictor of increase in FEV1 was upper-lobe predominance (r = .38, P < .001), which was followed by heterogeneity (r = .31, P = .002). The seven patients who died had a significantly lower percentage of maximally perfused lung than the survivors (25% vs 34%, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Perfusion scintigraphy can provide modest prognostic information in patients who undergo evaluation for lung volume reduction surgery.

Lung volume reduction surgery: comparison of preoperative radiologic features and clinical outcome.

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between preoperative radiologic findings and clinical outcome after lung volume reduction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 50 consecutive patients, preoperative chest radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans were scored by four radiologists for features related to the severity and distribution of emphysema and compared with clinical improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), arterial partial pressure of oxygen, and exercise tolerance 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the 47 surviving patients, follow-up data showed greater postoperative improvement in function in patients with a global pattern of predominantly upper-lobe emphysema (P < .05) and in patients with a more heterogeneous distribution of emphysema, compressed lung, and a larger percentage of normal and mildly emphysematous lung (P < .05 for improvement in FEV1). Radiographic scores for individual features were more strongly correlated with outcome than CT scores. The combination of upper-lobe severity and percentage of normal and mildly emphysematous lung at CT were the strongest predictors of improvement in FEV1 (r2 = .49). The three patients who died were older (P = .05) and had more severe, diffuse emphysema compared with other patients. CONCLUSION: Imaging studies may help predict the degree of improvement and therefore should be considered an integral part of an objective patient selection process. Radiography alone may be adequate for initial screening.

Patients with emphysema: quantitative CT analysis before and after lung volume reduction surgery. Work in progress.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively assess the morphologic changes in the lungs after lung volume reduction surgery and determine whether changes at quantitative computed tomography (CT) reflect changes in lung function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 10 patients, chest CT images were obtained at full inspiration and expiration before and after surgery. A semiautomated segmentation method was developed to isolate the lung regions and calculate the lung volumes and frequency distribution of attenuation values. The changes in lung volume and attenuation after surgery were compared with clinical findings, and an exploratory evaluation of outcome predictors was conducted. RESULTS: Semiautomated segmentation and quantitative analysis compared favorably with manual techniques, and there was good correlation between the emphysema indexes and percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity, and diffusing capacity. The emphysema index decreased from 60% to 38% at inspiration and from 60% to 27% at expiration after surgery. The average CT lung volume decreased from 7.5 to 5.6 L at inspiration (25%) and from 6.4 to 3.8 L (41%) at expiration after surgery and correlated well with measurements at plethysmography. CONCLUSION: Substantial decreases in the lung volumes and emphysema index, increased airflow, possible reexpansion of some remaining lung, and the relation between preoperative quantitative CT indexes and clinical outcome suggest a multifactorial mechanism for improvement seen after surgery.

Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.

PURPOSE: To compare the subjective visibility of normal anatomy and pathologic structures in the chest on conventional screen-film radiographs versus selenium-based digital radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screen-film and digital standard posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiographs were obtained in 49 patients (32 men, 17 women; mean age, 60 years; range, 24-91 years) undergoing chest computed tomography (CT). Conventional images were phototimed at 115 kVp with use of a wide-latitude screen-film system and an antiscatter grid. Digital images were obtained at 150 kVp with use of a commercial system with a selenium detector and an air gap alone for scatter reduction. The image sets were independently compared by four radiologists, and the relative visibility of anatomic and pathologic features (proved at CT) was graded. Statistical significance (P < .0028) was evaluated with a one-tailed t test. RESULTS: Visibility with the digital images was statistically significantly increased for 11 of 13 normal anatomic features and for pathologic structures in the lung, soft tissue, and bone. CONCLUSION: Subjective visibility of pathologic structures and most normal anatomic features in the thorax was statistically significantly improved with selenium-based digital chest radiography compared with conventional screen-film chest radiography.

Pseudomass due to atelectasis in patients with severe bullous emphysema.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the atypical presentation of atelectasis as a pseudomass in patients with severe bullous emphysema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiologic studies and clinical records of 11 patients with severe bullous emphysema and mass-like opacities representing atelectatic lung were reviewed. The diagnosis was proven by surgery in nine patients and by follow-up imaging in two patients. RESULTS: Pseudomasses were found primarily in the upper lobes and the right middle lobe (n = 10). Common features included an oblong, lenticular, or triangular shape (n = 8); a sharp interface with aerated lung (n = 9); hyperexpansion of the hemithorax containing the pseudomass (n = 8); a central location abutting the mediastinum (n = 8); and adjacent emphysema (n = 11). CT revealed subsegmental atelectasis in other lobes adjacent to the bullous lung in six patients. In three patients, the pseudomasses were associated with persistent distention of large bullae following spontaneous pneumothoraces. Reexpansion of pseudomasses occurred in seven of the eight patients who underwent resection of bullous lung. CONCLUSION: These pseudomasses most likely result from compression of the lung by adjacent large bullae. The diagnosis should be suspected when central, sharply marginated, mass-like opacities that are oblong, lenticular, or triangular are bordered by severe bullous emphysema.

Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship.

OBJECTIVE: Over half of the major papers published in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) have five or more coauthors. This project was designed to evaluate the specific contributions of coauthors and the prevalence of undeserved authorship in major papers from institutions in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to the first author of 275 major papers from institutions in the United States that were published in the AJR in 1992 and 1993. Questions focused on coauthors' contributions to research design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation, and on undeserving authorship. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six (72%) of the surveys were returned. Ninety-nine percent of first authors, 75% of second authors, fewer than half of third authors, and one third of fourth authors and beyond were said to have contributed to at least three of the following: research design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation (p < .02). A strong correlation was indicated between authorship position and contribution (r = -.69, p < .001), with a mean overall contribution of 63 +/- 17% (mean +/- SD) for the first author, 20 +/- 12% for the second author, 10 +/- 7% for the third author, 7 +/- 6% for the fourth author, and 5 +/- 5% for all other authors. Coauthors were listed in decreasing order of contribution in 70% of articles. However, the last author was the second major contributor in 10% of articles with three or more authors. The incidence of "undeserved" coauthors increased from 9% on papers with three authors to 30% on papers with more than six authors (mean, 17%; r = .97; p < .001). Undeserved authorship was attributed largely to individuals who contributed only cases (29%) or who created a sense of obligation or fear in the first author (40%). Manuscripts were more likely to include an undeserved coauthor when the first author was a nontenured staff member (45%) than when he or she was tenured faculty (28%) (p < .02). When decision about authorship were made at project conception, there were fewer coauthors (3.9 versus 5.4, p < .02) and a lower incidence of manuscripts with undeserving coauthors (23% versus 47%, p < .01). The final manuscript was read by all coauthors in 80% of manuscripts, and all coauthors were thought to understand the manuscript to the extent they could publicly defend it in 78% of manuscripts. The most commonly cited reason that otherwise honest individuals accept undeserved authorship was academic promotion. CONCLUSION: Undeserved authorship is a common and serious problem that is motivated primarily by academic promotion policies. The first two authors are said to account for the preponderance of work in almost all major papers.

Effect of exposure variation on the clinical utility of chest radiographs.

PURPOSE: To study the effects of exposure error on the clinical utility of chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under- and overexposed screen-film images were simulated by adding exposure offsets to the normalized CR log(10) exposure data from a computed radiography (CR) system and printed by using the sensitometric response of a medium-latitude system. The clinical utility of the overall image, lung, and soft tissue in 48 images were independently graded by eight radiologists. RESULTS: Most variability in image scores was due to differences in exposure. About 95% of the lung regions and 75% of the soft-tissue regions were rated as having good or ideal clinical utility at the nominal exposure. About 80% of the overall images were rated as good or better for exposures within 40% [0.15 log(10) exposure] of the nominal. The overall image scores were heavily influenced by the lung region, and reader tolerance for exposure error was greater for soft tissue than for lung. The optimal exposure for soft tissue was about 60% [0.25 log(10) exposure] greater than for lung; therefore, no single exposure was optimal for the entire image. CONCLUSION: Conventional medium-latitude screen-film systems have intrinsic limitations for capturing and displaying the wide transmittance differences in the thorax. The clinical utility of chest radiographs may be improved by developing better image capture and display techniques.

Mottle on computed radiographs of the chest in pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between radiation exposure and perceived mottle at bedside pediatric chest examinations performed with screen-film and computed radiographic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a pediatric intensive care unit, chest radiographs were obtained with both computed radiography (60 radiographs) and a 600-speed screen-film system (14 radiographs). The relative radiation exposure was estimated by using the sensitivity value obtained in the processing of each computed radiograph. Five radiologists assessed the mottle present in the computed radiographs and screen-film images. RESULTS: For computed radiographs, the perceived level of mottle was inversely related to radiation exposure. For the same radiation exposure, the perceived mottle on computed radiographs was significantly higher than that on screen-film images (P < .001 for small cassettes; P < .01 for large cassettes). CONCLUSION: Pediatric computed radiography of the chest requires approximately twice the exposure of a 600-speed screen-film system to attain the same level of mottle.